ÿWPC6 …# VUNa %¯ 0(µbÝw.å4 ' 6 0J> 0Tˆ 0^Ü 0h: 0r¢ 0| 0† 0 1u¦ 0d U> B)½ DCæ AM)U*v v~° B.vÓK D3 0@Q AO‘Æà 0D¦ D/ê B˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀäÌÀÀÌÀä0 (ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡- ù-EEÓ€DÒ x93|x2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d7Border 1dd€- Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÔ€"ÔÔ€"ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€"XÔÌÌOctober€18,€1996ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó óPtPtHPð€ÿÜÿìô”(üHPð€P € €' dStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Geneva ÒÒ  BA Op Geneva Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ€ÑÑ7€ö%XXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  Ñ›Ìò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€ex.€rel.,à àà à)ÌDOUGLAS€M.€œSIZEMORE,à àà à)à àDavidson€Chancery€CourtÌCommissioner€of€the€Departmentà àà à)à àCase€No.77„739„IIÌof€Commerce€and€Insurance€for€theà à)ÌState€of€Tennessee,à àà àà àà à)à àAppeal€No.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à01A01„9604„CH„00191ÌÙ€€ÙßL€!# ;+'h|Ûüª` ç `€€Lßà àPlaintiff/Appellee,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌMUTUAL€INSURANCE€COMPANYà à)ÌOF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àDefendant/Appellant.à àà à)Ìó ó›Ìò òÌÌà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àMIDDLE€SECTION€AT€NASHVILLEÌÌà@ àAPPEAL€FROM€THE€DAVIDSON€COUNTY€ÌÓ  ÓCHANCERY€COURT€OF€NASHVILLE,€TENNESSEEÌÓ  ÓÌà@ àHONORABLE€ELLEN€HOBBS€LYLE,€CHANCELLORÌó óÌÌCHARLES€W.€BURSONÌAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌÌGINA€J.€BARHAM€(BPR€10368)ÌDeputy€Attorney€GeneralÌ500€Charlotte€AvenueÌNashville,€Tennessee€37243„0485ÌATTORNEY€FOR€PLAINTIFF/APPELLEEÌÌÌDONALD€R.€OððGUIN,€SR.Ì2204€Lebanon€RoadÌNashville,€Tennessee€37214ÌœPRO€SE€FOR€DEFENDANT/APPELLANT›ÌÌÌÓ  Óò òÔ€¼ÔœAFFIRMED.Ô€XÔó ó›ÌÓ  ÓÌÌà àà àà àà àà àHENRY€F.€TODDÌà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONÌÌÌÌÌœCONCUR:Ì›ÌSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€JUDGEÌœWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,›€JUDGEÌÌÌÓ  Óò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€ex.€rel.,à àà à)ÌDOUGLAS€M.€SIZEMORE,à àà à)à àDavidson€Chancery€CourtÌCommissioner€of€the€Departmentà àà à)à àCase€No.77„739„IIÌof€Commerce€and€Insurance€for€theà à)ÌState€of€Tennessee,à àà àà àà à)à àAppeal€No.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à01A01„9604„CH„00191Ìà àPlaintiff/Appellee,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌMUTUAL€INSURANCE€COMPANYà à)ÌOF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àDefendant/Appellant.à àà à)Ìó óÌÌÔ€„Ôà@ àòòò òO€P€I€N€I€O€Nóóó óÔ€XÔÌÓÓà àÌà àThis€œappeal›€arises€from€the€termination€of€the€receivership€of€Mutual€Insurance€Company€ofÏTennessee€which€originated€on€May€œ12,›€œ1977.›€€The€former€president€of€the€corporation€and€a€claimantÏagainst€the€estate€has€appealed€from€the€final€order€of€the€Trial€Court€which€reads€as€follows:ÌÓÓà àà à€€€€This€€cause€€came€€on€€to€€be€heard€before€€the€Honorable€C.Ìà àà àAllen€€High€€on€€May€5,€1995,€upon€the€motion€€of€the€SpecialÌà àà àDeputy€Commissioner€David€S.€Weed,€œfor›€an€œorder›€permitting€Ìà àà àhim€to€remit€the€remaining€unclaimed€assets€of€the€receivershipÌà àà àto€the€Division€€of€€Unclaimed€€Property,€€to€€approve€the€final€Ìà àà àaccounting,€to€dissolve€the€receivership,€to€€release€the€Special€Ìà àà àSpecial€Deputy€Commissioner€from€any€further€obligations€and€Ìà àà àto€€dismiss€€the€€case.€€€Whereupon€€after€€consideration€€of€€theÌà àà àmotion,€€arguments€€of€€counsel€€and€€statements€of€€Donald€€R.Ìà àà àOððGuin,€Sr.€and€the€entire€record€in€this€cause,€the€Court€foundÌà àà àthat€the€motion€was€well€taken€and€should€be€granted.ÌÌà àà à€€€€IT€€€IS€€€THEREFORE€€€ORDERED,€€€€ADJUSTED€€€ANDÌà àà àDECREED€that:ÌÌà àà à€€€€1.€€The€Special€Deputy€€Commissioner€€remit€€the€€remaining€Ìà àà àunclaimed€€€assets€€of€€€the€€€receivership€€to€€€the€€€Division€€€of€Ìà àà àUnclaimed€property;ÌÌà àà à€€€€2.€€The€final€accounting€of€the€Special€Deputy€CommissionerÌà àà àis€approved;Ìà àà àÌà àà à€€€€3.€€The€receivership€is€dissolved;Ìà àà àÌà àà à€€€€4.€€The€Special€€Deputy€€Commissioner€is€released€from€any€Ìà àà àfurther€responsibilities;€andÌÌà àà à€€€€5.€€The€case€is€dismissed.ÌÌà àAppellant€presents€the€following€issues€for€review:ÌÌà àà àœI.€€€€That›€the€final€order€of€May€22,€1995€is€void€and€notÌà àà àenforceable.ÌÌà àà àœII.€€€That›€the€final€order€of€May€22,€1995€€œis€›€œnot€›€a€final€Ìà àà àorder.ÌÌà àà àœIII.€€That›€the€order€of€March€14,€1996€œ€is›€œ€contravening›Ìà àà àto€Tennessee€rules€of€appellate€procedure.ÌÌà àà àœIV.€€That›€œ€defendant›€€has€€a€€right€€to€€examine€œ€receiver›Ìà àà àas€to€his€administration€of€the€receivership.ÌÌà àà àœV.€€€Appellant›€€is€not€€bared€€from€œfiling›€€counterclaims€Ìà àà àagainst€œinsolvent›€œinsurer›€œand›€€the€œreceiver›€œfor›€insolvent€Ìà àà àinsurer€who€has€brought€suit€against€appellant.ÌÌ€à àà àà àÌÓÓà àThe€third€issue€relates€to€the€production€of€the€record€on€appeal,€and€will€therefore€be€consideredÏfirst.€€The€judgment€under€review€was€entered€on€May€22,€1995.€€œNotice€of€appeal€was€filed€June€20,Ï1995.€€Ninety›€days€from€June€20,€1995,€was€allowed€for€preparing€and€filing€a€verbatim€or€narrativeÏstatement€of€the€evidence.€€T.R.A.P.€Rule€œ24(c).›€€This€period€expired€on€September€18,€1995.€€OnÏOctober€23,€1995,€over€30€days€after€the€expiration€of€the€time€allowed€for€filing€œan›€evidentiary€record,Ïappellant€filed€the€following€motion:ÌÓÓòòà àà àREQUEST€FOR€PRODUCTION€OF€DOCUMENTSóóÌÌà àà à€€€€Comes€now€the€Defendant,€Cross„Plaintiff,€Claimant€Ìà àà àand€€Policy€€holder€€of€€Mutual€€Insurance€Company€of€Ìà àà àTennessee,€€Donald€€R.€€OððGuin,€€Sr.€€and€€respectfully€Ìà àà àrequest€€that€the€Plaintiff€produce€the€transcripts€of€theÌà àà àhearings€€€held€€€on€€€September€€27€€and€€28,€€1977€€on€Ìà àà àPlaintiffððs€Petition€For€Rehabilitating€Mutual€InsuranceÌà àà àCompany€of€Tennessee.€This€transcript€to€be€filed€withÌà àà àthe€Defendantððs€record€on€appeal.ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àRespectfully€submitted,ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àòò€€€€€€€€œ(Signed)›€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àóóDonald€R.€OððGuin,€Sr.Ìà àà àà àà àà à2204€Lebanon€RoadÌà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37214Ìà àà àà àà àà à(615)€883„7188Ìà àÌà àò òÌÓÓà àó óThe€Receiver€responded€that€he€had€been€unable€to€locate€the€requested€documents€and€that€theÏtime€for€making€them€a€part€of€the€appellate€record€had€expired.ÌÌà àOn€March€14,€1996,€the€Trial€Court€sustained€the€œreceiverððs›€objection€to€the€request€forÏdocuments€and€reiterated€a€previous€ruling€rejecting€a€narrative€of€proceedings€held€on€July€8,€1994.€€AÏnotice€of€appeal€from€the€March€14,€1996,€order€was€filed€on€April€11,€1996.ò òÌÌà àó óThe€documentary€material€sought€by€appellant€was€evidentiary€in€œcharacter€should€have€beenÏtendered€at€the€May€5,€1995,€hearing.€€The€record€contains€no€evidence€of€any€effort€to€obtain€or€tender€itÏon€or€prior€to€that€date.€›œ€The›€Trial€Court€correctly€overruled€appellantððs€œbelated€request›€for€production€ofÏdocuments.ÌÌà àAppellantððs€second€issue€insists€that€the€May€22,€1995,€order€is€not€a€final€order€because€theÏclaims€of€the€œreceiver›€against€him€and€his€cross€claims€have€not€been€adjudicated,€citing€T.R.A.P.€RuleÏ3(a).€€If€appellantððs€position€is€correct,€his€appeal€must€be€dismissed€at€his€cost.ÌÌà àHowever,€the€allegedly€unresolved€issues€were€presented€to€this€Court€in€a€former€appeal€of€thisÏsame€case€and€were€resolved€by€the€opinion€filed€by€this€Court€on€April€28,€1993.€€For€this€reasonÏappellantððs€œfifth›€œissue€is›€not€available€to€appellant€in€the€present€œappeal.›ÌœÌà àAppellantððs€fourth€issue€is€not€supported€by€citations€to€the€record€demonstrating€timelyÏapplication€to€the€Trial€Court€for€examination€of€the€receiver€and€refusal€of€such€application€by€the€TrialÏCourt.€€See€Rule€6(a)€(1„3)€of€the€Rules€of€this€Court.Ì›Ìà àAppellantððs€first€issue€asserts€that€the€May€22,€1995,€order€is€void€and€unenforceable.€€AppellantÏasserts€that€he€received€no€notice€of€the€œreceiverððs›€motion€file€on€April€21,€1995,€for€the€relief€granted€onÏMay€22,€1995.€€However,€appellant€concedes€that€he€learned€of€the€motion€on€May€3,€1995,€and€that,€onÏthe€same€date,€he€filed€a€response€in€opposition,€and€that€he€was€present€at€the€hearing€on€May€5,€1995.ÌÌà àAppellant€cites€no€other€reason€why€the€May€22,€1995,€order€is€unenforceable.€€He€insists€thatÏð ðan€order€obtained€by€violation€of€the€rules€of€the€court€is€void€and€unenforceable.ðð€€No€authority€is€citedÏto€support€this€broad€insistence.€€If€a€party€is€prejudiced€by€the€violation€of€a€rule,€he€is€entitled€toÏappropriate€relief,€but€prejudice€must€be€shown€in€order€to€obtain€such€relief.€€No€such€prejudice€isÏshown.ÌÌà àBy€reply€brief,€appellant€relies€upon€oral€statements€in€his€narrative€statement€of€the€evidenceÏwhich€was€untimely€filed€and€rejected€by€the€Trial€Judge.€€It€therefore€is€not€a€proper€part€of€the€recordÏand€cannot€be€considered€by€this€Court.ÌÌà àœAppellantððs›€brief€points€out€a€technical€frailty€in€the€May€22,€1995,€order€which€should€be€noted.€ÏThe€order,€quoted€above,€undertakes€to€authorize€disbursement€of€remaining€funds€òòandóó€discharges€theÏreceiver.€€The€two€provisions€are€not€properly€contained€in€the€same€order.€€A€fiduciary€should€not€beÏdischarged€until€he€has€presented€satisfactory€evidence€of€the€faithful€performance€of€all€of€his€duties.€ÏGibsonððs€Suits€in€Chancery€œSeventh›€Edition€ðð€372,€p.€œ351,›€75€C.J.S.€€Receivers€ðð€94.ÌÌà àHaving€authorized€the€disbursement€of€funds€remaining€in€the€Receivers€hands,€the€Trial€CourtÏshould€have€reserved€judgment€upon€the€request€for€discharge€until€the€Receiver€submitted€his€finalÏaccounting€showing€the€disbursement€completed€in€accordance€with€the€order€of€the€Court.€€Then,€andÏthen€only€would€a€final€discharge€be€in€order.ÌÌà àNevertheless€there€is€no€complaint€or€showing€that€the€Receiver€failed€to€perform€the€order€of€theÏCourt.€€Without€such€a€showing,€a€reversal€of€the€order€in€this€appeal€would€be€presumptuous.ÌÌà àOut€of€an€abundance€of€caution,€it€would€be€good€practice€for€the€Receiver€to€file€his€final€reportÏshowing€the€disbursement€and€request€final€release.ÌÌà àAt€the€bar€of€this€Court,€appellant€argued€that€funds€representing€uncashed€checks€forÏdistribution€to€claimants€should€not€be€forfeited€to€the€State€but€should€be€distributed€to€remainingÏclaimants.€€This€argument€ignores€the€rights€of€the€claimants€who€have€not€cashed€their€checks€as€set€outÏin€T.C.A.€ðð€œ66„29„123(a).›ÌÌà àNo€reversible€error€is€found€in€the€judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€or€its€subsequent€order,€which€areÏaffirmed.€€Costs€of€this€appeal€are€assessed€against€the€appellantÌÌÓ  ÓÔ€¼Ôò òAFFIRMED.ó óÔ€XÔÌÓ  ÓÓÓÌÌà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à___________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àHENRY€F.€TODDÌà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ____________________________ÌSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€JUDGEÌÌÌ____________________________ÌœWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,›€JUDGEÌÌÌ