ÿWPCŒ …U:V %b–žn­® 04[w.—4Å 0xÙ 0DQ 0J• 0Tß 0^3 0h‘ 0rù 0|k 0†ç 0m 1uý 0dr U>Ö B)DC= AM€U*Í÷v~vÓ„ D3W BŠ 0@§ AOçÆ6 0Dü D/@ Bo<þ6X9`("Courier NewTTX- ù-3|xú!«<þ6X9`("Courier NewTTXXxþ6X@ÉDQX@( ¤T$¡¡Ó  Óë!ì!Eí!Eî!ï!Eð!Ó€ú!DÒ (((3Þ $¤¤Ý ƒ¤T!ÝÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d####7Border 1dd€-$Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÔ€&ÔÔ€&ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€&XÔÌÌAugust€29,€1997ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó óPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò,,,,'ÿÿdxd d("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ ` ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€ÊëXXdÈdÈ7ÑÑ€ÑÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÔ€"Ôò ò›Þ ÞÌSCEPTER,€INC.,à àà àà àà à€€€)à àAppeal€No.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)€à à01A01„9612„CH„00540Ìà àPlaintiff/Appellant,à àà à€€€à à€€€)à àÌà àà àà àà à€€€à àà à€€€)€ÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)à àHumphreys€County€ChanceryÌà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)€à àCase€No.€23„232̜ـ€ÙßR€%'$A1-j|CZ` ç `€€@ÿRß›HUMPHREYS€COUNTY,€TENNESSEE€€€€€)Ìand€THE€HUMPHREYS€COUNTY€à à€€€)ÌAIRPORT€AUTHORITY,à àà àà à€€€)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)Ìà àDefendant/Appellee.à àà àœà à›€€€)ó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌò òÓ  ÓIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌMIDDLE€SECTION€AT€NASHVILLEÌÌÌAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€HUMPHREYS€COUNTYÌÌAT€WAVERLY,€TENNESSEEÌÌÌHONORABLE€ROBERT€E.€BURCH,€JUDGEÌÓ  ÓÌó óÌÌÌLeah€G.€Gossett,€#16698ÌJames€R.€BucknerÌMILLER€&€MARTINÌSuite€1000,€Volunteer€BuildingÌ832€Georgia€AvenueÌChattanooga,€TN€37402„2289ÌATTORNEYS€FOR€PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT,ÌÌJohn€Lee€WilliamsÌPORCH,€PEELER,€WILLIAMS€&€THOMASONÌ102€South€Court€SquareÌWaverly,€TN€37185„2198ÌATTORNEY€FOR€DEFENDANT/APPELLEEÌÌÌò òÓ  ÓREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDó óÌÓ  ÓÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àHENRY€F.€TODDÌà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONÌÌÌCONCURS:ÌÌSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€JUDGEÌBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGE,ÌÌò òSCEPTER,€INC.,à àà àà àà à€€€)à àAppeal€No.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)€à à01A01„9612„CH„00540Ìà àPlaintiff/Appellant,à àà à€€€à à€€€)à àÌà àà àà àà à€€€à àà à€€€)€ÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)à àHumphreys€County€ChanceryÌà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)€à àCase€No.€23„232ÌHUMPHREYS€COUNTY,€TENNESSEE€€€€€)Ìand€THE€HUMPHREYS€COUNTY€à à€€€)ÌAIRPORT€AUTHORITY,à àà àà à€€€)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€)Ìà àDefendant/Appellee.à àà àà à€€€)ó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÓÓÌò òòòÓ  ÓÔ€"¼ÔO€€P€€I€€N€€I€€O€€NÔ€"XÔóóó óÌÓÓÓÓÓ  ÓÌà àThis€is€a€suit€to€enforce€an€oral€lease€of€airport€hanger€privileges€at€a€county„owned€airport.€ÏThe€Trial€Court€entered€the€following€judgment:ÌÓÓÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` Òà àThis€cause€came€on€to€be€heard€this€date€upon€theÏcomplaint€filed€by€the€Plaintiffs,€the€motion€to€dismiss€filedÏby€the€Defendants,€arguments€of€the€Solicitors€for€theÏparties,€and€the€entire€record€in€the€cause.€€From€all€of€whichÏthe€Court€finds€the€motion€to€dismiss€to€be€well€taken.