ÿWPCZ 6# UN %] 0 ccU<Æw@4BV AQe 0§¶ 0J] 0T§û 0^ 0ha 0rÉ 0|; 0†· 0= 1uÍ 0dB 0@¦ D3æ 0D U>] B)› DCÄ AM U*T B~ Æ› 0Da 0D¥ D/é B`5S•Cè(+¶Sv~ vÓ‡˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLHÎ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX(;cW$¡¡Ò°ÒÒ„°ÒÔ€XaBXXXÔ-šBu Z‹$Arrus BT Roman ?@AEBCUDîEÓ€FÓ€RU §aö"xTS Ô3|xU*+ ,-Cþÿ<< Cÿÿ(W(3²&$¤¤Ý ƒcW!ÝÒ°ÒÒ„°ÒÔ€XÄ:XXXÔÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô  ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò))))'ÿÿdxd(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d%%%%7Border 1dd* &Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial dƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó..'÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd VÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€$ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ+"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÔ€(ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€(XÔÌÌò òAugustÏ22,Ï1997ÌÌCecilÏCrowson,ÏJr.ÌÔ€(ôÔAppellateÏCourtÏClerkó ó IÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€$ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Mrs.€Paehler€filed€approximately€ten€police€reports€between€1988€andÏ1993€relating€to€the€alleged€thefts€of€evidence€from€this€lawsuit.€Ì 9Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€$ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Mrs.€Paehler€retained€five€different€attorneys€during€the€course€of€thisÏlitigation,€but€now€she€is€acting€òòpro€seóó.Ì Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€$ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Mrs.€Paehler€filed€the€complaint€in€her€capacity€as€executrix€of€theÏestate€of€Louis€Paehler.Ì ¬Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€$ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Mrs.€Paehler€claims€that€$450,000.00€was€stolen€from€the€safe€depositÏbox,€but€her€attorneys€would€not€amend€the€complaint€with€this€figure.€€TheÏamended€complaint€before€the€trial€court€and€this€Court€clearly€statesÏ$31,000.00.€€In€addition,€Mrs.€Paehler€filed€a€motion€to€amend€the€complaintÏto€add€a€fraud€charge€with€damages€of€$3,500,000.00.€€However,€the€amendedÏcomplaint€does€not€request€damages€of€$3,500,000.00,€and€the€trial€courtÏdenied€a€motion€to€correct€the€amended€complaint.ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€$ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€ÜÜXXdðdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÞ ÞÌà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àWESTERN€SECTION€AT€JACKSONÌà àà à€€€€______________________________________________ÌÌò òELEANOR€W.€PAEHLERó ó,ò òÌ(As€Executrix€for€the€Estate€ofÌLouis€Paehler,€Deceased),ÌÌó óà àPlaintiff„Appellant,ÌÌVs.à àà àà àà àà àà àà àShelby€Equity€No.€97378„1Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àC.A.€No.€02A01„9606„CH„00133Ìò òÙ€*ÙßR€'/&A1-j|Ìû` à. `€€@ÿRßUNION€PLANTERS€NATIONAL€BANK,ÌINC.,€WEBSTER€SAFE€AND€LOCKÌCO.,€INC.,€ð ðBARBIEðð€ARCHIBALD,€ÌJEAN€JOHNSON€and€SCOTT€FISHER,ó óÌÌà àDefendants„Appellees.