ÿWPC€ …# VUFa %§ 0@­4í w@ P n­X  0J 0TO 0^£ 0h 0ri 0|Û 0†W 0Ý 1um U,â 0dU,rU6ž BÔB)ñDC AM]U*ª D3ÔCv~J 0@ÈvÓ AOÛÆ* 0Dð D/4 Bc˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 <¾½Q 9Z ‹.Courier New RegularX(ù$¡¡Ó  ÓÓ  Óà~| ¡Ó 3|x2  !D"#$E%&D'Ó€«<þ6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXxþ6X@É“8Ç;X@2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Courier New d% Line 7 d&&&&7Border 1dd€-'Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial%%%%'ÿÿdxd 9Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€$ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ€)ÔÔ€)ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€)XÔÌÌò òMarch€29,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€)ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó óPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  ÒStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA:Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA:Op Monaco Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€##X„d&ÓÑ#€##Xd#ÑÔ€$ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÑ ¸ ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€É¢XXdÖXXdÖ7ÑÙ€€ÙßL€(+';+'h|` Å `€€Lß›à@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌWILLIAM€LEFFEW,€and€wife,€€€€€€€)à àKNOXÏCIRCUITÌCHRISTINE€LEFFEW,€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àC.A.€œNO.€03A01„9508„CV„00280›Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiffs„Appellants€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHON.€DALE€WORKMANÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àJUDGEÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)ÌœACandS,›€Inc.,€œet›€al€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Defendants„Appellees€€)ÌÌÌÌÌGEORGE€A.€WEBER,€III,€œMIKE›€G.€œNASSIOS›€and€œJERE›€FRANKLIN€œOWNBY›€III,Ïof€the€Law€Offices€of€Peter€G.€œAngelos›,€Knoxville,€for€Appellants.ÌÌÌWILLIAM€D.€VINES,€III,€MARTIN€L.€ELLIS€and€œVONDA›€M.€œLAUGHLIN›,€ofÏButler,€Vines€&€œBabb›,€œP.L.L.C.›,€Knoxville,€for€œACandS,›€Inc.ÌÌDWIGHT€E.€œTARWATER›,€THOMAS€A.€BICKERS,€ANDREW€R.€œTILLMAN›€and€œWYNN›Ïdu€M.€C.€œHALL,€Paine,€Swiney€and€Tarwater,€Knoxville,›€for€Owens„Corning€œFiberglas›€Corporation.ÌÌW.€MORRIS€œKIZER›,€and€F.€SCOTT€œMILLIGAN›,€Gentry,€œTipton›,€œKizer›€&ÏLittle,€P.C.,€œKnoxville,›€for€Pittsburgh€Corning€Corporation.ÌÌM.€DENISE€œMORETZ›,€Wolf,€œMcMclain›,€Bright,€Allen€and€Carpenter,ÏKnoxville,€for€Owens„Illinois,€Inc.,€and€W.€R.€Grace€&€Co.€ð"ð€Conn.ÌÌÌÌÌÇÌÓÓà@ àòòO€P€I€N€I€O€NóóÌÌà€ àMcMurray,€J.ÌÌà àThis€is€an€appeal€from€a€summary€judgment€dismissing€theÏplaintiffs'€claims€as€being€time€barred€by€the€one„year€statute€ofÏlimitations€found€in€T.C.A.€ðð€28„3„104.€€We€reverse€the€judgmentÏof€the€trial€court.ÌÌà àThis€case€is€basically€in€the€same€posture€as€that€in€òòWyattÏv.€A„Best€Co.,€Incóó.,€910€S.W.2d€851€(Tenn.€œ1995),›€affirming€òòWyattÏv.€A„Best€Co.,€Incóó.,€Lexis€421€(Tenn.€App.€1994).€€The€only€dif…ference€of€any€remote€significance€is€that€in€this€case,€theÏplaintiffs,€through€counsel,€filed€a€claim€in€œbankruptcy›€œcourt.›€ÏThe€defendants€assert€that€the€claim€œas›€filed€in€bankruptcy€courtÏconclusively€establishes€that€the€plaintiffs€knew€that€they€had€aÏcause€of€action€more€than€one€year€before€bringing€this€action.€ÏWe€respectfully€disagree.ÌÌà àIn€the€bankruptcy€claim,€a€statement€was€filed€by€counsel€forÏthe€plaintiffs,€which€among€other€things,€stated€that€on€June€6,Ï1990,€the€plaintiff,€William€Leffew,€was€first€diagnosed€as€suf…fering€from€interstitial€fibrosis€and€that€on€June€28,€1990,€Mr.ÏLeffew€was€first€diagnosed€as€having€"probable€asbestos€relatedÏlung€disease."