˙WPC6 …# VUNa %¯ 0(ĩbŨw.å4 ' 6 0J> 0Tˆ 0^Ü 0h: 0rĸ 0| 0† 0 1uĻ 0d U> B)Ŋ DCæ AM)U*v v~° B.vĶK D3 0@Q AO‘Æā 0DĻ D/ę B˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTĀĖĀääĀĀĖ0 (ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($ĄĄ- ų-ŒEŽE‘Ķ€›DŌ 3|x›2 ˙˙0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ˙˙0Indent2ā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ˙˙0Indent3ā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ˙˙0Indent4ā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ˙˙0Indent5ā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ˙˙0Indent6ā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ˙˙0Indent7ā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ˙˙0Indent8ā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ˙˙?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ˙˙8Mac DefaultMac DefaultĶ ` °šXĶ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d7Border 1dd€- Cū˙ << G˙˙< Œ 9p`(Arial Ũ ƒ!ŨŅ  ŅŅ#€d#ŅÔ€ÔŨ  ŨÔ€"ÔÔ€"ÔĶ  Ķō ōÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€"XÔĖĖNovember€1,€1996ĖĖCecil€W.€CrowsonĖAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôķ ķPtPtHHÚ(˙á˙âųFG(üHHÚ(d'@ dStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃĐ ĐĐHHĐĐ  ĐĐ2ĐĐ˙˙¸æ$˙ĐĐHHĐĐĐĐĐĐĐĐ  ĐĐ ĐĐ ĐŅŅŅGenevaŅŅ ŅŅ € ŅŅ<Px–ČŅŌŌŌ443!#4ŌŌ$ *$ŌŌ$*$ŌŌ ˙KK ŌŌ  Geneva ŌŌ  Geneva ŌĶ.,ĶĶĶĶ6ĶĶ ĶßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßŅGenevaŅŅ ŅŌ  BA Op Geneva ŌŌ  BA Op Geneva Ō%%%%'˙˙dxd("˙˙$ŖŖŌ  ŌŌ  Ō€-‚ƒCū˙<< C˙˙ƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ō ōÚ  Ú1Ú  Úķ ķ„„'÷˙ dxdü˙P PdŨ ƒ!ŨÔ . ÔÔ€ÔŨ  ŨŌ  ŌŌ „ ŌŅ  ŅŅ\R AØ'\ŅŅ€ŅŅ7€ļeXXdėdČ7ŅŅ  ŅŅ  Ņō ō›SUSAN€œKAY›€PILGER€RIGGS,ā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āPlaintiff/Appellant,ā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āDavidson€CircuitĖā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āNo.€€91D„2188ĖVS.ā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āAppeal€No.Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā ā01A01„9601„CV„00007ĖJAMES€LANDRY€RIGGS,ā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āœDefendant/Appellee.ā ā›ā āā ā)ĖĖŲ€€؜ßL€!# ;+'h|į,` į `€€LߛĖā@ āIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEĖā@ āMIDDLE€SECTION€AT€NASHVILLEĖĖĖā@ āAPPEAL€FROM€THE€DAVIDSON€CIRCUIT€COURTĖā@ āAT€NASHVILLE,€TENNESSEEĖĖĖā@ āHONORABLE€MURIEL€ROBINSON,€JUDGEĖķ ķĖĖFred€C.Dance,€#7004ĖDANCE,€DANCE€&€LANEĖ3200€West€End€Avenue,€Suite€101ĖNashville,€Tennessee€37203˜ATTORNEY€FOR€PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT›ĖĖĖDavid€I.€Komisar,€#9207Ė211€Printerđđs€Alley€BuildingĖSuite€400ĖNashville,€Tennessee€37201ĖATTORNEY€FOR€œDEFENDANT/APPELLEE›ĖĖĖĶ  ĶÔ€ŧÔō ōAFFIRMED€AND€REMANDED.ķ ķÔ€XÔĖĶ  ĶĖĖĖā āā āā āā āā āā āHENRY€F.