ÿWPC= …U:V %b–žn­® 04[w.—4Å 0JÙ 0T# 0^w 0hÕ 0r= 0|¯ 0†+ 0± 1uA U,¶ 0dâ U,F U>r B)° DCÙ AM BiU*†$°v~ÔvÓR D3% 0@X AO˜Æç 0D­ D/ñ B <þ6X9`("Courier NewTTX- ù-3|xø«<þ6X9`("Courier NewTTXXxþ6X@ÉDQX@( ¤T$¡¡Ó  ÓéêEëìEíîÓ€øDÒ 2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d""""7Border 1dd€-#Cþÿ << Gÿÿ d< Œ 9p`(Arial Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÔ€&ÔÔ€&ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€&XÔÌÌAugust€28,€1996ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó óPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA Op Monaco Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€  X„d&ÓÑ#€  Xd#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ ` ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€VÏXXdÖdÈ7ÑÑ€ÑÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÔ€!Ô›METROPOLITAN€GOVERNMENT€OF€à à€€€)ÌNASHVILLE€AND€œDAVIDSONà à›à à€€€)ÌœCOUNTY,€ET€AL.›à àà àà àà à€€€)Ìà àœà àà à›à à€€€à àà à€€€)€€Davidson€ChanceryÌà àœPlaintiffs/Appellees,›à àà àà à€€€)€€No.€91„2997„IIIÌà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)ÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)€€Appeal€No.ÌœANN€MARTIN,€ET€AL.›à àà àà à€€€)€€01„A„01„9508„CH„00381Ìœà àà àà à›à àà àà à€€€)Ìà àœDefendants/Appellants.›à àœà à›€€€)Ìà àœà àà àà à›à àà àÌÌÌÓ  ÓIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌMIDDLE€SECTION€AT€NASHVILLEÌÌÌAPPEALED€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€DAVIDSON€COUNTYÌÌ€AT€NASHVILLE,€TENNESSEEÌÓ  ÓÌÌÓ  ÓHONORABLE€ELLEN€HOBBS€LYLE,€CHANCELLORÌÓ  Ó̜ـ€ÙÙ€€ÙßL€$'#;+'h|e` ç `€€Lß›ÌJAMES€L.€MURPHY,€IIIÌErika€GeetterÌMetropolitan€Department€of€LawÌNashville,€Tennessee€37201ÌATTORNEY€FOR€PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEESÌÌÌJoel€H.€MoseleyÌMOSELEY€&€MOSELEYÌSuite€100,€American€Trust€BuildingÌ301€Union€StreetÌNashville,€Tennessee€37201„1406ÌATTORNEYS€FOR€DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTSÌÌÌAFFIRMED€AND€REMANDEDÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àHENRY€F.€TODDÌà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€œJUDGE̛̜CONCURS€WITH€RESULT:ÌWILLIAM›€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€œJUDGE›ÌÌÌÌMETROPOLITAN€GOVERNMENT€€€)ÌOF€NASHVILLE€AND€DAVIDSON,€€)ÌCOUNTY,€ET€AL.à àà àà à€€€)Ìà àà àà àà àà à€€€)Ìà àPlaintiffs/Appellees,à àà à€€€)à à€€Ìà àà àà àà àà à€€€)€€Davidson€ChanceryÌà àà àà àà àà à€€€)€€No.€91„2997„IIIÌà àà àà àà àà à€€€)ÌVS.à àà àà àà àà à€€€)Ìà àà àà àà àà à€€€)€€Appeal€No.Ìà àà àà àà àà à€€€)€€01„A„01„9508„CH„00381ÌANN€MARTIN,€ET€AL.à àà à€€€)Ìà àà àà àà àà à€€€)Ìà àœDefendants/Appellants.›à à€€€)ÌÌÌò òòòÓ  ÓO€€P€€I€€N€€I€€O€€Nóóó óÌÌÌÓÓÓ  Óà àThe€Defendants,€Ann€Martin€and€AME,€Inc.€have€appealed€from€a€œjudgment›€of€the€TrialÏCourt€finding€them€in€contempt€of€court,€ordering€them€to€cease€an€desist€from€certain€activities,Ïclosing€defendantððs€business€Friday,€August€4,€1995,€through€Monday,€August€7,€1995,€andÏtaxing€them€with€costs.