WPCx # VUNa % 0(w@4 1 @ 0JH 0T 0^ 0hD 0r 0| 0 0 1u 0d% U> B) DC AM3U*f Bv~v D3` 0@ AO" 0D D/, B[HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPT0 (9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($ EEEeӀD 3|x2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d7Border 1dd- C << G<  9p`(Arial !  ""   YYY FILED"XJanuary15,1997CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerk   \\RA'\ dPtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva %%%%'dxd("$    -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! .   ݛ       \RA'\ќ   \RA'\ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE̜R!# A1-j|o`  `@RߛMIDDLESECTIONATNASHVILLE X   MATTHEWSEFFERNICK,  )      ) Plaintiff/Appellant,   )      ) DavidsonCircuit      ) No.93C1800VS.      )      ) AppealNo.      ) 01A019606CV00282SAINTTHOMASHOSPITALAND )BARRYE.YARBROUGH,M.D.,  )      )Defendants/Appellees.   )         OPINIONONPETITIONTOREHEARX    Theappellees,St.ThomasHospitalandBarryYarbrough,M.D.,havefiledarespectfulpetitiononfourgrounds. AppelleesinsistfirstthattheopinionofthisCourtconflictswithunpublishedopinionofaWorkersCompensationPaneloftheSupremeCourtwhichbearsthefollowingnotice:  Notice:Thisopinionisdesignatedasnotforpublication  andmaynotbecitedexceptasprovidedbyTenn.S.Ct.Rule4. Thecitedopiniondoesnotstatewhethertheexcerptofadepositionwasauthenticatedbycertificateorotherwise,orwhetherthedepositionhadeverbeenfiledwiththeTrialClerk. Inthepresentcase,theunauthenticatedexcerptwasnotfiled,butwasapparentlyattachedtoa NoticeofFilingwhichdoesnotqualifyitforconsiderationbythisCourt. AppelleesnextcomplainthatthisCourtmisapprehendstherequirementsofT.R.C.P.Rule30.03and56.05,neitherofwhichauthorizesorrequirestheconsiderationofunauthenticatedevidenceattachedtoapleading. AppelleesnextcomplainthatthisCourtacteduponitsownmotioninrefusingtoconsiderunauthenticatedevidence,butcitenoauthorityrequiringthisCourttoconsiderevidencewhichitdeemsinappropriateforconsideration.$ Finally,appelleesinsistthattheopinionofthisCourtis atoddswithRule6oftheRulesofthisCourtwhichdealswithproceduralerrorsofatrialcourtandnotdeterminationofthecompetenceofevidencepresentedtothisCourtforreview. Thepetitiontorehearisrespectfullydenied.   ENTER__________________      ____________________________________      HENRYF.TODD      PRESIDINGJUDGE,MIDDLESECTION      ____________________________________      SAMUELL.LEWIS,JUDGE      ____________________________________      BENH.CANTRELL,JUDGE