ÿWPC³ …# VUFa %§ 0@­4í  w@ 0„X 0DÜ n­ 0JÍ 0T 0^k 0hÉ 0r1 0|£ 0† 0¥ 1u5U,ª 0dÖU,:U6f BœB)¹DCâ AM% D3rU*¥BÏ 0@®Q¾ÿv~½vÓ; AOÆ] 0D# D/g B–˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 <¾½Q 9Z ‹.Courier New RegularX(ù$¡¡Ó  ÓÓ  Óà~| ¡Ó 3|xÎ º»¼D½¾¿teÀÁDÂÃÓ€(4(3DX$¤¤Ý ƒù!ÝÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó«<þ6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXxþ6X@É“8Ç;X@2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Courier New d% Line 7 d''''7Border 1dd€-(Cþÿ << Gÿÿ&&&&'ÿÿdxd< Œ 9p`(Arial 8Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ€+ÔÔ€+ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€+XÔÌÌò òApril€4,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€+ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò ¤Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝòòThe€record€does€not€demonstrate€how€the€property€was€conveyed€by€AaronÏKirby€nor€to€whom.€€There€is€no€copy€of€the€conveyance€in€the€record.€ÏAppellant's€complaint€simply€states€that€"Aaron€Kirby,€father€of€the€plaintiffÏherein,€and€others€acquired€certain€property€in€Sevier€County,€Tennessee€andÏconveyed€their€interests€in€various€manners€so€that€litigation€resulted€andÏthe€property€rights€resolved€in€Chancery€[court]€...€and€the€litigation€wasÏterminated€by€an€agreed€order."óóÌ ´Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝòòIn€the€previous€litigation,€the€appellee€was€the€attorney€for€AaronÏKirby€and€wife,€Ollie€Kirby.€€As€their€attorney,€he€received€a€one„thirdÏinterest€in€the€property€as€payment€for€his€services.€€There€is€no€disputeÏconcerning€this€interest.óóÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA:Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA:Op Monaco Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€$$X„d&ÓÑ#€$$Xd#ÑÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÑ ä ÑÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\Ñ›Ñ7€YóXXdÖXXdÖ7ќـ€ÙßL€),(;+'h|` Å `€€Lß›à@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌBETTY€MANIS,€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àSEVIERÏCHANCERYÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àC.A.€NO.€03A01„9512„CH„00433Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiff„Appellant€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHON.€CHESTER€S.€RAINWATERÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àCHANCELLORÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)ÌJERRY€K.€GALYON,€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àAFFIRMED€AND€REMANDEDÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Defendant„Appellee€€€€)ÌÌÌÌÌJ.€LEWIS€œKINNARD›,€Madisonville,€for€Appellant.ÌÌÌDWIGHT€E.€STOKES,€Sevierville,€for€Appellee.ÌÌÌÌÌÌÓÓà@ àòòO€P€I€N€I€O€NóóÌÌà€ àMcMurray,€J.ÌÌà àThis€action€was€instituted€as€a€complaint€for€a€declaratoryÏjudgment€and€for€a€partition€of€real€estate.€The€appellant€soughtÏa€declaratory€judgment€that€she€was€the€owner€of€an€undividedÏinterest€in€a€tract€of€land€located€in€Sevier€County€as€a€tenantÏin€common€with€the€appellee.€€She€further€sought€to€have€the€courtÏpartition€the€property€in€question.€€Both€parties€filed€motionsÏfor€summary€judgment.€€The€trial€court€sustained€the€defendant'sÏmotion€for€summary€judgment,€denied€plaintiff's€motion€and€foundÏthat€the€appellant€held€no€interest€in€the€property.€€This€appealÏresulted.