€€Defendants€during€oral€argument€before€this€court€Ïand€in€their€briefs€argued€vehemently€that€the€bankruptcy€claimÏconclusively€established€that€the€plain‚tiffs€knew€or€should€haveÏknown€of€their€cause€of€action€no€later€than€June€6,€1990,€andÏthat€since€this€action€was€not€instituted€until€June€27,€œ1991,›€theÏone„year€statute€of€limitations€now€bars€the€claim.€€They€furtherÏassert€various€theories€of€judicial€admissions,€and€judicialÏestoppel€as€a€bar€to€the€œplaintiffs'›€action€here.ÌÌà àSince€we€find€the€issue€relating€to€the€bankruptcy€claim€toÏbe€€dispositive€of€this€appeal,€we€will€limit€our€discussion€toÏthe€effect,€if€any,€the€filing€of€the€bankruptcy€claim€has€on€thisÏcase.€€We€and€the€Supreme€Court€in€òòWyattóó,€supra,€noted€that€aÏdiagnosis€of€interstitial€fibrosis€consistent€with€pneumoconiosisÏand€a€diagnosis€of€asbestosis€are€not€synonymous€diagnoses.€ÍInterstitial€fibrosis€and€pneumo‚coniosis€include,€but€are€notÏlimited€to,€œasbestosis.›€€Asbestosis€is€a€form€of€interstitialÏfibrosis€and€pneumoconiosis€but€the€converse€is€not€necessarilyÏtrue.€€Thus,€a€determination€or€diagnosis€of€interstitial€fibrosisÏknown€to€the€plaintiffs€on€June€6,€1990,€is€not€a€determination€orÏdiagnosis€of€asbestosis€but€is€simply€an€indication€that€furtherÏscreening€and€testing€should€be€done€to€determine€the€nature€ofÏthe€interstitial€fibrosis.€€òòWyattóó,€supra,€specifically€held€that€a€Ïpreliminary€or€tentative€diagnosis€of€interstitial€fibrosis€con…sistent€with€pneumo‚coniosis€does€not€trigger€the€running€of€theÏstatute€of€œlimitations,›€œbut€merely›€triggers€a€duty€on€the€part€ofÏthe€plaintiff€to€determine€with€due€diligence,€whether€he,€inÏfact,€œhas›€an€asbestos€related€disease.ÌÌà àIn€view€of€the€foregoing,€even€if€we€accept€the€notion€(whichÏwe€do€not)€that€the€bankruptcy€claim€would€or€could€create€aÏconclusive€admission€or€conclusive€judicial€estoppel€or€otherÏestoppel,€as€to€the€facts€therein€stated,€nevertheless,€the€earli…est€knowledge€that€the€plaintiffs€had€of€an€asbestos€relatedÏdisease€was€June€28,€1990.€€This€action€was€instituted€on€June€27,Í1991,€was€timely€filed€and€is€not€barred€by€the€statute€of€limita…tions.ÌÌà àThis€case€is€controlled€by€€òòWyatt€v.€A„Best€Co.,€Incóó.,€supra.€ÏThere€is€no€meaningful€distinction.ÌÌà àWe€find€that€the€summary€judgment€in€this€case€was€im‚provi…dently€granted.€€We€reverse€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€andÏremand€this€case€to€the€trial€court€for€such€other€and€furtherÏaction€as€may€be€necessary€to€conclude€this€litigation.€€Costs€areÏtaxed€to€the€appellees.ÌœÌÓÓà€ à______________________________Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Don€T.€McMurray,€J.ÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌHouston€M.€Goddard,€Presiding€JudgeÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌCharles€D.€Susano,€Jr.,€J.ÌÇÑ  ÑÑ7€ËXXd×XXd×7Ñà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌWILLIAM€LEFFEW,€and€wife,€€€€€€€)à àKNOX€CIRCUITÌCHRISTINE€LEFFEW,€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àC.A.€NO.€O3A01„9508„CV„00280Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiffs„Appellants€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHON.€DALE€WORKMANÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àJUDGEÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)ÌACandS,€Inc.,€Et€al€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Defendants„Appellees€€)ÌÌÌà@ àò òòòORDERóóó óÌÌÌÓÓà àThis€appeal€came€on€to€be€heard€upon€the€record€from€theÏCircuit€Court€of€Knox€County,€briefs€and€argument€of€counsel.€ÏUpon€consideration€thereof,€this€Court€is€of€the€opinion€thatÏthere€was€reversible€error€in€the€trial€court.Ìà àWe€reverse€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€and€remand€thisÏcase€to€the€trial€court€for€such€other€and€further€action€as€mayÍbe€necessary€to€conclude€this€litigation.€€Costs€are€taxed€to€theÏappellees.ÌÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€PER€CURIAMÌ›