Ì____________________________________________________________________________ÌÌà@ àFROM€THE€SHELBY€COUNTY€CHANCERY€COURTÌà@ àTHE€HONORABLE€NEAL€SMALL,€CHANCELLORÌÌÌÌÌÌà@ àEleanor€W.€Paehler,€Pro€SeÌÌà@ àRobert€L.€Crawford€and€Johnathan€P.€Lakey;€Ìà@ àWayatt,€Tarrant€&€Combs€of€MemphisÌà@ àFor€Appellees,€Union€Planters€Bank,€Inc.,€Ìà@ àð ðBarbieðð€Archibald€and€Jean€JohnsonÌÌÌÌÌÌà@ àò òòòAFFIRMEDó óóóÌÌà@ àOpinion€filed:€ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€W.S.ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌDAVID€R.€FARMER,€JUDGEÌÌHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€JUDGEó óÌ›Ñ „ ÑÑ „ ÑÓÓà àThis€case€involves€the€alleged€theft€of€the€contents€of€a€safe€deposit€box.€ÏPlaintiff,€Eleanor€W.€Paehler,€appeals€the€order€of€the€trial€court€grantingÏsummary€judgment€to€defendants,€Union€Planters€National€Bank,€BarbieÏArchibald,€and€Jean€Johnson.Ìà àIn€1975,€Mrs.€Paehlerððs€husband,€Louis€Paehler,€rented€a€safe€deposit€boxÏfrom€Union€Planters.€€Louis€Paehler€died€on€€October€8,€1987,€and€after€hisÏdeath,€Mrs.€Paehler€was€subsequently€appointed€executrix€of€his€estate.€€OnÏFebruary€12,€1988,€Mrs.€Paehler,€as€executrix,€went€to€the€Union€Planters€BankÏto€open€the€safe€deposit€box.€€Entry€to€safe€deposit€boxes€is€accomplished€byÏtwo€keys€„€one€kept€by€the€customer€and€one€kept€by€the€bank.€€When€aÏcustomer€desires€to€enter€a€box,€a€card€showing€the€date€and€time€of€entryÍmust€be€signed€by€the€customer,€then€a€bank€representative€and€the€customerÏuse€the€respective€keys€to€access€the€box.€€Mrs.€Paehler€did€not€have€theÏcustomer€key,€so€Union€Planters€arranged€for€the€box€to€be€drilled€open€byÏWebster€Safe€and€Lock€Company.Ìà àBarbie€Archibald,€an€employee€of€Union€Planters,€accompanied€Mrs.ÏPaehler€to€open€the€safe€deposit€box.€€Scott€Fisher,€the€locksmith€employed€byÏWebster€Safe€&€Lock,€drilled€the€lock€and€opened€the€door€to€the€box.€ÏArchibald€left€the€vault€momentarily,€but€quickly€returned,€and€Fisher€handedÏthe€safe€deposit€box€to€Archibald.€€Archibald€took€the€box€to€her€desk€behindÏthe€row€of€bank€tellers€while€Fisher€remained€in€the€vault€to€repair€the€lock.€ÏArchibald€called€Jean€Johnson,€another€bank€employee,€to€tell€her€the€box€wasÏready€to€be€inventoried.€€Mrs.€Paehler€remained€in€the€waiting€area€untilÏJohnson€arrived.€€Johnson€removed€the€box€from€Archibaldððs€desk,€and€whenÏJohnson€opened€the€safe€deposit€box,€it€was€empty.Ìà àIn€her€deposition,€Mrs.€Paehler€testified€that€Fisher€pulled€the€safeÏdeposit€box€out€far€enough€to€open€the€lid.€€She€saw€Fisher€lift€the€lid€of€theÏbox,€and€she€observed€what€appeared€to€be€a€ð ðbox€within€a€box.ðð€€When€FisherÏstarted€to€push€the€safe€deposit€box€back€into€its€slot,€Mrs.€Paehler€asked€himÏto€stop.€€Fisher€lifted€the€lid€a€second€time,€and€Mrs.€Paehler€saw€a€large€manillaÏenvelope€in€the€box.€€However,€Mrs.€Paehler€did€not€actually€see€Fisher€moveÍthe€envelope.€€Archibald€testified€in€her€deposition€that€Fisher€did€not€lift€theÏlid€of€the€safe€deposit€box,€and€Fisher€testified€that€he€did€not€lift€the€lid€of€theÏbox,€that€he€did€not€open€the€box,€and€that€the€box€was€not€opened€in€hisÏpresence.Ìà àMrs.