WPC" #VU: % 0b 4  0 0D 0J? D3 0T 0^ 0hn 0r 0|H 0 0J 1uU,O 0d{U,U* B)5DC^ AM8v~vX B+ 0@H AO 0 0Dq! D/! B!HP LaserJet 4/4MHPPCL5E,,,,0ZP _5^?G^WW ,  AZ"Arial RegularX( 7$` ` TR[A' Legal[A' LegalA' LegalA' LegalT- -c`3|x*((3T6$  7!` TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T   `   0  (#$  0  2 0Indent123  ****'dxd2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23    ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)<  9p`(ModernP 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Monaco<  9p`(Arial% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd-"C << G  !  #d#     ` \RA'\  "      YYY FILED X January29,1996CecilCrowson,Jr. AppellateCourtClerk  . !  #d#     ` \RA'\  $       Rule10.AffirmancewithoutopinionMemorandumopinion. (b)Memorandumopinion.TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated"MEMORANDUMOPINION,"shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'@Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Monaco   BA: T Monaco  BA: T Monaco  d("$    -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$  7!` pTR[A' Legal[A' LegalA' LegalA' LegalT  ($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! . &Xd&#Xd#     ` \RA'\  p 7XXdd7    L#$";+'h|` . `LINTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEEEASTERNSECTIONATKNOXVILLE 󄄄  WILLIAMLEONMARCUS,  )      ) KNOXCIRCUIT Plaintiff/Appellant   )      ) No.03A019510CV00365v.      )      ).SIDNEYW.GILREATH,   )      ) AFFIRMED  Defendant/Appellee  ).  CarlWinkles,Knoxville,FortheAppellant.RichardL.Duncan,Knoxville,FortheAppellee.  MEMORANDUMOPINION (PursuanttoRule10(b),RulesoftheCourtofAppeals) %     INMAN,SeniorJudge     Thisnonjuryaction,whichsoughtrecoveryofthebalanceofafeeallegedlyowingtotheplaintiff,atoxicologist,bythedefendant,anattorney,wasdismissedfollowingpresentationoftheevidence.Ourreviewisdenovoontherecordaccompaniedwiththepresumptionthatthejudgmentiscorrectunlesstheevidenceotherwisepreponderates.Tenn.R.App.P.13(d). Thetrialjudgefound,interalia:(1)thattheplaintiffheldhimselfouttobeanexpertinthefieldoftoxicologyandavailableforemploymentasanexpertwitnessinthatdiscipline;(2)thathewasemployedbythedefendanttotestifyconcerningtoxicologicaldamagesinatortactionpendinginNorthCarolina;(3)thatthecredibilityoftheplaintiffwascrucialtothesuccessfulprosecutionofthetortaction;(4)thattheplaintiffgrosslymisrepresentedhisqualificationsasanexpertintoxicologyandfailedtorevealcriticalfactsinhiseducationalbackgroundwhichinconcertservedtodiscredithisexpertiseandcausedamaterialbreachofcontract. Wedonotdeemitnecessarytorecounttheessentiallyundisputedevidenceofferedinthiscase.Sufficetostatethatitdoesnotpreponderateagainstthejudgment. Theplaintiffarguesthatthedefendantagreedtopaythebalanceofhisfeeupondemand,whichforeclosestheinitialdefenses.Thetrialjudgefoundtherewasnoestoppelorratification,andweagreewithhisconclusion.Thejudgmentisaccordinglyaffirmedatthecostoftheappellant.      򀀀      WilliamH.Inman,SeniorJudgeConcur:̀HerschelP.Franks,JudgèDonT.McMurray,Judge