ÿWPCŸ =[^ ã­gäÀ—y4@€†¯X¸ˆ])PÁ“”ˆ0*Öâ\tï»^x¾ó#9v¸NEšeÁa°î ÆëšƒEñué`“æ-ÉVe-$±‹ =äT+Ë2ý2—#(µ®r½òëv9 ýYv‘³hÔÀØ´€J7y ¶pèWÁ=ZúçMa‡Wí–h¬c —M)í–¢ר’m*¤?<'Õá?€$R¢²Üý9Ó Ú‹tÝ8 pк¨•?%A€·QÐ3Æ5FuË$ÀŒÎ­nÄ/û¯“K¥Ý¹E[rÖ<İ.!ôÝžþhZÝc¨[.§Ú0ÜÍ#×ó'F|¸©ëN¿­í¼{×(T ­z1F¡lL^ v0ò¯¸*fRïÌßôF4°~ítVÎ*q—ëvø>›œØÐu_ãä¤Ùúµ¼ŒZFæU—F8çü¢:Ì75ÿ.€s #ò>m¤½éöÎU¶3û/ʸ¡vÇ{”È’mâg—k|³J<ÝYwž$i‰ô!)ç=fÌç"úBGGF­¾!Ù¨ZMR¤>áOªLöL.*jx e` `€€@Eÿ` 8ttxP7°u e tß›ññDAVID€WILLIAMS,à à àà 8 àà  à)Ð ° Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)ÌÓ6€ü(‚X˜‘X€Ð‡Xè“X6Óà Ø àPetitioner/Appellant,à  à)à  àAppeal€No.Ð Ð  Ðà Ø àà  à)à  à01„A„01„9801„CH„00010Ð à0 Ðv.à Ø àà  à)Ð ð@ Ðà Ø àà  à)à  àDavidson€ChanceryÐ  P ÐTENNESSEE€DEPARTMENT€OFà  à)à  àNo.€97„2523„IÐ  ` ÐCORRECTION,à  à)Ð  p Ðà Ø àà  à)Ìà Ø àRespondent/Appellee.à  à)Ð @  Ðà Ø àà  àÌÌÌÔ#†Xv-X¼¼o8#ÔÔ‡»œl»XXv-ÔÓ  ÓCOURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ €Ð  ÐÌÌAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€FOR€DAVIDSON€COUNTYÌÌAT€NASHVILLE,€TENNESSEEÌÌÌTHE€HONORABLE€IRVIN€H.€KILCREASE,€JR.,€CHANCELLORÌÓ9°,X‚Xì“X€ü(‚X˜‘X9ÓÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓDAVID€J.€WILLIAMS,€Pro€SeÌ#093823€NECX€€POB€5000ÌMountain€City,€Tennessee€€37683ÌÔ#†Xv-X»»œl#ÔÔ‡¼o¼XXv-ÔÌÌÌJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÌAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌÌMICHAEL€E.€MOOREÌSolicitor€GeneralÌÌMICHAEL€L.€HAYNIEÌAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌCivil€Rights€and€Claims€DivisionÌ425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌSecond€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÌNashville,€Tennessee€€37243„0488Ìà Ø àATTORNEYS€FOR€RESPONDENT/APPELLEEÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓAFFIRMED€AND€REMANDEDÌÓ  ÓÌññÑ foÑÑ7€v-XXdìXXdì7ÑÑ€ ÑÑ  ÑÑ foÑÑ#€O@Xÿÿd#ÑÑ € ÑÑ  ÑññÌññÑ foÑÑ7€v-XXdìXXdì7ÑÑ€ ÑÑ  Ñññà @ àà @ì àWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGEÐ à:063_ ÐÑ foÑÑ7€v-XXdìXXdì7ÑÑ€ ÑÑ  ÑññÑ foÑÑ7€¶XXdìdÈ7ÑÑ€ ÑÑ  ÑññÓÓÓ  ÓòòÔ#†Xv-X¼¼o#ÔÔ‡°N°XXv-ÔOPINIONóóÐ ° ÐÓ  ÓÔ#†Xv-X°°N& #ÔÓ€ÓÓ9°,X°4ì“X°,X‚Xì“X9ÓÔ€¼o¼XXv-Ôà  àPetitioner,€David€J.€Williams,€on€July€29,€1997,€filed€in€the€ChanceryÐ T¤ ÐCourt€of€Davidson€County,€Tennessee,€a€petition€for€judicial€review€and/orÏdeclaratory€judgment€and/or€common„law€writ€of€certiorari.ÌÌà  àActing€pro€se€he€asserts€that€he€is€being€held€unconstitutionally€andÏillegally€by€the€defendant.ÌÌà  àHe€contends€that€he€is€entitled€to€immediate€release€because€his€sentenceÏstructure€is€incorrect€and€illogical€and€further€that€he€is€entitled€to€immediateÏrelease€because€he€should€be€re„sentenced€under€the€Criminal€Sentencing€ReformÏAct€of€1989,€and€because€he€is€entitled€to€both€retroactive€and€cumulative€sentenceÏcredits.€€He€further€asserts€that€it€is€a€violation€of€constitutional€equal€protectionÏrights€and€constitutional€freedom€from€cruel€and€unusual€punishment€for€him€toÏbe€treated€differently€from€individuals€sentenced€under€the€Criminal€SentencingÏReform€Act€of€1989.