WPCl ZbRht/Z. vs%,U)w&ր框 Lm"zjh 2,8WDhA;V_iINms*Zhr8+SY,8B_w'mR!l5'9|<ՙG/9J5jz;Vo)byP;K,{\Tt6.xn*+P0kB_ʏL+2;/>//#JN Lg0oMΛo82J-LKE5q޻`0zXw-ruE=AhdW9I̐p4M0`#!@UNa % 0(w4N  0l 0Do  { m0G6U:^ ;;;;;GGl B999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 AQV 0Dm 0D 0D D39HP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX(${Z=' ,3|x   $    3    Therecordonappealdoesnotcontaintherestrainingorderand,thus,doesnotexplain  whyMunceywasrestrainedforfortyeightdays.Unlessextendedbythetrialcourt,restraining  ordersautomaticallyexpireattheendoffifteendays. See T.R.C.P.65.03(5).Therecorddoes  notindicatethatthetrialcourtextendedtherestrainingorderinthiscase.((3$ !      0  (#$  0   q  $    5    Onappeal,MunceyhascomplainedaboutthetrialcourtsfailuretorequireTaylorto  postaninjunctionbondpriortoissuanceoftherestrainingorder.Inourview,itwasincumbent  uponMunceytobringthisoversighttotheattentionofthetrialcourtinatimelymanner. See    PyottLand&MiningCo. ,150S.W.at540;T.R.C.P.65.05(3).Munceydidnotcomplainabout t TaylorsfailuretoprovideasufficientbonduntilhefiledhisansweronJune12,1997,fivedays ` beforetheJune17,1997,temporaryinjunctionhearing.Aswepreviouslydiscussed,theApril L  1997restrainingordershouldalreadyhaveexpiredbythattime. Seesupra note3.U z  $    4    TheSupremeCourtofTexashasprovidedahelpfulexplanationofthedifferencesinthe  twotypesofwrongfulinjunctionactions. See  DeSantisv.WackenhutCorp. ,793S.W.2d670,  68586(Tex.1990), cert.denied ,498U.S.1048(1991). , ["  _X;XXXXX;   Ad FILEDX;X  September1,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAx ,cAZ"Arial Regular9!'  |  $    1    DefendantRobertL.Morrisisnotapartytothisappeal. b  $    2    See T.R.C.P.65.03. dZ[\]_C<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1   'dxd !  _TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T',XXX' xY_B2.jz1`  `@E` 8ttxP 1 x_@O O INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE,  @$ATNASHVILLE   @. . _______________________________________________________  ) TIMTAYLOR ,  )  WarrenCountyChanceryCourt 8    )  No.6472 ( x ЀPlaintiff/Appellee/CrossAppellant.  )  d   )VS.  )  C.A.No.01A019804CH00211  <    ) ROBERTL.MORRIS ,  )     )̀Defendant  )     ) AND   ) x   ) TERRYMUNCEY ,  ) T   )̀Defendant/Appellant/CrossAppellee.  ) 0 ______________________________________________________________________________FromtheChanceryCourtofWarrenCountyatMcMinnville. AubreyL.Harper ,McMinnville,Tennessee  AttorneyforDefendant/Appellant/CrossAppellee,TerryMuncey. DianaC.Benson , X! TRAIL&TRAIL,Murfreesboro,TennesseeAttorneyforPlaintiff/Appellee/CrossAppellant.OPINIONFILED: REVERSEDANDREMANDED  )$(   FARMER,J.  l,'+  CRAWFORD,P.J.,W.S. :(Concurs) D.)-  LILLARD,J. :(Concurs) 4/*.  4;6; _ԇ0,X` X,XX0   ` DefendantTerryMunceyappeals,andPlaintiffTimTaylorcrossappeals,thetrial  courtsjudgmentawardingMuncey$1000indamagesonhiscounterclaimforwrongfulinjunction  againstTaylor.WereversethetrialcourtsjudgmentbaseduponourconclusionthatMunceyfailed ` tomeethisburdenofprovingtheelementsofhisclaimforwrongfulinjunction. 8   ` InDecember1996,PlaintiffTimTaylorandDefendantRobertL.Morris  #  1      ׀enteredinto  8  acontractwherebyMorrisagreedtosell,andTayloragreedtopurchase,   8 ` [a]llmarkabletimber14in.andupon25acresmoreorless,[located] p intheVervillacommunity,inWarrenCo.McMinnville,Tenn.This \ includesthewholetree,with12mo.toremovesaidtimberfromday H contractissigned,withallnecessaryrightofwaysonsubject 4 property. p` x` x Atthetimetheyenteredintothecontract,TaylorandMorrisdiscussedthefactthat,beforehecould   removethetimberfromMorrissproperty,Taylorwouldneedtoobtainarightofwayoreasement  fromaneighboringlandowner.Thepartiesagreedthatthetwelvemonthcontractperiodwouldnot  runduringthetimeTaylorwastryingtoobtainthenecessaryeasement.Thepartiesplannedtofill X  inthedateonthecontractonceTaylorobtainedtheeasement.Atthattime,Tayloralsowouldpay 0"  Morristhepurchasepriceof$15,000. $X"  ` InearlyApril1997,TaylorcontactedMorristoadvisehimthathehadobtainedthe '#& necessaryeasementandthathewasreadytopaythe$15,000purchasepriceandbegincuttingtimber )$( onMorrissproperty.Morrisrespondedbystatingthatherecentlyhadagreedtosellthetimberto h+&* DefendantTerryMunceyinsteadofTaylor,andMorrisrefusedtohonorTaylorscontract. @-(,  ` Consequently,TaylorfiledthislawsuitagainstMorrisandMunceyinwhichhe 0@,0 soughtspecificperformanceofhiscontractwithMorrisor,alternatively,$50,000indamagesfor 2.2 Morrissbreachofthecontract.Taylorscomplaint,filedApril28,1997,alsoaskedthetrialcourt 4/4 toissuearestrainingorder|  #  2      ׀preventingtheDefendantsfromremovinganyofthetimberfrom x616 Morrisspropertypendingahearingonthepartiesrespectiverightstothetimber.   ` Althoughtherecordonappealdoesnotcontainarestrainingorder,thetrialcourt ` apparentlyissuedtherestrainingorderrequestedinTaylorscomplaintbecausethesubsequent 8  pleadingsreferredtosuchanorder.Inhisanswer,TerryMunceyassertedseveralcounterclaims,  ` includingtheclaimthathehadbeenwrongfullyrestrainedorenjoinedfromexercisinghisrightto  8  harvestthetimber.    ` InJune1997,thetrialcourtheldahearingonTaylorsMotionforRestrainingOrder. p Althoughtheappellaterecordisnotclearonthispoint,wecanonlysurmisethattheactualpurpose H oftheJune1997hearingwastodeterminewhetherthetrialcourtshouldissueatemporary  p injunction,asopposedtoarestrainingorderwhichthecourtalreadyhadissued. Compare  H T.R.C.P.65.03(requirementsforrestrainingorder) with T.R.C.P.65.04(requirementsfortemporary   injunction).Thistime,thetrialcourtdeniedTaylorsrequestforinjunctivereliefbaseduponhis  failuretoprovethathewouldsufferimmediateandirreparableinjuryiftheinjunctionwasnot  granted. See T.R.C.P.65.04(2). X   ` AtthesubsequenttrialheldinNovember1997,TimTaylortestifiedthat,whenthe $X" contractwasexecuted,heandMorrisdiscussedthefactthatTaylormightneedsixmonthsormore %0!$ toobtainthenecessaryeasement.AccordingtoTaylor,Morrisindicatedthatthistimeframewas '#& acceptable.Taylorbelievedthatthecontractobligatedhimtoattempttoobtainthenecessary )$( easementsothathecouldfulfillthetermsofthecontract.Tayloragreed,however,thathecould h+&* have walkedawayfromthecontractwithoutobligationifhefailedtoobtaintheeasement.Taylor @-(, alsoacknowledgedwritingalettertoMorrisduringtheircontractnegotiationswhereinTaylor /h*. indicatedthathewouldreturnMorrisscopyofthecontractandacashierscheckfor$15,000 if 0@,0 Taylorwasabletoobtaintheeasement. 2.2  ` Indefendingthebreachofcontractaction,RobertMorrisacknowledgedthat,inthe x616 past,prospectivepurchasershadexperienceddifficultyinobtainingtheeasementneededtoremove P838 thetimber.InMorrissopinion,thecontracthesignedwithTaylorobligatedhimtosellthetimber (:x5: toTayloronlyifTaylorwasabletoobtainthenecessaryeasementwithinareasonableperiodof