ÿWPCI& …# VUNa %¯ 0(µw@Ý4 1 B@ 0l‚ 0Dî U:2 l 0Jt 0T¾ 0^ 0hp 0rØ 0|J 0†Æ 0L 1uÜ 0dQ BµU>ÒU*B): D3cDC– AMÙ 0@&âf™Hráv~SvÓÑ AO¤$Æó$ 0D¹% D/ý% B,&˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 (ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ œ.D.ž.{Ÿ. .¡.D¢.£.Ó€­.®.DÒ xúÿÿú, ú3|x°.C:\WPWIN60\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d$$$$'ÿÿdxd))))7Border 1dd€-+Cþÿ << Gÿÿ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò ØÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€'ÔÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÔ€(ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€(XÔÌÌJanuary€15,€1997ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó ó Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€'ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÔ€(ôÔAlthough€the€Plaintiff€has€not€appealed€the€trial€courtððs€dismissal€on€substantive€grounds,€weÏnote€that€the€trial€courtððs€ruling€on€the€statute€of€limitations€defense€appears€to€be€correct.€€The€eventsÏwhich€formed€the€basis€of€the€Plaintiffððs€complaint€occurred€in€1992,€but€the€Plaintiff€did€not€file€hisÏcomplaint€until€June€27,€1995.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€29„20„305(b)€(Supp.€1992)€(providing€that€any€action€againstÏa€governmental€entity€ð ðmust€be€commenced€within€twelve€(12)€months€after€the€cause€of€action€arisesðð).ÌÌà àWe€also€agree€with€the€trial€courtððs€ruling€that€the€savings€statute€did€not€prevent€dismissal€of€thisÏaction.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€28„1„115€(Supp.€1995).€€The€affidavit€and€materials€filed€in€support€of€the€motion€forÏsummary€judgment€indicated€that€the€Plaintiff€filed€a€similar€action€in€federal€district€court€in€June€1993€andÏthat€the€federal€court,€by€order€entered€June€29,€1994,€dismissed€the€Plaintiffððs€state„law€claims€ð ðwithoutÏprejudice€for€lack€of€jurisdiction.ðð€€The€savings€statute€provides€that,€ð ð[n]otwithstanding€any€applicableÏstatute€of€limitation€to€the€contrary,€any€party€filing€an€action€in€a€federal€court€that€is€subsequentlyÏdismissed€for€lack€of€jurisdiction€shall€have€one€(1)€year€from€the€date€of€such€dismissal€to€timely€file€suchÏaction€in€an€appropriate€state€court.ðð€€T.C.A.€ðð€28„1„115€(Supp.€1995).€€This€court€previously€has€held,Ïhowever,€that€the€savings€statute€does€not€apply€to€actions€against€a€governmental€entity€under€theÏTennessee€Governmental€Tort€Liability€Act.€€òòWebster€v.€Tennessee€Bd.€of€Regentsóó,€902€S.W.2d€412,Ï414„15€(Tenn.€App.€1995);€òòNance€v.€City€of€Knoxvilleóó,€883€S.W.2d€629,€631„32€(Tenn.€App.€1994).Ì hÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€'ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÔ€(ôÔWe€similarly€conclude€that€the€summary€judgment€procedure€employed€in€this€case€did€notÏviolate€the€due€process€provisions€of€the€Tennessee€and€United€States€Constitutions,€or€the€open€courtsÏprovision€of€the€Tennessee€Constitution.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòFather€&€Sons€Lumber€&€Bldg.€Supplies€v.€NLRBóó,Ï931€F.2d€1093,€1096€(6th€Cir.€1991)€(rejecting€employersðð€contention€that€NLRB€violated€their€dueÏprocess€rights€by€refusing€to€conduct€evidentiary€hearing€after€employers€permitted€default€summaryÏjudgment€to€be€entered€against€them).