ÿWPCG ŒU}æ6-•§°–w6”^,ˆøµ¸_J=¹GžŠšë&‘cAž1ÈâOuØáñS^íBú3‡Y¯ÀQfB~´H'©ñæšb°]Ì»ÂÂüÿÓHšüÍZûªŸÌú¹5gQ-‹x ÿxF{Nƒ 9?º„Ùe·ŸpŠt"¯Eš2¬+þ8ü?S2.Ñèœû\[¹=i+üÁ=-wQn¢?S@Ee«¡OÍЙý€}g¯±yÞ¥L@™ËÖ­—÷ì-ÿ5wÄRòÇ7Sd #ðîx²O_»lÇ*‹a±Š©´ zŸ¤ ¼ò¨a{ñ9ˆ6—vQóM²øIe½Ù ÏD×4¾”z§îÕ%Ϥæ¼ÝùÆÌÀõOÓ6Ã4&¢JLY¹^+ 06‡^¹®¶¤GdÔ°´X,á­Tn†e]ôxªd÷j‘c•_U;a“L®†—,-­R̳-3 ƒo *ëóMÚ‡.ã*>c–ñÁ\+?(¨sÐúÛ²›B• §ûy‰4I­ƒÔž|?Ç™£=úüùçZµi`gµj¸§åÓÐ{Vä#QÜ)KMá<<òŃޢ‰€H ü é=£Š˜§Á°2ҹ؄µø}Ÿ·$q¤&„ÿÊDœŒ‰—Ú Íο놕À…# F UFQ %— 0@ 4Ý ñ U: : w@B ‚ 0„” 0D \ \ U:{µU:ÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔ B D3+++ 0D^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ AO¢Æññ 0D· D/û B*˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLÐ<¾½Q 9Z ‹.Courier New RegularX(ù$¡¡Ó  ÓÓ  Ó¢RC&¡Ó 3|x <Ô6X9`+"Courier 10cpi  U E U E     Ó€  Ý ƒ DX$ÝÓ  ÓÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡ô"ôXXÔDefault€judgment€was€entered€against€Tina€Smith€and€she€is€not€involvedÐ ¸  Ðin€this€appeal.Ô#†X ÉXôô"[#Ô(4(2DX$¤¤Ý ƒù!ÝÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ô€Xè%XXXÔÔ€îÞÁîXXè%ÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€`›îîÞÁÔÐ  ÐÌò òApril€16,€1999Ð ¶¶ ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ô¸¶ô`›ÔAppellate€CourtÐ –– ÐClerkó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ô€Xè%XXXÔÔ€îÞÁîXXè%ÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€`›îîÞÁÔÐ  ÐÌò òApril€15,€1999Ð ¶¶ ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ô¸¶ô`›ÔAppellate€CourtÐ –– ÐClerkó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d'ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒù!ÝÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  Ýñ ñ›ñ ññ ññ ñÝ ƒùÿÝÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝѸ °ÑÑܰÑÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÑ7€ ÉXXdÖXXdÖ7ÑÔ€X'ÔXXXÔñ ññ ñßr€*<,(j 8 `€€@E¼  tt0"H¸ ¨Örßñ ññ ññ ñßr€*<,(j 8 `€€@E¼  tt0"H¸ ¨Örßñ ññ ñ›ñ ñà@ˆˆìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSˆÌÓ  ÓAT€KNOXVILLEÌÓ’ÓÌÌÌÌÌÌÓ'°8X°` ˜X°œX'ÓœALVIN€McNAIR,€€€€€€€€€€€€à À à)›à  àœKNOX€CHANCERY›Ð ø@ ÐÓ+ °œX°8X°` ˜XÁ+Óœ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€›€€€€€)à  àC.A.€œNO.€03A01„9804„CH„00122›Ð À  М€€€€€€€€€›€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€œDefendant„Appellant,€€)›à  àÐ P˜  Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€œ)à  àHON.€FREDERICK€D.€McDONALD›Ð ¨ð  Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€œ)€€€€CHANCELLOR›Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€œ)à  àÐ 8€  ÐCARLTON€E.€SMITH,€€€›€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€œ)à  à›Ð È Ѐ€€€€€€€€œPlaintiff„Appellee.€€)à  àVACATED€AND€REMANDED›Ð Ø Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àœ)€€€€€€€€€€€€›Ìà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àœ)€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€›ÌœÌÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€›ÌœÌCARLTON€E.