ÌÌà àOnly€an€abbreviated€record€is€before€this€Court,€hence€it€is€impossible€to€narrate€the€earlyÏproceedings€which,€according€to€Appelleeððs€brief,€began€on€September€12,€1991,€with€a€complaintÏthat€the€defendant,€Martin,€was€utilizing€certain€described€property€for€adult€entertainment€activitiesÏin€violation€of€Section€17.64.270€of€the€Zoning€Laws€of€the€Plaintiffððs€city.ÌÌà àThe€present€record€begins€with€a€memorandum€filed€by€the€Trial€Judge€on€March€6,€1993,Ïfinding€the€defendants€guilty€of€violating€Section€17.64.270€by€conducting€adult€entertainmentÏwithin€500€feet€of€a€school.ÌÓÓà àœÌà àOn›€March€17,€1993,€the€Trial€Court€entered€an€order€stating:ÌÓÓÓÓÌà àà à€€€€It€is€therefore€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€and€DECREED€Ìà àà àthat€Defendants€Ann€Martin€and€AME,€Inc.,€a€Tennessee€Ìà àà àcorporation,€d/b/a/€Classic€Cat€II,€are€conducting€adultÌà àà àentertainment€commercial€œactivities›€at€126€8th€Avenue€œÌà àà àNorth,›€(Map€and€Parcel€œNo.›€93„64„3„13)€in€violation€of€œÌà àà àSection›€17.64.270€œof›€the€Metropolitan€Code€of€Laws.€ÌÌà àà à€€€€It€is€further€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€and€€Ìà àà àDECREED€that€Defendants€Ann€Martin€and€AME,Ìà àà àInc.,€a€Tennessee€corporation,€d/b/a/€Classic€Cat€II,€Ìà àà àtheir€respective€officers,€agents,€representatives,€Ìà àà àemployees€and€successors,€and€all€other€persons€in€Ìà àà àactive€concert€and€participation€with€them,€be€andÌà àà àthey€hereby€are€permanently€enjoined€from€conducting€Ìà àà àadult€entertainment€commercial€activities€at€126€8th€€Ìà àà àAvenue€North€(Map€and€Parcel€No.€93„6„3„13)€in€Ìà àà àviolation€of€Section€17.64.270€of€the€Metropolitan€Ìà àà àCode€of€Laws.ÌÓÓÌÓÓÓÓà àOn€December€5,€1994,€the€Supreme€Court€denied€application€to€appeal€from€the€judgmentÏof€this€Court€affirming€the€March€17,€1993,€order€of€the€Trial€Court.ÌÌà àOn€June€26,€1995,€the€Plaintiffs€instituted€the€present€proceeding€by€filing€a€petition€forÏœcontempt›€containing€the€following:ÌÌÓÓà àœà à€€€That›€Section€17.04.150€of€the€Metropolitan€Code€of€œÌà àà àLaw›€defined€the€activity€type€ð ðadult€entertainmentðð€as€œÌà àà àfollows:›ÌÌà àà à17.04.150à àAdult€entertainmentÌÌà àà à€€€€ð ðAdult€entertainmentðð€means€any€adult€bookstore,€adult€Ìà àà àmotion€picture€theater,€adult€mini„motion€picture€theater,€Ìà àà àor€any€commercial€establishment€which€for€a€fee€or€Ìà àà àincidentally€to€another€service,€presents€material€or€Ìà àà àexhibitions€distinguished€or€characterized€by€an€emphasis€Ìà àà àon€matter€depicting,€describing€or€relating€to€ð ðspecified€Ìà àà àsexual€activitiesðð€or€specified€anatomical€areas,ðð€as€Ìà àà àdefined€below€for€observation€by€patrons€therein.ÌÌœà àà à€€€ð ðSpecified›€sexual€activitiesðð€are€defined€in€Section€œÌà àà à17.04.1230›€as€follows:ÌÌà àà à17.04.1230à àSpecified€sexual€activitiesÌÌà àà àð ðSpecified€sexual€activitiesðð€means:ÌÌœà à›à àA.€€Human€genitals€in€a€state€of€sexual€arousal;Ìà àà àB.€€Acts€of€human€masturbation,€sexual€intercourse€Ìà àà àor€sodomy;Ìà àà àC.€€Fondling€or€other€erotic€touching€of€human€genitals,€Ìà àà àpublic€Region,€buttock€or€female€breast.ÌÌÌœà àà àð ðSpecified›€anatomical€areasðð€are€defined€in€Section€œÌà àà à17.04.1220›€as€follows:Ìœà àà àÌà àà àð ðSpecified€anatomical€areasðð€means:ÌÌà àà à17.04.1220à àSpecified€anatomical€areasÌÌà àà àA.