WPC6 2 PDpQr019=+EnQb]q0R&4ٶbg0,6P"OxjhgxZ̖d5#E1&-s"/d]8 @yc#lTww:7Ək"!˸hQ@nj] W*sf@=x\ӕ0% dP@P?E-y_>lIP>EBRx`FT.K5eZ+mhkK 9拦0{Ǹa;ctsM{uq\}LtkIr~̽(x>LFa#*[y5ƺk=0?Q9F"< Q$4s^Hx=s)G"|!~iq͐!,y c]}&ɰb4Yd7gSuP$L~<2t/r?>65h(J_c!1x]K# % ^ 0 UNi w 4 z I  * m, .C q7 0DNEb 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K AS8 0Q 0D A999999999999999999999999999999 D5 BHP LaserJet 4Si,,,,,,0Nj(L (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular~(CORE C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU $ R $      1  XX  _Rule10oftheRulesoftheCourtofAppealsreadsasfollows:  8   ` TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,may  affirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrial_cout_Ԁbymemorandumopinionwhen  aformalopinionwouldhaveno_precendential_Ԁvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedby p memorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shall `  notbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninanyunrelated P  case.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0   - -(|G2 $ !.8dd8         0  XX d(|3!$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3!$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK)!dxdxP Pd !.8dd8     _  8XXdd8@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLEԈ ,   February2000Session X #w#XX #XX#  AZZAMM.TARIFv.DEREKBULLION,etal.#[#XX   ` z@   DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforHickmanCounty  h @ No.995024CIIDonaldP.Harris,Judge  X @*AV) ` dE<` A߈ (  @' ' No.M199900475_COA_ԄR3CVFiled_July19,2000_Ԁ '  AV) ` dE<` A    Petitioner,astateprisoner,appealstheactionofthetrialcourtindismissingunderTennesseeRule  ofCivilProcedure12.02(6)hiscivilrightscomplaint.Weaffirm.     Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed   #X#XXXWILLIAMB.Cain,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichBENH.CANTRELL,P.J.,M.S.,and f PATRICIAJ.COTTRELL,J.,joined. V AzzamM.Tarif,Only,Tennessee,ProSe. 6 PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter,MichaelE.Moore,SolicitorGeneralandMark f A.Hudson,AssistantAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellees,DerekBullion,RickyMathis,andWayne V Brandon. F @! MEMORANDUMOPINION  #  1       &   Appellant,_Azzam_ԀM._Tarif_,stateshiscaseinhisbriefbeforethiscourtasfollows: !  8   ` OnMarch31,1999,appellantfiledacivilrightscomplaint,pursuantto42 #" U.S.C.1983,1985(3)and1986namingDeputyWarden,WayneBrandon,Unit $#' ManagerRickyMathisandCorrectionalOfficerDerekBullionasdefendants.   8   ` AppellantallegedthatonJanuary26,1999,appelleeBullionapproachedthe  appellantandbeganmaking raciststatementstowardsappellantandusing  derogatoryandprofanelanguage,whileappellantwasreadingtheunitsbulletin  boardoncriteriarequiredtorunintheprisonsgrievanceboardelection.... p AppellantallegedthatBullioncommittedthisconductto illtreatandabuse `  appellantonaccountofappellantsraceandreligion....P    8   ` AppellantallegedthatappelleeBullionsconductwasalsodesignedtodeny 0  appellanttheequalprotectionofthelawaffordedtoappellantasaninmateconfined  p  intheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection....Appellantfurtherassertedthat `  appelleesBrandonandMathisknewofBullionsunlawfulconduct,andrefusedto P  takeappropriatemeasurestostopBullionsunlawfulconduct,andrefusedtotake @  appropriatemeasurestostopBullionsrepeatedabuseofappellantdespitetheduty 0  imposeduponthembyTennesseelaw....    8   ` Appellees[]responsetothecomplaintassertedthatappellantsallegations  ofverbalabusebyBulliondonotrisetothelevelofacivilrightsviolation,and  therefore,theappellantfailedtostateaclaimuponwhichreliefcanbegranted.On  July14,1999,thetrialcourtagreedwithappelleesandfileditsOrderdismissing  appellantscivilrightscomplaint.Appellantfiledatimelynoticeofappeal,andthis p caseisnowproperlybeforethisCourt.`     Thetrialjudgegrantedthemotiontodismissandweaffirm.Thecomplaint,takenasa @ whole,chargesonlyverbalharassmentwithracialovertones.Nodefendantischargedwithanything 0 otherthanverbalharassment,threateninglanguage,andavaguelyassertedconspiracytoverbally  p harassAppellantbecauseofhisraceandreligion.Suchallegations,iftrue,arenotsufficienttostate ` acauseofactionunder42U.S.C.1983.Martinv.Sargent,780F.2d1334(8thCir.1985);Collins P v.Cundy,603F.2d825(10thCir.1979).Neitherdosuchallegationsconstitutepunishmentwithin @ themeaningofthe8thAmendmenttotheUnitedStatesConstitution.Iveyv.Wilson,832F.2d950 0 (6thCir.1987);Torresv.CountyofOakland,758F.2d147(6thCir.1985).     Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisinallrespectsaffirmedandcostsassessedagainst "  Appellant,_Azzam_ԀM._Tarif_. #!    `     h   __________________________________________ `'"%    `     h   WILLIAMB.CAIN,JUDGE