€€The€summary€judgment€process€ð ðis€designed€to€provide€a€quick,Ïinexpensive€means€of€concluding€cases,€in€whole€or€in€part,€upon€issues€as€to€which€there€is€no€genuineÏdispute€regarding€material€facts.ðð€€òòByrd€v.€Hallóó,€847€S.W.2d€208,€210€(Tenn.€1993).€€On€appeal,€theÏPlaintiff€has€failed€to€articulate€any€genuine€issue€of€material€of€fact€requiring€a€trial€on€the€merits€in€thisÏcase.ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€'ÔÝ  ÝÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓ` Ü‚Xh—XÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€(ÔÑ7€ÆMXXdìdÈ7Ñ›Þ ÞÌà@ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àWESTERN€SECTION€AT€NASHVILLEÌÌÌHAROLD€EUGENE€SMITH,à àà àœà à)›€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àó óPlaintiff/Appellant,à àà àò ò)€€Davidson€Circuit€No.€95C„2036Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à)€€Appeal€No.€01A01„9607„CV„00338̜ـ€ÙßR€,.+A1-j|Š‘` ç `€€@ÿRß›à àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌMETROPOLITAN€GOVERNMENT€OFà àœà à)›ÌNASHVILLE€AND€DAVIDSONà àà àœà à)›ÌCOUNTY,€TENNESSEE,€et€al,à àà àœà à)›Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àó óDefendants/Appellees.à àò ò)ó óÌÌÌà@ àAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CIRCUIT€COURT€OF€DAVIDSON€COUNTYÌà@ àAT€NASHVILLE,€TENNESSEEÌà@ àTHE€HONORABLE€HAMILTON€V.€GAYDEN,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌò òHAROLD€EUGENE€SMITH,€pro€seÌó óNashville,€TennesseeÌÌÌò òPAUL€D.€KRIVACKAÌMETROPOLITAN€ATTORNEYÌó óNashville,€TennesseeÌAttorney€for€Appellee€Metropolitan€GovernmentÌof€Nashville€and€Davidson€CountyÌÌÌò òGEORGE€E.€BARRETTÌPHILLIP€A.€PURCELLÌBARRETT,€JOHNSTON€&€PARSLEYÌó óNashville,€TennesseeÌAttorneys€for€Appellees€Metropolitan€DevelopmentÌand€Housing€Agency,€Gerald€F.€Nicely,ÌBob€Howard€and€Paul€Jenningsò òÌó óÌÌÌÌÌÌò òAFFIRMEDÌÌÌó óà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òALAN€E.€œHIGHERS,€J.€›ÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,€P.J.,€W.S.ÌÌDAVID€R.€FARMER,€J.ÌÌÑ7€ 4ú XXdæXXdì7Ñœó ó›ÓÓà àPlaintiff€Harold€Eugene€Smith,€appearing€òòproóó€òòseóó,€appeals€the€trial€courtððs€finalÏorder€which€dismissed€the€Plaintiffððs€complaint€against€Defendants/AppelleesÏMetropolitan€Government€of€Nashville€and€Davidson€County€(Metro),€MetropolitanÏDevelopment€and€Housing€Agency€(MDHA),€and€two€MDHA€employees,€Bob€HowardÏ(Howard)€and€Paul€Jennings€(Jennings).€€The€trial€court€dismissed€the€Plaintiffððs€claimsÏagainst€Metro€and€MDHA€based€on€the€one„year€statute€of€limitations€contained€in€theÏTennessee€Governmental€Tort€Liability€Act.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€€29„20„305(b)€(Supp.€1992).€ÏRegarding€the€Plaintiffððs€other€claims,€the€trial€court€entered€summary€judgment€inÏfavor€of€Howard€and€Jennings€based€on€the€œaffidavit,›€depositions,€and€documents€filedÏin€this€case.€€For€the€reasons€hereinafter€stated,€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€dismissal€ofÏthe€Plaintiffððs€complaint.ÌÌà àThis€lawsuit€arose€out€MDHAððs€efforts€during€the€summer€of€1992€to€remove€theÏPlaintiff€and€his€possessions€from€property€located€at€521€Southgate€Avenue€inÏNashville,€Davidson€County,€Tennessee.€€The€property€formerly€was€owned€by€theÍPlaintiffððs€family€but€had€been€condemned€by€MDHA.€€The€Plaintiffððs€œcomplaint,€filedÏJune€27,€1995,›€contains€the€following€factual€allegations:ÌÌÓÓà8 àà à8.à àBy€letter€dated€April€17,€1992,€Defendant€HowardÏnotified€Plaintiff€that€Defendant€MDHA€was€planning€to€purchase€propertyÏlocated€at€521€Southgate€Avenue€in€Nashville,€Davidson€County,ÏTennessee.€€Defendant€MDHA€was€acting€pursuant€to€a€CondemnationÏOrdinance€passed€by€[Metroððs]€County€Council,....€€At€the€time€the€letterÏwas€received€by€Plaintiff,€Plaintiff€resided€and€had€resided€at€521ÏSouthgate€Avenue€since€1975.€€Although€Plaintiff€did€not€hold€legal€titleÏto€the€property,€he€was€pursuing€a€lawsuit€against€his€father,€James€A.ÏSmith,€in€the€Circuit€Court€of€Davidson€County,€claiming€an€equitableÏinterest€in€the€property€based€on€a€resulting€trust€from€his€grandmother.ÌÌà8 àà à9.à àOn€numerous€occasions,€Plaintiff€talked€withÏDefendant€Howard€by€telephone€and€attempted€to€obtain€assistance€forÏrelocation.€€During€these€conversations,€Defendant€Howard€was€rudeÏand€condescending€to€Plaintiff,€and€on€one€occasion,€Defendant€HowardÏtold€Plaintiff€that€he€was€going€to€ð ðthrow€your€damn€black,€squatting€assÏout.ððÌÌà8 àà à10.à àDefendant€MDHA€obtained€title€to€the€property€at€521ÏSouthgate€Avenue€on€July€13,€1992,€through€a€Court€Order€which€did€notÏbecome€final€until€August€13,€1992.€€Plaintiff€did€not€become€aware€of€thisÏchange€of€title€until€July€13,€1992,€when€he€received€a€letter€fromÏ[MDHAððs€Executive€Director]€dated€July€10,€1992,....€€[The]€letterÏinformed€Plaintiff€that€it€was€the€intention€of€MDHA€to€remove€all€PlaintiffððsÏpossessions€from€the€premises€on€July€14,€1992.ÌÌà8 àà à11.à àOn€July€14,€1992,€Plaintiff€filed€a€lawsuit€in€theÏChancery€Court€for€Davidson€County€seeking€to€enjoin€MDHA€fromÏtaking€possession€of€the€property€located€at€521€Southgate€Avenue.ÌÌà8 àà à12.à àOn€July€14,€1992,€and€without€any€notice€to€Plaintiff,ÏDefendant€Jennings,€acting€on€behalf€of€MDHA,€obtained€a€criminalÏwarrant€against€Plaintiff€alleging€that€Plaintiff€had€committed€the€crime€ofÏcriminal€trespass.€€On€July€15,€1992,€Defendants€Howard€and€Jennings,Ïand€several€other€unknown€officers€and€employees€of€MDHA,€executedÏthe€warrant€and€arrested€Plaintiff€at€his€home€at€521€Southgate€Avenue.€ÏBecause€Plaintiff€could€not€post€bond€in€the€amount€of€$5,000.00,€heÏremained€in€custody€for€approximately€36€hours,€until€General€SessionsÍJudge€Gale€Robinson,€Junior€released€Plaintiff€on€his€own€recognizance.€ÏOn€October€26,€1992,€the€State€of€Tennessee,€through€its€AssistantÏDistrict€Attorney€General,€dismissed€the€criminal€action€against€Plaintiff.ÌÌà8 àà à13.à àWhile€Plaintiff€was€incarcerated,€agents€of€the€MDHAÏremoved€numerous€possessions€of€Plaintiff€from€the€property€which,€toÏthis€date,€have€not€been€returned€to€Plaintiff.€€This€property€included,€butÏis€not€limited€to,€irreplaceable€business€records€in€the€form€of€computerÏdata,€programs,€correspondence,€books,€microfilm,€video€and€audioÏtapes,€compact€discs,€tools,€computer€and€other€[electronic]€equipment,Ïhousehold€furniture,€appliances,€personal€clothing,€and€many€childhoodÏand€family€mementos.ÌÌà8 àà à14.à àPlaintiff€then€negotiated€by€and€through€his€counselÏSam€Lipshie€with€MDHA€attorney€George€Barrett€an€agreement€underÏwhich€MDHA€agreed€to€allow€Plaintiff€to€recover€what€property€was€left€atÏ521€Southgate€Avenue€prior€to€September€9,€1992.€€Despite€thisÏagreement,€and€in€direct€breach€of€this€agreement,€MDHA,€on€SeptemberÏ8,€1992,€looted€and€bulldozed€the€premises€at€521€Southgate€Avenue,Ïthereby€causing€the€Plaintiff€further€and€substantial€harm€and€damages€toÏhis€property.€œÌ›ÌÌÌÓÓà àBased€on€these€factual€allegations,€the€œPlaintiff›€œasserted›€claims€against€theÏDefendants€for€false€arrest€and€false€imprisonment,€malicious€prosecution€and€abuseÏof€process,€outrageous€conduct€and€intentional€infliction€of€emotional€distress,€andÏtrespass€to€chattels€and/or€conversion.€œMetro›€responded€by€filing€a€motion€to€dismiss,Ïcontending€that€the€Plaintiffððs€complaint€failed€to€state€a€claim€upon€which€relief€couldÏbe€granted,€òòseeóó€T.R.C.P.€12.02(6),€and€that,€in€any€event,€the€Plaintiffððs€claims€wereÏbarred€by€the€one„year€statute€of€limitations€contained€in€the€Tennessee€GovernmentalÏTort€Liability€Act.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€€29„20„305(b)€(Supp.€1992).€€The€remainingÏDefendants€also€filed€a€motion€to€dismiss€pursuant€to€rule€12.02(6)€and,€in€theÏalternative,€a€motion€for€summary€judgment.€€òòSeeóó€T.R.C.P.€56.02.ÌÌà àAfter€the€trial€court€entered€its€final€order€granting€the€Defendantsðð€motions€andÏdismissing€the€Plaintiffððs€complaint,€the€Plaintiff€filed€a€motion€to€set€aside€the€trialÏcourtððs€final€order.€€œThe›€trial€court€œdenied›€the€Plaintiffððs€motion,€and€this€appealÏfollowed.€ÌÌà àOn€appeal,€the€Plaintiff€raises€two€procedural€issues€for€review:ÌœÓÓà8 àI.[Whether]›€the€circuit€court€erred€in€allowing€the€admission€into€the€trialÏrecord€œ[of]€the›€October€11,€1995,€document€entitled;€ð ðReply€Brief€ofÏDefendants€MDHA,€Howard€and€Jennings.ððÌÌœà8 àII.[Whether]›€the€circuit€court€abused€its€authority€in€not€setting€aside€itsÏorder€which€denied€[the€Plaintiffððs]€constitutionally€guaranteed€rights.€ÌÌÓÓÌà àWe€first€reject€the€Plaintiffððs€contention€regarding€the€trial€courtððs€admission€intoÏthe€record€of€the€October€11,€1995,€Reply€Brief€because€the€record€on€appeal€fails€toÏreflect€that€the€Plaintiff€objected€to€admission€of€the€brief€below.€€The€trial€courtÏconducted€a€hearing€on€the€Defendantsðð€motions€to€dismiss€on€October€13,€1995.€€œOn›ÏOctober€9,€1995,€the€Plaintiff€filed€a€response€to€the€Defendantsðð€œmotions.›€According€toÏthe€Plaintiffððs€brief€on€appeal,€the€Defendants€MDHA,€Howard,€and€Jennings€filed€theÏReply€Brief€on€October€11,€1995,€two€days€before€the€hearing€on€the€motions€toÏdismiss.€œThe›€Plaintiff€contends€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€consideringÏthe€Defendantsðð€Reply€Brief€at€the€October€13€hearing€because€the€Defendants€failedÏto€serve€this€document€upon€the€Plaintiff€by€5:00€p.m.,€Wednesday,€October€11,€1995,Ïin€violation€of€Local€Rule€12.€€œòòSeeóó›€Davidson€County€Cts.€R.€12.04(e)€(requiring€thatÍreplies€to€responses€to€motions€ð ðbe€served€on€all€other€parties€no€later€than€5:00€p.m.Ïon€the€Wednesday€before€the€Friday€on€which€the€motion€is€to€be€heardðð).ÌÌà àThis€issue€is€without€merit.€€The€record€on€appeal€fails€to€contain€either€theÏOctober€11,€1995,€Reply€Brief€or€a€transcript€of€the€October€13,€1995,€hearing€duringÏwhich€the€trial€court€allegedly€considered€the€Reply€Brief.€€Without€such€a€record,€weÏare€unable€to€determine€whether€the€trial€court€improperly€admitted€the€Reply€Brief€atÏthe€hearing€below€or€whether€the€Plaintiff€raised€a€timely€objection€to€its€introduction.€ÏòòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Bolingóó,€840€S.W.2d€944,€951€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992)€(stating€that,Ïpursuant€to€T.R.A.P.€24(b),€appellant€has€duty€ð ðto€prepare€a€record€which€conveys€aÏfair,€accurate€and€complete€account€of€what€transpired€in€the€trial€court€with€respect€toÏthe€issues€which€form€the€basis€of€the€appealðð);€òòBarnhill€v.€Barnhillóó,€826€S.W.2d€443,Ï458€(Tenn.€App.€1991)€(holding€that,€where€appellant€failed€to€make€appropriateÏobjection€at€trial€court€level,€issue€was€waived€€on€appeal).ÌÌà àWe€also€reject€the€Plaintiffððs€argument€that€the€trial€courtððs€refusal€to€set€asideÏthe€final€order€dismissing€the€Plaintiffððs€claims€resulted€in€a€denial€of€the€PlaintiffððsÏconstitutional€rights€of€due€process€and€equal€protection€under€the€Tennessee€andÏUnited€States€Constitutions.€€òòSeeóó€U.S.€Const.€amends.€V,€XIV;€Tenn.€Const.€art.€I,€ðð€8;ÏTenn.€Const.€art.€XI,€ðð€8.€€In€making€this€argument,€the€Plaintiff€contends€that€he€isÏentitled€to€his€day€in€court€to€have€the€case€determined€on€its€merits.€ÌÌà àIn€dismissing€the€Plaintiffððs€claims,€the€trial€court€relied€primarily€on€the€one„yearÏstatute€of€limitations€contained€in€the€Tennessee€Governmental€Tort€Liability€Act.œ× ƒ/ ××  ×›ÏTennessee€courts€have€repeatedly€held€that€similar€statutes€of€limitation€and€reposeÏdo€not€result€in€a€denial€of€equal€protection€or€due€process€rights€under€either€theÏTennessee€or€United€States€Constitutions.€€òòJones€v.€Five€Star€Engineering,€Inc.óó,€717ÏS.W.2d€882,€883€(Tenn.€1986)€(equal€protection€and€due€process);€òòHarmon€v.€AngusÏR.€Jessup€Assocs.óó,€619€S.W.2d€522,€524„25€(Tenn.€1981)€(equal€protection);€òòHarrisonÏv.€Schraderóó,€569€S.W.2d€822,€824„27€(Tenn.€1978)€(equal€protection);€òòBrown€v.€Stateóó,Ï928€S.W.2d€453,€455„56€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996)€(equal€protection€and€due€process).€ÏAdditionally,€such€statutes€do€not€violate€the€Tennessee€Constitutionððs€open€courtsÏprovision,€which€provides€that€ð ðall€courts€shall€be€openðð€and€that€ð ðevery€man,€for€anÏinjury€done€him€in€his€lands,€goods,€person€or€reputation,€shall€have€remedy€by€dueÏcourse€of€law,€and€right€and€justice€administered€without€sale,€denial,€or€delay.ðð€ÍòòHarrisonóó,€569€S.W.2d€at€827€(quoting€Tenn.€Const.€art.€I,€ðð€17);€òòaccordóó€òòFive€StarÏEngineeringóó,€717€S.W.2d€at€883;€òòHarmonóó,€619€S.W.2d€at€524.œ× ƒ0 ××  ×›Ìà àÌÔ&  Ôà àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€hereby€affirmed.€€Costs€on€appeal€are€taxed€toÏthe€œPlaintiff,›€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€œnecessary.Ô'  ÔÌÌÓÓÌà àà àà àà àà àà àòòà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àHIGHERS,€J.ÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌCRAWFORD,€P.J.,€W.S.ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óó€ÌFARMER,€J.›