ÿWPCñ  ØWž‰Ü‘´×æô“p\Eb9ƒSÕóH¯“a=™RÓB_â•]„ ÎE¦ãÙôPŠ#ô™ž æÃIU²µøzýïî}l‰ M¥Ùæwêe†÷1¿7ZÐ[4wON¶’£Ž+ ýÃ]pTKüñ®X]*z²ø°?834eÈWÍ{ÄØ_A-×ð)ï2eÆøƒ˜¿‡;ôÇÌëå7SC,$xuÛ}Úç@fN ÿ)ß p)ÆÓ[Õ̇<µ"À%1J[L„s©Æº»…–_Ðìób·'Cñb19‘ºå¹e9mÒ_Z ó7uÑÛÌ/\¤ßÄŽc$£3q¢±4¥+,I-%R=‰ƒg'†,!c‘_×Qp€TCPfÔ Àb‡ù/mk;EÓÁÂ/.¾ˆ Åø½€„kzy…Ì0¾?×ìY9šºý]ÿ OÝEÿ\»4`ÝÙ‡å¼íŠ?±ã"Ë-Ðv&Éà -ËpC§ƒ_ö-¥‰Ôw›,„ûT7ð‚ÌÝ RÜ‹ÚÓŒüuZ= …Á‘·m“u¬â¥*r„bsÅ×äàù0›æØð&Ê(ÌÅéœÍ‡mªcg£ü ÚpYaÕa šwwŒe6o€—ûüÐ’Ý“µ˜éÉÍ*# LU :W %‘ 0(—b ¿n­Ëw@x4¸ÌU:Ô£ 0l± 0D a a a a p p p p p p p p p p p p p Br AQ Æà 0D¦ 0Dê 0D. . D/r r B¡ D3¾ ˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLHÎ, øð AZ‹"Arial RegularX($¡¡- ù -«<þ6X9`("Courier NewTTXXxþ6X@ÉDQX@ íîDïðDñòóôDõPöÓ€©yË&lô„,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ™Ò€°ÒÒ„°ÒÓ  ÓÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà Ø àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€ôÉôXXÔMr.€Smith€calculated€the€gross€amount€he€realized€upon€the€exercise€of€his€stock€options€toÐ  Ðbe€$217,142.€However,€for€the€purposes€of€this€appeal,€he€has€accepted€the€figure€of€€$221,180,€whichÏwas€calculated€by€Ms.€Smith€and€used€by€the€trial€court.€((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó3|xÿ øÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€ X/ëXXXÔÔ€ ’;X X/ëÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€ X/ëX ’;ÔÐ  ÐÌJuly€29,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó d!"#$&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýñöñ›ñöñÑ°ÑÒ€°ÒÒ„°ÒÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ7€/ëXXdædÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  Ñò òÔ€¼<¼XXÔÓ  Óñöñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@Eô ` 8ttxP,ð  rß›ñöñà@  êàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ  Ðà@¦¦(êàAT€NASHVILLEó óÔ€X/ëX¼¼<ԈР ÐÌÌÌÌSHARON€ANN€SMITH,à à àà 8 àà  à)Ð È À Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àPlaintiff/Appellee,à à àà 8 àà  à)Ð ”Œ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àAppeal€No.Ð zr  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è à01„A„01„9809„CH„00515Ð `X  ÐœVS›.à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ð F>  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àWilliamson€ChanceryÐ ,$  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àNo.€22128Ð   ÐALAN€WAYNE€SMITH,à à àà 8 àà  à)à è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àà H! àà  # àÐ øð  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àDefendant/Appellant.à 8 àà  à)Рļ ÐÌÌà@ææêàAPPEALED€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€WILLIAMSON€COUNTYˆÌà@ÆÆ#êàAT€FRANKLIN,€TENNESSEEˆÌÌà@j j êàTHE€HONORABLE€HENRY€DENMARK€BELL,€JUDGEˆÌÌÌÌÌR.€E.€Lee€DaviesÌœHARTZOG›,€œSILVA›€&€DAVIESÌ123€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌP.€O.€Box€664ÌFranklin,€Tennessee€37065„0664Ìà Ø àAttorney€for€Plaintiff/AppelleeÌÌGREGORY€D.€SMITHÌFARRIS,€œWARFIELD›€&€œKANADAY›,€œPLC›Ì424€Church€Street,€Suite€1900ÌNashville,€Tennessee€37219Ìà Ø àAttorney€for€Defendant/AppellantÌÌÌÌÌà@¤¤$êàAFFIRMED€AND€REMANDEDˆÌÌÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌKOCH,€J.ÌCAIN,€J.ÌÐ  Î8Æ17 ÐÓÓò òÔ€„¼j„XX/ëÔòòà@tt(êàO€P€I€N€I€O€Nóóó óÔ€X/ëX„„¼jԈР ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àWhen€the€parties€divorced,€the€trial€court€calculated€the€husbandððs€netÏincome€for€child€support€purposes€by€averaging€his€salary€over€a€three€year€period.ÏThe€wife€appealed,€arguing€that€the€child€support€guidelines€required€that€a€capitalÏgain€of€over€$200,000€realized€by€the€husband€during€the€same€period€also€beÏincluded€in€the€calculation.