€Paehler€also€claims€that€Rebecca€Paehler,€one€of€Louis€PaehlerððsÏprevious€wives,€entered€the€safe€deposit€box€on€January€14,€1983€and€removed€aÏcertificate€of€deposit€worth€$17,909.12.€€Rebecca€Paehler,€who€was€notÏauthorized€to€enter€the€box,€signed€the€sign„in€card€for€Louis€Paehlerððs€box,€butÏlater€the€signature€was€scratched€out.€€Rebecca€Paehler€also€rents€a€safe€depositÏbox€from€Union€Planters,€and€the€bank€claims€that€Rebecca€merely€signed€theÏwrong€card€because€the€cards€are€in€alphabetical€order.€€Rebecca€PaehlerððsÏsignature€appears€on€the€proper€card€on€the€same€date,€but€fifty€minutes€later.€ÏMrs.€Paehler€did€not€bring€a€claim€against€Rebecca€Paehler,€but€instead€sheÏclaims€that€Union€Planters€fraudulently€allowed€Rebecca€Paehler€to€enter€theÏwrong€box.Ìà àMrs.€Paehler€claims€that€there€is€a€conspiracy€against€her€and€that€her€lifeÏis€not€her€own.€€She€contends€that€her€files€related€to€this€lawsuit€and€evidenceÏof€the€boxððs€contents€were€stolen€from€her€home€and€from€her€personal€safeÏdeposit€box€at€a€different€bank.× ƒ0 ××  ×€€She€also€claims€that€her€phone€has€beenÍtapped€and€that€her€attorneysðð€actions€were€controlled€by€Union€Planers.× ƒ1 ××  ×€Ìà àOn€June€23,€1989,€Mrs.€Paehler€filed€her€original€complaint€against€UnionÏPlanters,€Webster€Safe,€Barbie€Archibald,€Jean€Johnson,€and€Scott€Fisher€for€theÏð ðreturn€of€converted€property€of€the€Estate€of€Louis€Paehler.ðð× ƒ2 ××  ×€€On€August€5,Ï1993,€Mrs.€Paehler€amended€her€complaint.€€The€amended€complaint€allegesÏthat€the€contents€of€the€safe€deposit€box,€jewelry€and€approximately€$31,000.00Ïin€cash,€were€converted€by€the€defendants€to€their€own€use.× ƒ3 ××  ×€€The€amendedÏcomplaint€also€alleges€breach€of€fiduciary€duty,€breach€of€contract,€grossÏnegligence,€and€fraud€against€all€defendants.Ìà àOn€June€24,€1991,€the€trial€court€granted€summary€judgment€to€WebsterÏSafe€and€Scott€Fisher.€€Mrs.€Paehler€appealed€the€judgment,€but€the€appeal€wasÏdismissed€by€this€Court€on€June€10,€1992€because€the€order€of€the€trial€courtÏwas€not€a€final€judgment.€€On€November€10,€1994,€the€trial€court€entered€anÍorder€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€54.02€that€made€the€order€granting€summaryÏjudgment€to€Webster€Safe€and€Scott€Fisher€a€final€judgment.€€Mrs.€Paehler€didÏnot€appeal€this€order€within€thirty€days,€therefore,€Webster€Safe€and€ScottÏFisher€are€not€parties€to€€this€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€T.R.A.P.€4(a).Ìà àOn€November€22,€1995,€Union€Planters,€Barbie€Archibald,€and€JeanÏJohnson€filed€a€motion€for€summary€judgment.€€The€trial€court€granted€theÏmotion€on€February€9,€1996.€€Mrs.€Paehler€appeals€the€judgment€of€the€trialÏcourt€granting€summary€judgment€to€Union€Planters,€Archibald,€and€JohnsonÏ(hereinafter€the€defendants).€€Although€her€brief€does€not€clearly€state€the€issue,Ïwe€perceive€the€issue€to€be€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€granting€summaryÏjudgment.€€The€defendants€present€two€additional€issues:€€1)€whether€T.C.A.€ððÏ45„2„902€entitles€the€defendants€to€summary€judgment,€and€2)€whether€Mrs.