€€Less€than€completely€and€opaquely€covered:Ìà àà à1.€€Human€genitals,€public€region;Ìà àà à2.€€Buttock;€andÌà àà à3.€€Female€breast€below€a€point€immediately€above€Ìà àà àthe€top€of€the€areola;€andÌà àà àB.€€Human€male€genitals€in€a€discernibly€turgid€state,Ìà àà àeven€if€completely€and€opaquely€covered.€€(Prior€Ìà àà àCode€Appx€A€ðð€12.10€(part)).Ì›Ìà àà à€€€€That€on€the€evening€of€July€17,€1995,€the€Defendants,€Ìà àà àdoing€business€as€the€Classic€Cat€in€the€location€identified€Ìà àà àin€Paragraph€1€above,€presented€for€the€observation€of€Ìà àà àpatrons€an€exhibition€consisting€of€at€least€two€dancers€Ìà àà àwho€were€dancing€wearing€ð ðG„stringsðð€and€clear€plastic€Ìà àà àpasties€on€the€areola,€leaving€the€entire€breast€exposed.€€Ìà àà àA€third€dancer€was€wearing€only€a€G„string.€€The€buttocks€Ìà àà àof€these€dancers€were€exposed.€€A€similar€exhibition€was€Ìà àà àpresented€for€observation€on€the€evening€of€July€24,€1995.€€Ìà àà àFurthermore,€patrons€were€able€to€purchase€private€dances€Ìà àà àin€which€a€dancer€removed€all€clothing€and€engaged€in€acts€Ìà àà àof€masturbation€and€simulated€sex€acts.ÌÌà àà à€€€€That€the€activities€described€in€Paragraph€10€constitute€Ìà àà àð ðadult€entertainment€commercial€activitiesðð€at€126€8th€Ìà àà àAvenue€North€in€violation€of€Section€17.64.270€of€the€Ìà àà àMetropolitan€Code€of€Laws€and€in€direct€violation€of€this€Ìà àà àCourtððs€order€of€March€17,€1993,€enjoining€Defendants€Ìà àà àfrom€conducting€such€activities.ÌÌÌà àà à€€€€Wherefore,€Plaintiffs€pray€for€this€court€to€find€Ìà àà àDefendants€in€contempt€of€this€court€and€for€the€following€Ìà àà àrelief:ÌÌÌà àà àa.€€To€order€the€Defendants€to€appear€before€this€court€Ìà àà àto€show€cause€why€they€should€not€be€held€in€contempt.ÌÌà àà àb.€€To€order€that€Defendantsðð€establishment,€the€Classic€Ìà àà àCat,€remain€closed€until€such€time€as€Defendants€are€able€Ìà àà àto€establish€to€the€Metropolitan€Government€that€they€Ìà àà àare€able€to€operate€at€their€current€location€without€Ìà àà àconducting€adult€entertainment€activities€in€violation€of€Ìà àà àSection€17.64.270€of€the€Metropolitan€Code€of€Laws;ÌÌà àà àc.€€For€other€such€relief€as€this€Court€deems€appropriate.ÌÌà àThe€Defendants€answered€as€follows:ÌÌà àà à€€€€Come€the€defendants€and€in€answer€to€the€PetitionÌà àà àfor€Contempt€filed€against€them€in€the€cause€hereby€Ìà àà àdeny€that€they€are€guilty€of€wilful€contempt€of€the€Ìà àà àorders€of€this€Court€and€further€deny€that€there€Ìà àà àis€any€adult€activity€being€conducted€at€126€8th€Ìà àà àAvenue,€North,€Nashville,€Davidson€County,€Ìà àà àTennessee,€as€defined€by€the€Zoning€Regulations€Ìà àà àof€the€Metropolitan€Government.ÌÌà àThe€judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€states:ÌÌà àà à€€€€The€evidence€presented€to€this€Court€at€the€Ìà àà àhearing€on€August€3,€1995,€establishes€that€on€Ìà àà àtwo€separate€occasions€Section€17.64.270€was€Ìà àà àviolated€in€that€the€dancers€on€stage€at€the€Ìà àà àClassic€Cat€were€wearing€G„strings,€there€were€Ìà àà àbare€breasts€exposed,€there€were€nude€videos,€Ìà àà àand€there€were€repeated€VIP€dances€where€the€Ìà àà àdancer€was€fully€nude€and€engaged€in€specified€Ìà àà àsexual€activities€as€that€term€is€defined€in€Section€Ìà àà à17.04.1230€of€the€Metropolitan€Code.