ÿWPCé 6# UN %] 0(cU<‹w@Ç4 0l* 0D– D3Ú  0J 0T_ 0^³ 0h 0ry 0|ë 0†g 0í 1u} U,ò 0d 0@‚ B U,ß U> B)I AOr ÆÁ 0D‡ 0DË D/ B> DC[ AMž U*ë -VBv~˜vÓ˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 (ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡-šBu Z‹$Arrus BT Roman ()E*+U,D-U.U/î0Ó€<;p‚ 3|x<((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó""""'ÿÿdxd2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò d< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d* ,-Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó..'÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd((((7Border 1dd* /Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial #Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€'ÔÝ  ÝÔ€1ÔÔ€1ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€1XÔÌÌò òApril€30,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€1ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó LÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€'ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔThe€Foustððs€filed€a€petition€under€Chapter€11€of€the€BankruptcyÏCode€and€are€not€parties€to€this€lawsuit.€ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA Op Monaco ÒÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€&&X„d&ÓÑ#€&&Xd#ÑÔ€'ÔÝ  ÝÑ7€õXXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÔ€ÔÓ  ÓÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÒ  ÒÒ „ Òà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àWESTERN€SECTION€AT€JACKSONÌà àà à€€Ï________________________________________________ÌÌò òKESTERSON€FOODS,€ó óÌÌà àPlaintiff„Appellant,Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àHenry€Circuit€No.€60ÌÙ€*ÙßL€02/;+'h|´Å` Å `€€LßVs.à àà àà àà àà àà àà àC.A.€No.Ï02A01„9504„CV„00081ÌÌò òRONNIE€W.€SCOTT,€ó óÌÌà àDefendant„Appellee.Ì___________________________________________________________________________ÌÌà@ àFROM€THE€CIRCUIT€COURT€OF€HENRY€COUNTYÌÌà@ àTHE€HONORABLE€C.€CREED€MCGINLEY,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌÌà@ àDavid€A.€Riddick€of€JacksonÌà@ àFor€Plaintiff„AppellantÌÌà@ àWilliam€R.€Neese€of€DresdenÌà@ àFor€Defendant„AppelleeÌÌÌÌÌÌà@ àò òòòVACATED€AND€REMANDEDó óÌÌà@ àóóOpinion€filed:ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€W.S.ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌDAVID€R.€FARMER,€JUDGEÌÌHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€JUDGEó óÌÌ›Ñ7€õXXdìXXdì7ÑÑ  ÑÓÓà àIn€this€non„jury€case,€plaintiff,€Kesterson€Foods,€appeals€fromÏthe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€dismissing€its€suit€against€defendant,ÏRonnie€Scott.€€The€pertinent€facts€have€been€stipulated€by€the€partiesÏand€are€as€follows.€€On€April€5,€1990,€Scott,€as€a€limited€partner,€andÏJames€and€Norma€Foust,€as€general€partners,€formed€a€limitedÏpartnership€entitled€ð ðFoust€and€Scott,€L.P.ðð€(hereinafter€ð ðPartnershipðð),Ïthe€primary€purpose€of€which€was€to€operate€a€convenience€store€inÏCamden,€Tennessee.× ƒ3 ××  ×€€Under€the€terms€of€the€partnership€agreement,ÏScott€made€a€capital€contribution€of€$26,000.00€to€the€Partnership.€ÍThe€capital€contribution€plus€12€percent€interest€per€annum€was€to€beÏrepaid€by€the€plaintiffs€under€an€amortization€œplan›€in€sixty€(60)Ïmonthly€payments€of€$591.58.€€The€Partnership€failed€to€make€theÏscheduled€payments€to€Scott€and€in€June€of€1992,€the€balance€due€wasÏ$17,026.61.