€SMITH,€Whiteville,€Pro€Se€Appellant.ÌÌÌGARY€M.€KIRK,€Knoxville,€for€Appellee.ÌÌÌÌÌÌòòÓ  ÓO€P€I€N€I€O€NóóÐ 'X# ÐÓ  ÓÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àà  àMcMurray,€J.›ÌœÌÌ›ÌÌœÓÓà  àIn€this€action,€defendant€Carlton€Smith€appeals€the€trialÏcourt's€decision€to€deny€his€motion€to€set€aside€a€default€judgmentÏwhich€had€been€entered€against€him,€which€he€filed€under€Rule€60.02Ïof€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Civil€Procedure.€€In€his€motion,€SmithÏalleges€that€he€was€never€served€with€valid€service€of€process€andÏthus€was€not€given€notice€of€the€action€against€him€which€had€beenÏfiled€by€the€plaintiff,€Alvin€McNair.€€We€vacate€the€trial€court'sÏjudgment€and€remand€the€case€for€a€trial€on€the€merits.€€Ìâ âÐ 9P-:Ç Ðà  àThis€action€began€on€September€19,€1988,€when€McNair€filed€aÏâ âpetition€for€declaratory€judgment,€which€alleged€as€follows:ÌÓÓÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€Defendants,€Carlaton€[sic]€Smith€andÏTina€Smith׃ ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×,€are€the€sole€heirs€at€law€of€SarahÐ h° ÐJean€Turner,€deceased.€€Sarah€Jean€Turner€diedÏintestate€in€Knox€County,€Tennessee€on€JulyÏ29,€1988.Ð ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àIn€1972€the€deceased,€Sarah€Jean€Turner,Ïpurchased€a€house€and€lot€at€3407€McPhersonÏStreet,€Knoxville,€Tennessee.€Ð ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àOn€or€about€November€12,€1975€the€Peti…¼tioner,€Alvin€McNair,€took€up€residence€withÏthe€deceased,€Sarah€Jean€Turner,€and€these€twoÏparties€lived€together€until€the€death€ofÏSarah€Jean€Turner€on€July€29,€1988.Ð ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àDuring€the€period€of€time€from€NovemberÏ12,€1975€and€up€through€the€present€time€theÏPetitioner€has€made€a€large€portion€of€theÏpayments€on€the€first€mortgage€on€the€realÏproperty€owned€by€Sarah€Jean€Turner€at€3407ÏMcPherson€Street.€.€.during€the€last€five€toÏsix€years€your€Petitioner€made€all€of€theÏpayments€on€the€aforesaid€mortgage.Ð ` x` x ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  à*à h àà À à*à  àà p à*Ð (#p ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àPlaintiff€would€aver€that€a€constructiveÏtrust€should€be€established€to€protect€hisÏinterest€in€the€real€property€at€3407ÏMcPherson€Street.€.€.and€the€amount€of€hisÏinterest€should€be€determined€by€this€Court.€¼à ¸ àÐ ` x` x ÐÌÓÓà  àNo€certificate€of€service€was€attached€to€McNair's€PetitionÏfor€Declaratory€Judgment.€€ÌÌà  àThe€next€pleading€in€the€record€is€McNair's€motion€for€defaultÏjudgment,€which€alleges€that€Smith€"w[as]€duly€served€with€a€copyÏof€the€summons€and€complaint€in€this€action€on€September€22,€1988."