ÌÌà àIT,€THEREFORE,€CONSIDERED€AND€ORDEREDÏBY€THE€COURT,€That€the€(sic)€this€suit€is€herebyÏdismissed.€€The€costs€are€taxed€to€the€Plaintiff€for€whichÏexecution€shall€issue€if€becoming€necessary.ÌÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓÓÌà àThe€record€contains€no€other€expression€of€the€reasons€for€the€judgment.€€The€motion€toÍdismiss€referred€to€in€the€judgment€read€as€follows:ÌÓÓÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` Òà àDefendants€move€the€Court€for€entry€of€an€orderÏdismissing€the€claims€of€Plaintiff€pursuant€to€Tennessee€RuleÏof€Civil€Procedure€12.02(1)€for€the€reason€that€this€CourtÏlacks€jurisdiction€over€the€subject€matter€of€this€suit.€ÏSpecifically,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€42„5„122(c)Ïprovides€that€municipalities€(which€include€counties€byÏdefinition)€and€their€agents€are€immune€from€actions€or€suitsÏarising€out€of€€ð ðmaintenance,€operation,€superintendence,€orÏmanagement€of€a€municipal€airport.ððÌÌà àHumphreys€County€owns€and€operates€the€publicÏairport,€the€operation€of€which€is€the€subject€of€the€presentÏsuit.ÌÌà àHumphreys€County€Airport€Authority€is€œ(sic)Ïexecutive›€agent€of€Humphreys€County€for€the€purpose€ofÏoperating€and€managing€this€public€airport.ÌÌà àBoth€Defendants€are€immune€from€the€present€suit€inÏthis€case€by€reason€of€the€said€statute.ÌÌà àWherefore,€Defendants€pray€that€the€Court€dismissÏthis€suit€for€lack€of€jurisdiction€over€the€subject€€matterÏresulting€from€the€immunity€œtherefrom›€granted€by€statute.ÌÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓÓÌà àœT.C.A.›€ðð€œ42„5„122,›€cited€in€the€œmotion,›€reads€œin€pertinent€part€as›€follows:ÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ X ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` ÒÓÓà à(c)à àNo€action€or€suit€shall€be€brought€orÏmaintained€against€any€municipality,€or€its€officers,€agents,Ïservants€or€employees,€in€or€about€the€construction,Ïmaintenance,€operation,€superintendence,€or€management€ofÏany€municipal€airport.ÌÌà à(d)à àNothing€in€this€section€shall€be€construed€toÏprohibit€any€action,€suit,€or€proceedings€by€or€on€behalf€ofÏany€holder€of€bonds€of€a€municipality€heretofore€or€hereafterÏissued€for€airport€purposes€of€whatsoever€nature,€pursuantÏto€this€chapter,€or€pursuant€to€any€other€section€or€chapter€ofÏthis€Code,€or€any€other€general€or€special€law€or€charter.Ï[Acts€1957,€ch.€375,€ðð€5;€T.C.A.,€ðð€42„326.]€ÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ X ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓÓÌà àThe€complaint€alleged:ÌÓÓÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` Ò3.à àThe€Humphreys€County€Airport€Authority€purportsÏto€be€a€public€body€created€by€resolution€of€the€HumphreysÏCounty€Commission€in€December,€1992.€€It€purports€to€actÏfor€the€county€with€respect€to€the€management€and€regulationÏof€the€Humphreys€County€Authority.€€Apparently,€theÏAuthority€was€created€pursuant€to€T.C.A.€ðð€42„3„103.ÌÓ  Ó„€„€„€„ÌÓ  Ó5.à àRock€Abou„Sakher€(ð ðSakherðð)€is€a€citizen€andÏresident€of€Humphreys€County,€Tennessee.€€He€served€asÏmanager€of€the€Humphreys€County€Airport€at€least€throughÏthe€end€of€1995.€€Sakher€had€actual€and/or€apparent€authorityÏto€enter€contracts€on€behalf€of€the€county€with€respect€toÏmatters€within€the€ordinary€course€of€business€of€theÏHumphreys€County€Airport.ÌÌ6.à àAs€manager€of€the€Humphreys€County€Airport,ÏSakher€on€behalf€of€the€County€entered€a€lease€agreementÏwith€Scepter.