ÿWPCÎ …# V %a 0@g4§»U:Ê w@ L 0JR 0Tœ 0^ð 0hN 0r¶ 0|( 0†¤ 0* 1uº U,/ 0d[ U,¿ U6ë B)!DCJ AM BÚU*÷D!v~evÓã D3¶ 0@é AO)Æx 0D> D/‚ B±˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀäÌÀÀÌÀä0 X(ù$¡¡Ó  ÓÓ  Ó©U!¡Ó 3|xF<Ô6X9`+"Courier 10cpi 2345D678D9:;Ó€H2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d""""7Border 1dd€-#Cþÿ << Gÿÿ d< Œ 9p`(Arial :Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€!ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ€&ÔÔ€&ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€&XÔÌÌò òAugust€21,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€&ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó óPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA Op Monaco Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€  X„d&ÓÑ#€  Xd#ÑÔ€!ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  Ý›Ñ  ÑÑ ¸ ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€ XXdÈXXdÈ7ќـ€ÙßL€$'#;+'h|` ¤ `€€Lß›à@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌMICHELLE€MARIE€YOUNG€NELSON,€€€€)à àLOUDON€GENERAL€SESSIONSÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àC.A.€NO.€03A01„9602„GS„00065Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiff„Appellant€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHON.€JOHN€GIBSONÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àJUDGEÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)ÌROBERT€RICHARD€NELSON,€€€€€€€€€€)à àAFFIRMED€IN€PART,€MODIFIED€IN€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ï)€€PART€AND€REMANDED€WITH€Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)€€INSTRUCTIONSÌ€€€€€€€€€€Defendant„Appellee€€€€)ÌÌÌÌÌL.€CAESAR€STAIR€III,€and€ELIZABETH€K.€B.€MEADOWS,€Knoxville,€forÏAppellant.ÌÌÌJOHN€D.€œLOCKRIDGE›€and€œSCARLETT›€A€œBEATY›,€Knoxville,€for€appellee.ÌÌÌÌÌÌÓÓà@ àòòO€P€I€N€I€O€NóóÌÌThis€action€began€as€a€divorce€action€between€the€parties.€€AfterÏan€extensive€bench€trial,€the€court€awarded€a€divorce€pursuant€toÏT.C.A.€ðð€36„4„129.€€Custody€of€the€parties€minor€children€wasÏgiven€to€the€husband€with€the€wife€having€specified€visitationÏprivileges.€€The€court€further€ordered€child€support€to€be€paid€inÏaccordance€with€the€Child€Support€Guidelines;€however€no€specificÏamount€of€child€support€was€established.€€Finally,€the€courtÏdivided€the€marital€property€between€the€parties.€€From€the€judg…ment€of€the€trial€court€this€appeal€resulted.€€We€affirm€in€part,Ïmodify€in€part€and€remand€with€instructions.Ìà€ àMcMurray,€J.ÌÌà àThis€action€began€as€a€divorce€action€between€the€parties.€ÏAfter€an€extensive€bench€trial,€the€court€awarded€a€divorce€pursu…ant€to€T.C.A.€ðð€36„4„129.€€Custody€of€the€parties€minor€childrenÏwas€given€to€the€husband€with€the€wife€having€specified€visitationÏprivileges.€€The€court€further€ordered€child€support€to€be€paid€inÏaccordance€with€the€Child€Support€Guidelines;€however€no€specificÏamount€of€child€support€was€established.€€Finally,€the€courtÏdivided€the€marital€property€between€the€parties.€€From€the€judg…ment€of€the€trial€court€this€appeal€resulted.€€We€affirm€in€part,Ïmodify€in€part€and€remand€with€instructions.ÌÌà àGenerally€stated,€the€appellant€wife€takes€issue€with€theÏcourt's€judgment€regarding€child€custody€and€visitation.€€SheÏfurther€complains€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€making€a€disposi…tion€of€the€family€home.