€€We€agreed,€but€suggested€the€trial€court€could€prorate€theÏcapital€gain€over€the€longer€time„frame€during€which€the€capital€gain€income€wasÏapparently€earned.€€Upon€remand,€the€trial€court€took€evidence€as€to€the€length€of€thatÏperiod,€and€made€a€fresh€calculation,€which€the€husband€objects€to€in€this€appeal.€€WeÏaffirm€the€trial€court.ÌÌà@$êàò òI.€€Prior€Proceedingsó óˆÐ ”Œ ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àSharon€Smith€and€Alan€Smith€divorced€in€1994.€€The€trial€court€dividedÏthe€marital€property€and€gave€the€wife€custody€of€the€two€children€of€the€marriage.€Mr.ÏSmith€was€ordered€to€pay€child€support€and€alimony.€€Two€years€later,€Ms.€SmithÏpetitioned€the€trial€court€for€an€increase€in€child€support,€claiming€that€her€formerÏhusbandððs€net€income€had€greatly€increased.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€trial€court€heard€proof€that€the€husband€earned€an€annual€salaryÏthat€averaged€$113,000€as€a€Vice€President€of€œComdata›€Corporation€during€the€yearsÏ1994„1996.€€He€also€earned€substantial€bonuses€and€commissions€during€thoseÏyears.€€In€1995,€Mr.€Smith€exercised€stock€options€he€had€acquired€incident€to€hisÏemployment,€resulting€in€a€capital€gain€of€$221,180œ×ƒ ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×›.€€The€court€calculated€a€fixedÐ 03(,0 Ðamount€of€monthly€child€support€($2,086)€based€upon€Mr.€Smithððs€salary€income€andÐ ü4ô-2 Ðordered€that€he€also€pay€as€child€support€32%€of€any€future€bonuses€or€commissionsÏhe€received.€€The€court€did€not€take€the€1995€capital€gain€into€account€in€any€way.€ÏThe€wife€appealed.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àFollowing€oral€argument,€we€filed€an€opinion€in€this€case€œ(ñåññäñSñäññåññæñòòñæññçñSmith€v.€Smithóóñçññèñ,Ð h`  ÐñèññçññæñóóñæññçñAppeal›€No.€01„A„01„9705„CH„00216,€filed€Nashville,€October€29,€1997).€€We€foundÏthat€the€trial€court€had€exceeded€its€authority€in€ordering€an€automatic€adjustment€inÏchild€support€based€upon€the€husbandððs€future€bonuses€and€commissions,€becauseÏthe€child€support€guidelines€promulgated€by€the€Legislature€require€the€courts€to€fixÏsome€òòdefiniteóó€amount€for€the€obligor€to€pay,€based€upon€his€earning€capacity.€€Tenn.Ð ÈÀ ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101(a)(2)(A).€€We€also€noted€that€the€definition€of€gross€incomeÏfound€in€the€Rules€and€Regulations€of€the€State€of€Tennessee€defined€gross€incomeÏbroadly€as€ð ðall€income€from€any€sourceðð€and€that€it€specifically€included€capital€gains.€Ï€€€€Ì€Ìà Ø àà 0 àWe€accordingly€remanded€this€case€to€the€trial€court€for€a€freshÏcalculation€of€net€income€upon€which€to€base€Mr.€Smithððs€child€support€obligation,€withÏthe€following€instructions:ÌÒ0 €ÒÒ„ÒÓÓà ˆ àWe€therefore€hold€that€in€calculating€a€definite€monthlyÏamount€of€child€support,€the€trial€court€must€consider€Mr.ÏSmithððs€1995€capital€gains€as€well€as€his€commissions,Ïbonuses€and€salary.€€Since€Mr.€Smith€apparentlyÏaccumulated€his€stock€options€during€the€entire€period€of€hisÏemployment€at€ñáñœñáñComdatañáñ›ñáñ,€and€not€just€during€the€year€inÏwhich€he€exercised€them,€it€might€be€equitable€to€average€hisÏcapital€gains€over€that€entire€period,€or€to€prorate€them€inÏsome€way,€rather€than€just€averaging€them€over€the€threeÏyear€period€that€was€used€for€calculating€his€average€salary,Ïcommission€and€bonus.€€The€trial€court€may€take€proof€on€theÏprocess€by€which€the€options€were€acquired,€in€order€to€makeÏthis€determination.€€€€ÌÌÒ€0 ÒÒ„ÒÓÓÌœñéñÐ ¨9 26 Ðñéñ›à@"êàò òII.€€Current€Proceedingsó óˆÐ  ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àFollowing€the€remand,€Ms.€Smith€filed€a€motion€to€set€child€support.€€TheÏchancellor€conducted€a€hearing€in€his€chambers€on€May€19,€1998.€€No€court€reporterÏwas€present,€so€there€is€no€transcript€of€that€hearing.€€The€court€heard€arguments€ofÏcounsel€and€reviewed€unsworn€documents€presented€by€the€parties.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àMs.€Smith€presented€a€letter€by€Sara€ñáñœñáñGroehlerñáñ›ñáñ,€Stock€OptionÏAdministrator€at€ñáñœñáñCeridianñáñ›ñáñ€Corporation€(ñáñœñáñCeridianñáñ›ñáñ€bought€ñáñœñáñComdatañáñ›ñáñ€in€œ1995)ñêñ,ñêñ›Ïaccompanied€by€an€employee€stock€option€summary€in€the€form€of€a€table,€whichÏlisted€the€grant€date€for€Mr.€Smithððs€stock€options€as€August€3,€1993.€€Mr.€SmithÏpresented€an€offer€of€employment,€in€the€form€of€a€letter€to€him€dated€April€17,€1983Ïfrom€Louis€ñáñœñáñMolettiereñáñ›ñáñ,€a€Senior€Vice€President€of€ñáñœñáñComdatañáñ›ñáñ.€€The€letter€outlined€theÏsalary€and€benefits€that€were€to€accompany€the€offered€job,€including€a€grant€of€Ïð ð25,000€shares€of€the€Companyððs€common€stock€under€the€1987€Non„Statutory€StockÏOption€Plan.ðð€€€€€ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àFollowing€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€issued€an€order€pro„rating€Mr.ÏSmithððs€stock€options€from€August€1993.€€The€chancellorððs€order€referenced€theÏdocuments€described€above,€but€did€not€state€the€reasons€for€apparently€preferringÏthe€evidence€presented€by€Ms.€Smith€over€that€of€Mr.€Smith.€€The€recalculation€of€Mr.ÏSmithððs€annual€income€from€1994„1996€resulted€in€œñëña€finding€that€hisñëññìñanñìñ›€average€grossÏannual€income€œñíñwasñíññîñofñîñ›€$206,881,€or€$17,240€a€month.€€Based€œñïñupñïñon›€this€œamountñðñ,ñðñ›œñññ€(or€moreÏprecisely,€based€upon€the€net€income€derived€from€this€amount),ñññ›€Mr.€Smithððs€childÏsupport€obligation€came€to€$3,860€per€month.€€The€arrearage€from€the€date€of€œñòñtheÏñòñcourtððs›€earlier€order€came€to€$28,069€after€consideration€of€the€amount€of€childÏsupport€actually€paid€since€that€time.€ÌÐ ¨9 26 Ðà Ø àà 0 àMr.€Smithððs€attorney€subsequently€filed€a€motion€under€Rule€59,€Tenn.ÏR.€Civ.€P.,€to€Alter€or€Amend€the€Judgment,€or€for€New€Trial.€€Attached€as€an€exhibitÏto€the€motion€was€a€ledger€containing€a€listing€of€stock€options€that€were€grantedÏbetween€January€1,€1987€and€January€27,€1995.€€The€ledger€indicated€€that€Mr.€SmithÏhad€been€granted€options€for€25,000€shares€of€œComdata›€Corporation€on€October€1,Ï1991.€€At€the€hearing€on€the€motion,€Mr.€Smith€also€produced€the€sworn€affidavit€ofÏMichael€W.€Sheridan,€acting€Secretary€of€œComdata›,€testifying€to€the€regularity€andÏcorrectness€of€both€the€above„mentioned€ledger,€and€of€another€document,€theÏminutes€of€a€regular€meeting€of€the€Board€of€Directors€of€œComdata›€Corporation€heldÏon€October€1,€1991,€which€included€a€resolution€approving€the€aforementioned€grantÏto€Mr.€Smith.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àIn€her€response€to€the€Rule€59€motion,€Ms.€Smith€argued€that€Mr.€SmithÏwas€not€entitled€to€have€his€new€evidence€considered€by€the€court€because€he€failedÏto€file€an€affidavit€to€meet€his€burden€of€proving€that€the€evidence€he€wished€to€presentÏcould€not€have€been€discovered€prior€to€the€original€proceeding€through€the€exerciseÏof€due€diligence.€òò€Seeóó€òòœSeay›€v.€City€of€Knoxvilleóó,€654€S.W.2d€397,€399€(Tenn.€App.Ð %  Ð1983).€ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àAt€the€end€of€the€hearing,€the€chancellor€took€the€matter€underÏadvisement.€€On€August€26,€1998,€he€filed€an€order€denying€the€Rule€59€motion.€€ThisÏappeal€followed.ÌÌà@¹¹êàò òIIIó ó.€ò ò€A€Necessarily€Limited€Reviewó óˆÐ (2 +. ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àWe€must€note€at€the€outset€the€irregular€nature€of€the€hearing€of€May€19,Ï1998.€€A€proceeding€in€chambers€may€be€useful€for€some€limited€purposes,€but€whenÏthe€rights€of€the€parties€are€to€be€conclusively€determined,€it€is€not€an€adequateÐ ¨9 26 Ðsubstitute€for€a€hearing€in€open€court,€in€accordance€with€the€Rules€of€Civil€ProcedureÏand€the€Rules€of€Evidence.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€absence€of€a€transcript€of€the€evidence€is€€particularly€damaging€toÏan€appellantððs€prospects,€for€without€such€a€transcript€(or€in€the€alternative,€aÏstatement€of€the€evidence€filed€in€accordance€with€Rule€24(c),€Tenn.€R.€App.€Proc.),Ïthe€presumption€of€correctness€that€normally€accompanies€findings€of€fact€by€the€trialÏcourt€becomes€conclusive.€€See€Rule€13(d),€Tenn.€R.€App.€Proc.;òò€Word€v.€Wordóó,€937Ð (  ÐS.W.2d€931€(Tenn.€App.€1996);€òòœSherrod›€v.€œWix›óó,€849€S.W.2d€780,€783€(Tenn.€App.Ð  Ð1992).ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àIt€appears€to€us€that€both€parties€submitted€without€objection€to€theÏprocedures€whose€results€are€now€at€issue.€€Neither€party€alleges€that€he€or€sheÏobjected€to€the€admission€of€documents€submitted€by€the€other€that€could€have€beenÏexcluded€as€inadmissible€hearsay€by€a€timely€objection.€€If€we€are€mistaken€andÏobjections€were€indeed€taken,€the€failure€of€the€parties€to€preserve€those€objectionsÏby€arranging€for€the€presence€of€a€court€reporter€prevents€us€from€reviewing€theÏcourtððs€actions€in€any€meaningful€way.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àRelief€is€not€generally€available€in€the€appellate€courts€to€a€party€whoÏfails€to€take€whatever€action€is€necessary€to€prevent€or€nullify€the€harmful€effect€of€anÏerror.€€See€Rule€36(a),€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€€Thus,€we€cannot€consider€the€appellantððsÏargument€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€accepting€the€unsworn,€unexplained€letter€fromÏMs.€œGroehler›€and€its€attachments,€and€in€using€those€documents€to€determine€theÏdate€of€the€grant€of€the€stock€options€in€question.€€ÌÌà Ø à€à 0 àAs€for€the€hearing€on€the€Motion€to€Alter€or€Amend€or€for€€New€Trial,€weÐ È7À04 Ðbelieve€the€appellee€is€correct€in€stating€that€when€the€basis€of€such€a€motion€is€theÐ ¨9 26 Ðexistence€of€newly€discovered€evidence,€the€appellant€has€a€duty€to€furnish€the€courtÏwith€an€adequate€explanation€as€to€why€such€evidence€could€not€have€been€producedÏat€the€trial€of€the€case.€€The€reason€is€that€without€such€a€rule,€our€courts€would€haveÏa€much€more€difficult€time€closing€the€books€on€many€cases,€and€achieving€that€finalityÏof€judgment€which€is€one€of€the€primary€goals€of€our€judicial€system.€€ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àSince€the€appellant€did€not€even€attempt€to€offer€such€an€explanation,Ïthe€trial€court€did€not€err€in€refusing€to€reverse€its€earlier€ruling,€despite€the€appellantððsÏcontention€that€he€was€in€possession€of€evidence€that€was€better€than€the€evidenceÏhe€produced€at€trial.ÌÌà@ïïêàò òIV.€€€The€Educational€Trust€Fundó óˆÐ ¨  ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€Tennessee€Child€Support€Guidelines€permits€the€court€to€order€aÏnon„custodial€parent€to€pay€that€portion€of€child€support€which€is€based€upon€netÏincome€in€excess€of€$6,250€per€month€into€an€educational€trust€fund€for€the€benefit€ofÏthe€children,€rather€than€going€directly€to€the€custodial€parent.€€Tenn.€Rules€&€œRegs›Ï1240„2„4„.04(3).€€The€appellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€refusing€to€order€theÏcreation€of€such€a€fund.€€However€the€creation€of€an€educational€trust€fund€is€notÏmandatory,€but€is€within€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€òò€œNash›€v.€œMulle›óó,€846Ð ¨* #& ÐS.W.2d€803,€804€(Tenn.€1993).ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àSince€there€is€no€evidence€in€the€record€that€the€appellant€asked€theÏcourt€to€create€an€educational€trust€fund,€we€cannot€find€that€the€court€abused€œiñóñtsñóññôñnñôñ›Ïdiscretion€in€failing€to€do€so.€€But€because€of€the€modifiable€nature€of€child€supportÏorders,€we€see€nothing€to€prevent€the€appellant€from€moving€the€court€for€the€creationÏof€such€a€fund,€if€he€believes€it€would€be€to€his€advantage,€or€that€of€the€children.€€€€ÌÐ ¨9 26 Ðà Ø àà 0 àMs.€Smith€has€also€asked€to€be€awarded€her€attorney€fees€on€appeal.ÏWe€note,€as€we€did€in€our€earlier€opinion€in€this€case,€òòsupraóó,€that€a€substantial€portionÐ èà Ðof€the€attorney€fees€she€incurred€were€for€the€purpose€of€vindicating€her€right€toÏreceive€an€appropriate€amount€of€support€for€her€children.€€We€therefore€direct€the€trialÏcourt€to€order€the€appellant€to€pay€one„half€of€her€attorney€fees€on€this€appeal.Ì€Ìà@‹‹-êàò òV.ó óˆÐ H@  ÐÌœñõñà Ø àñõñ›à 0 àThe€order€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€Remand€this€cause€to€theÏChancery€Court€of€Williamson€County€for€further€proceedings€consistent€with€thisÏopinion.€€Tax€the€costs€on€appeal€to€the€appellant.ÌÌÌÌÓÓà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àà H! àà  # à¼à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à_________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGEÌÐ  4-0 ÐÑ  ÑÔ€¼‡Ó¼XX™aÔò òà@ú ú êàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ  Ðà@™™(êàAT€NASHVILLEó óÔ€X™aX¼¼‡ÓԈР ÐÌÌÌÌSHARON€ANN€SMITH,à à àà 8 àà  à)Ð ô ì Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àPlaintiff/Appellee,à à àà 8 àà  à)à è àAppeal€No.Ð ÔÌ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è à01„A„01„9809„CH„00515Рļ  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àœÐ ´¬  ÐV›S.à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àWilliamson€ChanceryÐ ¤œ  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àNo.€22128Ð ”Œ  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àÐ „|  ÐALAN€WAYNE€SMITH,à à àà 8 àà  à)à è àAffirmed€andà ˜ àà ð àà H! àà  # àÐ tl  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àRemandedÐ d\ Ðà Ø àDefendant/Appellant.à 8 àà  à)Ð TL ÐÌÔ€¼‡Ó¼XX™aÔò òòòà@uu'êàJ€U€D€G€M€E€N€Tóóó óˆÐ 4, ÐÌÓÓÔ€X™aX¼¼‡ÓÔà Ø àà 0 àThis€cause€came€on€to€be€heard€upon€the€record€on€appeal€from€theÐ `X ÐChancery€Court€of€Williamson€County,€briefs€and€argument€of€counsel;€uponÏconsideration€whereof,€this€Court€is€of€the€opinion€that€in€the€decree€of€the€ChancellorÏthere€is€no€reversible€error.Ìà Ø àà 0 àIn€accordance€with€the€opinion€of€the€Court€filed€herein,€it€is,€therefore,Ïordered€and€decreed€by€this€Court€that€the€decree€is€affirmed.€€The€cause€isÏremanded€to€the€Chancery€Court€of€Williamson€County€for€the€enforcement€of€theÏdecree€and€for€the€collection€of€the€costs€accrued€below.Ìà Ø àà 0 àCosts€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€against€Alan€W.€Smith,€Principal,€andÏGregory€D.€Smith,€Surety,€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.ÌÓÓÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à______________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€PRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à______________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à______________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGEÌ