ÿWPCÓ  ÅJƒEÔ1+­îë|cøé‹I‹†_Þ_;;mƒf×…lñ¸é¾XÑrú@¡ÔêÿÂüÔV!H 0#dÞC'„”:¹xz×m(£GVÙÏ,øÈšùE³%—_$…)…è¦ÇÒ¤;éÖc"çîB̦¡nûÁùN=«‹wüG{ ‰O5`®›ßvwµ+îed¢èÿH•Úù!0€ÚS„Q ¦»œKé±VËÕ6段 €ÔdÔâ9d‡ ¢‡ðöXG˜Mè£@y5°AÜå6ÄÈú;Áöiï&O£ÞZAÃEæâþ+tOÙC$Œõ²Ç ˆÓ|#¼CÄ¡ì†QJå€=áõUòÌO•EI“—^žl¬”r;VsÎ’ÆsGúH³oÞzðåqh—ÂjvÃ`HøµâoÏé?´\^ÎENF8V%y€Qcp‚Ö7«„Wnb éô º£>ׂ^’Òbe¥â «É…€Oïw«\œièØõÅAV¶¦“ª‡@8*Ýñ÷p»ò‹xë±bA 4Qš*dÇcáÝÊl&¬B”§ª7tNY!é‚i0#)4”@]‘z=Çêó™ª(»TëÛ{—ª×™dlÿ`f!i2- ¶ý¦ëu€X[ƒ2ô P0*# LU NW %¥ 0(«w@Ó4'Œ6 0l 0D.UNrÀÈUNÌU:                BT AQq ÆÂ 0Dˆ 0DÌ 0D  D/T T Bƒ D3  ˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLlÎ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ ÕÖDרDÙÚÛEÜÝÓ€ç©yË&3|xç ‚Ý ƒ üÝ$Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝDeborah€Kay€Thompson€was€formerly€known€as€Deborah€Kay€Miceli.€((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular úÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€Xè%XXXÔÔ€‡.XXè%ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€Xè%X‡.ÔÐ  ÐÌAugust€17,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d!"#$&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝñÝñ›ñÝñÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ  Ñò òÔ‡ XŒQXXXÔÑ7€ü¡XXdðXXdð7ÑÓ  ÓñçññÝñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@Eȱ` 8ttxP°ð  rßñÝññçññçññçññÝñ›ñÝñà@ ìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEó óˆÐ ° Ðò òñçñœßt€ )>.*jxêÿ<` `€€@E²Ø` 8ttxPêœð < tß›ñçñà@úú$ìàAT€NASHVILLEˆÐ œì Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌóóÌELEANOR€MICELI,à  à€à h àà À à)Ð L œ Ðó óà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àò ò)ó óÐ 8 ˆ Ðà  àPlaintiff/Appellant,€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ò ò€€à À à)ó óà  àSumner€Chancery€No.€97C„229Ð $ t Ðò òà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)ó óà  àà p àÐ  d Ðò òv.à  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à€Ð  P  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àó óAppeal€No.€01A01„9807„CH„00400ò òÐ ì <  ÐDEBORAH€KAY€THOMPSON,€à h àà À à)€Ð Ü,  ÐCHARLES€R€BURNETT,€and€wifeà À à)à  àÐ È  ÐMEREDYTH€G.€BURNETT,à h àà À à)Ð ´  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ìà  àó óDefendants/Appellees.à h àò òà À à)Ð ŒÜ  ÐÌÌÌà@¯¯ìàó óAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€SUMNER€COUNTYˆÐ @ Ðà@ùùìàAT€GALLATIN,€TENNESSEEˆÌÌÌà@D D ìàTHE€HONORABLE€TOM€E.€GRAY,€CHANCELLORˆÌòòÌÌFor€the€Plaintiff/Appellantóó:òòà  àà h àà À àFor€the€Defendants/AppelleesÔ#†Xü¡XX XŒQ‰#ÔÔ‡ XŒQXXXü¡Ôóó:à x àà Ð àòòÐ ´ ÐÌóóVance€Cramb,€Jr.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à h à€€€€€€€€€€€€William€Timothy€Hill€€Ð ŒÜ ÐNashville,€Tennessee€€€à  àà h àà À à€Nashville,€Tennessee€Ð xÈ ÐÌÌÌò òÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAFFIRMEDÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àó óHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€J.Ð Ø&("% Ðà  àÌÌÌCONCURS:ÌòòÌóóW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,€P.J.,€W.S.Ð `,°'+ ÐÌALAN€E.€HIGHERS,€J.Ô#†Xü¡XX XŒQ‰ #ÔòòÐ  8.