ÌÌà àThe€appellee€husband€complains€of€the€court's€failure€toÏestablish€and€award€child€support€during€the€pendency€of€theÏdivorce€action€and€in€failing€to€establish€a€specific€amount€ofÏchild€support.ÌÌà àOur€standard€of€review€in€non„jury€cases€is€governed€by€RuleÏ13(d),€Tennessee€Rules€of€Appellate€procedure.€€"Unless€otherwiseÏrequired€by€statute,€review€of€findings€of€fact€by€the€trial€courtÏin€civil€actions€shall€be€òòde€novoóó€upon€the€record€of€the€trialÏcourt,€accompanied€by€a€presumption€of€the€correctness€of€theÏfinding,€unless€the€preponderance€of€the€evidence€is€otherwise."€ÏIn€a€òòde€novoóó€review,€the€parties€are€entitled€to€a€reexaminationÏof€the€whole€matter€of€law€and€fact€and€this€court€should€renderÏthe€judgment€warranted€by€the€law€and€evidence.€€òòœThornburg›€v.ÏChaseóó,€606€S.W.2d€672€(Tenn.€App.€1980);€€òòAmerican€Buildings€Co.Ïv.€Whiteóó,€640€S.W.2d€569€(Tenn.€App.€1982);€Tennessee€Rules€ofÏAppellate€Procedure,€Rule€36.€We€note€that€no€such€presumptionÏattaches€to€conclusions€of€law.€€òòSeeóó€€òòAdams€v.€Dean€Roofing€Coóó.,Ï715€S.W.2d€341,€343€(Tenn.€App.€1986).ÌÌà àThese€parties€met€at€a€fundamentalist€church€which€they€bothÏattended.€€They€were€married€in€July,€1984.€€At€that€time,€Mr.ÍNelson€was€a€claims€representative€for€Allstate€Insurance€CompanyÏand€Dr.€Nelson€had€recently€received€her€Doctorate€of€VeterinaryÏMedicine€degree.€€Dr.€Nelson€worked€somewhat€intermittently€duringÏthe€next€two€years.€€Testimony€at€trial€indicated€that€job€stressÏin€conjunction€with€Mr.€Nelson's€desire€to€have€a€full„time€house…wife€led€to€this€arrangement.ÌÌà àIn€the€fall€of€1986€the€Nelsons€moved€to€Tennessee.€€Mr.ÏNelson€was€still€working€as€a€claims€representative€for€AllstateÏInsurance.€€Dr.€Nelson€did€not€seek€employment€outside€the€homeÏbecause€the€parties€planned€to€start€a€family€and€she€was€to€stayÏhome€and€be€a€full„time€mother€and€wife.€€The€first€of€two€sons,ÏJonathan,€was€born€on€June€22,€1988,€and€œEthan›€was€born€on€Oct.€1,Ï1990.ÌÌà àIn€late€1993,€Dr.€Nelson€began€suffering€from€severe€depres…sion.€€She€spent€ten€days€in€the€hospital.€€The€day€after€sheÏreturned€home,€November€24,€while€she€was€in€the€shower,€Mr.ÍNelson,€aided€by€his€mother,€took€the€two€young€boys€away€from€theÏhome.€€Mr.€Nelson,€his€sons€and€his€mother€stayed€in€variousÏhotels€pending€the€filing€of€this€action.€€Mr.€Nelson€filed€aÏcomplaint€for€divorce€and€sought€an€òòex€parteóó€temporary€injunctionÏprohibiting€Dr.€Nelson€from€interfering€with€his€custody€of€theÏchildren€and€his€possession€of€the€marital€home.€ÌÌà àOn€December€14,€1993,€a€hearing€was€held€regarding€the€tempo…rary€custody€of€the€two€young€sons.€€Mr.€Nelson€retained€custodyÏwhile€Dr.€Nelson€was€allowed€to€see€her€sons€for€two€hours€everyÏother€day.ÌÌà àThe€case€was€thereafter€tried€on€the€merits€at€a€bench€trialÏwhich€lasted€four€days.€€After€hearing€testimony€from€numerousÏwitnesses€called€on€behalf€of€each€party€and€the€parties€them…selves,€including€several€clinical€psychologists,€the€trial€courtÏgranted€the€divorce,€awarded€sole€custody€of€the€children€to€Mr.ÏNelson,€ordered€that€the€parties€would€retain€the€marital€resi…dence€as€tenants€in€common,€with€Mr.€Nelson€having€an€option€toÏpurchase€Dr.€Nelsonððs€interest€in€the€home€for€$24,000.00€withÏpayments€spread€over€ten€years€at€5%€interest.ÌÌà àWe€will€first€look€to€the€issue€of€child€custody.€€In€òòBah€v.ÏBahóó,€668€S.W.2d€663€(Tenn.€App.