WPC  # VUFa % 0@4  w@ 0X 0D n  0J 0T 0^k 0h 0r1 0| 0 0 1u5U, 0d B:U,WU6B) D3DC AMX 0@U*ClRv~v< AO^ 0D$ D/h B HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPT0 <Q 9Z .Courier New RegularX($    ӻ~g  3|x DPeӀDӀ(4(3DX$ !         0  (#$  0  <6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@8;X@2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)<  9p`(ModernP 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X d<  9p`(Monaco<  9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d&&&&'dxd))))7Border 1dd-+C << G("$    <  9p`(Arial 9 !  #d#(     ..   YYY FILED.X March19,1996CecilCrowson,Jr..AppellateCourtClerk  b !#d#(      $       Rule10.AffirmativewithoutopinionMemorandumopinion.(a)AffirmanceWithoutOpinion.TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirmtheactionofthetrialcourtbyorderwithoutrenderingaformalopinionwhenanopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalueandoneormoreofthefollowingcircumstancesexistandaredispositiveoftheappeal:̀(1)theCourtconcursinthefactsasfoundorasfoundbynecessaryimplicationbythetrialcourt.̀(2)thereismaterialevidencetosupporttheverdictofthejury.̀(3)noreversibleerroroflawappears.̀Suchcasesmaybeaffirmedasfollows:"AffirmedinaccordancewithCourtofAppealsRule10(a)."̀(b)MemorandumOpinion.TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated"MEMORANDUMOPINION,"shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.[AsamendedbyorderfiledApril22,1992.]PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'@Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Monaco   BA: T Monaco  BA: T Monaco -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! . &''Xd&#''Xd#(            \RA'\7XXdXXd7L,/+;+'h|`  `Lߛ@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSMELANIEELAINEKELLEY,) HAMILTONCHANCERỲ) C.A.NO.03A019509CH00330̀)̀PlaintiffAppellee)̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)vs.) HON.HOWELLN.PEOPLES̀) CHANCELLOR̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)STEPHENLEONKELLEY,) AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED̀)̀DefendantAppellant)DONW.POOLE,Poole,Lawrence,Thornbury,Stanley&Morgan,Chattanooga,forAppellant.DAVIDHAINESROTROFF,Chattanooga,forAppellee.@ MEMORANDUMOPINION McMurray,J. ThisappealspringsfromajudgmentinadivorceactionwhichwasenteredintheChanceryCourtforHamiltonCounty.Theappellantchallengesonlythatpartofthetrialcourt'sjudgmentmakingadivisionofmaritalproperty.Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. Theappellant'sonlycomplaintonthisappealisthatthetrialcourtawardedtohimajudgmentintheamountof$30,000.00.Hefeelsthatinlightoftheproofatthetrialheisentitledtoajudgmentfor$67,000.00.Notwithstandingtheappellantslimitedappeal,however,herelatesmuchdetailinhisbriefconcerningthegroundsfordivorce.Wewillrespondonlytothespecificissueraisedonthisappeal. Itiswellsettledlawthatthedivisionofpropertydoesnotrequireanequaldivisionbutanequitableone.Suchisthecasehere.Itisapparentfromtherecordthattheappelleemadethegreatercontributiontothemarriage.Thechancellorrecognizedthathercontributionwasmuchlarger.InhisdecisionannouncedϜfromthebenchhestated:"Thedefendantisnotreceivingexactlyanequaldivisionofassetsandliabilities,buthiscontributionstothemarriagewerenotequal." ThepartiesweremarriedNovember21,1992,andthedivorceactionwasfiledonOctober10,1994.Weagreewiththechancellorthatadivisionofmaritalpropertyshouldbe,toalargeextent,measuredbytherespectivecontributionstothemarriagebythepartieswhenamarriageisofsuchshortduration. WeareoftheopinionthatthisisapropercasefordispositionundertheprovisionsofRule10,Rulesofthiscourt. 0   כWefindthataformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalueandfurtherweconcurinthefactsasfoundbythetrialcourt.Noreversibleerroroflawappears.̀ Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtis affirmedinaccordancewithCourtofAppealsRule10,Rulesofthiscourt.Costsaretaxedtotheappellantandthiscaseisremandedtothetrialcourtforthecollectionthereof. ______________________________̀DonT.McMurray,J.CONCUR:___________________________________HoustonM.Goddard,PresidingJudge_______________________________CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.  7[ XXdXXd7@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSMELANIEELAINEKELLEY,) HAMILTONCHANCERỲ) C.A.NO.03A019509CH00330̀)̀PlaintiffAppellee)̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)vs.) HON.HOWELLN.PEOPLES̀) CHANCELLOR̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)STEPHENLEONKELLEY,) AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED̀)̀DefendantAppellant)@ ORDER  ThisappealcameontobeheardupontherecordfromtheChanceryCourtofHamiltonCounty,briefsandargumentofcounsel.Uponconsiderationthereof,thisCourtisofopinionthattherewasnoreversibleerrorinthetrialcourt. Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtis affirmedinaccordancewithCourtofAppealsRule10paragraphs(a)and(b)Rulesofthiscourt.Costsaretaxedtotheappellantandthiscaseisremandedtothetrialcourtforthecollectionthereof.̀PERCURIAM