ÌÌà  àPetitioner€was€convicted€of€aggravated€rape€on€July€22,€1981,€the€rapeÏhaving€occurred€on€June€29,€1980€in€Washington€County.€€The€defendant€was€alsoÏconvicted€of€rape€on€February€12,€1981€with€this€offense€having€occurred€inÏCarter€County,€Tennessee.€€The€sentences€ran€œconsecutively.€€The€aggravated€rapeÏconviction€waññsññ€for€a€Class€X€felony.ÌÌà  àThe€learned€chancellor€addressed€these€issues€by€comprehensiveÏmemorandum€which€is€adopted€as€the€opinion€of€the€court€in€part:ÌÓ€ÓÓ<€ü(€ / è“X°,X°4ì“X<Óà8  àà / àÔ€Xv-X¼¼oÔThe€petitioner,€òòpro€seóó,€is€an€inmate€in€the€custody€of€theÐ ”.ä)2 ÐTennessee€Department€of€Correction€at€the€Northeast€CorrectionalÏCenter€in€Mountain€City,€Tennessee.€€He€has€filed€a€petition€in€whichÏhe€seeks€a€declaratory€judgment:€€1)€that€his€sentence€as€imposed€by€theÏcourts€is€erroneous;€2)€that€he€is€entitled€to€be€sentenced€under€theÏCriminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼101€òòet€seqóó.;€3)€that€he€is€entitled€to€certain€sentence€credits€which€haveÐ 4l/8 Ðbeen€unlawfully€withheld;€and€4)€that€he€is€entitled€to€be€releasedÏimmediately.€€Alternatively,€the€petitioner€seeks€review€of€the€decisionÏof€the€Department€of€Correction€to€deny€his€request€for€a€declaratoryÏorder€under€the€common€law€writ€of€certiorari.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àThe€petitioner€committed€the€offense€of€aggravated€rape€on€JuneÏ29,€1980€and€the€offense€of€rape€on€February€12,€1981.€€On€July€22,Ð ¤9ô4> Ð1981,€the€petitioner€was€sentenced€to€life€imprisonment€for€theÏWashington€County€Aggravated€Rape€conviction.€€This€life€sentence€isÏconsecutive€to€the€petitioner's€20€year€sentence€for€his€Carter€CountyÏRape€conviction.€€At€the€time€of€the€petitioner's€offense€and€at€the€timeÏof€his€conviction€and€sentencing,€Aggravated€Rape€was€a€Class€XÏfelony€pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„1„701€òòet€seqóó.€(repealed).€€OnÐ L œ ÐNovember€1,€1989,€the€Class€X€felony€law€under€which€the€petitionerÏwas€sentenced€was€repealed€and€replaced€by€the€Criminal€SentencingÏReform€Act€of€1989.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„101€òòet€seqóó.€€TheÐ  ` Ðpetitioner€contends€that€under€the€1989€Act,€the€maximum€sentence€heÏwould€have€received€is€35€years€at€30%.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àThis€matter€is€before€the€Court€on€motion€of€the€respondent,€byÏand€through€the€office€of€the€Tennessee€Attorney€General,€to€dismiss€theÏpetition€pursuant€to€Rule€12.02€(6)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€CivilÏProcedure€for€failure€to€state€a€claim€upon€which€relief€may€be€granted.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àThe€petitioner€filed€with€the€Department€of€Correction€a€requestÏfor€a€declaratory€order€that€his€sentences€were€imposed€erroneously;€thatÏhe€is€entitled€to€have€his€Class€X€sentence€reduced€in€accordance€withÏthe€above€language;€that€he€is€entitled€to€the€sentence€credits€on€theÏreduced€sentence;€and€that€he€is€entitled€to€be€released€immediately.€ÏThe€department€denied€the€petitioner's€request.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àThe€petitioner€first€contends€that€his€sentences€were€not€properlyÏimposed€and€that€as€a€result€he€was€incorrectly€granted€custodial€paroleÏfrom€his€20„year€sentence€into€his€life€sentence.€€He€asserts€that€it€wasÏ"logistically€impossible"€for€him€to€serve€the€Washington€CountyÏsentence€consecutive€to€his€Carter€County€sentence€since€theÏWashington€County€offense€was€first€in€time.€€The€TennesseeÏDepartment€of€Correction€is€not€responsible€for€the€sentencing€andÏparole€of€inmates.€€The€trial€court€in€which€an€individual€is€convictedÏis€responsible€for€imposing€judgment€and€sentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð€40„20„101€òòet€seqóó.€€Only€the€Board€of€paroles€has€the€authority€toÐ X ¨ Ðdetermine€an€inmate's€parole€status.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„28„103.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àThe€petitioner€next€contends€that€adjustment€to€his€sentence€isÏmandated€by€the€criminal€savings€statute€which€was€codified€at€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€39„1„105€at€the€times€of€his€offense,€conviction€andÏsentencing.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„1„105€provided:Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà8/  Ð  Ð àRepealed€or€amended€laws€„„€Application€in€prosecutionÏfor€offense.„„€Whenever€any€penal€statute€or€penalÏlegislative€act€of€the€state€is€repealed€or€amended€by€aÏsubsequent€legislative€act,€any€offense,€as€defined€by€suchÏstatute€or€act€as€being€repealed€or€amended,€committedÏwhile€such€statute€or€act€was€in€full€force€and€effect€shallÏbe€prosecuted€under€such€act€or€statute€in€effect€at€theÏtime€of€the€commission€of€the€offense.€€In€the€event€theÏsubsequent€act€provides€for€a€lesser€penalty,€anyÏpunishment€imposed€shall€be€in€accordance€with€theÏsubsequent€act.€€Ð / ¥/ ¥ ÐÔ€¼œH¼XX¶Ôà8  àÔ€X¶X¼¼œHÔThe€above€provision€was€repealed€in€1989€and€reenacted€as€Tenn.€CodeÐ 0T+/ ÐAnn.€ðð€39„11„112.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„1„105€did€not€apply€to€sentences€whichÏwere€already€received€when€a€subsequent€act€or€amendment€providedÏfor€a€lesser€penalty.€€In€òòState€ex€rel.€Stewart€v.€McWherter,€óó857€S.W.2dÐ ´3/3 Ð875€(Tenn.€Cr.€App.€1992),€the€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals€noted:€€"ByÏtheir€terms,€the€former€and€present€savings€statutes€relate€to€activeÏòòprosecutionsóó,€not€past€cases€for€which€sentences€are€being€served."€Ð x6È16 Ð(emphasis€in€original).€€Furthermore,€the€language€of€the€CriminalÏSentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989€is€clear€in€that€it€applies€only€to€thoseÏoffenses€for€which€a€person€committed€or€was€tried€and€sentenced€afterÏNovember€1,€1989.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„117.