€1983),€this€court€recognizing€thatÏthe€paramount€concern€in€child€custody€cases€is€the€welfare€andÏbest€interest€of€the€child,€adopted€"what€we€believe€is€a€commonÏsense€approach€to€custody,€one€which€we€will€call€the€doctrine€ofÏ'comparative€fitness.'"€òòIdóó.€at€666.€€The€òòBahóó€court€further€statedÏthat€"[œf]itness›€for€custodial€responsibilities€is€largely€a€com…parative€matter.€€No€human€being€is€deemed€perfect,€hence€no€humanÏcan€be€deemed€a€perfectly€fit€custodian.€€Necessarily,€therefore,Ïthe€courts€must€determine€which€of€the€two€or€more€availableÏcustodians€is€more€or€less€fit€than€others."ÌÌà àThere€was€extensive€evidence€introduced€at€the€trial€relatingÏto€the€comparative€fitness€of€each€parent.€€We€see€have€no€reasonÍto€set€out€in€detail€the€strengths€and€weaknesses€of€either€party.€ÏTo€do€so€would€serve€no€purpose.€€The€record€reflects€that€theÏcourt€did€apply€the€"comparative€fitness€test"€in€making€hisÏcustody€determination.€€Suffice€it€to€say€that€the€evidence€doesÏnot€preponderate€against€the€trial€courtððs€custody€determination.€ÏFurther,€in€child€custody€cases€€trial€courts€are€vested€with€wideÏdiscretion€in€matters€of€child€custody€and€reviewing€courts€willÏnot€interfere€except€upon€a€showing€of€an€abuse€of€discretion.ÏòòGrant€v.€Grantóó,€39€Tenn.€App.€539,€286€S.W.2d€349,€350€(1954);ÏòòMarmino€v.€Marminoóó,€34€Tenn.€App.€352,€238€S.W.2d€105,€107€(1951).€ÏWe€affirm€the€trial€court's€award€of€custody€to€the€appellee.ÌÌà àWe€will€next€look€to€the€issue€of€child€support.€€TrialÏcourts€are€required€to€determine€the€amount€of€child€support€basedÏupon€the€provisions€of€the€Child€Support€Guidelines€promulgated€byÏthe€Department€of€Human€Services.€€The€amount€calculated€pursuantÏto€the€guidelines€carries€with€it€a€rebuttable€presumption€thatÍthe€amount€is€reasonable.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€36„5„101.€€In€this€caseÏthe€court€stated€in€its€final€judgment:ÌÌà@ à*€€€€€*€€€€€*€€€€€*ÌÓÓà8 àà à4.à àòòò òCHILD€SUPPORTóóó ó:€€The€wife€shall€pay€weeklyÏchild€support€to€the€husband€commensurate€with€the€childÏsupport€guidelines€except€during€the€period€of€time€inÏthe€summer€when€the€children€are€with€her.ÌÌà8 àà àThe€husband€shall€pay€weekly€child€support€to€theÏwife€commensurate€with€the€child€support€guidelinesÏduring€the€summer€when€the€wife€has€visitation€with€theÏexception€of€the€third€week€in€July€during€which€time€noÏchild€support€shall€flow€from€either€party.ÌÌà8 àà àThe€husband€shall€also€pay€child€support€commensu…rate€with€the€guidelines€to€the€wife€during€the€last€twoÏweeks€in€December€of€each€year.ÌÌà@ à*€€€€€*€€€€€*€€€€€*ÌÓÓÌà àIn€our€opinion,€the€above€provisions€do€not€comply€with€theÏChild€support€guidelines€or€T.C.A.€ðð€36„5„101€in€that€the€courtÏfailed€to€make€a€determination€of€the€amount€of€child€supportÏwhich€should€have€been€ordered€under€the€child€support€guidelines.€ÏAccordingly,€we€are€of€the€opinion€that€the€case€must€be€remandedÍfor€a€determination€of€the€child€support€payable€under€the€childÏsupport€guidelines€and€if€a€deviation€is€allowed,€a€written€find…ing€that€the€application€of€the€child€support€guidelines€would€beÏunjust€or€inappropriate€in€accordance€with€T.C.A.€ðð€36„5„101.ÌÌà àThe€husband€raises€a€further€issue€relating€to€child€support.€ÏHe€insists€that€the€wife€should€have€been€required€to€pay€childÏsupport€and€contribute€to€medical€and€dental€expenses€during€theÏpendency€of€the€divorce.€€Since€on€remand,€the€court€is€to€consid…er€child€support€in€accordance€with€the€Child€Support€Guidelines,Ïwe€do€not€find€it€necessary€to€address€the€matter€further.