€TODDĖā āā āā āā āā āā āPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONĖĖĖĖĖCONCUR:ĖĖSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€JUDGEĖBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGEĖĖĖĖĖĖĖĖō ōSUSAN€œKAY›€PILGER€RIGGS,ā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āPlaintiff/Appellant,ā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āDavidson€CircuitĖā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āNo.€€91D„2188ĖVS.ā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āAppeal€No.Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā ā01A01„9601„CV„00007ĖJAMES€LANDRY€RIGGS,ā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ĖĶĶā āœDefendant/Appellee.ā ā›ā āā ā)ĖĖÔ€ŧÔā@ āōōO€P€I€N€I€O€Nķķķ ķÔ€XÔĖĶ  ĶĖā āThe€plaintiff/wife€has€appealed€from€the€judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€declaring€theĪparties€divorced€pursuant€to€T.C.A.€đđ€36„4„129,€placing€child€custody€œin›€the€wife€andĪawarding€child€œsupport.€€The›€issues€on€appeal€relate€only€to€support.ĖĖā āThe€parties€were€married€on€March€15,€1985.€€One€child,€a€son,€was€born€on€May€15,Ī1985.€€œOn›€June€7,€1991,€the€wife€sued€for€divorce,€praying€for€the€usual€relief,€œand›€inΜaddition,›€enforcement€of€œpendente›€lite€support€ordered€in€a€previous€divorce€suit€which€wasĪdismissed.ĖĖā āOn€July€25,€1991,€the€Trial€Court€entered€an€order€containing€the€following:ĖĶĶā āā  €€At€€the€€conclusion€of€€the€hearing,€having€considered€the€Ėā āā ātestimony€€of€€the€parties€€and€the€entire€record€in€the€cause,Ėā āā āthe€€Court€finds€that€an€emergency€financial€situation€exists,Ėā āā āand€that€€the€€Complainant,€Susan€Kay€Pilger€Riggs,€and€theĖā āā āminor€child€of€€the€parties,€Jamie€Riggs,€are€entitled€to€childĖā āā āsupport€and€alimony€pendente€lite€pending€further€orders€of€Ėā āā āthe€Court.€ĖĖā āā  €€The€€Court€€finds€that€the€Complainant,€Susan€Kay€PilgerĖā āā āRiggs,€lacks€the€present€ability€to€earn€income€which€wouldĖā āā āsupport€herself€and€the€minor€child€at€this€time.ĖĖā āā  €€Accordingly,€€the€€Court€ORDERS€that€the€Respondent,Ėā āā āJames€€Landry€€Riggs,€immediately€€pay€the€June€mortgageĖā āā āpayment€and€late€fees€representing€the€indebtedness€knownĖā āā āas€the€first€mortgage€on€the€partiesđđ€home€place€located€€atĖā āā ā909€€€€Oak€€€€Valley€€€€Lane,€€€€Nashville,€€€Tennessee.€€€The€Ėā āā āRespondent€is€€further€€ORDERED€€to€€make€€payment€€of€Ėā āā ā$1,263.00€no€€later€€than€€5:00€p.m.€Monday,€July€15,€1991€Ėā āā āto€€the€€mortgage€€company€€to€€pay€the€mortgage€payment€Ėā āā ādue€for€the€month€of€July,€1991,€and€to€pay€to€Susan€Riggs€Ėā āā āthe€sum€of€$237.00€for€a€total€July€obligation€of€$1,500.00.€€Ėā āā āThe€€Respondentđđs€€€obligation€€€to€€€make€€€the€€€mortgage€Ėā āā āpayments€€described€hereinabove€shall€include€any€late€fees€Ėā āā āwhich€may€have€resulted€from€the€untimely€payment€of€theĖā āā āsums€due€in€June€and€July€of€1991.