WPC  65-z~WI7xoŜ>8h[gdA:X7r;Zŭ*3 3GMcڦq;I :\V6! w{PW'd@'\M=׀DRD9S~~.'N?ÏHJxV:]ʵ7]5 0Dơ-aؔ ${ΣD6HcZz.>y]q4%?yƽ]knL5r4@!YⷢG{Rg }|1YXh|ҏ唩q*H`瘿ڜZW _80?J$HTzk:m}9_NG]!* IhaoֆiXXbMUu*WV0a>ƀlw 1vo\V@:"Rp˺wkkkn@:} ֗r/Qcb2F2yBekA^Ϊ룵7#sڍ):Z*# LU:W % 0(b w@4 .6U:888888888888888888888 AQr 0D 0D 0D  D/U B B D3 HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh,  AZ"Arial RegularX($- - DDPDUӀy&3|x ""   XϔXXX X Xϔ   Ad FILED XϔX   July27,1999CecilCrowson,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAh ,cAZ"Arial Regular!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ((' dxd dP Pd'''''dxd !  TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7ϔXXdd7    &NXX  r )<,(j 8` `@E` 8ttxP,  r@  INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEEt )>.*jxD8` `@E8` 8ttxPp 8 tߛ@(ATNASHVILLE XϔX&NԈ ( ̜THESTATEOFTENNESSEE,exrel.,  )   THECITYOFLAFAYETTE, 8   ) j  TENNESSEE,     8   ) P   Amunicipalcorporation,   8   ) 6    0      8   ) Plaintiff/Appellant,   8   ) R    0      8   )  AppealNo. 8    0      8   )  01A019810CV00520   МVS.  0      8   )    0      8   )  MaconCircuit    0      8   )  No.3893  RONALDJ.MOWELL,LINDAJ.    ) @      H!  #  f  ̜MOWELLandDAVIDR.WILSON,  ) 2   0      8   ) Defendant/Appellee. 8   ) N @ APPEALEDFROMTHECIRCUITCOURTOFMACONCOUNTY@vv#ATLAFAYETTE,TENNESSEE@ THEHONORABLEBOBBYCAPERS,JUDGELISACOTHRONSTINNETT100W.LocustStreetLafayette,Tennessee37083 AttorneyforPlaintiff/AppellantB.KEITHWILLIAMS102EastMainStreetLebanon,Tennessee37087 AttorneyforDefendant/Appellee@$AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED  0      8     BENH.CANTRELL,  0      8     PRESIDINGJUDGE,M.S.CONCUR:KOCH,J.CAIN,J.  ";r6<9  |XXϔ@tt(OPINION XϔX|Ԉ    0 Inthiscondemnationcasetheonlyquestioniswhetherthereisanymaterialevidencetosupportthejurysverdict.Weaffirmthejudgmentbelow.@- I.      0 RonaldandLindaMowellownedahomeonaquietstreetinLafayette.InimprovingthestreetinfrontoftheMowellshome,theCityloweredit,straighteneditout,andconvertedaquietstreetintoanindustrialaccessroad.TheCitytook0.149acresoftheMowellsproperty.TheMowellshouseisnowelevatedfromthestreet,withasteeperdriveway,andabanknexttotheroadandalongthedrivewaythatcannotbemowedbecauseofitssteepness.  0 Mr.andMrs.Mowelltestifiedthatthevalueoftheirpropertyafterthecompletionoftheprojectwas$30,000lessthanitwasbeforethetaking.TheCitycalledanappraiserwhotestifiedthattheMowellsdamageamountedto$9,000.TheϜMowellsalsocalledanappraiserwhogavehisopinionthattheyhadbeendamagedintheamountof$13,850.Thejuryreturnedaverdictfor$20,000.@- II.  )$(   0 TheCityarguesonappealthattheMowellstestimonywasincompetentandthattheupperlimitoftherangeofreasonablenesswas$13,850.TheargumentisbasedonthefactthattheMowellsgavetheiropiniononvaluesasofthedateofthetrialratherthanonthevaluesasofthedateofthetaking.SeeLovev.Smith,566 2.2 S.W.2d876(Tenn.1978).  0 Apropertyowneriscompetenttotestifytothevalueofhis/herownproperty.Rule701(b),Tenn.R.Evid.WethinktheCityoverstateswhattherecord 945: showswithrespecttotheinadequacyoftheMowellstestimony,butitisclearϜnonethelessthattheevidencecameinwithoutobjection.Absentextraordinarycircumstances,atrialjudgecannotbereversedfortheadmissionofinadmissibleevidenceunless atimelyobjectionormotiontostrikeappearsofrecord,statingthespecificgroundofobjection.Rule103(a)(1),Tenn.R.Evid.;InreEstateof @  Armstrong,859S.W.2d323,328(Tenn.App.1993).     0 AcompanionruletoRule103(a)(1),Tenn.R.Evid.,isRule36(a),Tenn.R.App.Proc.,whichprovidesthatreliefisnotgenerallyavailableintheappellatecourtstoapartywhofailedtotakewhateveractionwasreasonablyavailabletopreventornullifytheharmfuleffectofanerror.Thisrulefollowsalonglineofcasesholdingthatthefailuretoobjecttotheadmissionofevidenceinthetrialcourtisfataltothechancetoassigntheadmissionofthatevidenceaserrorintheappellatecourt.Andersonv.State,341S.W.2d385(Tenn.1960);Wilkersonv.State,348S.W.2d314   (Tenn.1961);Vowellv.State,341S.W.2d735(Tenn.1960). "    0 Wethinktherecordcontainedevidencesupportingthejurysverdict.Therefore,thejudgmentofthecourtbelowisaffirmedandthecauseisremandedtotheCircuitCourtofMaconCountyforanyfurtherproceedingsnecessary.Taxthecostsonappealtotheappellant.  0      8      @      H!  #   0      8     ______________________________  0      8     BENH.CANTRELL,  0      8     PRESIDINGJUDGE,M.S.̜CONCUR:_____________________________WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE_____________________________WILLIAMB.CAIN,JUDGE  ;`6:   wXXi; @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @(ATNASHVILLE̜ Xi;XwTHESTATEOFTENNESSEE,exrel.,  )  n THECITYOFLAFAYETTE, 8     )  ^ МTENNESSEE,     8   )  N Amunicipalityincorporationedbythe  )StateofTennessee,   8   )  >   0      8   ) Plaintiff/Appellant,   8   )  AppealNo.#wXXi;#Xi;Xw     0      8   )  01A019810CV00520#wXXi;#Xi;Xw     0      8   )     МVS.  0      8   )  MaconCircuit#wXXi;#Xi;Xw     0      8   )  No.3893#wXXi; #Xi;Xw     0      8   )   ~ RONALDJ.MOWELL,LINDAJ. 8   )  Affirmedand     H!  #  n МMOWELLandDAVIDR.WILSON,  )  Remanded ^   0      8   ) Defendant/Appellee. 8   ) > #wXXi;!#Xi;XwwXXi; @uu'JUDGMENT  n Xi;Xw  0 Thiscausecameontobeheardupontherecordonappealfromthe J CircuitCourtofMaconCounty,briefsandargumentofcounsel;uponconsiderationwhereof,thisCourtisoftheopinionthatinthejudgmentofthetrialcourtthereisnoreversibleerror.  0 InaccordancewiththeopinionoftheCourtfiledherein,itis,therefore,orderedandadjudgedbythisCourtthatthejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.ThecauseisremandedtotheCircuitCourtofMaconCountyfortheexecutionofthejudgmentofthatcourtandforthecollectionofthecostsaccruedbelow.  0 CostsofthisappealaretaxedagainsttheCityofLafayette,MayorWillT.Colter,Principal,andLisaC.Stinnett,Surety,forwhichexecutionmayissueifnecessary.̜  0      8 _____________________________________  0      8 BENH.CANTRELL,PRESIDINGJUDGE,M.S.  0      8 _____________________________________  0      8 WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE  0      8 _____________________________________  0      8 WILLIAMB.CAIN,JUDGE