€€In€March€of€1993,€€the€Partnership€and€Scott€negotiated€aÏsecurity€agreement€and€financing€statement,€giving€Scott€a€securityÏinterest€in€the€convenience€storeððs€inventory.€€The€security€agreementÏprovided,€in€pertinent€part:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àThis€security€interest€is€granted€inÏconsideration€of€the€Secured€Partiesðð€[Scott]Ïforbearance€from€declaring€a€default,€demandingÏpayment€in€full€and€starting€collectionÏactivities€and€to€secure€a€certain€obligation,Ïevidenced€in€the€Limited€Partnership€AgreementÏdated€April€5,€1990,€in€the€principal€amount€ofÏtwenty„six€thousand€dollars€($26,000),€payableÏin€sixty€monthly€installments€of€principal€andÏinterest€at€a€variable€rate,€and€other€charges€asÏprovided€therein,€together€with€any€extensions,Ïmodifications,€and€renewals€thereof.ÌÌÓÓScott€duly€perfected€the€security€agreement€by€filing€a€UCC„l€financingÏstatement€on€May€25,€1993.€€Ìà àNot€only€did€the€Partnership€fail€to€pay€Scott,€it€also€failed€toÏmake€timely€rental€payments€to€its€landlord€and,€consequently,€theÍlandlord€entered€and€retook€the€premises€on€June€25,€1993.€€TheÏlandlordððs€actions€constituted€an€event€triggering€dissolution€per€theÏpartnership€agreement,€but€the€record€is€silent€as€to€any€winding€up€ofÏthe€partnership.€€The€landlord€thereafter€contacted€Scott,€as€theÏsecured€party,€and€negotiated€a€purchase€of€the€inventory€from€him.€€AÏprofessional€inventory€control€company€valued€the€inventory€atÏ$11,102.22€and€Scott€sold€the€goods€to€the€landlord€for€that€amount.€€Ìà àPrior€to€the€dissolution€of€the€Partnership,€Kesterson€FoodsÏdelivered€goods€to€the€Partnershipððs€convenience€store€on€open€account.€ÏWhen€the€Partnership€ceased€doing€business,€the€Partnershipððs€accountÏbalance€with€Kesterson€was€$6,043.00.€€Kesterson€filed€suit€againstÏScott€in€general€sessions€court€for:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àdamages€in€the€amount€of€$6,043.00€due€toÏDefendantsðð€violation€of€Limited€PartnershipÏAgreement€with€B„Rite€Food€Co.€#504€and€forÏT.C.A.€€ðð€61„2„802€in€that€the€DefendantÏimproperly€circumvented€the€requirements€ofÏT.C.A.€€ðð€61„2„802€and€the€Limited€PartnershipÏAgreement€when€he€received€his€capitalÏcontribution€back€from€said€partnership€prior€toÏpayment€of€Creditors€of€which€Kesterson€FoodÏCompany€is€a€Creditor€of€B„Rite€Store€#504€inÏthe€amount€of€$6,043.00.ÌÌÓÓà àFrom€an€adverse€judgment€in€general€sessions€court,€KestersonÍappealed€to€the€circuit€court,€and€now€appeals€from€the€circuit€courtððsÏjudgment€dismissing€its€suit.€€Kestersonððs€issue,€as€stated€in€its€brief,Ïis:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àWho€has€priority€in€regard€to€the€proceedsÏderived€from€the€sale€of€assets€of€a€limitedÏpartnership,€a€creditor€of€the€partnership€or€aÏlimited€partner?ÌÌÓÓà àA€determination€of€this€issue€is€not€dispositive€of€this€appeal.€ÏPursuant€to€T.C.A.€€ðð€61„2„804€(1)€regarding€distribution€of€assets,Ïcreditors€are€entitled€to€the€first€distribution.€€The€real€issue€in€thisÏcase€is€whether€a€limited€partner€may€become€a€secured€creditor€byÏsecuring€his€contribution€as€a€limited€partner.Ìà àThe€main€purpose€of€a€limited€partnership€is€to€permit€a€form€ofÏbusiness€enterprise,€other€than€a€corporation,€in€which€persons€mayÏinvest€money€without€becoming€liable€for€the€debts€of€the€firm.€€59AÏAm.€Jur.€2d€€òòPartnershipsóó€œðð›€1240€(1987).€€In€the€instant€case,€ScottððsÏcontribution€to€the€limited€partnership€was€$26,000.00,€and€theÏagreement€provides€for€repayment€of€the€capital€contribution€asÏheretofore€set€out.