WPCZ 2n&> !o6<,cҸ.}SH{rVX}L=Le3/E&{HZ-ujG3Ο>%SRXQZSa&FѪ0!?KIXH=EKS7y[BFA<(*2'#xjlX؎N 00U+H[v:u /*#,buOSvsj"dLtI]iuvI^Q~U=0}3$g$7x:F=NJD c)5^wMRǤWl|9[ WO=m\44F Z 0(i  w@  UN U:F  U: UB %           B! ! ! ! ! D3> > > 0Dq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q AO  0D D/ B=RC&3|xA($ )U*U+,D-.D/D01Ӏ= XoXXXXXo   Ad FILED   April21,1999  CecilCrowson,Jr. AppellateCourt  Clerk (hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular,cAZ"Arial Regular  XoXXX X Xo   Ad FILED     April15,1999  CecilCrowson,Jr.   AppellateCourt  Clerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiX d%%%%'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !  11  TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdXXd7X`>XXXXX`>=1r*<,(j 8 `@E  tt0"Hr1==r *<,(j 8 `@E  tt0"Hr=11񀀀@j j  INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @>>%ATKNOXVILLE ̛̜PATRICIAANNEPEHLMAN,    )C/ANO.03A019809CV00311   4    <     ) 4  Appellant, <     )KNOXCIRCUIT    4    <     )v. 4    <     )HON.BILLSWANN,    4    <     )JUDGEGREGORYLAWRENCEPEHLMAN,  )    4    <     ) 4  Appellee, <     )   4    <     )and 4    <     )   4    <     )SOBIESKI,MESSER&ASSOCIATES,)AFFIRMED 4    <     )AND 4  Intervenor. <     )REMANDED  ̜))ROBERTL.CROSSLEY,THECROSSLEYLAWFIRM,P.C.,Knoxville,forAppellant.DANIELL.TAYLOR,Memphis,forAppellee.WANDAG.SOBIESKI,SOBIESKI,MESSER&ASSOCIATES,Knoxville,forIntervenor.̜**@% OPINION  ,%%  4    <      D   Franks,J. 4  InthisactionPatriciaAnnePehlmanessentiallyseeksadeclarationthatmaritalpropertyawardedtoherinadivorceisnotsubjecttoalieninfavoroftheintervenor. 4  TheintervenorinitiallyrepresentedGregoryPehlmaninthePehlmansdivorcesuit.Duringpendencyoftheactionintervenorwithdrewfromrepresenting :23O GregoryandGregoryandintervenoragreedontheamountofattorneysfeesthendueintervenor,asreflectedinaNotesignedbyGregory.Intervenorfiledalienlis   pendensonthepropertyintheRegisterofDeedsOfficeandnoticeoflieninthe   divorceaction.Subsequently,thePehlmansweredivorcedandtheDivorceDecreerecitesthat [t]hepartiesannouncedasettlementoftheissuesinthisdivorcelitigation,anduponsaidannouncementtheCourtapprovedtheirincorporationintoafinaldecreeofabsolutedivorce,andastothemaritalproperty,theDecreeprovided:0 4 0 4(#4(#AsadivisionofmaritalpropertypursuanttoT.C.A.364121wifeshallreceivetheresidenceofthepartieslocatedat1947GrenadeBoulevard,Knoxville,Tennessee37922.Husbandshallexecuteaquitclaimdeedtransferringhisinterestinsaidresidencetothewife,andsaidexecutedquitclaimdeedshallbeheldbyhusbandsattorney,inescrow,untilthisdecreeofdivorcebecomesfinal.HusbandshallbesolelyresponsibleforimmediatelyresolvinghisdisputewithWandaSobieski,sothatherattorneylienisremovedfromtheresidence.  (# (# Subsequently,PatriciafiledaMotiontoQuashIntervenorsLien,andNotice,whichhadbeenfiledpursuanttoT.C.A.232102,forlegalservicesrenderedGregoryinthedivorceaction.Subsequently,theTrialCourtdetermined:0 4 0 4(#4(# Thesettlementthatresultedinafinaldecreeofabsolutedivorcevestedthepartiesmaritalresidenceintheplaintiff/counterdefendant.  (# (# 0 4 0 4(#4(# Plaintiff/counterdefendanttooksuchpropertywithfullknowledgeoftherecordedlienandsubjecttosaidlien,andthattheliensurvivedthedivorcedecree.  (# (#  4  PatriciaappealedthatordertothisCourtandweremanded,upondeterminingthatthejudgmentorderedthehusbandtoresolvehisdisputewithhisformerattorney,andwenoted thejudgmentprovides,toresolvehisdisputewithintervenor,notonlyastotheamountofthefee,butastothevalidityofthelien.̜UponremandandargumentofcounselandreceiptofevidencetheTrialCourtruled:0 4 0 4(#4(#ThisCourtconfirmsthatitsintentwithrespecttolanguage resolvedhisdisputeandthisCourtsorderofAugust14,1996,wassimplythatMr.Pehlmanpayhiscounsel.Thereisnodisputeastothelien,theproprietyofthelien,thefeesclaimed,oranyothermatterbetweenMr.Pehlmanandtheintervenor.  (# (#  :33 TheCourtthenreaffirmeditsformerholding inallrespects. 4  PatriciahasagainappealedtothisCourtinsistingthelienisinvalidbecausethehusbanddidnot recoverthemaritalresidence,andthestatutorylienfailedbecauseitwasnotdeclaredinthefinaldecree. 4  Noticeofthestatutorylienwasfiledinthedivorceaction,//0andthe000/andthe/+dispositionofthe+maritalestatewas,subjectmatter,-atissue-.jurisdiction.inthataction.GregoryvoluntarilydeededhisinteresttoPatriciaasapartofthedivorcesettlement,andsheacceptedastheTrialJudgefound withfullknowledgeoftherecordedlien,andsubjecttosaidlien.TheoperationaleffectofthislienisnotunlikethecircumstancesinThird H@ NationalBankinNashvillev.Nobler,789S.W.2d254(Tenn.1990).InNobler, PH duringthependencyofanactionfordivorcebetweentheNoblers,acreditorofthehusbandleviedonsomerealpropertywhichtheNoblersownedastenantsbytheentirety.TheTrialJudgeorderedthepropertysoldinthedivorceaction,andtheSupremeCourtultimatelyheldthattherightofsurvivorshippreviouslyconveyedorattachedbyajudgmentcreditorwasnotdestroyedbythedissolutionofthetenancybytheentireties,andconcludedthatthejudgmentcreditorwasentitledtothesurvivorshipinterestinthepropertytotheextentofthecreditorsinterest. 4  Itisgenerallyheldthatthetransferofpropertysubsequenttotheattachmentofaliendoesnotaffectthelien.SeeMichiganv.UnitedStates,317U.S. +$$ 338,34063S.Ct.302,303,87L.Ed.312.Aspousemayconveyherrightofsurvivorshipwithoutconsentoftheother.SeeRobinsonv.TrousdaleCounty,516 /(( S.W.2d626(1974).Accordingly,alienmayattachtoaspousesrightofsurvivorship,withouttheconsentoftheotherspouse. 4  WethereforeconcludethattheintervenorslienattachedtotheGregorysrightofsurvivorship,andsurvivedthetransferoftitletoPatricia. 4  'Intervenormaycausethesurvivorshipinteresttobesold,withtheproceedsappliedtothesatisfactionofthelien,orifthepartiesshouldagreetoasaleoftheproperty,thevalueofthesurvivorshipinterestcouldthenbeestablishedand 922 paidovertointervenorfromtheproceedsofthesale.̛  'WeaffirmthejudgmentoftheTrialCourtandremandwiththecostof 922 appealassessedtotheappellant.))@+ D     4    <     __________________________    4    <     HerschelP.Franks,J.CONCUR:___________________________HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.___________________________WilliamH.Inman,Sr.J.