€€The€statute€doesÐ (:x5: Ðnot€provide€for€a€reduction€in€the€petitioner's€sentence.€€Therefore,€theÏpetitioner€is€not€entitled€to€a€declaratory€judgment€in€this€regard.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àThe€petitioner's€claim€that€theñýñ€ñýñDepartmentt€withheld€sentenceÏcredits€to€which€he€is€lawfullyñûñ€ñûñentitledñüñmñüñ€is€likewise€without€merit.€€In€hisÏpetition,€the€petitioner€claims€that€he€is€"entitled€to€earn,€and€shouldÏhave€received€the€following€sentence€reduction€credits€òòat€the€same€timeÐ L œ Ðand€retroactivelyóó€as€a€matter€of€law":Ð8 ˆ Ð  Ð  ÐÓB€ ü(€ / [<@’X€ü(€ / è“XBÓà8  àà8/  Ð  Ð à1.à [ àgood€and€honor€time€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.ñþñ€ñþñðððð€à @‹ à41„à @• àà @• àà @• àñÿñà @• àÐ $ t Ðñÿñ21„212€and€„214;Ð / ¥/ ¥ Ðà8  àà8/  Ð  Ð à2.à [ àgood€conduct€sentence€credits€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð ü L  ÐÔ‡¼œH¼XX¶Ô€à [ àÔ#†X¶X¼¼œH¾(#Ôðð€41„21„229;Ðè 8 / ¥/ ¥ Ðà8  àà8/  Ð  Ð à3.à [ àprisoner€performance€credits€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€Ô‡¼œH¼XX¶ÔÐ øH  Ðà [ àÔ#†X¶X¼¼œHœ)#Ôðð€41„21„230;€andÐä4 / ¥/ ¥ Ðà8  àà8/  Ð  Ð à4.à [ àinmate€incentive€credits€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€Ô‡¼œH¼XX¶ÔððÔ#†X¶X¼¼œHŽ*#Ô€41„Ð Ð  Ðà [ à21„228.Ð / ¥/ ¥ ÐÔ€¼œH¼XX¶Ôà8  àÔ€X¶X¼¼œHÔHowever,€when€the€petitioner€was€convicted€he€was€not€eligible€to€earnÐ Ì Ðany€kind€of€credits.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„1„703€provided€that€ClassÏX€felonies€were€not€subject€to€reduction€for€good,€honor€or€incentive€orÏother€sentence€credit€of€any€sort.€€The€sentence€terminated€only€afterÏservice€of€the€entire€sentence,€day€for€day.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àIn€1983,€the€law€was€amended€to€permit€Class€X€felons€to€earnÏPrisoner€Performance€Sentence€Credits€to€reduce€the€sentenceÏexpiration€date,€provided€a€waiver€was€signed€by€the€inmate€waiving€hisÏright€to€serve€his€sentence€under€the€law€in€effect€at€the€time€his€offenseÏwas€committed.€€Ch.€400€Public€Acts€of€1983,€ðð€3,€6„8.€€The€petitionerÏdoes€not€assert€that€he€signed€such€a€waiver.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àIn€1985,€Class€X€felons€became€eligible€to€earn€Prison€€SentenceÏReduction€credits€to€reduce€sentence€expiration€and€release€eligibility,Ïprovided€a€waiver€is€signed€by€the€inmate.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€41„21„¼236.€€The€statute€specifically€provides€that€"sentence€reduction€creditsÏauthorized€by€this€section€may€be€awarded€only€for€conduct€and/orÏperformance€from€and€after€the€date€a€person€becomes€eligible€underÏthis€section."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€41„21„236(c)(3).€€The€petitioner€wasÏnot€eligible€to€earn€the€ðð€41„21„236€sentence€reduction€credits€until€heÏsigned€a€waiver€in€1989.€€Furthermore,€as€a€Class€X€felon,€the€petitionerÏis€only€eligible€to€earn€the€credits€provided€for€in€ðð€41„21„236.