ÌÌà àIn€our€next€inquiry€we€will€examine€the€issue€of€visitationÏprivileges€granted€to€the€mother.€€The€court€set€out€specificÏvisitation€privileges€as€follows:ÌÌÓÓà8 àà à[The€wife€shall€have€visitation€rights€on]€theÏfirst€and€third€weekends,€when€the€husband€has€fullÏcustody,€from€Friday€evenings€at€6:00€p.m.€until€SundayÏevening€at€6:00€p.m.;€from€the€day€school€is€out€atÍChristmas€until€New€Year's€day€at€6:00€p.m.,€exceptÏhusband€is€to€have€children€on€Christmas€Day€of€eachÏyear€from€9:00€a.m.€until€7:00€p.m.;€spring€vacationÏfrom€school;€three€hours€from€5:00€p.m.€until€8:00€p.m.Ïon€Thursday€of€each€week€wife€does€not€have€weekendÏvisitation;€in€the€summer€months€from€two€days€afterÏschool€is€out€until€two€days€before€school€starts,€theÏwife€is€to€have€custody€of€the€children€with€the€husbandÏto€have€same€visitation€rights€as€the€wife€except€theÏthird€week€in€July€he€shall€have€the€children€for€oneÏfull€week€to€take€them€on€a€vacation€trip.ÌÌÓÓà8 àÌà àBy€an€amended€final€judgment,€the€court€extended€the€mother'sÏvisitation€to€include€Wednesday€and€Thursday€from€5:00€p.m.€untilÏ8:00€p.m.€of€each€week€that€she€does€not€have€weekend€visitation.€ÏWe€find€the€visitation€privileges€granted€to€the€mother€to€beÏquite€liberal.€€She€complains,€however,€that€the€Wednesday€andÏThursday€visits€should€be€overnight€visits€rather€than€limited€toÏ8:00€p.m.€€We€find€the€visitation€granted€to€the€wife€to€be€rea…sonable.€€It€is€in€the€best€interest€of€the€children€that€there€beÏsome€degree€of€stability€in€the€home€life€of€the€children.€€WeÏbelieve€that€further€overnight€visitation€would€further€disrupt€anÍalready€unsettling€home€life.€€We€decline€to€increase€the€visita…tion€privileges€granted€to€the€mother.ÌÌà àThe€husband€complains€that€the€court€erred€in€granting€fullÏsummer€visitation€privileges€to€the€mother€and€in€holiday€visita…tion.€€We€recognize€that€the€trial€court€has€wide€discretion€inÏmatters€of€child€support,€custody€and€visitation.€€The€details€ofÏcustody€and€visitations€are€peculiarly€within€the€broad€discretionÏof€the€trial€court.€€òòEdwards€v.€Edwardsóó,€501€S.W.2d€283€(Tenn.ÏApp.€1973).€Our€review€of€the€trial€court's€decision€regardingÏvisitation€is€òòde€novoóó€with€the€presumption€that€the€trial€court'sÏfindings€of€fact€are€correct,€but€we€review€the€details€of€theÏtrial€court's€visitation€arrangement€to€determine€whether€theÏtrial€court€abused€its€discretion.€òòNeely€v.€Neelyóó,€737€S.W.2dÏ539,544€(Tenn.€App.€1987).€€In€reviewing€the€trial€court's€deci…sion,€we€note€that€the€welfare€of€the€child€has€always€been€theÏparamount€consideration€for€the€courts.€òòLuke€v.€Lukeóó,€651€S.W.2dÏ219,221€(Tenn.€1983).ÌÌà àUpon€consideration,€we€are€of€the€opinion€that€the€trialÏcourt€was€in€error€in€granting€full€summer€visitation€to€theÏmother,€reserving€only€one€week€in€July€to€the€father.€€We,€there…fore,€modify€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€to€allow€the€fatherÏtwo€weeks€in€July€rather€than€one.€€In€all€other€respects€theÏjudgment€of€the€trial€court,€as€to€visitation,€is€affirmed.Ô% € ÔÌÌà àThe€appellant€also€complains€of€the€way€and€manner€in€whichÏthe€court€made€disposition€of€the€marital€residence.€€The€courtÏordered€that€the€parties€would€retain€title€to€their€real€propertyÏas€tenants€in€common€subject€to€the€following:ÌÌÓÓà8 àà àa.