€€This€lease€agreement€was€a€year€to€yearÏagreement€that€has€been€renewed€annually€every€year€sinceÏ1988.€€From€1988€through€March,€1996,€Scepter€has€paidÏrent€monthly.€€Each€rent€payment€has€been€delivered€to€andÏaccepted€by€the€County€or€the€Authority.̛̜Ì7.à àThe€lease€agreement€between€the€County€and€ScepterÏis€an€oral€lease,€many€of€the€terms€of€which€have€beenÏdefined€by€the€course€of€dealing€between€the€parties,€theÏregular€business€practices€of€the€Airport,€and€the€customaryÏpractices€of€rural€municipal€airports€in€general.€€ForÏexample,€Scepter€has€throughout€its€occupancy€of€a€portionÏof€the€Airport€driven€vehicles€onto€the€tarmac€in€order€to€loadÏand€unload€airplanes.€€Further,€throughout€the€lease€termÏpilots€and€passengers€have€parked€vehicles€in€the€hangarÏwhile€on€trips.€€Most€importantly,€Scepter€has€had€access€toÏits€hangar€space€for€24€hours€a€day€365€days€a€year.€€SuchÏaccess€is€a€material€aspect€of€the€lease€agreement€as€ScepterÏofficers€and€employees€often€must€travel€for€businessÏpurposes€or€return€from€business€trips€outside€the€scope€ofÏregular€business€hours.ÌÌ8.à àRecently,€the€Airport€Authority,€acting€as€the€agentÏof€the€County,€breached€the€lease€agreement€between€theÏCounty€and€Scepter.€€In€addition,€the€Authority€hasÍattempted€to€impose€various€rules€and€regulations€onÏScepter,€as€lessee,€that€are€outside€the€scope€of€the€statutoryÏauthority€granted€to€a€municipal€airport€authority.ÌÓ  Ó„€„€„€„ÌÓ  Ó14.à àScepter€seeks€monetary€damages€with€respect€toÏthose€damages€that€can€be€quantified.€€Scepter€also€seeks€aÏpreliminary€and€permanent€injunction€pursuant€to€Rule€65€ofÏthe€Tennessee€Rules€of€Civil€Procedure€preventing€theÏCounty€and€the€Authority€from€unlawfully€detaining€theÏleased€premises€from€Scepter.ÌÓ  Ó„€„€„€„ÌÓ  Ó22.à àAs€the€lessee€of€space€at€the€Humphreys€CountyÏAirport,€Scepter€seeks€a€preliminary€and€permanentÏinjunction€prohibiting€the€enforcement€of€the€traffic€rules€andÏregulations€in€Section€2€of€the€Authorityððs€ò òòòGeneral€RulesÏand€Regulationsóóó ó.ÌÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓÓÌà àT.C.A.€ðð€42„3„108€cited€in€the€complaint,€reads€in€pertinent€part€as€follows:ÌÓÓÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` Òò òGeneral€powers€„€Motor€vehicle€trafficÏregulations.€„€ó óÌ(a)€An€authority€shall€have€all€the€powers€necessary€orÏconvenient€to€carry€out€the€purposes€of€this€chapterÏ(excluding€the€power€to€levy€and€collect€taxes€of€specialÏassessments)€including,€but€not€limited€to,€the€power€to:ÌÌœ(a)€€(A)€€Sue›€and€be€sued;ÌÓ  Ó„€„€„€„ÌÓ  Ó€€€œ(D)€Have€›€œsuch€›€immunity€œ€in€›€œtort€›€œcases€›€œas€›€doÏœmunicipalities›€under€the€Municipal€Airport€Act,€œcompiled›€inÏchapter€5€of€this€title;ÌœÓ  Ó„€„€„€„›ÌÓ  Óœ(2)›à àExecute€such€contracts€and€other€instruments€andÏtake€such€other€action€as€may€be€necessary€or€convenient€toÏcarry€out€the€purposes€of€this€œchapter.›ÌÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓÓà àAn€uncertified€unauthenticated€copy€of€the€General€Rules€and€Regulations€of€the€œDefendantÏCounty€Commission›€is€attached€to€the€complaint.ÌÌà àPlaintiff€filed€a€motion€for€temporary€and€permanent€restraining€order€to€enforce€the€leaseÏsupported€by€an€affidavit.ÌÌà àDefendants€filed€a€response€to€the€motion€admitting€that€the€regulations€of€the€CommissionÏdeny€use€of€hangar€space€for€individuals.