WPCQ  0~V 0x 0kL 0k 0" 0~ 0: 0 0 0 0  0 01 0C 0V( 0~ 0M 0 0 0X 0 0 0 0KUB %0 0z6 0 1 0 r 0= 0F 0P 1V 0 0O$#Es# 0}u# 0x# 0j$ 0j$ 0ea% 0W% 0W& 0t& 0j& 0b' 0( 0( 0w) 0X* 0L+ 0S, 0-m- 0@. 0/ 00 0#1 01 0^2 03 03 0l4 04 15?6nO6 046 B074M7 0a77 0J8 1m8 0dU9 0@9 D39 0J,: 0Tv: 0^: 0h(; 0r; 0|< 0~< 0= 1u=U, > 0d5>U,>U6>B)>DC$? AMg?U*?I?'AfBv~ZCvD 0J 0:K 0K 0dL 0M 0M 0N AOOO 0PP 0DQ D/RQ BQV& 8Document[8]Document Style0..8` ..` V8Document[4]Document Style.. . V 8Document[6]Document Style8..V 8Document[5]Document Style0..V/8Document[2]Document Style 2A.3  Ԁ   V& 8Document[7]Document Style0..0` ..` zU :Right Par[1]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..2I.3  Ԁ..0..zh :Right Par[2]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..2A.3  Ԁ..0` ..` V?8Document[3]Document Style.. 21.3  Ԁ   z{ :Right Par[3]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  ..P 21.3  Ԁ` ..` 0 .. z :Right Par[4]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. .. 2a.3  Ԁ .. 0..z :Right Par[5]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..2(1)3  Ԁ..0h..hz :Right Par[6]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h..2(a)3  Ԁh..h0..z :Right Par[7]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....2i)3  Ԁ..0..z :Right Par[8]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....p..2a)3  Ԁ..0p..pVX8Document[1]Document Style  @..8  2I.3  Ԁ     Ԉ l2:Technical[5]Technical Document Style.. 2(1)3  Ԁ. l2:Technical[6]Technical Document Style.. 2(a)3  Ԁ. l/%:Technical[2]Technical Document Style 2A.3  Ԁ   .. l,!:Technical[3]Technical Document Style 21.3  Ԁ   .. l(!:Technical[4]Technical Document Style 2a.3  Ԁ   .. l:0:Technical[1]Technical Document Style  2I.3  Ԁ     .. l1:Technical[7]Technical Document Style.. 2i)3  Ԁ. l1:Technical[8]Technical Document Style.. 2a)3  Ԁ. <6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXR& 8BibliogrphyBibliography0....jo4Tech InitInitialize Technical StyleS   1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 S CuyTechnicalTechnical Document Style11.11.1.11.1.1.11.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1fp2Doc InitInitialize Document StyleS #    I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)S !"($0 ($0 0 (($0 0 0   A_ekqwDocumentDocument StyleI.1.A.a.(1)(a)i)a)x?t2PleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading Paper % z &(  &XXXXX6G''*d66G''*d6HH1HH2HH3HH4HH5HH6HH7HH8HH910111213141516171819202122232425262728  .+('2$ FT!   p4Heading 2Underlined Heading Flush LeftV4Heading 1Centered Heading@..  b* 8Bullet ListIndented Bullet List0..0` ..` B& $1Document Style0..8` ..` B $2Document Style.. . B $3Document Style8..B $4Document Style0..B-$5Document Style 23  Ԁ   B& $6Document Style0..0` ..` dS $7Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..23  Ԁ..0..df $8Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..` 23  Ԁ..0` ..` B=$9Document Style.. 23  Ԁ   fy &10Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. 23  Ԁ` ..` 0 .. f &11Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..23  Ԁ .. 0..f &12Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h23  Ԁ..0h..hf &13Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h..23  Ԁh..h0..f &14Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....23  Ԁ..0..f &15Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....p..p23  Ԁ..0p..pDV!&16Document Style  @..  