€€TheÏpetitioner€is€not€entitled€to€retroactive€application€of€sentence€credits€asÏhe€claims.€€òòSee€Henderson€v.€Lutcheóó,€938€S.W.2d€428,€430.€€Nor€is€heÐ 'd"% Ðentitled€to€cumulative€credits.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àThe€scope€of€review€under€the€common€law€writ€of€certiorariÏcovers€only€an€inquiry€into€whether€the€board€exceeded€its€jurisdictionÏor€acted€illegally,€fraudulently,€or€arbitrarily.€€The€manner€in€which€aÏdecision€is€reached€is€subject€to€review.€€The€correctness€of€the€decisionÏis€not.€€òòPowell€v.€Parole€Eligibility€Review€Boardóó,€879€S.W.2d€871Ð œ,ì'+ Ð(Tenn.€App.€1994).Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àIn€support€of€his€petition€for€a€writ€of€certiorari,€the€petitionerÏasserts€that€his€right€to€equal€protection€under€the€Tennessee€and€UnitedÏStates€Constitutions€is€violated€because€he€is€treated€differently€thanÏthose€sentenced€under€the€1989€Act.€€The€òòStewartóó€court€also€addressedÐ 81ˆ,0 Ðthis€equal€protection€argument.€€The€court€held€that€the€legislature€mayÏtreat€a€particular€class€of€persons€differently€so€long€as€the€classificationÏhas€a€reasonable€relationship€to€a€legitimate€state€interest.€€TheÏpetitioner€forfeited€his€fundamental€right€to€personal€liberty€when€heÏcommitted€the€offenses€for€which€he€was€convicted€and€sentenced,Ïtherefore,€a€lower€level€of€scrutiny€should€apply€in€this€case.€€However,Ïthe€òòStewartóó€court€held€that€even€if€strict€scrutiny€is€applied,€the€resultÐ ¬7ü27 Ðwould€not€change€because€the€purposes€for€distinguishing€between€theÏtwo€groups€(those€sentenced€prior€to€November€1,€1989€and€thoseÐ „9Ô49 Ðsentenced€after€the€Criminal€[S]entencing€Reform€Act€of€1989€becameÏeffective)€satisfy€a€compelling€state€interest€and€the€means€used€areÏsuitablññeññññyññ€tailored€to€accomplish€those€purposes.€€The€òòStewartóó€courtÐ ˆØ Ðstated:Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà8/  Ð  Ð àA€primary€purpose€in€the€development€and€enactment€ofÏthe€1989€Sentencing€Act€was€to€address€the€pressing€issueÏof€prison€overcrowding€through€the€creation€of€newÏoffense€and€sentencing€standards.€€By€limiting€the€Act'sÏapplication€to€persons€who€were€not€previouslyÏsentenced,€the€legislature€devised€a€partial€solution€toÏprison€overcrowding€while€avoiding€the€reopening€ofÏcases€in€which€persons€have€been€validly€sentencedÏpreviously.€€Thus,€the€petitioner's€right€to€equal€protectionÏunder€the€law€has€not€been€violated€by€his€continuedÏincarceration€under€the€original€sentences.€€òòId.óó€at€877.Иè / ¥/ ¥ ÐÔ€¼œH¼XX¶Ôà8  àÔ€X¶X¼¼œHÔà / àIn€further€support€of€his€petition€for€a€writ€of€certiorari,€theÐ „Ô  Ðpetitioner€contends€that€the€Department's€refusal€to€reduce€his€sentenceÏviolated€the€Eighth€Amendment's€prohibition€against€cruel€and€unusualÏpunishment.€€The€enabling€legislation€for€the€1989€Act€limited€itsÏapplication€to€persons€sentenced€after€November€1,€1989,€whileÏspecifically€excluding€its€›application€to€cases€in€which€penalties€wereÏalready€incurred.