ˆ)- ÐØØÑ7€ü¡XXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  Ñà@55'ìàò òóóOPINIONòòó óˆÐ ° ÐóóÌÓÓà  àThis€case€involves€the€enforcement€of€a€judgment€lien.€€The€trial€court€held€that€the€judgmentÏlien€had€expired€because€the€judgment€creditor€failed€to€enforce€the€lien€within€the€three€year€periodÏset€out€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€25„5„105.€€We€affirm.Ìà  àOn€March€4,€1994,€Plaintiff/Appellant€Eleanor€Miceli€(ð ðMiceliðð)€obtained€a€judgment€againstÏDefendant/Appellee€Deborah€Kay€Thompson€(ð ðThompsonðð)€in€the€Chancery€Court€of€DavidsonÏCounty,€Tennessee,€in€the€amount€of€$18,000.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€On€March€23,€1995,€an€order€was€entered€allowingÐ ð@  Ðthe€judgment€to€be€paid€by€installments.€€At€the€time€of€the€judgment,€Thompson€and€her€husbandÏThomas€Thompson€owned€real€property€located€at€1096€Jenkins€Lane,€Hendersonville,€Tennessee,Ï(ð ðthe€Propertyðð)€as€tenants€by€the€entirety.€€On€March€8,€1996,€Deborah€Kay€Thompson€and€ThomasÏThompson€were€divorced.Ìà  àAfter€the€Thompsons€were€divorced,€on€March€27,€1996,€Miceli€recorded€a€judgment€lienÏagainst€the€Property.€€Deborah€Kay€Thompson€and€Thomas€Thompson€subsequently€conveyed€theirÏinterest€in€the€Property€to€Defendants/Appellees€Charles€and€Meredyth€Burnett€(ð ðthe€Burnettsðð)€byÏwarranty€deed€on€May€9,€1996.Ìà  àApproximately€one€year€later,€on€May€7,€1997,€Thompson€filed€another€motion€to€pay€theÏjudgment€by€installments.€€On€May€8,€1997,€the€trial€court€stayed€garnishment€for€sixty€days€fromÏthe€date€of€its€order.€€On€June€23,€1997,€Miceli€attempted€to€execute€on€Thompsonððs€personalÏproperty€in€order€to€satisfy€the€judgment.€€The€execution/levy€was€returned€ð ðNulla€Bonaðð€on€JulyÏ1,€1997.€€On€July€31,€1997,€Miceli€filed€a€complaint€to€enforce€the€judgment€œlien.€€The›€Burnetts€filedÏan€answer€and€a€cross„claim€against€Deborah€Kay€Thompson€and€a€third€party€complaint€againstÏThomas€Thompson€for€breach€of€warranty€in€the€conveyance€of€the€Property.€€Miceli€filed€a€motionÏfor€default€judgment€against€Deborah€Kay€Thompson;€the€motion€was€granted€on€March€18,€1998.Ìà  àThe€Burnetts€filed€a€motion€for€summary€judgment.€€In€the€motion,€the€Burnetts€argued€thatÏthe€judgment€lien€had€expired€because€Miceli€failed€to€execute€the€lien€within€the€three„year€periodÏset€out€by€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€25„5„105.€€The€Burnetts€noted€œthat›€the€judgment€was€enteredÏon€March€4,€œ1994,›€and€the€complaint€seeking€to€enforce€the€judgment€lien€was€filed€on€July€31,Ï1997,€well€beyond€the€statutory€period.€€In€response,€Miceli€argued€that€the€statutory€period€shouldÏbe€extended€because€the€trial€court€granted€several€motions€to€stay€execution€on€ThompsonððsÐ 09€48 Ðpersonal€property.€€Miceli€œnoted›€that€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€26„3„101€requires€that€theÏplaintiff€first€execute€on€goods€and€chattels€of€the€defendant,€and€if€the€amount€recovered€isÏinsufficient€to€pay€the€debt,€plaintiff€may€then€execute€on€the€defendantððs€real€property.€€MiceliÏargued€that€the€trial€court€stayed€execution€on€personal€property,€which€prevented€Miceli€fromÏexecuting€on€the€real€property.€€Miceli€also€noted€that€a€judgment€lien€attaches€to€œafter„acquired›Ïproperty€of€the€debtor,€and€asserted€that€Thompson€in€effect€acquired€a€ð ðnewðð€interest€in€the€PropertyÏwhen€the€divorce€decree€was€entered€on€March€12,€1996.Ìà  àThe€trial€court€œgranted€the€Burnettsðð€motion€for€summary€judgment:›ÌÒ°ÒÒ°ÒÓÓà ` à[T]hat€œa›€judgment€for€which€Eleanor€Miceli€seeks€enforcement€in€this€suitÏwas€rendered€on€March€4,€1994.€€The€abstract€of€judgment€obtained€by€Miceli€wasÏrecorded€on€March€27,€1996€.€.€.€.€€Thomas€E.€Thompson,€et€ux,€Deborah€KayÏThompson€executed€and€conveyed€certain€real€property€in€Sumner€County€to€CharlesÏR.€Burnett€et€ux,€Meredyth€Burnett€by€Warranty€Deed€.€.€.€on€May€9,€1996.€€ThisÏaction€to€enforce€the€judgment€lien€as€to€real€property€was€commenced€on€July€31,Ï1997.Ìà ` àT.C.A.€25„5„105€states€that€a€lien€given€by€that€chapter€will€be€lost,€unless€anÏexecution€is€taken€out€within€three€(3)€years€commencing€with€the€date€of€entry€ofÏthe€judgment.€€Levy€on€personal€property€was€issued€on€June€23,€1997.€€ExecutionÏwas€taken€out€more€than€three€years€after€the€rendition€of€the€judgment.€€This€actionÏwas€commenced€after€the€time€period€as€prescribed€by€T.C.A.€25„5„104€and€T.C.A.Ï25„5„105€and€the€lien€expired.Ìà ` àPlaintiff€asserts€that€the€injunctive€powers€granted€pursuant€to€T.C.A.€26„2„¼216€are€equal€in€effect€to€an€extension€of€time€for€execution€for€other€adverseÏproceedings€provided€in€T.C.A.€25„5„106.€€The€injunctive€powers€and€extension€ofÏtime€for€execution€for€other€adverse€œproceedings›€was€a€provision€which€was€deletedÏby€the€legislature€in€1986.€€T.C.A.€25„5„106€provides€that€the€time€for€sale€in€sectionÏ25„5„105€shall€commence€upon€the€final€determination€of€such€case€if€an€appeal€isÏtaken.€€T.C.A.€25„5„106€as€amended€in€1986€does€not€provide€for€extension€of€timeÏon€injunctions€or€other€adverse€proceedings€as€previously€enacted.Ìà ` àPlaintiff€next€submits€that€the€judgment€lien€attached€to€after€acquired€interestÏin€land€and€continued€for€the€period€of€three€years€from€the€time€that€title€wasÏacquired€by€judgment€debtor.€€While€the€Debtors€divorce€decree€may€have€œdividedÏ[sic]›€certain€actions€to€take€place€with€respect€to€title,€the€deed€as€filed€by€the€partiesÏand€before€this€Court€.€.€.€does€not€reflect€any€conveyance€to€a€judgment€debtor,€butÏrather€was€executed€by€both€Thomas€E.€Thompson€and€Deborah€Kay€Thompson€toÏpresent€owners€and€defendants,€Charles€R.€Burnett€and€wife,€Meredyth€G.€Burnett.€ÏThe€doctrine€of€after€acquired€property€does€not€apply€so€as€to€defeat€defendantððsÏMotion€for€Summary€Judgment.Ìà ` àThe€plaintiff€submitted€several€documents€in€asserting€admissions€andÏwaivers.€€These€items€are€presented€to€the€Court€absent€an€affidavit€and€are€not€a€partÏof€certified€documents€from€the€Court.