ĖĖā āā  €€Thereafter,€€€beginning€€€€the€€€month€€€of€€€August,€€€theĖā āā āRespondent€shall€and€is€ORDERED€to€pay€direct€to€SusanĖā āā āKay€€Pilger€€Riggs€€the€€sum€of€$1,500.00€per€month.€€SaidĖā āā āpayment€shall€be€due€and€payable€no€later€€than€the€5th€day€Ėā āā āof€€each€€month€€and€€from€said€payment,€Susan€€Kay€PilgerĖā āā āRiggs,€€is€€ORDERED€€to€€pay€€on€€a€€timely€€basis€€the€firstĖā āā āmortgage€€indebtedness€€and€utility€charges€accruing€on€the€Ėā āā āpartiesđđ€€home€€place.€€ĖĖā āā  €€Pending€€further€€orders€€of€the€Court,€and€in€addition€to€Ėā āā āthe€€$1,500.00€€cash€€€payable€€to€€€the€€€Complainant,€€€the€Ėā āā āRespondent€€shall€€maintain€€health€€insurance€coverage€on€Ėā āā āMrs.€€Riggs€€and€€the€€€minor€€child€€and€€pay€€€any€€and€€all€Ėā āā āuncovered€€hospital,€€medical,€€doctor€€or€€dental€€expensesĖā āā āpending€a€final€hearing€in€this€cause.˜ĖĶ  Ķ„€„€„Ė›ĖĶ  Ķā āā  €€It€is€the€finding€of€the€Court€that€ōōall€of€the€payments€and€Ėā āā āobligations€set€out€hereinabove€are€in€the€nature€of€support€Ėā āā āof€the€partiesđđ€minor€child€and€the€œComplainantķķ.€€(EmphasisĖā āā āsupplied.)›ĖĶ  ĶĶĶĖā āOn€November€17,€1994,€a€petition€for€contempt€was€filed€in€this€case€on€behalf€of€theĪwife€alleging€$36,531.29€delinquency€in€the€$1,500€per€month€support€and€failure€to€provideĪinsurance€as€ordered.ĖĖā āOn€January€18,€1995,€the€wife€filed€an€amended€complaint€for€absolute€divorce.ĖĖā āOn€January€25,€1995,€an€order€was€entered€by€the€Trial€Court€deferring€indefinitelyĪaction€upon€the€contempt€petition€filed€November€17,€1994.ĖĖā āOn€April€7,€1995,€the€wife€filed€an€amended€petition€for€contempt€alleging€specificĪunpaid€insurance€and€medical€expenses€and€accumulated€unpaid€support€of€$36,531.19,€andĪpraying€for€sentence€for€contempt,€judgement€for€arrears,€lien,€wage€assignment€and€attorneysĪfees.ĖĖā āOn€April€12,€1995,€the€husband€moved€for€reduction€of€support€payments.€€ĖĖā āOn€April€20,€1995,€the€Trial€Court€entered€an€order€providing:ĖĶĶā āā  €€IT€€IS€€THEREFORE€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€ANDĖā āā āDECREED€that€the€Amended€Petition€for€Contempt€shallĖā āā ābe€dismissed€and€that€ōōno€arrearage€shall€be€awarded€Wifeķķ.€œĖā āā ā(Emphasis€supplied.)›ĖĶĶĖā āā āThe€cause€was€heard€on€its€merits€on€July€5€&€6,€1995,€and,€on€August€1,Ī1995,€the€Trial€Court€entered€an€order€stating:ĖĶ͜›ā āā  €€Upon€testimony€of€the€parties,€their€witnesses,€consideration€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ėā āā āof€€their€exhibits€and€the€entire€record€herein,€the€court€finds€asĖā āā āfollows:ĖĖā āā  €€This€€case€€has€been€in€a€state€of€confusion€since€1989.€€TheĖā āā āproblem€€is€that€Mrs.€Riggs€married€Mr.€Riggs€when€he€was€inĖā āā ādebt,€€and€€her€€expectations€€and€€her€€demands€are€unrealistic,€Ėā āā āwhich€€is€€not€€to€€say€€that€Mr.€Riggsđđ€are€too.