WPC 'PgDRP4r d\I̪#Z`JNEQxo gZj3UT*O|g/$/1,T;S焫*cz%s`o&u1$Y)=;e$Q+/6d6%W#:X߅'b%(xoD1k eJ0)"7%Ċ(`[ZXfyҍH+tBs 獼OׯWx6%NOP tq*ƌ# F UNQ % 0 UN w 4    U: U:)))))))))))))))))))))))) Bccccc D3 0D AOFF 0D  D/P BHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($71dXdXd7  HgITR[A' Legal[A' LegalA' LegalA' LegalT(Y Z 6Times New Roman RegularHIJDKULMNDOPQURS eTUDVWDXDYZD[\D]^D_Ӏkh&3|xm  Xl|XXX X Xl|   Ad FILED      June28,1999  CecilCrowson,Jr. |   AppellateCourt  Clerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular  Xl|XXX X Xl|   Ad FILED      June25,1999  CecilCrowson,Jr. |   AppellateCourt  Clerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular d%%%%'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !7lXXdXXd7  HDXXTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T  _SS_  `D7lXdXXd7   k_r *<,(j 8 `@Ex tt0"r_kkr *<,(j 8 `@Ex tt0"rk__INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEEATKNOXVILLE     NATIONSBANKOFTENNESSEE,  ) p HAMILTONCHANCERY  X  `     h     ) p (No.73919)  h  ` Plaintiff/Appellant h     ) p  ( x  `     h     )v. `     h     ) p NO.03A019808CH00279 H   `     h     ) p  X  FORMPAK,INC.and h     ) p HON.HOWELLN.PEOPLES h  RONCAMPBELL, h     ) p CHANCELLOR x   `     h     ) ` Defendants/Appellees    ) p AFFIRMED  RonCunningham,Knoxville,forAppellant.C.MarkWarren,Chattanooga,forAppellees. @(  `OPINION#`  T#Ԉ (x  `     h      p INMAN,SeniorJudge p     ` Thisisanactiontorecoveronapromissorynoteforborrowedfunds,theSpamentSSpaymentSofwhichwassecuredbyalienonavehicle.Beyondthispointthefactsbecomeobscured;thereisnotranscript,andnostatementoftheevidence. ` Theappellant,initsbrief,incorporatesa StatementofUndisputedFacts,whichtheappelleedoesnotcontest.WeareabletogleanfromthisYsYZSZtatement,andthe[e[\E\xhibits,thatonAugust7,1990,thedefendantsborrowedasumofmoneytopurchasea1991GMCJimmyinwhichwastakenasecurityinterest.Thiswasfollowedbytherenewal,onSeptember10,1990,ofanoteinitiallyexecutedin1983,thepaymentofwhichwassecuredbythedefendantFormpaksaccountsreceivable,inventory,fixturesandequipment.ThedefendantsdefaultedinthepaymentoftheSeptember10,1990note,andweresued underthetheoryofbreachofScomercialSScommercialSnote2andthesecurityagreementofcommercialnote1.Wededuce 9@52G thatthesuitallegeddefaultonthepromissorynoteusedtopurchasetheGMC]t]ruck.TheChancellordismissedthecase,holdingthattheplaintiffhadreleasedthe defendantfromtheobligationofthepromissorynote. ` Thisrulingwasbaseduponanagreedorderofdismissalwhichprovidesthat SSNationsbankSSofTennesseedoesherebyreleaseallFormpaks...andequipment. ` Accordingtothebriefs,anumberofwitnessestestified.Weareunabletodeducefromthe StatementofUndisputedFactstheprecisetestimonyoffered;unlikethiscourt,theChancellorhadthebenefitofthedisputedfacts. ` Rule2^1^4ofT.R.A.P.providesthattherecordonappealshallconsistof(3)thetranscriptorstatementoftheevidence.Ifnotranscriptoftheevidenceisavailable,itisthedutyoftheappellanttoprepareaIsIJ>S>Jtatementoftheevidenceforapprovalbythetrialjudge.Thiswasnotdone,andwearethusboundtoassumethattherecord,haditbeenpreserved,wouldhavecontainedsufficientevidencetosupportthefindingsofthetrialcourt.SSSherrodSSv.SSWixSS,849S.W.2d780(Tenn.SSWTaTWUDaDUVAVppSS. P  1992). ` ThejudgmentisaffirmedatthecostsoftheapHpellant.HKKMMNNL `     h     _______________________________ `     h     WilliamH.Inman,SeniorJudgeLOCONCUR:OP̜PXPPXP_______________________________HerschelP.Franks,JudgePQQR_______________________________CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,JudgeR