€€The€response€is€supported€by€affidavit€that€theÏCommission€is€the€executive€agent€of€the€County,€admitting€that€the€regulations€of€the€CommissionÏexclude€automobiles€from€hangars,€and€asserting€that€the€Commission€does€not€have€full€control€ofÏthe€airport€because€Rock€Abou„Sakher,€whose€lease€expired€on€March€1,€1996,€has€not€yetÏsurrendered€possession.€€Attached€to€said€response€or€affidavit€œis€an›€uncertified€œandÏunauthenticated€copy›€of€a€complaint€of€the€County€against€said€Sakher,€a€ð ðFixed€Base€OperatorððsÏLease€Agreementðð€and€final€decree€invalidating€the€action€of€the€County€Commission€in€creatingÏthe€County€Airport€Commission€for€violation€of€the€Open€Meetings€Law.€€Also€attached€to€theÏresponse€or€affidavit€is€an€unauthenticated€œand€uncertified›€transcript€of€the€oral€comments€œof›€theÏTrial€Judge€in€respect€to€his€judgment€invalidating€the€creation€of€the€Airport€Commission.€€AlsoÏattached€to€the€response€or€affidavit€is€an€unauthenticated€and€uncertified€copy€of€a€letter€from€theÏCounty€Executive€and€Chairman€of€the€Airport€Commission€to€Rock€Abou„Sakher.ÌÌà àThis€completes€a€survey€of€the€record€upon€which€this€Court€is€expected€to€resolve€theÏissues€on€appeal€which,€according€to€the€plaintiff„appellant,€are:ÌÓÓÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` Ò1.à àWhether€The€Court€Erred€In€Dismissing€This€CaseÏBased€On€T.C.A.€ðð€42„5„122(c)€Which€Provides:ÌÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ X ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ  ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ  ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒNo€Action€or€suit€shall€be€brought€or€maintained€against€any€municipality€orÏits€officers,€agents,€servants,€or€employees,€in€or€about€the€construction,Ïmaintenance,€operation,€superintendence,€or€management€of€any€municipalÏairport.ÌÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ X ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` ÒÌII.à àWhether€The€Trial€Courtððs€Ruling€Violates€Article€I,ÏSection€20€of€the€Tennessee€Constitution€By€Rendering€TheÏContract€Between€Scepter€And€The€DefendantsÍUnenforceable.ÌÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓÓÌà àAccording€to€the€defendants,€the€issue€on€appeal€is:ÌÓÓÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` Òà àThe€single€issue€in€this€case€is€whether€or€not€as€aÏmatter€of€law€Section€œ42„5„122(c),›€Tennessee€CodeÏAnnotated,€immunizes€Humphreys€County€and€its€AirportÏAuthority€from€the€particular€claims€and€demands€made€byÏthe€Plaintiff„Appellant€in€this€case.ÌÒ  ÒÒ ` ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓÓÌà àFrom€the€above€summarized€œrecord,›€the€threshold€issue€appears€to€be€whether€theÏplaintiffððs€suit€should€be€dismissed€because€of€T.C.A.€ðð€œ42„5„122(c)›€which€exempts€theÏdefendants€from€actions€or€suits€arising€from€ð ðconstruction,€maintenance,€operation,Ïsuperintendence,€or€management€of€a€municipal€airport.ððÌÌà àIt€appears€that€the€gravamen€of€the€action€stated€in€the€complaint€is€the€breach€of€a€leaseÏcontract,€that€the€primary€defense€is€œimmunity,›€and€œthat€the€plaintiffððs€rejoinder›€to€the€defense€isÏthat€the€immunity€granted€by€the€statute€was€intended€by€the€Legislature€to€apply€œonly€to›€tortiousÏœmisconduct›€corresponding€to€that€mentioned€in€the€Tennessee€œGovernmental€Tort›€Liability€Act,ÏT.C.A.€ðððð€29„20„101,€et€seq.ÌÌà àThe€interpretation€of€a€statute€is€generally€a€matter€of€law€for€the€courts.€€òòWinter€v.€Smithóó,ÏTenn.€App.€œ1995,›€914€S.W.2d€527.