€€Scott€asserts€that€this€case€involves€a€conflictÏbetween€the€ð ðclaim€of€a€duly€perfected€secured€creditor€to€hisÍcollateral€and€the€claim€of€an€unsecured€creditor€to€the€same€assets.ðð€ÏWe€must€respectfully€disagree,€because€the€first€question€to€beÏanswered€is€whether€Scott€can€convert€his€capital€contribution€into€aÏsecured€debt.€€We€have€no€quarrel€with€Scottððs€assertion€that€a€limitedÏpartner€may€also€be€a€creditor€of€the€limited€partnership.€€ò òòòSeeó óóó€T.C.A.€€œðð›Ï61„2„108.€€However,€we€find€nothing€in€the€statute€that€would€allow€aÏlimited€partner€to€have€the€status€of€a€€€creditor€as€to€the€amount€ofÏhis€contribution€as€a€limited€partner.€€The€intent€of€T.C.A.€€ðð€61„2„804Ïis€to€the€contrary.€€The€statute€provides:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àò ò61„2„804ó ó.€€ò òDistribution€of€assetsó ó.€ò ò„ó ó€(a)ÏUpon€the€winding€up€of€a€limited€partnership,€theÏassets€shall€be€distributed€as€follows:ÌÌà8 àà8 à(1)€To€creditors,€including€partners€who€areÏcreditors,€to€the€extent€otherwise€permitted€byÏlaw,€in€satisfaction€of€liabilities€of€the€limitedÏpartnership€(whether€by€payment€or€the€makingÏof€reasonable€provisions€for€payment€thereof)Ïother€than€liabilities€for€which€reasonableÏprovision€for€payment€has€been€made€andÏliabilities€for€distributions€to€partners€under€€ððÏ61„2„601€or€€ðð€61„2„604;ÌÌà8 àà8 à(2)€Unless€otherwise€provided€in€the€partnershipÏagreement,€to€partners€in€satisfaction€ofÏliabilities€for€distributions€under€€ððÔ€1Ô€61„2„601€or€Ô€ÔÏðð€61„2„604;€andÌÌà8 àà8 à(3)€Unless€otherwise€provided€in€the€partnershipÏagreement,€to€partners€and€former€partners€firstÏfor€the€return€of€their€contributions,€and€secondÏrespecting€their€partnership€interests,€in€theÏproportions€in€which€the€partners€share€inÏdistributions.€ÌÌà8 àà8 à(b)€A€limited€partnership€which€has€dissolvedÏshall€pay€or€make€reasonable€provision€to€pay€allÏclaims€and€obligations,€including€all€contingent,Ïconditional€or€unmatured€claims€and€obligations,Ïknown€to€the€limited€partnership€and€all€claimsÏand€obligations€which€are€known€to€the€limitedÏpartnership€but€for€which€the€identity€of€theÏclaimant€is€unknown.€€If€there€are€sufficientÏassets,€such€claims€and€obligations€shall€be€paidÏin€full€and€any€such€provision€for€payment€madeÏshall€be€made€in€full.€€If€there€are€insufficientÏassets,€such€claims€and€obligations€shall€be€paidÏor€provided€for€according€to€their€priority€and,Ïamong€claims€and€obligations€of€equal€priority,Ïratably€to€the€extent€of€assets€availableÏtherefor.€€Unless€otherwise€provided€in€aÏpartnership€agreement,€any€remaining€assetsÏshall€be€distributed€as€provided€in€this€chapter.€ÏAny€liquidating€trustee€winding€up€a€limitedÏpartnershipððs€affairs€who€has€complied€withÏthis€section€shall€not€be€personally€liable€to€theÏclaimants€of€the€dissolved€limited€partnershipÏby€reason€of€such€personððs€actions€in€winding€upÏthe€limited€partnership.ÌÌÓÓà àThe€statute€is€quite€explicit€that€creditors€of€the€limitedÏpartnership€have€€first€priority.€€Following€payment€of€the€creditors,Íthe€partners€may€distribute€the€remaining€assets.€€Reading€this€statuteÏas€a€whole,€we€find€that€the€legislature€did€not€intend€for€the€rights€ofÏa€limited€partnershipððs€creditors€to€be€subordinate€to€the€right€of€aÏlimited€partner(s)€to€be€repaid€his€€contribution.€€This€conclusion€isÏfurther€supported€by€the€provisions€of€T.C.A.