€€But€it€is€not€as€Ėā āā ācomplicated€€as€it€seems.€€This€marriage€virtually€has€no€assets,Ėā āā ābut€€it€€is€€a€marriage€of€two€professional€people€that€can€work.€€Ėā āā āThe€€court€€further€€finds€€that€both€are€capable€of€making€their€Ėā āā āown€€way€€since€€they€€are€€both€licensed€real€estate€agents€and€Ėā āā āhave€been€that€way€for€some€time.ĖĖā āā  €€The€€€court€€€declares€€€the€€€parties€€€divorced€€€pursuant€€€toĖā āā āT.C.A.€đđ36„4„129€in€that€ōōboth€parties€have€grounds€for€divorceĖā āā āagainst€the€other.ķķĖĖā āā  €€The€€€court€€€further€€€finds€€€that€€ōōMrs.€€Riggs€€is€€capable€of€Ėā āā ārehabilitation€and€reestablishing€herself€in€the€real€estate€€worldķķ.€Ėā āā āĖā āā  €€The€œ€€court€€›€œfinds€€›€œthat€€›€œthere€›€œis€›€no€œ€evidence›€œ€that€›€œshe€›€is€Ėā āā āincapacitated€in€anyway€healthwise,€and€€rehabilitative€alimony€Ėā āā āfor€one€year€is€necessary€and€that€will€€be€payment€of€€$500.00€€Ėā āā āplus€€œher›€TennCare€€insurance€€premium€€œ€each›€œ€›€month€€for€12€Ėā āā āmonths.€€œThe›€€first€€payment€€for€€the€€alimony€€and€health€care€Ėā āā āinsurance€premium€pursuant€to€this€final€decree€will€be€due€for€Ėā āā āthe€€month€€of€€August€€1995€€and€€the€€responsibility€€for€€€the€Ėā āā ārehabilitative€alimony€and€TennCare€insurance€€will€cease€with€Ėā āā āthe€payments€due€July€1996.ĖĖā āā  €€It€€is,€therefore,€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED,€and€DECREEDĖā āā āthat€€the€€parties€are€declared€divorced€pursuant€to€TCA€€đđ€36„Ėā āā ā4„129€and€each€is€restored€to€all€the€privileges€of€an€unmarried€Ėā āā āperson.ĖĖā āā  €€It€is€further€ORDERED€that€child€support€shall€be€set€in€theĖā āā āamount€€€of€€€$520.00€€€per€€€month€€plus€€€the€€€clerkđđs€€€lawful€Ėā āā ācommission€€€of€€€$26.00€€beginning€€August€5,€€1995€by€wage€Ėā āā āassignment.€€ĖĖā āā  €€It€€€is€€€further€€€ORDERED€€€that€€€James€€€Riggs€€€will€€pay€Ėā āā ārehabilitative€€€alimony€€€€to€€Susan€€€Riggs€€in€€the€€amount€€of€Ėā āā ā$500.00€plus€her€TennCare€insurance€premium€each€month€for€€€Ėā āā ā12€months.€€The€first€payment€for€the€alimony€€and€€health€care€Ėā āā āœinsurance›€premium€pursuant€to€this€final€decree€will€be€due€for€Ėā āā āthe€€month€€of€€August€€1995€€on€€August€5,€1995€€and€the€fiveĖā āā āhundred€€dollar€€alimony€€payment€€will€be€by€wage€assignment€Ėā āā āand€€the€€responsibility€for€the€rehabilitative€alimony€and€Tenn„Ėā āā āCare€€insurance€will€cease€with€the€payments€due€July€5,€1996.€€Ėā āā āAfter€€€that,€€€any€€€health€€€insurance€€€premium€€€will€€€be€€€the€Ėā āā āresponsibility€of€Mrs.€Riggs.ĖĖā āā  €€It€is€further€ORDERED€that€James€Riggs€will€be€responsibleĖā āā āfor€€the€€second€€mortgage€€on€the€property€located€at€909€OakĖā āā āValley€€Lane€€as€€ōōalimony€which€is€necessary€for€the€support€of€Ėā āā āthe€€wife€€and€€the€€childķ퀀€and€€€will€€€be€€€nondischargeable€€€in€Ėā āā ābankruptcy.