à àThe€husband€shall€for€a€period€of€fifteen€(15)Ïdays,€have€the€option€to€purchase€the€wife's€interest€atÏthe€sum€of€$24,400.00€secured€by€a€second€mortgage€loanÏon€the€property€and€payable€at€the€rate€of€$2,440.00€perÏyear€on€the€principal,€plus€5%€interest€on€the€unpaidÏbalance.ÌÌà8 àà àb.à àIf€the€husband€does€not€exercise€said€option,Ïthe€wife€shall€have€the€same€option€for€a€period€ofÏfifteen€(15)€days€from€the€date€the€husband's€optionÍexpires.€€The€time€will€begin€on€the€date€the€finalÏdecree€is€entered€and€no€appeal€of€this€case€is€made.ÌÌà8 àà àc.à àDuring€this€period€the€person€in€possessionÏshall€be€responsible€for€mortgage€payment,€and€shallÏkeep€insurance€in€full€force€and€effect.€€The€equityÏshall€be€considered€as€profit€to€be€divided€by€tenantsÏin€common€on€sale.ÌÌà8 àà àd.à àIf€neither€party€exercises€this€option,€and€noÏagreement€can€be€reached€by€the€parties€as€to€disposi…tion€of€the€property,€then€either€party€may€petition€theÏcourt€for€a€court€sale€of€the€property€for€division.ÌÌÓÓÌà àWe€are€of€the€opinion€that€the€disposition€of€the€maritalÏresidence€by€the€court€is€inequitable€as€to€the€wife€in€that€theÏinterest€rate€to€be€paid€by€the€husband€is€well€below€the€estab…lished€market.€€Secondly,€we€agree€with€the€appellee€that€theÏtrial€court's€judgment€is€unclear€in€that€it€also€states€that€theÏequity€would€be€considered€as€profit€to€be€divided€by€tenants€inÏcommon€on€sale.ÌÌà àOn€remand,€we€are€of€the€opinion€that€the€marital€residenceÏshould€be€sold€either€as€the€parties€may€agree€or€as€the€courtÍshall€order,€absent€an€agreement,€and€the€equity€in€the€propertyÏdivided€equally€between€the€parties.ÌÌà àIn€our€discretion,€costs€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€equallyÏbetween€the€parties.€€This€case€is€remanded€to€the€trial€court€forÏsuch€other€and€further€action€as€may€be€required€consistent€withÏthis€opinion.ÌÌÌÓÓà€ à______________________________Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Don€T.€McMurray,€J.ÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌHerschel€P.€Franks,€J.ÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌClifford€E.€Sanders,€Sp.€J.ÌÌœÇÑ  ÑÑ7€ĨXXdÈXXdÈ7Ñà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌMICHELLE€MARIE€YOUNG€NELSON,€€€€)à àLOUDON€GENERAL€SESSIONSÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àC.A.€NO.€03A01„9602„GS„00065Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiff„Appellant€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHON.€JOHN€GIBSONÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àJUDGEÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)ÌROBERT€RICHARD€NELSON,€€€€€€€€€€)à àAFFIRMED€IN€PART,€MODIFIED€IN€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ï)€€PART€AND€REMANDED€WITH€Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)€€INSTRUCTIONSÌ€€€€€€€€€€Defendant„Appellee€€€€)ÌÌ›œÌà@ àò òòòORDERóóó óÌÌÌÓÓà àThis€appeal€came€on€to€be€heard€upon€the€record€from€theÏGeneral€Sessions€Court€of€Loudon€County,€briefs€and€argument€ofÍcounsel.€€Upon€consideration€thereof,€this€Court€is€of€the€opinionÏthat€there€was€reversible€error€in€the€trial€court.Ìà àThis€case€is€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€such€other€andÏfurther€action€as€may€be€required€consistent€with€this€opinion.InÏour€discretion,€costs€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€equally€between€theÏparties.€€ÌÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€PER€CURIAM›