ÌÌà àà à€€€€Given€the€circumstances€described€in€Paragraph€Ìà àà à2,€the€Court€finds€that€the€primary€function€of€the€Ìà àà àdefendant€was€an€adult€entertainment€activity,€that€Ìà àà àsuch€activity€had€been€permanently€enjoined€by€Ìà àà àChancellor€Brandt,€that€there€was€a€violation€of€Ìà àà àChancellor€Brandtððs€order,€and€that€the€defendants€Ìà àà àshould€therefore€be€held€in€contempt.ÌÌà àà à€€€€The€Court€additionally€determines€that€this€Ìà àà àcontempt€was€willful,€in€that€the€law€in€question€Ìà àà àis€published€and€is€clear€as€to€what€comprises€Ìà àà àspecific€sexual€activities€and€specified€sexual€areas.ÌÌà àà à€€€€The€Court€additionally€determines€that€the€Ìà àà àwearing€of€pasties€results€in€a€violation€of€the€Ìà àà àordinance€at€issue€in€that€they€constitute€a€ð ðless€Ìà àà àthan€completely€and€opaquely€covered€.€.€.€.€Ìà àà àfemale€breast€below€a€point€immediately€above€Ìà àà àthe€top€of€the€areolaðð€as€set€forth€in€Ìà àà à17.04.1220.A.3.€of€the€Metropolitan€Code€Ìà àà àdescribingð ðspecified€anatomical€areas.ðð€€In€so€Ìà àà àdetermining,€the€Court€adopts€the€argument€Ìà àà àof€Metroððs€legal€counsel,€finding€that€the€Ìà àà àphrase€ð ðbelow€a€point€immediately€above€the€Ìà àà àtop€of€the€areolaðð€modifies€the€term€ð ðbreast,ðð€Ìà àà àthus€making€clear€that€the€breasts€have€to€be€Ìà àà àcovered€from€the€top€of€the€areola€on€down.ÌœÌÌ›Ìà àœà à€€€€In›€light€of€the€above€findings,€it€is€therefore€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€andÏœà àà àDECREED›€as€œfollows:Ì›Ìà àà à1.à àThat€Defendants€Ann€Martin€and€AME,€Ìà àà àInc.€d/b/a€Classic€Cat€are€found€to€be€in€contempt€Ìà àà àof€court.ÌÌà àà à2.à àThat€Defendants€Ann€Martin€and€AME,€Inc.€Ìà àà àd/b/a€Classic€Cat€cease€and€desist€from€the€activities€Ìà àà àfound€by€this€œcourt›€to€be€in€violation€of€the€March€Ìà àà à17,€1993€injunction,€including€but€not€limited€to€the€Ìà àà ànude€dancing,€nude€videos,€and€specified€sexual€Ìà àà àactivities.ÌÌà àà à3.à àThat€the€Classic€Cat€be€closed€effective€Ìà àà àFriday,€August€4,€1995,€through€closing€time€on€Ìà àà àMonday,€August€7,€1995,€to€enable€the€Defendant€Ìà àà àto€counsel€its€employees,€to€make€any€changes€in€Ìà àà àattire€that€are€necessary,€to€instruct€employees,€Ìà àà àand€to€do€so€in€order€to€assure€that€there€will€not€Ìà àà àbe€any€violation€of€the€order€in€the€future.ÌÌà àOn€appeal,€defendants€present€three€issues,€as€follows:ÌÌà àà à1.à àWas€the€principal€activity€conducted€by€Ìà àà àthe€defendant,€AME,€Inc.,€a€violation€of€Ìà àà àðð€17.64.270€of€the€Metropolitan€Code?ÌÌà àà à2.à àIf€the€defendants€violated€ðð€17.64.270€Ìà àà àof€the€Metropolitan€Code,€was€the€violation€Ìà àà àð ðwillful?ððÌÌà àà à3.à àDid€the€trial€court€correctly€interpret€and€Ìà àà àapply€ðð€17.04.1220.A.3€of€the€Metropolitan€Code?ÌÌÌÌà àðð€17.64.270€of€the€Metropolitan€Code€reads€as€follows:ÌÌà àà à17.64.270à àRestricted€locations€of€adult€entertainment€establishments.