€€Mr.€€Riggs€€will€€pay€€the€€second€€mortgage€€in€€a€ĖĶĶā āā ātimely€œfashion.€€(Emphasis€supplied.)›ĖĖā āFrom€the€foregoing€judgment,€the€wife€has€appealed€and€presented€œfive›€œissues.›ĖĖĶĶā āā āā āā āā āō ōōōISSUE€Iķķķ ķĖĖā āā  €€Did€€the€€trial€€court€err€in€forgiving€an€arrearage€in€Ėā āā āThe€€support€€€payments€€ordered€€€paid€€to€€the€Wife?ĖĖā āā āā āā āā āōōō ōISSUE€IIķ ķķķĖĖā āā  €€Did€€the€€trial€court€abuse€its€discretion€in€forgivingĖā āā āthe€arrearage€in€support€payments€ordered€paid€to€the€ĖĶĶā āā āWife?ĖĶĶĖĖĶĶā āThese€two€issues€complain€of€the€single€sentence€of€the€June€1,€1995,€order€quotedĪabove,€which€dismissed€the€amended€petition€for€contempt€and€œdenied›€an€award€for€arrearage.€ĪNo€other€wording€of€the€order€indicates€a€đ đforgivenessđđ€of€court€ordered€support.ĖĖā āT.C.A.€€đđ€36„5„101(a)(5)€does€forbid€retroactive€reduction€or€đ đforgivenessđđ€of€childĪsupport.€€However,€the€wife€fails€to€cite€and€this€Court€has€been€unable€to€find€any€concreteĪindication€in€œany›€order€of€the€Trial€Court€that€any€child€support€was€retroactively€reduced€orĪforgiven.ĖĖā āAs€indicated€above,€child€support€was€not€awarded€separately€from€đ đwife€support.đđ€ĪThe€required€payments€were€designated€support€for€wife€and€œchild.€€The›€record€does€œnot€reflect›Īany€designation€of€any€specified€part€of€the€đ đsupportđđ€as€child€support.€€It€is€thereforeĪimpossible€for€this€Court€to€ascertain€what€part€of€the€œđ đsupport,đ𛀜if€any,€was›€œforgiven.›ĖĖā āā āThe€varied€and€confusing€relationship€of€the€parties€during€the€extended€lapsesĪin€proceedings€in€this€case€creates€œuncertainty›€as€to€the€reason€or€reasons€why€no€judgment€wasĪawarded€for€arrears€support.€€For€a€part€of€the€time,€the€wife€stipulated€that€support€paymentsĪwere€received.€€Other€parts€of€the€time€lapse€were€periods€when€the€parties€were€living€togetherĪand€the€husband€was€bearing€the€expenses€of€the€household.ĖĖā āIn€its€convoluted€state,€the€evidence€does€not€support€a€judgment€for€arrears€support.ĖĖā āā āā āā āō ōISSUE€III€„€ōōAMOUNT€OF€œALIMONYķķķ ķĖ›Ėā āā āIn€its€final€judgment,€quoted€above,€the€Trial€Court€awarded€the€wife€$500.00Īper€month€rehabilitative€alimony€and€œhealth›€care€insurance€for€one€year€only.€€However,€theĪsame€judgment€requires€the€husband€to€pay€a€second€mortgage€đ đas€alimony€which€is€necessaryĪfor€the€support€of€the€wife€and€child.đđ€€The€wife€testified€that€the€original€amount€of€the€secondĪmortgage€was€$30,000,€but€no€evidence€is€cited€or€found€as€to€the€unpaid€balance€or€terms€ofĪpayments.€€The€record€leaves€considerable€uncertainty€as€to€the€amount€and€duration€ofĪalimony.ĖĖā āEqually€uncertain€are€the€facts€concerning€the€needs€of€the€wife,€her€ability€to€earnĪmoney€and€the€ability€of€the€husband€to€pay.