WPCf  Q6,Oҏ%YT4\7o-ASW/4k1_ScyPijE Ų, N=TgK$+"x zdJ^3a?5vq`fqSkdK4of`Iz>8[2.(pp,Wv"\,CePMl_vj[ 頲ƢPu<ݹ°# j4B"c.%܏ks,4Iu2ǥ/*W\_uN!GV24њkˋ^/5?r|vyFa{%f/ Ӆ/bm̬Qg{R<>Ae8=jq٬9'S] cŝ3Upu~>aB) ֟k~46ɅCV r&Y>v"aYh! kT*# LU :W % 0(b w@4 .6 0l 0Df  U: B AQ U 0D 0D_ 0D D/ B D33 HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLl,  AZ"Arial RegularX($- - DDDPDӀcl&3|x  XX      1    Rule10(b)oftheRulesoftheCourtofAppealsreadsasfollows:  8   ! ! 8  0 TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.((3$ !      0  (#$  0   ""  X?XXXfQ XX?   Ad FILEDX?X fQ  March12,1999CecilCrowson,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAh ,cAZ"Arial Regular d!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ((' dxdP Pd'dxd !  TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7?XXdXXd7    YXX  r )<,(j 8` `@E` 8ttxP,  rߛ@  INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @(ATNASHVILLE X?XYԈ  ̛̜̜TERRYROGERS,     8   )     0      8   ) Claimant/Appellant,   8   ) Nr    0      8   )  AppealNo. 4X    0      8   )  01A019803BC00160 >  МVS.  0      8   ) $    0      8   )  ClaimsCommission     0      8   )  No.102464   МSTATEOFTENNESSEE,   8   )   @      H!  #      0      8   ) Defendant/Appellee. 8   ) ~ @ APPEALEDFROMTHETENNESSEECLAIMSCOMMISSION@&MIDDLEDIVISION@ THEHONORABLEW.R.BAKER,COMMISSIONERHARRYA.WIERSEMA,JR.422S.GayStreetKnoxville,Tennessee37902 AttorneyforClaimant/AppellantJOHNKNOXWALKUPAttorneyGeneral&ReporterMARYG.MOODYSeniorCounsel425FifthAvenueNorthNashville,Tennessee37243 AttorneyforDefendant/Appellee@||$REVERSEDANDREMANDED  0      8     BENH.CANTRELL,  0      8     PRESIDINGJUDGE,M.S.̜CONCUR:̜KOCH,J.CAIN,J.  828  L[XX?@% d L[MEMORANDUMOPINION#L[  d% # X?XL[Ԝ   #  1      כ    0 ThisisadisputeoverwhethertheClaimsCommissionshouldhavesetasideitsordertodismisstheclaimbecauseanattorneyofrecordfortheclaimantwasnotnotifiedofthemotiontodismiss.Wefind,however,thattheorderofdismissalwasnotvalidlyenteredaccordingtoRule58,Tenn.R.Civ.Proc.We,therefore,remandthecausetotheCommissionforconsiderationoftheStatesmotiontodismissforfailuretoprosecute.̛̜  0 OnSeptember27,1991,MichaelWalker,anattorneyfromJamestownfiledanoticeofclaimwiththeDivisionofClaimsAdministrationonbehalfofTerryRogers.ThenoticeallegedthatMr.Rogerswasinjuredinabicycleaccidentbecauseofanunsafeanddangerousconditiononastatehighway.OnJanuary6,1992theDivisionofClaimsAdministrationtransferredtheclaimtotheClaimsCommission.̛̜  0 Atsomepoint,attorneysHarryWiersemaandMichaelWalkerfileda ClaimintheNatureofComplaintintheClaimsCommissiononbehalfofTerryRogersandwifeLisaRogers.TheStatefiledanansweronMay4,1992.̛̜  0 OnJanuary21,1997theCommissionersignedanorderrelievingMichaelWalkerfromfurtherresponsibilitiesinthecase.Mr.Walkersignedtheorderandapproveditforentry.̛̜  0 OnDecember16,1997theStatemovedtodismisstheclaimforthefailuretoprosecute.ThemotioncontainedacertificatethatithadbeensenttoMr.Rogers.ThecertificatedidnotmentionMr.WiersemranorMrs.Rogers.OnMarcyh p3-2 3,1998theCommissionerdismissedtheclaim.ThecertificateontheordershowsacopytotheAssistantAttorneyGeneralandMr.RogersnottoMr.WiersemanortoMrs.Rogers.  0 ThestatutescreatingtheClaimsCommissionprovidethatitsproceedings shallbeconductedpursuanttorRulesoftheTennesseeRulesofCivilProcedurewhereapplicable....Tenn.CodeAnn.98403.Rule58provides:̜8 80 ! !  Entryofajudgmentoranorderoffinaldispositioniseffectivewhenajudgmentcontainingoneofthefollowingismarkedonthefacebytheclerkasfiledforentry: 0 0  8 80 ! !  (1)  thesignaturesofthejudgeandallpartiesor      counsel,or 0 0   8 0 80 !0 !(2)  thesignaturesofthejudgeandonepartyor l   counselwithacertificateofcounselthata @  @ copyoftheproposedorderhasbeenserved  on Lp allotherpartiesorcounsel,or  8 80 ! !  (3)  thesignatureofthejudgeandacertificate ,P     oftheclerkthatacopyhasbeenservedon    allotherpartiesorcounsel. 0 0  ̛̛̜  0 Inouropiniontheorderdismissingtheclaimwasnotvalidlyenteredbecauseitwasnotsignedbyallpartiesorcounselnordiditcontainacertificatethatacopyoftheorderhadbeenservedonallpartiesorcounsel.  0 WethereforevacatetheorderdismissingtheclaimandremandthecausetotheClaimsCommissionforreconsiderationofthemotiontodismissforfailuretoprosecute.TaxthecostsonappealtotheState.̛̜  0      8      @      H!  #   0      8   _________________________________  0      8   BENH.CANTRELL,  0      8   PRESIDINGJUDGE,M.S. L;p59 CONCUR:_____________________________WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE̜_____________________________WILLIAMB.CAIN,JUDGE   0    ќWXX= @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @(ATNASHVILLE X=XWԈ  МTERRYROGERS,     8   )     0      8   ) Claimant/Appellant,   8   )  AppealNo.     0      8   )  01A019803BC00160     0      8   )     VS.  0      8   )  ClaimsCommission x    0      8   )  No.102464 h    0      8   )   X|  STATEOFTENNESSEE,   8   )  Reversedand   H!  #  Hl    0      8   )  Remanded 8\  Defendant/Appellee. 8   ) (L WXX= @uu'JUDGMENT  , X=XW  0 Thiscausecameontobeheardupontherecordonappealfromthe 4X ClaimsCommission,andbriefsandargumentofcounsel;uponconsiderationwhereof,thisCourtisoftheopinionthatinthejudgmentoftheCommissionerthereisreversibleerror.  0 InaccordancewiththeopinionoftheCourtfiledherein,itis,therefore,orderedandadjudgeddecreedbythisCourtthatthejudgmentisreversed.ThecauseisremandedtotheClaimsCommissionforfurtherproceedingsconsistentwiththeopinionherein,andforthecollectionofthecostsaccruedbelow.  0 CostsofthisappealaretaxedagainsttheStateofTennessee.  0      8 ______________________________________  0      8 BENH.CANTRELL,PRESIDINGJUDGE,M.S.  0      8   0      8 ______________________________________  0      8 WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE  0      8 ______________________________________  0      8 WILLIAMB.CAIN,JUDGE