€ÏThe€certificate€of€service€attached€to€this€motion€states€that€aÏcopy€of€the€motion€was€served€upon€Smith€at€3407€McPherson€Street,Ð  5h)5 ÐKnoxville,€Tennessee.€€The€trial€court€granted€McNair€a€defaultÏjudgment€against€Smith€on€January€20,€1989.ÌÌà  àThe€petition€for€declaratory€judgment€was€heard€on€February€3,Ï1989,€whereupon€the€court€ordered€as€follows:ÌÓÓÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à.€.€.the€Court€was€of€the€opinion€that€it€wasÏproper€that€a€constructive€trust€be€estab…¼lished€on€a€certain€parcel€of€property€at€3407ÏMcPherson€Street,€Knoxville,€Knox€County,ÏTennessee€to€protect€the€interest€of€AlvinÏMcNair€as€it€may€appear€in€said€property[,]Ïsaid€interest€being€in€the€amount€of€FifteenÏThousand€Dollars€($15,000.00)€plus€paymentsÏmade€after€the€entry€of€this€judgment.Ð ` x` x ÐÌÌÓÓ›à  àOn€August€10,€1989,€McNair€filed€a€"motion€for€judicial€saleÏto€satisfy€judgment"€in€which€he€alleged€that€he€"continues€to€makeÏpayments€on€the€property€and€no€efforts€have€been€made€by€theÏdefendants€herein€to€sell€the€property€and€to€satisfy€the€lienÏthereon€in€favor€of€your€plaintiff€herein."€€On€November€28,€1989,Ïafter€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€ordered€that€the€property€at€3407ÏMcPherson€Street€be€sold.ÌÌà  àThe€property€was€sold€at€public€sale€on€January€4,€1990.€ÏMcNair€made€the€highest€bid€at€the€sale,€a€bid€of€nine€hundredÏdollars€($900.00),€and€the€property€was€sold€to€him€at€that€price.€ÏAn€order€confirming€the€sale€was€entered€by€the€Knox€CountyÏChancery€Court€on€January€10,€1990.ÌÌà  àThe€next€pleading€in€the€record€is€Smith's€Rule€60.02€motionÏto€set€aside€the€default€judgment,€filed€January€26,€1998,€whichÏstates€in€relevant€part€as€follows:ÌÓÓÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à1.€I€Carlton€E.€Smith€was€and€have€been€keptÏignorant€to€any€suit€being€taken€against€meÐ 9P-: Ðdue€to€the€false€and€fraudulent€summons€thatÏwas€suppose[d]€to€have€been€served€upon€me€onÏSept.€22nd€of€1988.€€The€courts€was€[sic]Ïgiven€false€information€by€the€plaintiff€andÏthrough€counsel€for€the€plaintiff,€of€my€trueÏwhereabouts.€€2.€At€the€time€of€the€service€ofÏthe€summons,€I€Carlton€E.€Smith€was€incarcer…¼ated€at€Morgan€County€Corrections,€and€couldÏnot€have€been€served€with€a€summons€at€theÏaddress€that's€on€the€summons.€€To€[have]Ïserved€a€summons€on€me,€the€Deputy€SheriffÏwould€have€had€to€come€to€Wartburg,€Tn.€€3.€IÏCarlton€E.€Smith€could€not€have€responded€toÏany€default€judgement€against€me€in€a€timelyÏmatter€[sic]€because€I€had€no€knowledge€thatÏone€was€against€me,€nor€that€any€civil€mattersÏexisted.€€I€didn't€become€aware€of€the€situa…¼tion€til€[sic]€my€release€from€prison€yearsÏlater.€€4.€The€invalid€summons€is€what€led€toÏthe€default€judgement€being€taken€against€me.