ÌÌà àà à€€€€No€establishment€classified€as€an€adult€Ìà àà àentertainment€Activity€shall€be€located€within€Ìà àà àfive€hundred€feet€of€any€church,€school€ground,€Ìà àà àcollege€campus€or€park,€or€within€one€hundred€Ìà àà àfifty€feet€of€any€other€establishment€classified€Ìà àà àunder€the€category€ð ðadult€entertainmentðð;€and€Ìà àà àfurther,€all€such€establishments€shall€be€limited€Ìà àà àto€one€per€block€face.€€In€determining€the€Ìà àà àdistance€from€a€church,€school€ground,€college€Ìà àà àcampus,€park€or€any€other€establishment€Ìà àà àclassified€under€the€category€ð ðadult€entertainment,ðð€Ìà àà àthe€distance€shall€be€measured€from€property€line€Ìà àà àto€property€line.€€However,€a€variance€in€these€Ìà àà àrequirements€may€be€requested€of€the€board€of€Ìà àà àzoning€appeals€in€accordance€with€the€provisions€Ìà àà àset€forth€in€this€title€for€appeals,€only€where€the€Ìà àà àstrict€application€of€these€requirements€would€Ìà àà àresult€in€practical€difficulties€or€undue€hardships€Ìà àà àupon€the€owner€of€the€property.€(Prior€code€Ìà àà àAppx.€A€ðð€33.50)ÌÓÓÌÓÓÓÓà àDefendants€point€out€that€both€the€zoning€ordinances€and€the€injunction€use€the€expression,Ïð ðadult€entertainment€activitiesðð€and€insist€that€an€activity€must€be€the€principal€activity€on€theÏpremises€in€order€to€violate€the€œzon›œing›€law.ÌÌà àIn€support€of€this€insistence,€defendants€rely€upon€code€section€17.04.140€which€definesÏð ðactivityðð€as€ð ðthe€performance€of€a€function€or€operation€which€constitutes€the€use€of€the€land.ðð€ÏThe€evidence€in€this€record€leaves€no€doubt€that€the€land€in€question€was€used€in€the€performanceÏof€the€activity€constituting€the€grounds€of€this€action.ÌÌà àDefendants€also€rely€upon€Code€section€17.04.930€which€states:ÌÓÓà àà à€€€€Principal€activity€means€an€activity€œwhich€fulfills›€Ìà àà àœa›€primary€function€of€an€establishment,€œinstitution,›€œÌà àà àhousehold›€or€other€entity.ÌœÓÓÓÓÌà àDefendantsðð›€argument€œstates:Ì›Ìà àà à€€€€What€is€the€primary€function€of€the€ClassicÌà àà àCat€on€or€after€July€17,€1965?€€According€to€Ìà àà àthe€affidavit€of€Mr.€Gonzalez,€a€90%€of€the€Ìà àà àactivity€was€not€adult€entertainment€as€that€Ìà àà àterm€is€defined€in€the€zoning€regulations.€€Ìà àà àTherefore,€it€was€error€for€the€trial€court€to€Ìà àà àfind€that€the€principal€commercial€œactivity€was›€Ìà àà àœadult›€entertainment€in€violation€of€œthe€zoning›€Ìà àà àœregulations›€and€the€1993€order.ÌÌÓÓà àNo€citation€indicates€the€location€of€such€affidavit€in€the€record,€and€no€such€affidavit€isÏfound.€€Other€affidavits€of€this€affiant€are€found€which€do€not€bear€upon€the€issue€at€hand.€€Even€ifÏthe€missing€affidavit€should€support€the€quoted€argument,€it€would€œnot€affect›€the€results,€for€it€isÏtoo€general€in€tenor€to€defeat€the€conviction€of€contempt.ÌÌà àDefendants€operate€a€ð ðnight€clubðð€which€offers€live€and€video€entertainment€and€beverages.€ÏEach€activity€on€the€premises€is€calculated€to€attract€patronage€of€the€establishment€hence€it€is€anÏactivity€which€ð ðfulfills€a€primary€function€of€the€establishmentðð€which€is€patronage€and€profit.