23  Ԁ     Ԉ X/&17Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ. X/&18Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ. X-(&19Technical Document Style 23  Ԁ   .. X*$&20Technical Document Style 23  Ԁ   .. X)$&21Technical Document Style 23  Ԁ   .. X83&22Technical Document Style  23  Ԁ     .. X/&23Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ. X/&24Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ.   CRight ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersI.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)3|x<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXx6X@JQX@( T$   dc`$(G.2ə$ FT!   4XX     0  JEFFREYDUNLAPGREERThreadgillStoreyMarminoWallace($   0  Mtuvwxyz#,37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(<1$26.  0  3  0  ("$    GGGG'dxd2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23  TUVWXYZ[ ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)<  9p`(ModernP 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Monaco<  9p`(Courier New% Line 7 dgggg7Border 1ddPhC << G<  9p`(Arial ? F!  #d#]f  "  jj   YYY FILEDjX January11,1996CecilCrowson,Jr.jAppellateCourtClerk   F!#d#]f  I$f         Mr.MurphydidnotcontendthattheappreciatedvalueoftheTruckingCompanywashisseparateproperty,aswasthecaseinHarrisonv.Harrison,anunpublishedopinionoftheTennesseeSupremeCourt,filedinNashvilleonDecember18,1995. \\R'A\PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'@Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Monaco   BA: T Monaco  BA: T Monaco (gfi$0  2(6.  0  .  0  3  0` (#(#(b$0  0` (#(#2A   .3  0 ` (#` (#(xr$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#2A(  0  )3  0 (# (#(U$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#2A(  a  )3  0h(#(#(@$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#2A(   )3  0h(#h(#(t$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#2A  0  )3  0(#(#($0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#2A  a  )3  0p(#(#PC<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5((3$ FT!   ($$   1  ' dxdP Pd F! . ]&eeXd&#eeXd#f    7XXdd7\RA'\ `   Likh;+'h|`  `L@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE       @ EASTERNSECTIONREBAMITCHELLMURPHY@ )@  RHEACOUNTY@ ) 03A019411CH00402 PlaintiffAppellee  @ )  @ )@ )  v.@ ) HON.JEFFREYF.STEWART, H F H F ̀H @ ) CHANCELLOR @ ) JAMESEDWARDMURPHY@ ) @ ) AFFIRMEDASMODIFIED DefendantAppellant@ ) andREMANDEDL.THOMASAUSTINOFDUNLAPFORAPPELLANTSTEPHENT.GREEROFDUNLAPFORAPPELLEE     OPINION         Goddard,P.J.  JamesEdwardMurphyappealsadivorcedecreeoftheChanceryCourtforRheaCounty.ByhisissuesonappealhequestionstheCourt'sdivisionofmaritalpropertyanditsawardofchildsupport,alimony,andattorneyfees.  AtthetimeofthedivorceMrs.Murphywas46yearsofageandMr.Murphy43.Theyhadbeenmarriedalmost22years.Twochildrenwerebornofthemarriage,adaughterage16andason12.  Mrs.MurphywasemployedasaspecialeducationteacherintheRheaCountySchoolSystemwhereherearningsfor1993were$25,821.Mr.MurphywasPresidentofacorporationownedwithhisfather,Murphy&SonsTruckingCo.,andhisincomefor1993was$40,000.AtthetimeofthedivorcehewasasecondyearstudentattheUniversityofTennesseeLawSchool.  Mrs.Murphywasawardedadivorceonthegroundsofinappropriatemaritalconduct,whichisnotcontestedonappeal.TheCourtdividedtheparties'maritalpropertyandrequiredbothpartiestoassumecertainindebtedness.HethenorderedMr.Murphytopayaschildsupport$200perweek,plusonehalfoftheuninsuredmedicalexpenses,andasalimony$22,000,whichwasthebalanceowingontheparties'residence,plus$5000inattorneyfees.  