ÌÌà àHowever,€in€determining€the€applicability€of€a€statute€to€a€given€situation,€the€determinationÏof€the€œnature›€of€the€situation€involves€a€finding€of€facts€as€to€the€pertinent€details€of€the€situation.ÌÌà àThe€basic€function€of€statutory€construction€is€to€ascertain€and€give€effect€to€the€legislativeÏintent.€€òòStorey€v.€Bradford€Furniture€Co.,€Incóó.,€Tenn.€œApp.€1995,›€910€S.W.2d€857;€òòOwens€v.ÏStateóó,€Tenn.€œApp.€1995,›€908€S.W.2d€923ÌÌà àA€study€of€The€Tennessee€œGovernmental›€Tort€Liability€Act€fails€to€disclose€a€specificÏprovision€excluding€its€application€to€contracts,€but€the€overt€mention€of€torts€without€aÏcorresponding€mention€of€contracts€is€persuasive€grounds€for€limiting€the€immunity€granted€by€œ42„5„122(c)›€to€actions€for€tortious€conduct.ÌÌà àAlso€persuasive€is€œT.C.A.›€ðð€42„5„122(d),€quoted€above,€preserving€the€rights€of€œbondÏholders›€to€sue€to€enforce€their€rights€as€bond€holders.€€A€bond€is€a€promise€to€pay€which€is€aÏcontract.€€ÌÌà àIt€would€be€most€anomalous€to€hold€that€the€œLegislature›€intended€to€authorize€municipalitiesÏto€issue€bonds€but€œto€immunize›€the€issuer€from€suits€to€collect€the€bonds.€€ÌÌà àIt€is€clear€to€this€Court€that€the€legislative€intent€œin€enacting€the€Municipal€Airport€Act,Ïincluding€T.C.A.€ðð€42„5„122(c)›€was€to€limit€the€application€of€the€œgranted›€immunity€to€the€class€ofÏcases€immunized€by€the€œGovernmental›€Tort€Liability€Act,€T.C.A.€ðð€29„20„205(2)(3)(4).ÌÌà àAlso€persuasive€is€œT.C.A.€Title€9,€Chapter€8€which€provides›€procedure€to€obtain€paymentÏof€claims€for€performing€contracts€with€the€State.ÌÌà à€Some€argument€is€made€as€to€the€effect€of€the€population€classification€œof€cities›€œandÏcounties€in€T.C.A.€ð𛀜42„4„107(19)›€of€the€Metropolitan€Airport€Authority€œAct.€€However,€noÏevidence€is€cited€or€found€as€to€the€population€of€Humphreys€County.ÌÌà àIt€is€pled€(but€not€supported€by€competent€evidence),€that€the€creation€and€election€of€theÏdefendantððs€commission€has€been€invalidated€by€judicial€decree.€€On€remand€the€facts€should€beÏproperly€proven€and€adjudged.€€If€it€be€determined€that€the€Commission€has€not€been€validlyÏcreated,›€€œit›€should€be€dismissed€from€this€proceeding,€leaving€only€the€County€to€defend.ÌÌà àœThe€parties›€œpled›€but€œdid€not›€œestablish›€œfactually›€that€the€oral€lease€œasserted€by€plaintiff€was›Ïentered€into€on€behalf€of€the€County€by€an€airport€manager€œacting€for€the€county€or›€by€a€lessee€baseÏoperator€who€entered€into€a€sublease€with€œthe€plaintiff.›€€The€facts€in€this€regard€need€to€beÏascertained€œand€adjudged€on›€remand.ÌÌà àAlso€needing€resolution€is€the€question€of€whether€the€non„existence€œof€the€Commission›Ïaffects€the€holdover€rights€claimed€by€plaintiff.ÌÌà àThe€judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€dismissing€the€suit€of€plaintiff€is€reversed€and€vacated€andÏthe€cause€is€remanded€to€the€Trial€Court€for€further€procedure€in€conformity€with€this€opinion.€ÏCosts€of€this€are€taxed€against€the€œdefendant€Humphreys€County.›Ìà àÌÓÓò òÓ  ÓREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDó óÌÓ  ÓÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà à_____________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àHENRY€F.€TODDà àÌà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ________________________________ÌSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€JUDGEÌÌÌ________________________________ÌBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGEÌÌÌÔ€Ô