ÏPaehlerððs€appeal€should€be€dismissed€because€she€failed€to€comply€with€theÏòòTennessee€Rules€of€Appellate€Procedureóó.Ìà àWe€will€first€address€the€defendantsðð€second€issue.€€The€defendants€argueÏthat€Mrs.€Paehlerððs€brief€does€not€comply€with€T.R.A.P.€6€and€T.R.A.P.€27Ïbecause€it€does€not€contain€specific€references€to€pages€in€the€record€and€doesÏnot€contain€the€sections€required€by€the€rules.Ìà àThe€defendants€rely€upon€ò òòòDuchow€v.€Whalenóóó ó,€872€S.W.2d€692€(Tenn.ÏApp.€1993),€in€which€this€Court€dismissed€the€appeal€because€the€appellantððsÍbrief€failed€to€comply€with€T.R.A.P.€27.€€òòò òId.óóó ó€€In€òòò òDuchowóóó ó,€this€Court€stated€thatÏð ðwe€are€not€required€to€verify€unsupported€allegations€in€a€partyððs€brief€byÏpainstakingly€reviewing€the€record.ðð€€ò òòòIdóóó ó.€at€693.€€However,€ò òòòDuchow€óóó ódid€not€dealÏwith€a€òòpro€seóó€litigant.€€Parties€who€choose€to€represent€themselves€are€entitled€toÏfair€and€equal€treatment.€€òòò òIrvin€v.€City€of€Clarksvilleóóó ó,€767€S.W.2d€649,€652Ï(Tenn.€App.€1988).€€However,€they€are€not€excused€from€complying€withÏapplicable€substantive€and€procedural€law,€and€they€must€follow€the€sameÏsubstantive€and€procedural€law€as€the€represented€party.€€òòò òIdóóó ó.€(citationsÏomitted).€€Ìà àWe€agree€that€Mrs.€Paehlerððs€brief€does€not€comply€with€T.R.A.P.€27.€ÏNonetheless,€we€will€entertain€Mrs.€Paehlerððs€appeal.€€The€òòTennessee€Rules€ofÏAppellate€Procedureóó€should€be€construed€to€afford€all€parties€a€hearing€on€theÏmerits.€€T.R.A.P.€1;€òòò òIrvinóóó ó,€767€S.W.2d€at€653.€€This€Court€has€the€discretion€toÏsuspend€or€relax€some€of€the€rules€for€good€cause,€and€we€do€so€in€this€instanceÏas€to€the€strict€formalities€for€œMrs.€Paehlerððs€brief.›Ìà àIn€their€second€issue,€the€defendants€argue€that€T.C.A.€ðð€45„2„902€entitlesÏthem€to€summary€judgment.€€The€statute€provides€as€follows:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àAny€bank€has€the€right€to€construct€a€vault€on€its€realÏestate,€or€on€premises€leased€by€it,€or€to€rent€any€vaultÏwhich,€in€the€judgment€of€the€directors,€will€provideÏreasonable€means€of€safety€against€loss€by€theft,€fire€orÏother€cause,€in€which€vault€may€be€placed€safes,€boxes,Ïor€receptacles,€for€the€keeping€of€jewelry,€diamonds,Ígold,€bank€notes,€bonds,€notes,€and€other€valuables,Ïand€which€may€be€rented€by€the€bank€to€otherÏpersons€on€such€terms€as€may€be€agreed€by€theÏparties,€but€it€is€understood€that€in€no€event€shallÏsuch€bank€be€liable€for€any€loss€of€the€jewelry,Ïdiamonds,€gold,€bank€notes,€bonds,€notes,€or€otherÏvaluables€by€theft,€robbery,€fire,€or€other€cause,€suchÏbank€not€being€the€insurer€of€the€safety€of€theÏproperty,€nor€in€any€manner€liable€therefor.€€SuchÏbank€is€not€required€to€take€any€note€of€property€thusÏdeposited,€as€the€person€who€rents€a€safe,€box,€orÏreceptacle€is,€for€the€term€of€the€lease,€the€ownerÏthereof.ÌÌÓÓT.C.A.€ðð€45„2„902€(1993).Ìà àIn€ò òòòWhitaker€v.€First€American€Corp.óóó ó,€779€S.W.2d€383€(Tenn.€App.€1989),Ïthis€Court€dismissed€an€action€for€the€loss€of€items€placed€in€a€safe€deposit€boxÏpursuant€to€T.C.A.€ðð€45„2„902€because€there€was€no€allegation€of€a€breach€of€theÏduty€of€care€or€of€a€breach€of€contract.