ÌÌà àThe€mere€fact€that€the€objectionable€activity€was€conducted€by€relatively€few€of€theÏemployees€or€for€a€relatively€small€fraction€of€the€time€would€not€prevent€it€from€being€a€part€of€theÏprincipal€activity€of€the€business€if€it€was€calculated€to€attract€patronage€of€the€establishment.ÌÌà àDefendants€next€insist€that€there€is€no€evidence€that€the€defendant€Ann€Martin,€violated€theÏinjunction.€€It€is€not€questioned€that€Ms.€Martin€is€one€of€the€owners€of€the€establishment€and€hadÏthe€right€and€power€to€control€activities€on€the€premises.€€The€injunction€placed€upon€her€the€dutyÏof€preventing€the€premises€from€being€used€in€violation€of€the€zoning€ordinance.€€She€cannot€avoidÏthat€duty€by€absenting€herself€or€ð ðlooking€the€other€way.ðð€€Moreover,€the€judgment,€quoted€above,Íimposes€no€fine€or€imprisonment€upon€Ms.€Martin.€€Itððs€only€sanction€was€against€theÏestablishment,€interrupting€operation€for€a€few€days.ÌÌà àDefendants€next€complain€of€ð ðlack€of€directionðð€from€city€officials€as€œevidence›€œof€›€ð ðbadÏfaithðð€and€œstate›€that€reliance€upon€advice€of€their€counsel€should€be€a€ð ðmitigating€factor.ðð€ÏDefendants€do€not€suggest€how€the€light€sanction€imposed€by€the€Trial€Court€should€be€furtherÏmitigated.ÌÌà àFinally,€defendants€argue€that€the€Trial€Court€erred€in€finding€that€the€exposure€ofÏentertainerððs€bodily€œparts€constituted€a€code€violation.›€€Code€section€17.04.1220,€œquoted›€above,Ïdescribes€the€prohibited€exposure,€and€subsection€A3€is€the€particular€description€at€issue.Ìà àÌà àOne€of€the€requirements€is€that€the€covering€be€opaque,€that€œis,›€ð ðnot€transparent.ðð€€It€isÏœobvious›€that€a€transparent€covering€does€not€satisfy€the€requirement€of€the€zoning€ordinance.ÌÌà àDefendants€argue€that€the€ordinance€read€literally,€requires€opaque€covering€of€all€parts€ofÏthe€body€below€the€point€designated€in€subsection€3.€€Since€the€section€clearly€forbids€exposure€ofÏthe€parts€involved€in€the€present€appeal,€the€issue€as€to€what€other€parts€are€required€to€be€coveredÏis€moot€in€this€appeal.ÌÌà àDefendants€suggest€that€it€is€unconstitutional€to€prohibit€in€a€night€club€what€is€permitted€onÏpublic€beaches.€€This€argument€overlooks€the€fact€that€the€present€appeal€œinvolves›€what€isÏpermissible€within€500€feet€of€a€school.€€There€is€no€evidence€of€a€public€beach€within€suchÍproximity€of€a€school.ÌÌà àCorrespondingly,€what€is€done€at€other€places€of€entertainment€outside€the€prohibited€areasÏis€irrelevant€to€the€issues€in€this€case.ÌÌà àThe€judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€is€affirmed.€€Costs€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€against€theÏDefendants.€€The€cause€is€remanded€to€the€Trial€Court€for€further€proceedings.ÌÌÓÓà àAffirmed€and€Remanded.ÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà à_____________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àHENRY€F.€TODD,€PRESIDING€JUDGEà àÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌœ_____________________________›ÌSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€JUDGEÌ̛̜̜CONCURS€WITH€RESULT:ÌWILLIAM›€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌÔ€Ô