€€ðð€61„2„607,€which€œstate:›ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àò ò61„2„607.€€Limitations€on€distributionó ó.€„Ï(a)€A€limited€partnership€shall€not€make€aÏdistribution€to€a€partner€to€the€extent€that€atÏthe€time€of€the€distribution,€after€giving€effectÏto€the€distribution,€all€liabilities€of€the€limitedÏpartnership,€other€than€liabilities€to€theÏpartners€on€account€of€their€partnershipÏinterests€and€liabilities€for€which€the€recourseÏof€creditors€is€limited€to€specified€property€ofÏthe€limited€partnership,€exceed€the€fair€value€ofÏthe€assets€of€the€limited€partnership,€exceptÏthat€the€fair€value€of€property€that€is€subject€toÏa€liability€for€which€the€recourse€of€creditors€isÏlimited€shall€be€included€in€the€assets€of€theÏlimited€partnership€only€to€the€extent€that€theÏfair€value€of€that€property€exceeds€thatÏliability.ÌÌà8 àà8 à(b)€A€limited€partner€who€receives€a€distributionÏin€violation€of€subsection€(a),€and€who€knew€atÏthe€time€of€the€distribution€that€the€distributionÏviolated€subsection€(a),€shall€be€liable€to€theÏlimited€partnership€for€the€amount€of€theÏdistribution.€€A€limited€partner€who€receives€aÏdistribution€in€violation€of€subsection€(a),€andÏwho€did€not€know€at€the€time€of€the€distributionÍthat€the€distribution€violated€subsection€(a),Ïshall€not€be€liable€for€the€amount€of€theÏdistribution.€€Subject€to€subsection€(c),€thisÏsubsection€(b)€shall€not€affect€any€obligation€orÏliability€of€a€limited€partner€under€a€partnershipÏagreement€or€other€applicable€law€for€theÏamount€of€a€distribution.ÌÌà8 àà8 à(c)€Unless€otherwise€agreed,€a€limited€partnerÏwho€receives€a€distribution€from€a€limitedÏpartnership€shall€have€no€liability€under€thisÏchapter€or€other€applicable€law€for€the€amountÏof€the€distribution€after€the€expiration€of€threeÏ(3)€years€from€the€date€of€the€distribution.ÌÌÓÓà àIn€the€instant€case,€it€is€not€only€clear€that€the€legislatureððsÏintent€was€frustrated€when€Scott,€by€obtaining€a€security€interest€inÏhis€capital€contribution,€trumped€the€rights€of€Kesterson,€an€unsecuredÏcreditor,€it€is€also€evident€that€by€paying€Scott€the€assets€of€theÏlimited€partnership€were€depleted,€causing€the€partnershipððs€liabilitiesÏto€exceed€its€assets€in€violation€of€T.C.A.€Ô€1Ô€œÔ€Ôðð›€61„2„607(a).€€Ìà àCounsel€has€cited€no€Tennessee€case€to€this€Court,€nor€has€ourÏresearch€revealed€any,€which€specifically€addresses€the€question€ofÏwhether€a€limited€partner€may€enjoy€the€priority€status€of€aÏpartnership€creditor€with€regard€to€the€limited€partnerððs€capitalÏcontribution.€€However,€in€ò òòòKramer€v.€McDonald€Systems,ó óóó€397€€N.E.2dÍ504€(1979),€the€Illinois€Supreme€Court€considered€that€preciseÏquestion.€€That€court€held€that€the€limited€partner€is€prohibited€by€theÏexpress€provisions€of€€the€Uniform€Limited€Partnership€œAct€(1916)Ï(U.L.A.)›€œð𛀜16›œ,›€as€codified€in€the€Illinois€statutes,€from€acceptingÏcollateral€as€security€for€his€capital€contribution.€€The€ò òòòKrameró óóó€courtÏrelied€upon€ðð€œ16›€of€the€Uniform€Limited€Partnership€Act,€whichÏprovides,€in€pertinent€part:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 à€ðð€ò ò16.€€Withdrawal€or€reduction€of€limitedÏpartnerððs€contribution.ÌÌà8 àà8 àó ó(1)€A€limited€partner€shall€not€receive€from€aÏgeneral€partner€or€out€of€partnership€propertyÏany€part€of€his€contribution€untilÌÌà8 àà8 à(a)€All€liabilities€of€the€partnership,€exceptÏliabilities€to€general€partners€and€to€limitedÏpartners€on€account€of€their€contributions,€haveÏbeen€paid€or€there€remains€property€of€theÏpartnership€sufficient€to€pay€them.