€€òòò òWhitakeróóó ó,€779€S.W.2d€at€384.€€TheÏrental€of€safe€deposit€boxes€by€banks€creates€a€bailment€relationship€betweenÏthe€bank€and€the€customer€that€is€governed€by€the€application€of€common€lawÏand€statutory€bailment€principles.€€òòò òIdóóó ó.;€ò òòòsee€also€Smith€v.€The€Peoples€Bank€of€ElkÏValleyóóó ó,€No.€01A01„9111„CV„00421,€1992€WL€117061,€at€*3€(Tenn.€App.€June€3,Ï1992).€€T.C.A.€ðð€45„2„902€does€not€bar€the€application€of€common€law€bailmentÏprinciples€to€the€rental€of€a€safe€deposit€box.€€ò òòòSmithóóó ó,€1992€WL€117061,€at€*3.€Ìà àIn€this€case,€Mrs.€Paehler€alleged€conversion,€breach€of€fiduciary€duty,Ïbreach€of€contract,€gross€negligence,€and€fraud.€€A€bank€can€be€liable€to€aÍcustomer€for€loss€or€damage€to€the€bailed€property€if€the€bank€fails€to€meet€itsÏduty€to€provide€the€customer€with€a€level€of€care€commensurate€with€that€ofÏbanks€in€similar€communities.€€ò òòòWhitakeróóó ó,€779€S.W.2d€at€384;€ò òòòSmithóóó ó,€1992€WLÏ117061,€at€*3.€€Ìà àMrs.€Paehler€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€granting€summaryÏjudgment€to€the€defendants.€€A€trial€court€should€grant€a€motion€for€summaryÏjudgment€only€if€the€movant€demonstrates€that€there€are€no€genuine€issues€ofÏmaterial€fact€and€that€the€moving€party€is€entitled€to€judgment€as€a€matter€ofÏlaw.€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€56.03;€€ò òòòByrd€v.€Hallóóó ó,€847€S.W.2d€208,€210€(Tenn.€1993);Ïòòò òDunn€v.€Hackettó óóó,€833€S.W.2d€78,€80€(Tenn.€App.€1992).€€The€party€moving€forÏsummary€judgment€bears€the€burden€of€demonstrating€that€no€genuine€issue€ofÏmaterial€fact€exists.€òòò ò€Byrdó óóó,€847€S.W.2d€at€210.€€On€a€motion€for€summaryÏjudgment,€the€court€must€consider€the€motion€in€the€same€manner€as€a€motionÏfor€directed€verdict€made€at€the€close€of€the€plaintiffððs€proof;€that€is,€ð ðthe€courtÏmust€take€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€in€favor€of€theÏnonmoving€party,€allow€all€reasonable€inferences€in€favor€of€that€party,€andÏdiscard€all€countervailing€evidence.ðð€òòò ò€Idó óóó.€at€210„11.€€In€òòò òByrdó óóó,€the€TennesseeÏSupreme€Court€stated:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àOnce€it€is€shown€by€the€moving€party€that€there€is€noÏgenuine€issue€of€material€fact,€the€nonmoving€partyÏmust€then€demonstrate,€by€affidavits€or€discoveryÏmaterials,€that€there€is€a€genuine,€material€factÍdispute€to€warrant€a€trial.€€In€this€regard,€Rule€56.05Ïprovides€that€the€nonmoving€party€cannot€simply€relyÏupon€his€pleadings€but€must€set€forth€òòspecific€factsóóÏshowing€that€there€is€a€genuine€issue€of€material€factÏfor€trial.Ì€à@ àÌòòò òÓÓIdó óóó.€at€211€(citations€omitted)€(emphasis€in€original).€€Where€a€genuine€disputeÏexists€as€to€any€material€fact€or€as€to€the€conclusions€to€be€drawn€from€thoseÏfacts,€a€court€must€deny€a€motion€for€summary€judgment.€òòò ò€Id.€€óóó ó(citing€òòò òDunnó óóó,Ï833€S.W.2d€at€80).Ìà àMrs.€Paehlerððs€claim€for€conversion€against€the€defendants€must€failÏbecause€she€has€no€proof€that€the€defendants€converted€anything€to€their€ownÏuse.