Wehaveattachedanappendixtothisopinion,whichshowsthepropertyawardedbytheCourt,aswellasthedebtsrequiredtobeassumedbytheparties.ItalsoshowsthevaluesassignedbytheCourt,aswellasthoseconcurredinbythepartieswheretheCourtmadenospecificfindings.Exceptastotheraceway,whichweconcludehadnovalueinaccordancewithourdeterminationhereinaftersetout,wefindthattheCourt'sdeterminationastothevalueofpropertyawardedthehusbandandthewifeisappropriate.  Theappendixalsoliststhecontentionsofthepartiesrelativetothevalueofthepropertyawardedandtheamountofdebtsrequiredtobeassumed,otherthanthosefoundbytheTrialCourt,thisCourt,orconcurredinbytheparties.  Mr.Murphytakesstrongexceptiontothefindingsastothevalueofboththeracingandtruckingcorporations.Astotheformerheinsists,andweagree,thatundertheundisputedprooftheamountowedbytheracingcorporation,whichwas$35,000securedbyadeedoftrustuponthecorporation'sonlyassetrealestateuponwhichthetrackwaslocatedandanadditional$165,000owedtotheTruckingCompany,rendersthevalueofthecorporatestockzero,ratherthan$32,500asfoundbytheTrialCourt.  Mr.MurphyalsoarguesthattheevidencepreponderatesinfavorofafindingthathisinterestintheTruckingCompanywasworthatmost$29,000ratherthanthe$150,000foundbytheTrialCourt.  TheexpertsthattestifiedregardingtheTruckingCompany'svaluevariedfrom$810,000byMrs.Murphy'expert,to$158,000byMr.Murphy'sexpert.ItcanbeseenthatthevaluefixedbytheTrialCourt,$400,000,was"withintherangeofcompetentevidencesubmitted."Giventhepresumptionofcorrectnessaccordedatrialcourt'sfindingunderRule13oftheTennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure,wedonotfindtheevidencepreponderatesagainsttheTrialCourt'sfindingastotheTruckingCompany'svalue.Moreover,thevalueplacedupontheTruckingCompanybytheTrialCourtwaswithintherangeofthecompetentproofsubmitted.Wallacev.Wallace,733S.W.2d102(Tenn.App.1987).  TheTrialCourt,uponfindingtheTruckingCompanyhadavalueof$400,000,deductedfromthatamount$100,000,whichwasitsvaluewhenthepartiesweremarried.Thus,themaritalinterestintheTruckingCompanywasonehalfof$300,000,or$150,000. l   ׀ThisamountwhenaddedtotheotherpropertyawardedMr.Murphyandafterdeductingdebts,leaveshisdivisionoftheparties'propertywithavalueof$145,807.ThiscomparesfavorablywiththevalueofMrs.Murphy'snetaward,whichwas$130,795.  Weaccordinglyconcludethat,giventheheretoforementionedpresumptionofcorrectnessthatattachestotheTrialCourt'sfindingsoffact,hemusthavefound,althoughnotarticulated,thatthevalueoftheitemsnotspecificallyvaluedwassuchthatthetotalreceivedbyeachpartywasinaccordwiththemandatesofT.C.A.364121.  ItisclearfromthecompilationofthevariousvaluesofmaritalpropertynotfoundbytheTrialCourtorthisCourtandnotagreedtobytheparties,thatifweacceptMr.Murphy'sfigurestheCourt'sdivisionisinequitableinsofarasheisconcerned.Ontheotherhand,however,ifweacceptMrs.Murphy'sfiguresitisinequitableinsofarassheisconcerned.InlightofthefactthattheTrialCourtmadenofindingastovalueastomuchofthemaritalproperty,wearehandicappedinourreview,eventhoughdenovo,withoutanopportunitytoevaluatethecredibilityofthewitnesseswhentestifying.  Astothequestionofchildsupport,Mr.Murphycontendsthathisincome,atmost,was$35,000peryearwhich,accordingtohim,underthe1989guidelines,wouldrequirechildsupportpaymentsof$697.24permonth,or$160.90perweek.Consequently,theTrialCourt'sawardof$200perweekplusonehalfoftheuninsuredmedicalexpensesexceededthisguideline.  WefirstpointoutthatthereisproofintherecordthatMr.Murphy'sincomeis$40,000peryearratherthan$35,000,andthereisalsoproofthatifinfactitisnot$40,000heiscapableofearningthatamountand,consequently,thisfiguremaybeusedtodeterminehischildsupportobligations,Storeyv.Storey,835S.W.2d593(Tenn.App.1992).UponapplyingtheJuly1994guidelinestothe$40,000heisearningoriscapableofearning,hismonthlyincomewouldbe$3333.33which,roundedofftothehighestfigureontheguidelinetable,wouldshowanetincomeof$2506.18,oranobligationof$802permonth,whichwouldbe,whenalsoroundedoff,$185perweek.  TheonlyreasontheTrialCourtadvancedfororderingchildsupportinexcessoftheguidelineswasthepotentialearningcapacityofMr.Murphyafterhegraduatesfromlawschool,passesthebar,andbeginshispractice.WhileitmaybethatupontheforegoingoccurringMrs.Murphywouldbeentitledtoanincreaseinchildsupport,wedonotbelievechildsupportmaybepredicateduponpotentialearningcapacity,andthattheCourt'sreasonfordeviatingfromtheguidelinesisinsufficient.  WeaccordinglymodifythejudgmentrenderedbytheTrialCourttoreducetheweeklysupportto$185,effectiveasofJuly7,1994,thedateofthejudgmentbelow.  Aproposofalimonyandattorneyfees,theTrialCourtorderedMr.MurphytopaythemortgageontheresidenceawardedtoMrs.Murphyintheapproximateamountof$22,000,whichweassumewasintendedtobealimonyinsolido.Healsoawardedattorneyfeesintheamountof$5000.  Thetrialcourtisclothedwithwidediscretionintheawardingofbothalimonyandattorneyfees,andundertherecordpresentedwefindnoabuse.Threadgillv.Threadgill,740S.W.2d419(Tenn.App.1987);Marminov.Marmino,34Tenn.App.352,238S.W.2d105(1950).  FortheforegoingreasonsthejudgmentoftheTrialCourtasmodifiedisaffirmedandthecauseremandedforcollectionofcostsbelow.Exercisingourdiscretion,weadjudgethecostsofappealtoMr.Murphyandhissurety.      _______________________________      HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.CONCUR:________________________________DonT.McMurray,J.________________________________CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.m `     X  X f             @ KEY:FTC(FoundbyTrialCourt)         NFTC(NotFoundbyTrialCourt)         FCA(FoundbyCourtofAppeals)         PC(PartiesConcur)  @ HUSBAND'SASSETSANDDEBTS@ ASSETS      ̀Court   Husband    Wife `  ` TruckingCo. $150,000(FTC) $150,000(FTC)   $150,000(FTC) Raceway  0(FCA) 0(FCA)   0(FCA)EquityTownhouse (NFC)   1,500    5,000Furnishings̀Townhouse  (NFC)  1,700    2,5001991Camero  (NFC)   4,000    10,5001972GMCOTruck (NFC)   500    6,000Jewelry   (NFTC)  250    500IRA    25,000(PC) 25,000(PC)   25,000(PC)CountryClubStock (NFC)    50    0     $175,000 $183,000  $199,500   @ DEBTS  @ `   RheaCountyNationalBank  10,000(PC)  10,000(PC)   10,000(PC)MLBEquityCreditLoan    14,900(PC)  14,900(PC)   14,900(PC)SandySmithLoan  2,000(PC)  2,000(PC)   2,000(PC)AutomobileLoan (NFC)   3,500    0Household̀FinanceLoan  ___2,293____29,193󀀀___2,29332,693 ___2,29329,193̀$145,807$150,307$170,307                                                     @ WIFE'SASSETSANDDEBTS@ ASSETS        Court   Husband   WifeKemmerHillHouse&Lots  $100,000(FTC)  $100,000(FTC)  $100,000(FTC)  King'sHillLots  20,000(FTC) 20,000(FTC) 20,000(FTC)MembershipPoolAssoc.  1,500(PC)  1,500(PC) 1,500(PC)HouseholdFurnishings    (NFC)   57,050  12,500Jewelry      (NFC)   22,500   7001991GMCTruck     (NFC)   9,500   11,500IRA      2,210(PC)  2,210(PC)2,210(PC)Retirement     7,317(PC)  7,317(PC) 7,317(PC)Horse       (NFC)  3,500  WifecontendsownedbychildrenHorseTrailer     (NFC)   5,000  2,000RidingandShowEquipment   (NFC)   4,000  Wifecontendsownedbychildren3ShihTzuDogs(NFC)7500     ___________$131,027󀀀_________$233,327 __________$157,727                @ DEBTS1991AutoLoan     (NFC)  $7,500   9,698CreditCards     (NFC)  3,300   11,820LoanfromMother    (NFC)   0 11,720BandlandHorns     232(PC)232󀀀__232(PC)___$10,032___232(PC)_$33,470        $130,795$223,295$124,257fX