€Ð ` x` x ÐÌÌÓÓà  àOn€March€11,€1998,€the€trial€court€made€the€following€writtenÏorder:ÌÓÓÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àThis€cause€came€before€this€court€on€March€6,Ï1998€upon€the€Motion€to€Set€Aside€a€DefaultÏJudgment€and€a€Motion€for€a€Continuance€filedÏheretofore€by€the€Defendant,€the€appearance€byÏthe€Plaintiff,€argument€by€counsel€for€theÏPlaintiff,€and€upon€the€record€as€a€whole€fromÏall€of€which€the€court€finds€that€the€MotionÏfor€a€Continuance€should€not€be€granted€due€toÏa€failure€of€grounds€upon€which€the€Motion€toÏSet€Aside€a€Default€Judgment€should€beÏgranted.€€The€latter€results€from€the€factÏthat€the€court€could€find€no€fault€with€theÏoriginal€service€of€process€upon€the€defendantÏand€because€TRCP€requires€that€such€Motions€asÏis€[sic]€being€sought€here€be€brought€within€aÏreasonable€time€and€10€years€far€exceeds€theÏbounds€of€reasonableness.€It€is,€thereforeÐ ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àORDERED€that€the€Motions€of€the€DefendantÏshall€be€and€hereby€are€dismissed€with€preju…¼dice€against€refiling€same.Ð ` x` x ÐÌÌÓÓIt€thus€appears€from€this€order€that€the€Chancery€Court€dismissedÏSmith's€motion€after€what€amounted€to€an€òòex€parteóó€hearing,€withoutÐ X4 (4 Ðproviding€Smith,€a€pro€se€litigant,€a€chance€to€be€heard€or€presentÏevidence€supporting€his€position.ÌÐ 9P-: Ðà  àTennessee€Rule€of€Civil€Procedure€60.02€provides€the€followingÏin€relevant€œpart:ÌÌÓÓà8  àà8` Ð Ð àOn€motion€and€upon€such€terms€as€are€just,€theÏcourt€may€relieve€a€party€or€the€party's€legalÏrepresentative€from€a€final€judgment,€order€orÏproceeding€for€the€following€reasons:€(1)Ïmistake,€inadvertence,€surprise€or€excusableÏneglect;€(2)€fraud€(whether€heretoforeÏdenominated€intrinsic€or€extrinsic),Ïmisreprentation,€or€other€misconduct€of€anÏadverse€party;€(3)€the€judgment€is€void;€.€.€.Ï.€.or€(5)€any€other€reason€satisfying€reliefÏfrom€the€operation€of€the€judgment.€€TheÏmotion€shall€be€made€within€a€reasonable€time,Ïand€for€reasons€(1)€and€(2)€not€more€than€oneÏyear€after€the€judgment,€order€or€proceedingÏwas€entered€or€taken.Ð ` x` x Л̛̜ÌÓÓà  àGenerally,€when€presented€with€a€party's€motion€to€reopen€aÏfinal€judgment€under€Rule€60.02,€the€courts€have€applied€the€ruleÏthat€"[t]he€principle€of€finality€is€firmly€embedded€in€theÏprocedural€rules€and,€therefore,€Rule€60.02€is€an€"escape€valve"Ïthat€should€not€be€easily€opened."€€òòNCNB€National€Bank€of€NorthÐ ¸$  ÐCarolina€v.€Thrailkillóó,€856€S.W.2d€150,€153€(Tenn.App.€1993).€€OurÐ H&" Ðcourts€have€also€noted€that€"Tennessee€Rule€of€Civil€ProcedureÏ60.02(5)€is€intended€to€provide€relief€only€in€the€most€unique,Ïexceptional,€or€extraordinary€situations."€€òòId.óó€at€154.€€Ð ø*@( ÐÌà  àThe€courts€have€applied€these€general€rules€much€lessÏstrictly,€however,€when€the€judgment€sought€to€be€reopened€is€aÏdefault€judgment,€and€when€the€defaulting€party€can€demonstrateÏthat€his€or€her€failure€to€appear€was€reasonably€excusable.