ÌÌThe€ò òòòKrameró óóó€court€said:ÌÌà8 àà8 àA€limited€partnership€interest€is€in€the€natureÏof€an€investment.€€ò òòòKlein€v.€Weissó óóó,€(1978),€284ÏMd.€36,€53,€395€A.2d€126,€136.)€€Through€hisÏcontribution,€the€limited€partner€becomesÏentitled€to€share€in€the€profits€and€losses€of€theÏpartnership,€though€his€share€of€the€losses€willÏnot€exceed€the€amount€of€capital€initiallyÍcontributed€to€the€enterprise.€€(ò òòòKlein€v.€Weissó óóó,Ï(1978),€284€Md.€36,€52,€395€A.2d€126,€135.).€ÏHowever,€when€the€limited€partner€makes€theÏcontribution,€he€is€placing€that€amount€at€risk.€ÏHe€is€not€permitted€to€insure€that€risk€or€toÏguarantee€a€return€to€himself€by€taking€someÏform€of€security.ÌÌ396€N.E.2d€at€508.ÌÌÓÓà àAlthough€ò òòòKrameró óóó€was€decided€based€upon€Illinoisðð€adoption€of€€œðð›Ï16€of€the€€Uniform€œLimited€Partnership€Act›€of€1916,€the€TennesseeÏstatute,€T.C.A.€€ðð€61„2„607,€is€based€on€€œðð›€607€of€the€Uniform€LimitedÏPartnership€Act€of€1976€and€the€1985€amendments,€which€was€derivedÏfrom€œðð›€16(1)(a)€of€the€Uniform€œLimited€Partnership€Act›€of€1916.€€ò òòòSeeó óóóÏCommittee€Comment,€Uniform€Limited€Partnership€Act€œ(1976)€(U.L.A.)€Ïðð€607.›€€Significantly,€both€statutes€accomplish€the€same€purpose;€thatÏis,€they€prohibit€a€limited€partner€from€receiving€a€return€of€hisÏcontribution€prior€to€the€partnershipððs€creditors.€€Ìà àConsidering€the€Tennessee€Limited€Partnership€Act€as€a€whole,Ïwe€believe€that€the€comments€of€the€ò òòòKrameró óóó€court€are€equallyÏapplicable€to€Tennesseeððs€limited€partnership€statutes.€€Like€theÏò òòòKrameró óóó€court,€we€find€that€allowing€a€limited€partner€to€obtain€aÏsecurity€interest€in€his€capital€contribution,€thereby€insulating€himselfÍfrom€risk,€defeats€the€purpose€of€the€limited€partnership€businessÏenterprise.€€Accordingly,€we€hold€that€a€limited€partner€may€not€becomeÏa€creditor€of€the€limited€€partnership€with€regard€to€his€contribution€toÏthe€limited€partnership.€€Accordingly,€Scottððs€€€security€interest€in€theÏinstant€case€does€not€have€priority€over€the€œclaims€of€the€general›Ïcreditors.Ìà àThis€case€is€before€us€as€an€action€by€a€creditor€against€theÏlimited€partner.€€€Technically,€the€liability€of€the€limited€partner€is€toÏthe€limited€œpartnership,›€€T.C.A.€€œðð›€61„2„607(b),€but€because€theÏPartnership€apparently€ceased€to€exist,€we€deem€Kestersonððs€suit€asÏbrought€on€behalf€of€the€limited€partnership.€€The€distribution€ScottÏreceived€was€in€in€violation€of€€T.C.A.€€ðð€61„2„607(a),€thereby€makingÏScott€€liable€€to€the€Partnership€for€the€amount€of€the€distributionÏpursuant€to€T.C.A.€Ô€1Ô€œÔ€Ôðð›€61„2„607(b).€€Accordingly,€we€vacate€the€judgmentÏof€the€trial€court€and€remand€the€case€to€the€trial€court€for€furtherÏproceedings.€€Upon€remand,€the€trial€court€shall€enter€judgment€for€theÏPartnership€against€Scott€in€the€amount€of€$11,102.22€€pursuant€toÏT.C.A.€€ðð€61„2„607€(b).€€The€court€should€then€complete€theÏPartnershipððs€winding€up€pursuant€to€T.C.A.€€ðð€61„2„804.€€Costs€of€theÍappeal€are€assessed€against€the€appellee.ÌÓÓœà àà àà àà àà àà àà à_________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€W.S.ó óÌÌò òCONCUR:ÌÌÌ_________________________________ÌDAVID€R.€FARMER,€JUDGEó óÌÌ_________________________________Ìò òHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€JUDGEó óÌÔ€ÔÔ€Ô›œ