€€The€defendants€make€objection€that€theseÏitems€are€not€properly€filed€under€Rule€56€of€the€Rules€of€Civil€Procedure.€€TheÏCourt€does€not€œconsider€these€items›œñÚñ,€but€nonetheless,€these€ñÚññÛññÚñtñÚññÛññÜñitems€are€consideredñÜñ›€asÏrelevant€nor€material€facts.Ìà ` àThe€Court€finds€that€there€is€no€genuine€issue€as€to€any€material€fact€in€thisÏcause,€and€Charles€R.€Burnett€and€wife,€Meredyth€G.€Burnett€are€entitled€to€judgmentÏas€a€matter€of€law.ÌÌÒ°ÒÒ°ÒÓÓFrom€this€order,€Miceli€now€appeals.Ð 09€48 Ðà  àÔ‡XlÇXXXlÇÔA€motion€for€summary€judgment€should€be€granted€when€the€movant€demonstrates€that€thereÐ ° Ðare€no€genuine€issues€of€material€fact€and€that€the€moving€party€is€entitled€to€a€judgment€as€a€matterÏof€law.€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€56.04.€€In€this€case,€there€are€œno€disputed›€facts,€only€isses€of€law€which€ariseÏœfrom€the›€undisputed€facts.€€Since€only€questions€of€law€are€involved,€there€is€no€presumption€ofÏcorrectness€regarding€a€trial€court's€grant€of€summary€judgment.€€ò òòòBainó óóó,€936€S.W.2d€at€622.€Ð 0 € ÐTherefore,€our€review€of€the€trial€courtððs€grant€of€summary€judgment€is€òòde€novoóó€on€the€record€beforeÐ `  Ðthis€Court.€€ò òòòWarren€v.€Estate€of€Kirkó óóó,€954€S.W.2d€722,€723€(Tenn.€1997).Ð ð@  Ðà  àÔ#†XlÇXXXlÇ{%#ÔÔ‡XlÇXXXlÇÔTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€25„5„105€states€that€execution€on€a€judgment€lien€mustÐ Ð  Ðcommence€within€three€years€from€the€date€the€judgment€was€entered,€or€the€lien€will€be€lost.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€25„5„105€(Supp.€1998).€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€26„3„101€requires€execution€onÏpersonal€property€before€real€property:€ÌÒ°ÒÒ°ÒÓÓœExecutions›€shall€be€levied€on€the€goods€and€chattels€of€the€defendant,€in€the€firstÏinstance,€œiñÜñ›ñÜñf›€any€there€be;€but€if,€to€the€best€of€the€officerððs€knowledge,€there€be€noÏsuch€goods€and€chattels,€or€not€sufficient€to€answer€the€plaintiffððs€demands,€the€sameÏshall€be€executed€upon€the€lands€and€tenements.ÌÌÒ°[*ÒÒ°M*ÒÓi*ÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€Ô#†XlÇXXXlÇÓ(#Ôðð€26„3„101Ô‡XlÇXXXlÇÔ€(1980).€Ð P Ðà  àÔ#†XlÇXXXlÇ=,#ÔIn€this€case,€the€underlying€judgment€was€rendered€on€March€4,€1994.€€On€July€31,€1997,Ð à0 ÐMiceli€filed€a€complaint€to€enforce€the€judgment€lien.€€Miceli€argues€that€the€three€year€period€forÏthe€enforcement€of€the€judgment€lien€should€be€extended€because€the€trial€court€stayed€execution€onÏThompsonððs€personal€property,€and€precluding€execution€on€the€real€property.Ìà  àIn€ò òòòWeaver€v.€Hamrickóóó ó,€907€S.W.2d€385€(Tenn.€1995),€the€Tennessee€Supreme€CourtÐ `'°"% Ðaddressed€the€issue€of€whether€the€three€year€period€for€the€enforcement€œof€a›€judgment€œlien›€inÏTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€25„5„105€was€tolled€during€an€automatic€stay€in€bankruptcy,€whichÏprecluded€the€enforcement€of€the€lien.€€œThe›€òòò òWeaver€ó óóóCourt€noted€that€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ððÐ -P(+ Ð25„5„106€tolls€the€statute€only€during€the€appeal€of€the€underlying€judgment.€€òòò òWeaveróóó ó,€907€S.W.2dÐ à.0*- Ðat€390.€€The€Court€recognized€that€Ô‡XlÇXXXlÇÔSection€25„5„106€œonce›€provided€for€the€continuation€of€the€lienÐ À0,/ Ðð ð[i]f€.€.€.€prevented€by€injunction,€writ€of€error,€or€other€adverse€proceeding€in€court€.€.€.€.ðð€€ò òòòId.óóó ó€at€390Ð  2ð-1 Ð(citing€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€Ô#†XlÇXXXlÇ•0#Ôðð€25„5„106Ô‡XlÇXXXlÇÔ€(1980)).€€However,€the€statute€was€amended€to€delete€thisÐ €4Ð/3 Ðlanguage.€€The€ò òòòWeaveró óóó€Court€noted€ð ðthat€the€Tennessee€legislature€has€narrowed€the€situations€inÐ `6°15 Ðwhich€the€life€of€the€lien€may€be€extended.ðð€€œò òòòId.óóó ó€€Thus,€it€held€that€the€three€year€period€was€notÐ @837 Ðtolled€by€the€automatic€stay€in€bankruptcy.€€ò òòòId.ó óóó€at€ñÓñ390„91ñÓññÔñ________ñÔñ.›Ð  :p59 Ðà  àThe€reasoning€in€ò òòòWeaveró óóó€must€control€in€this€case.€€The€statutory€language€which€wouldÐ ° Ðsupport€Miceliððs€argument€was€specifically€deleted€by€amendment€of€the€statute.€€We€must€concludeÏœÔ#†XlÇXXXlÇæ1#ÔÔ‡XlÇXXXlÇÔthat›€the€three€year€period€to€enforce€the€judgment€lien€was€not€tolled€by€the€trial€courtððs€stays€ofÐ pÀ Ðexecution€in€this€case.€€ò òòòSee€ó óóóÔ#†XlÇXXXlÇå4#ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€25„5„106Ô‡XlÇXXXlÇÔ€(Supp.€1998).Ð P   Ðà  àMiceli€also€contends€on€appeal€that€the€three€year€period€Ô#†XlÇXXXlÇê5#Ôshould€commence€on€the€date€œtheÐ 0 € ÐThompsonsðð›€divorce€decree€was€entered.€€Miceli€argues€that€the€Property€was€œð ðafter„acquiredðð›Ïproperty€because€it€was€ð ðrevested,ðð€pursuant€to€the€language€of€the€divorce€decree,€as€a€tenancy€inÏcommon.€€The€trial€court€rejected€this€argument:ÌÒ°ÒÒ°ÒÓÓWhile€œtheñÕñ€DebtorsñÕññÖñ›€ñÖññ×ñ€ñ×ñdivorce›€decree€may€have€œdivided€ò òñØñ[?]ñØñó óñØñ›€ñØññÙñ[sic]€ñÙñcertain›€actions€to€take€placeÐ ° Ðwith€respect€to€title,€the€deed€.€.€.€òòdoes€not€reflect€any€conveyance€to€a€judgmentÐ  ð Ðdebtoróó,€but€rather€was€executed€by€both€Thomas€E.€Thompson€and€Deborah€KayÐ à ÐThompson€to€present€owners€and€defendants,€Charles€R.€Burnett€and€wife,€MeredythÏG.€Burnett.€€The€doctrine€of€after€acquired€property€does€not€apply€.€.€.€.€€ÌÌÒ°ÒÒ°ÒÓÓ(emphasis€added).€€We€agree€with€the€trial€courtððs€reasoning.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.Ìà  àThe€decision€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€Costs€are€taxed€to€the€Appellant,€for€whichÏexecution€may€issue,€if€necessary.€€€€€€€ÌÌÓÓÔ‡ X XXXlÇÔà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð Ð  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àò òóóHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€J.Ð ¼!  Ðó óà  àò òÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð X&¨!$ ÐóóW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,€P.€J.,€W.S.Ð D'”"% ÐÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ *X%( ÐALAN€E.€HIGHERS,€œJ.ó óÔ#†XlÇXX X P;#Ô›