€€TheÏSupreme€Court€noted€this€distinction€in€the€case€of€òòTennessee€Dept.Ð X4 (4 Ðof€Human€Services€v.€Barbeeóó,€689€S.W.2d€863,€867€(Tenn.€1985),Ð è50*6 Ðstating€that€"courts€often€apply€a€different€standard€when€facedÏwith€a€Rule€60€motion€in€regard€to€a€default€judgment.€.€.Rule€60Ð 9P-: Ðis€construed€with€liberality€to€afford€relief€from€a€defaultÏjudgment."€€òòId.óó€€In€òòKeck€v.€Nationwide€Systems,€Inc.óó,€499€S.W.2dÐ H  Ð266,€267€(Tenn.App.€1973),€this€court€noted:ÌÌÓÓà8  àà8` Ð Ð àOne€can€find€numerous€decisions€where€theÏcourts€make€it€clear€they€are€anxious€to€seeÏcases€determined€on€the€merits€whenever€suchÏis€possible.€€It€seems€to€be€a€universal€ruleÏthat€when€there€is€a€reasonable€doubt€as€toÏwhether€a€default€judgment€should€be€set€asideÏupon€proper€application,€the€court€shouldÏexercise€its€discretion€in€favor€of€grantingÏthe€application€so€as€to€permit€a€determina…¼tion€of€the€cause€upon€the€merits.€Ð ` x` x ÐÓ ,ÓÌœòòId.óó;›€òòaccordóó€òòTennessee€State€Bank€v.€Layóó,€609€S.W.2d€525,€527Ð X  Ð(Tenn.App.€1980),€òòNelson€v.€Simpsonóó,€826€S.W.2d€483,€485„87Ð è0 Ð(Tenn.App.€1991).€€The€primary€reason€for€this€principle€is€thatÏ"the€law€delights€in€giving€to€every€[person]€a€day€in€court€toÏmake€his€defense."€òòKeckóó,€499€S.W.2d€at€268,€òòcitingóó€òòRoberts€v.Ð ˜!à ÐStewartóó,€9€Tenn.€390,€œñ÷ñ392€(1830).ñ÷ñ›Ð (#p ÐÌà  àIn€the€present€case,€œthe€summons€allegedly€served€upon€SmithÏis€notñîññíñ€in€the€reñíññîññïñ€contained€in€the€record€before€us.ñïññðññïñ€ñïññðññññ€ñññ›€As€noted€above,€theÏmotions€in€the€record€filed€œsubsequentñøñlyñøñ›€to€the€initial€petitionÏinclude€certificates€of€service€certifying€that€copies€of€theÏmotions€were€served€œñùñonñùññúñtoñúñ›€Carlton€Smith€at€3407€McPherson€Street.€€InÏhis€motion€to€set€aside€the€judgment,€Smith€alleges€that€McNairÏprovided€this€address€to€the€deputy€sheriff€responsible€for€servingÏthe€summons€on€Smith,€knowing€that€the€address€was€incorrect€andÏthat€Smith€resided€elsewhere.€€It€is€interesting€to€note€that€theÏaddress€in€the€subsequent€certificates€of€service,€3407€McPherson,Ïwas€the€same€address€at€which€McNair€was€residing.€€Ìâ âÐ x7À+8 Ðà  àThe€Western€Section€of€this€court,€when€faced€with€circum…¼â âstances€remarkably€similar€to€those€of€this€case,€stated:ÌÓÓÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àIt€is€our€view€that€a€judgment,€obtained€uponÏa€false€return€made€by€the€sheriff€whether€theÏreturn€was€made€in€good€faith€or€not,€operatesÏas€a€fraud€upon€the€Court€when€the€CourtÏenters€a€judgment€based€on€the€return€with€noÏknowledge€of€such€lawsuit€on€the€part€of€theÏparty€against€whom€the€judgment€is€rendered.€ÏNo€[court]€would€knowingly€enter€such€a€judg…¼ment€as€it€deprives€a€party€of€the€fundamentalÏconstitutional€right€of€due€process.€TennesseeÏConstitution€Article€œ1,ñôñ€ñôññúñ›ñúññõñ€ñõññõñ›ñõññòñsñòññôñ›ñôññóñððñóñ›€8;€United€StatesÏConstitution,€Amendment€V.Ð ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àTherefore,€this€case€was€not€subject€to€dis…¼missal€for€failure€to€comply€with€Rule€60€asÏfound€by€the€Chancellor.Ð ` x` x ÐÌÌÓÓòòHawley€v.€Lavelleóó,€602€S.W.2d€499,€502€(Tenn.App.€1980).Ð °ø ÐÌà  àIt€is€axiomatic€that€"[a]€fundamental€requirement€of€dueÏprocess€is€notice€and€an€opportunity€to€be€heard."€òòPhillips€v.Ð `"¨ ÐState€Bd.€of€Regentsóó,€863€S.W.2d€45,€50€(Tenn.€1993);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòInÐ ð#8 Ðre€Riggsóó,€612€S.W.2d€461,€465€(Tenn.App.€1980)€("In€litigationÐ €%È! Ðbetween€private€parties€over€private€rights,€it€is€well„settledÏthat€due€process€of€laws€requires€that€both€notice€and€an€opportu…¼nity€to€be€heard€be€given€to€necessary€parties€as€to€the€essentialsÏof€a€judicial€proceeding.");€òòRedd€v.€Tennessee€Dept.€of€Safetyóó,€895Ð À+ ) ÐS.W.2d€332,€335€(Tenn.€1995).€€In€this€case,€Smith€alleges€he€wasÏpurposefully€deprived€of€notice€of€the€proceeding€against€him.€€HeÏwas€certainly€deprived€of€an€opportunity€to€be€heard,€and€toÏpresent€supporting€evidence,€when€the€Chancery€Court€dismissed€hisÏmotion€without€his€presence€in€the€courtroom.€€Under€theseÏcircumstances,€we€are€of€the€opinion€that€the€merits€of€the€caseÏshould€be€reopened,€and€œshould€receive›€a€full€and€fair€examination.€ÏSmith's€constitutional€right€to€due€process€requires€as€much.Ð @8ˆ,9 Їà  àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€vacated€in€its€entirety€andÏthe€case€is€remanded€for€a€full€consideration€of€the€merits.€€CostsÏon€appeal€are€assessed€to€the€appellee.̛̜œÌ›œà@,,"ìà›œò òPER€CURIUM€ORDERó óˆÐ ˆÐ  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€foregoing€opinion,€prepared€by€Judge€Don€T.€McMurray,Ïlate€member€of€the€Court€and€now€deceased,€is€now€approved€andÏadopted€as€the€opinion€of€the€Court.ÌÌÓÓÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à________________________ñ ññ ñ________ñ ññ ññ ñ__ñ ñÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àñ ñHouston€M.€Goddard,€P.J.ñ ñ›œñ ñÌñ ñ›œñ ñÌñ ñ›œñ ñÌñ ñ›œñ ñÌñ ñ›œñ ñà  àñ ñ›œñ ñà ` àñ ñ›œñ ñà ¸ àñ ñ›œñ ñà  àñ ñ›œñ ñà h àñ ñ›œñ ñà À àñ ñ›œñ ñ________________________ñ ññ ññ ñ____ñ ññ ññ ññ ññ ñ__ñ ññ ñÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àñ ññ ññ ñà  àñ ññ ññ ñCharles€D.€Susano,€Jr.,€J.ñ ñ›Ìœ›œñ ñà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àœ___________________________›Ìà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àDon€T.€McMurray,€JudgeÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌHouston€M.€Goddard,€Presiding€JudgeÌÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌCharles€D.€Susano,€Jr.,€JudgeÌÌñ ñ›