€€The€evidence€was€sharply€in€conflict,€and€theĪTrial€Judge€evaluated€credibility€in€reaching€œconclusions€above€quoted.›ĖĖā āAny€conflict€in€the€testimony€of€witnesses€requiring€a€determination€of€credibility€ofĪwitnesses€is€for€the€Trial€Court€and€binding€on€the€appellate€court€unless€other€real€evidenceĪcompels€a€contrary€conclusion.ōō€€State€ex€rel€Balsinger€v.€Town€of€Madisonvilleķķ,€222€Tenn.Ī272,€435€S.W.2d€803€(1968).€€No€such€real€evidence€is€cited€or€found€to€compel€a€conclusionĪcontrary€to€that€of€the€Trial€Judge.€€The€evidence€does€not€preponderate€otherwise.ĖĖā āIn€the€state€of€the€record,€this€Court€finds€the€third€issue€presents€no€ground€forĪreversal.ĖĖā āā āā āō ōISSUE€IV€AND€V€„€ōōCHILD€SUPPORT€GUIDELINESķķķ ķĖĖ€€€€€€ā āAt€the€conclusion€of€the€trial,€the€following€occurred;ĖĶĶā āā āTHE€COURT:€€sofar€as€the€child€support€is€concerned,€theĖ€ā āā āCourt€will€set€the€amount€of€$52€0.00€per€month.ĖĖā āā āBY€MR.€JABLONSKI:€Your€Honor€please,€and€I€am€sorryĖā āā ā„€„€I€disagree€€with€€his€€figure.€€He€€testified€€that€so€far€this€Ėā āā āyear€€he€€had€€made€€$34,000.00€including€„€„€or€$37,000.00Ėā āā āincluding€€a€€gift,€€take€that€gift€out€he€has€made€$27,000.00Ėā āā āand€€that€€is€€based€€on€a€$54,000.00€year,€I€would€calculateĖā āā āchild€support€at€$682.00.ĖĖā āā āTHE€€COURT:€€Okay.€€€I€€have€calculated€€€it€€€and€€I€€think€Ėā āā ā$520.00€is€a€more€accurate€figure.€$520.000€per€month€plusĖā āā āthe€€childđđs€€Tenn€€Care€€premium,€€plus€all€bills€not€coveredĖā āā āby€€the€€Tenn€€Care€insurance.€If€you€add€that€up,€he€will€be€ĖĶĶā āā āover€what€you€suggested.€€That€takes€care€of€the€child.ĖĖā āIt€is€seen€that€counsel€for€the€wife€computed€support€due€under€the€guidelines€atĪ$682.00,€and€the€Trial€Judge€found€that€$520.00€cash€plus€heath€expenses€would€amount€to€asĪmuch€as€$682.00.ĖĖā āIn€order€to€reverse€this€finding,€evidence€is€necessary€to€show€the€error€in€the€finding.€ĪSuch€evidence€is€not€cited,€and€this€Court€is€not€under€a€duty€to€search€the€record€for€uncitedĪevidence.€€Rule€6,€Rules€of€this€Court;€ōōAlexander€v.€Tenn.€Farmers€Mut.€Ins.€Co.ķķ,€Tenn.€App.Ī1995,€905€S.W.2d€177.€€€ĖĖā āNo€reversible€error€is€presented€by€issues€IV€and€V.ĖĖā āThe€judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€is€affirmed.€€Costs€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€against€theĪappellant.€€The€cause€is€remanded€to€the€Trial€Court€for€further€necessary€proceedings.Ė€€ĶĶā āĖĶ  ĶĶĶō ōÔ€ŧÔAFFIRMED€AND€REMANDEDā āÔ€XԀ€€€ķ ķĖĶ  ĶĶĶĖā āā āā āā āā āā ā_______________________________________Ėā āā āā āā āā āā āHENRY€F.€TODDĖā āā āā āā āā āā āPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONĖĖCONCUR:ĖĖ_____________________________________ĖSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€JUDGEĖĖ_____________________________________ĖBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGE