WPC # VUNa % 0(w@4 1 0J@ 0T 0^ 0h< 0r 0| 0 0 1u U, 0dI U, U> U6B)MDCv AMU*0 B.v~Kv D3 0@ AO^ 0D$ D/h BHP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPT0 (hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($ ?@DABDCDEDFDGDHӀZ 3|xS2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23    ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)<  9p`(ModernP 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Monaco<  9p`(&Times New Roman<  9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d 7Border 1dd-!C << G<  9p`(Arial !  ##   YYY FILED#X June11,1996CecilCrowson,Jr.#AppellateCourtClerk  dPtPtHH(FG(HH(d'@Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Monaco   BA Op Monaco  BA Op Monaco %%%%'dxd("$    -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! . &Xd&#Xd#  \RA'\@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEETRINATUCK,     )TENNESSEECLAIMSCOMMISSION       )C/ANO.03A019510BC00355  ClaimantAppellant,  )       )       )       )v.       )       )HONORABLEMICHAELS.LACY,       )COMMISSIONERL"$!;+'h|`  `L       )       )       )STATEOFTENNESSEE,    )       )  DefendantAppellee.  )@ OPINIONCONCURRINGIN@ PARTANDDISSENTINGINPART  Iconcurintheresultreachedinthemajorityopinion.IalsoagreewiththemajoritysreasoningexceptthatIamnotconvincedthatRule13(d),T.R.A.P.isinapplicabletoatrialcourtsfindingsoffactincaseswherethequestioniswhetherthelowercourtabuseditsdiscretion.IdissentfromsomuchofthemajorityopinionassuggeststhatRule13(d)isnotapplicabletoatrialcourtsfindingsoffactwhenitisexercisingitssounddiscretioninacaseinvolvingthepreponderanceoftheevidencestandard.Ifindnoexceptionfor abuseofdiscretioncasesintheplainlanguageofRule13(d);however,evenifthiscaseisreviewedasdirectedbyRule13(d),Idonotfindthattheevidencepreponderatesagainstthetrialcourtsexerciseofdiscretion.      ________________________________      CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.