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌà àNo€material€facts€are€in€dispute.€€Both€parties€moved€forÏsummary€judgment€on€the€grounds€that€there€were€no€issues€ofÏmaterial€fact,€each€claiming€to€be€entitled€to€judgment€as€aÍmatter€of€law.€€Thus,€we€are€presented€with€a€pure€question€of€lawÏand€no€presumption€of€correctness€attaches€to€the€trial€court'sÏjudgment.€€òòGonzales€v.€œAlman›€œConstr›.€Coóó.,€857€S.W.2d€42,€44€(Tenn.ÏApp.€1993).€We€must€decide€anew€whether€the€undisputed€facts€showÏthat€either€of€the€parties€is€"entitled€to€a€judgment€as€a€matterÏof€law."€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€56.03;€€òòGonzalesóó€at€44„45.ÌÌà àAaron€Kirby,€father€of€the€appellant,€was€the€owner€of€theÏtract€of€land€in€which€an€interest€is€now€sought€by€the€appellant.€ÏDuring€his€lifetime,€Aaron€Kirby€conveyed€away€his€interests€inÏthe€property€in€question€in€such€a€fashion€that€it€became€neces…sary€to€litigate€ownership€of€the€property.× ƒ. ××  ×€€In€previous€litiga…tion€in€the€Sevier€County€Chancery€Court€in€cause€no.€83„4„140,Ïstyled€òòMary€Jo€Kirby€Henderson,€et€al€v.€Aaron€Kirby,€et€alóó,€inÍwhich€all€necessary€parties€or€privies€to€this€action€were€beforeÏthe€court,€an€agreed€order€was€entered€resolving€all€issues,Ïwhich,€among€other€things,€vested€title€to€the€subject€property€inÏAaron€Kirby€and€wife,€Ollie€Kirby.× ƒ/ ××  ×ÌÌà àThe€agreed€order€specifically€recited€"that€all€rights,Ïtitled€(sic),€interest€and€equity€is€hereby€divested€from€MaryÏGeorge€Kirby€Henderson,€James€Kirby,€Lonnie€Kirby,€Faye€KirbyÏSands,€Barbara€Jean€Kirby€and€Clara€Nell€Kirby€œMcClure›,€and€vestedÏinto€Aaron€Kirby€òòand€wifeóó,€Ollie€Kirby.€(Emphasis€added).ÌÌà àIt€is€undisputed€that€prior€to€the€litigation€which€gave€riseÏto€the€agreed€order,€Ollie€Kirby€owned€no€interest€in€the€propertyÏin€question.€€The€record€does€not€disclose€the€interest,€if€any,ÏAaron€Kirby€had€in€the€subject€property€prior€to€that€litigation.€ÏWe€can,€however,€reasonably€conclude€that€the€property€decreed€toÍAaron€Kirby€and€wife,€Ollie€Kirby,€was€received€in€settlement€ofÏthat€litigation.ÌÌà àAaron€Kirby€died€and€was€survived€by€his€wife,€Ollie€Kirby.€ÏSubsequently,€Ollie€Kirby€and€two€of€her€daughters€conveyed€theirÏinterest€in€the€property€to€the€appellee.€€The€deed€specificallyÏrecited:ÌÌÓÓà8 àà àIt€is€the€intent€of€the€Grantors€by€this€instrumentÏto€convey€all€their€rights,€titles,€equities€and€inter…ests€to€the€Grantee€in€the€hereinabove€described€proper…ty.€Ollie€M.€Kirby€is€the€owner€of€all€of€said€propertyÏor€a€one„third€interest;€€Jean€K.€œBrackins›€is€the€ownerÏof€a€one„ninth€interest;€and€Brenda€K.€œTeaster›€is€theÏowner€of€a€one„ninth€interest,€which€they€are€conveyingÏto€the€Grantee€herein.ÌÌÓÓÌà àà àThe€threshold€question€which€we€must€address€is€whetherÏthe€agreed€order€entered€in€the€previous€case,€òòMary€Jo€KirbyÏHenderson,€et€al€v.€Aaron€Kirby,€et€alóó,€created€an€estate€by€theÏentireties€in€Aaron€Kirby€and€wife,€Ollie€M.€Kirby.ÌÌà àIt€is€such€well„settled€law€that€an€instrument€vesting€titleÏto€real€property€in€man€and€wife€creates€a€tenancy€by€the€entire…ties€that€no€citations€are€required.€€Yet€there€is€some€room€for€aÏcontrary€result€if€it€is€clearly€expressed€within€the€instrumentÏan€intent€to€create€an€estate€as€tenants€in€common€or€joint€ten…ants.€€òòSeeóó€òòœBost›,€et€al.€v.€Johnsonóó,€œ133›€S.W.2d€491€(Tenn.€1939).€ÏNo€such€intention€to€the€contrary€is€expressed€in€the€agreedÏorder.€€The€order€is€clear€and€unambiguous.ÌÌÓÓà8 àà àIn€exercising€its€powers€of€supervising€the€en…forcement€of€its€own€judgments,€a€court€has€necessaryÏand€inherent€power€to€interpret€or€construe€any€ambigu…ous€phraseology€of€the€judgment€sought€to€be€enforced.ÏLikewise,€a€court€which€is€called€upon€to€enforce€theÏjudgment€of€another€court€has€some€power€to€interpretÏthe€judgment€to€be€enforced.Ì€Ìà8 àà àAn€œunambiguous›€judgment€should€be€construed€as€aÏwhole€so€as,€if€possible,€to€give€effect€to€all€partsÏthereof€and€to€effect€the€intent€and€purpose€of€theÏCourt.€49€C.J.S.€Judgments€ðð€436,€p.€862.Ì€Ìà8 àà àHowever,€a€judgment€plain€and€ambiguous€by€itsÏterms€may€not€be€modified,€enlarged,€restricted€orÏdiminished.€Ibid,€p.€868.ÌÌòòTenpenny€v.€Tenpennyóó,€(Tenn.€App.€1995),€Lexis€105.€ÌÌÓÓÌà àThe€agreed€order€in€the€previous€case€is€clear€and€unambigu…ous€We,€therefore,€find€that€the€agreed€order€vested€title€inÏAaron€Kirby€and€wife,€Ollie€Kirby€as,€tenants€by€the€entirety.ÌÌà àWe€must€next€examine€the€assertion€by€the€appellant€that€theÏappellee€had€filed€a€previous€suit€concerning€the€same€subjectÏmatter€in€which€the€appellant€assumed€a€position€contrary€to€theÏposition€assumed€in€this€case.€€The€record€reflects€that€theÏappellee€here€filed€an€action€in€the€Circuit€Court€of€SevierÏCounty€against€the€appellant€seeking€to€have€the€subject€propertyÏpartitioned.€€Subsequently,€the€appellee,€in€that€action,€filed€anÏamendment€to€his€complaint€alleging€that€he€was€the€owner€of€theÏfee€and€that€the€appellant€had€no€interest€in€the€property.€ÏThereafter,€a€non„suit€was€taken.ÌÌà àAppellant€would€have€us€find€that€the€appellee€is€now€es…topped€from€asserting€that€he€is€the€owner€of€the€fee€simple€titleÏto€all€the€property€in€question.€€We€will€first€look€to€the€doc…trine€of€judicial€estoppel.€€Assuming€that€the€doctrine€of€judi…cial€estoppel€is€still€a€viable€doctrine€of€law€in€this€jurisdic…tion,€there€are€limitations€on€the€general€rule.ÌÌÓÓà8 àà à'While€judicial€estoppel€applies€where€there€is€noÏexplanation€of€the€previous€contradictory€sworn€state…ment€(òòœSartain›€v.€Dixie€Coal€&€Iron€Coóó.,€150€Tenn.€633,Ï650,€651,€266€S.W.€313),€it€does€not€apply€where€thereÏis€an€explanation€showing€such€statement€was€inadver…tent,€inconsiderate,€mistaken,€or€anything€short€of€aÏ'wilfully€false'€statement€of€fact.€òòBlack€Diamond€Col…lieries€v.€Dealóó,€150€Tenn.€474,€477,€265€S.W.€985;ÏòòœHelfer›€v.€[Mutual€Ben.]€Health€&€œAcc›.€œAss'n›óó,€170€Tenn.Ï630,€637,€638,€96€S.W.2d€1103,€1105,€113€A.L.R.€921,Ï924,€925.ÌÌòòSeeóó€òòD.€M.€Rose€&€Co.€V.€œSnyder›óó,€206€S.W.2d€897€(Tenn.€1947).ÌÌÓÓÌà àThe€reasons€for€the€perceived€inconsistency€are€clearly€setÏout€in€the€answers€to€the€interrogatories€propounded€by€the€appel…lant€to€the€appellee.€€The€appellee€explained€in€his€answers€toÏinterrogatories€that,€after€consultation€with€a€number€of€attor…neys,€he€was€advised€that€he€owned€the€entire€fee€and,€therefore,Ïamended€his€complaint€accordingly.€€Judicial€estoppel€is€notÏavailable€to€the€appellant€under€these€circumstances.ÌÌà àThe€doctrine€of€"judicial€admissions"€was€substantiallyÏchanged€by€Rule€803(1.2),€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence.€With€theÏadoption€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence,€Rule€803(1.2)€theÏdistinction€between€evidentiary€admissions€and€judicial€admissionsÏwas€abolished.€€Thus,€judicial€admissions€are€no€longer€conclu…sive.€Prior€to€the€adoption€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence,Ïthe€prevailing€rule€relating€to€"judicial€admissions"€was€set€outÏin€€òòJohn€P.€Saad€and€Sons€v.€Nashville€Thermalóó,€642€S.W.2d€151Ï(Tenn.€App.€1982).€€Indeed,€in€òòSaadóó€it€is€said:€€"Admissions€inÏpleadings€are€judicial€(conclusive)€admissions,€conclusive€againstÏthe€pleader€òòuntil€withdrawn€or€amendedóó.€McCormick€on€Evidence,€œ2nd›ÏEdition,€ðð€265,€p.€633;€31€C.J.S.€Evidence€ðð€301,€p.€772,€noteÏ23."€€Ìà àIt€is€clear€that,€since€the€circuit€court€pleadings€wereÏamended,€neither€the€old€rule€as€stated€in€òòSaadóó€nor€Rule€803(1.2)Ïwhich€is€now€in€effect€constitute€a€conclusive€admission.ÌÌà àAppellant€also€argues€that€the€appellee€is€bound€by€theÏdoctrine€of€estoppel€by€deed.€Our€Supreme€Court,€in€òòDenny€v.ÏWilson€Countyóó,€198€Tenn.€677,€281€S.W.2d€671€(1955),€has€describedÏestoppel€by€deed€as:€€"a€bar€which€precludes€one€party€to€a€deedÏand€his€privies€from€asserting€as€against€the€other€party€and€hisÏprivies€any€right€or€title€in€derogation€of€the€deed€or€fromÏdenying€the€truth€of€any€material€facts€asserted€in€it."€€òòSmith€v.ÏœSovran›€Bank€Centóó.,€792€S.W.2d€928€(Tenn.€App.€1990).€€We€do€notÏunderstand€the€recitations€in€the€deed€as€being€in€conflict€withÏappellee's€assertions€in€this€action.€€It€seems€clear€that€theÏrecitations€in€the€deed€were€clearly€intended€to€transfer€all€ofÏthe€grantors'€rights€in€the€property€to€the€grantee€ð"ð€nothingÏmore.ÌÌà àWe€find€no€estoppel€or€other€similar€rule€of€law€available€toÏthe€appellant€in€this€case€which€would€defeat€the€appellee's€titleÏto€the€property.€€Accordingly,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÏcourt.ÌÌà àCosts€of€this€cause€are€taxed€to€the€appellant€and€this€caseÏis€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€the€collection€thereof.ÌÌÌÓÓà€ à______________________________Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Don€T.€McMurray,€J.ÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ__________________________________ÌHerschel€P.€Franks,€J.ÌÌÌ__________________________________ÌClifford€E.€Sanders,€Special€JudgeÌÇÌÑ  ÑÑ7€»|XXd×XXd×7Ñà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌBETTY€MANIS,€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àSEVIER€CHANCERYÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àC.A.€NO.€03A01„9512„CH„00433Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiff„Appellant€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHON.€CHESTER€S.€RAINWATERÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àCHANCELLORÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)ÌJERRY€K.€GALYON,€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àAFFIRMED€AND€REMANDEDÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Defendant„Appellee€€€€)ÌÌÌÌà@ àò òòòORDERóóó óÌÌÌÓÓà àThis€appeal€came€on€to€be€heard€upon€the€record€from€theÏChancery€Court€of€Sevier€County,€briefs€and€argument€of€counsel.€ÍUpon€consideration€thereof,€this€Court€is€of€opinion€that€thereÏwas€no€reversible€error€in€the€trial€court.Ìà àWe€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€Costs€of€thisÏcause€are€taxed€to€the€appellant€and€this€case€is€remanded€to€theÏtrial€court€for€the€collection€thereof.ÌÌÌÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€PER€CURIAMÌ