€€ð ðA€conversion,€in€the€sense€of€the€law€of€trover,€is€the€appropriation€of€theÏthing€to€the€partyððs€own€use€and€benefit,€by€the€exercise€of€dominion€over€it,€inÏdefiance€of€plaintiffððs€right.ðð€€ò òòòMammoth€Cave€Prod.€Credit€Assððn€v.€Oldhamóóó ó,Ï569€S.W.2d€833,€836€(Tenn.€App.€1977)€(quoting€ò òòòBarger€v.€Webbóóó ó,€216€Tenn.Ï275,€278,€391€S.W.2d€664,€665€(1965)).€€In€her€brief,€Mrs.€Paehler€admits€thatÏshe€never€accused€anyone€other€than€Fisher€of€stealing€the€contents€of€the€safeÏdeposit€box.€€The€defendants€have€not€been€accused€of€taking€or€converting€anyÏof€Mrs.€Paehlerððs€property.€€Ìà àAs€for€Mrs.€Paehlerððs€other€claims,€the€defendants€argue€that€there€is€noÏfactual€support€in€the€record€to€support€Mrs.€Paehlerððs€allegation€thatÏsomething€was€stolen€from€the€safe€deposit€box€and€that€there€is€no€proof€inÍthe€record€regarding€what€the€box€contained.€€Mrs.€Paehler€argues,€in€her€brief,Ïthat€she€had€personal€knowledge€of€the€contents€of€the€safe€deposit€box€becauseÏshe€saw€a€large€manilla€envelope€in€the€box.€€Ìà àWe€do€not€believe€that€Mrs.€Paehlerððs€brief€glimpse€on€an€envelopeÏconstitutes€òòspecific€factsóó€to€overcome€the€defendantsðð€motion€for€summaryÏjudgment.€€Even€if€Mrs.€Paehler€observed€an€envelope,€she€has€no€possible€wayÏof€proving€the€envelopeððs€contents.€€Mrs.€Paehler€admitted€that€she€had€neverÏseen€the€box€before€the€day€it€was€drilled€and€that€she€had€no€other€evidence€toÏprove€the€boxððs€content.€€She€claims€that€the€evidence€was€stolen€from€herÏhouse.€€Mrs.€Paehler€cannot€present€any€sworn€testimony€that€establishes€thatÏanything€was€missing€from€the€safe€deposit€box;€therefore,€her€claims€for€breachÏof€fiduciary€duty,€breach€of€contract,€and€gross€negligence€must€fail.Ìà àFinally,€Mrs.€Paehler€asserts€that€the€defendants€fraudulently€allowedÏRebecca€Paehler€to€sign€the€sign„in€card€to€Louis€Paehlerððs€safe€deposit€box.€€InÏher€complaint,€Mrs.€Paehler€states,€ð ðIt€is€the€belief€of€the€Plaintiff€that€RebeccaÏPaehler€entered€the€box€without€proper€authorization€and€that€Union€Planters,Ïby€scratching€through€the€signature,€is€attempting€to€ððcover€upðð€the€error.ðð€ÏHowever,€there€is€absolutely€no€proof€in€the€record€that€Rebecca€PaehlerÏactually€entered€Louis€Paehlerððs€safe€deposit€box€or€that€anything€was€missingÏfrom€the€safe€deposit€box.€€Mrs.€Paehler€has€not€shown€that€she€was€damaged€inÍany€way€because€Rebecca€Paehlerððs€signature€is€scratched€out€on€the€sign„inÏcard.Ìà àIn€conclusion,€Mrs.€Paehler€has€not€come€forward€with€òòspecific€factsóóÏshowing€there€is€a€genuine€issue€of€material€fact€for€trial.€€She€cannot€rest€onÏher€bare€allegations€that€cash€was€stolen€from€the€safe€deposit€box.€€She€simplyÏhas€no€proof€that€anything€was€taken€from€the€safe€deposit€box.Ìà àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€Costs€of€this€appeal€areÏassessed€against€the€appellant.ÌÓÓ€€à àà àà àà àà àà àà à_________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€W.S.ó óÌò òCONCUR:ó óÌÌ____________________________________Ìò òDAVID€R.€FARMER,€JUDGEó óÌÌò ò____________________________________ÌHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€JUDGEó óœ