€€This€language€does€not€support€the€petitioner'sÏsuggestion€that€the€legislature€must€have€considered€the€prior€law€to€beÏtoo€severe.€€Simply€because€"a€penalty€is€reduced€by€new€legislationÏdoes€not€mean€the€sentence€under€the€old€law€was€disproportionate."€ÏòòState€ex€rel.€William€Jones€v.€McWherteróó,€199€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXISÐ ¼  Ð875.€€This€Court€finds€that€the€petitioner€alleges€no€facts€to€indicate€thatÏthe€Department€exceeded€its€jurisdiction€or€acted€illegally.€€Therefore,Ïa€writ€of€certiorari€is€not€appropriate€on€the€facts€asserted.Ð  Ð  Ð  Ðà8  àà / àÐ  Ð  Ð  ÐÓ€ÓÌÔ€¼œH¼XX¶Ôà  àThe€position€of€the€petitioner€is€essentially€a€re„argument€of€ò òòòState€ex€rel.Ð º!   ÐStewart€v.€McWherteró óóó,€857€S.W.2d€875€(Tenn.Crim.App.1992).€€ò òòòStewartó óóó€is€theÐ U#¥" Ðlaw€of€Tennessee€unless€and€until€overturned€either€by€the€supreme€court€or€theÏgeneral€assembly.ÌÌà  àPetitioner€has€received€all€of€the€sentence€credits€to€which€he€is€lawfullyÏentitled.€€None€of€the€mathematical€uncertainties€evidenced€in€ò òòòWashington€v.Ð P+ &, ÐDep't€of€Correctionsó óóó,€No.€01„A„01„9506„CH„00276,€1997€WL€272468€(Tenn.Ct.Ð ë,;(. ÐApp.May€23,€1997)€and€ò òòòJones€v.€Reynoldsó óóó,€No.€01„A„01„9510„CH„00484,€1997Ð †.Ö)0 ÐWL€367661€(œTenn.Ct.App.€›July€2,€1997)€are€present€in€this€case.€€Issue€is€simplyÏraised€as€to€which€sentence€credits€petitioner€is€entitled€and€such€has€beenÏadequately€answered€by€the€chancellor€and€is€further€answered€in€ò òòòVernonÐ Q3¡.6 ÐMauldin€v.€Tennessee€Dep't€of€Correctionsó óóó,€No.€01„A„01„9801„CH„00014Ð ì4<08 Ðreleased€by€this€court€January€7,€1999.ÌÌœññÐ ·95> Ðññ›à  àFinally,€Appellant€claims€that€he€was€not€fully€informed€of€his€rights€Ïpertaining€to€the€signing€of€a€waiver€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÏsection€41„21„236(c)(3).€€He€claims€that€such€failure€to€inform€was€responsible€forÏhis€failure€to€execute€this€waiver€until€1989.€€An€inmate€convicted€of€a€Class€XÏfelony€is€not€entitled€to€begin€earning€sentence€credits€until€the€signing€of€such€aÏwaiver.€€ò òòòHenderson€v.€Lutcheó óóó,€938€S.W.2d€428€(Tenn.Ct.App.1996).Ð ¨ ø  ÐÌà  àThis€issue€was€not€raised€in€the€trial€court€and€may€not€be€considered€onÏappeal.€€ò òòòIrvin€v.€Binkleyóó,€òò€óóó ó577€S.W.2d€677,€679€(Tenn.Ct.App.1979).Ð sà  ÐÌà  àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€in€all€respects€affirmed€with€costsÏassessed€against€Appellant.€€The€case€is€remanded€for€collection€of€costs.ÌÌÌÓ€ÓÓK"€ ü(€ / [<˜‘X€ ü(€ / [<@’XKÓà  àà / àà [ àà < àà  à___________________________________Ìà  àà / àà [ àà < àà  àWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGEÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ______________________________________ÌBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€PRES.€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌÌ______________________________________€€ÌPATRICIA€J.€COTTRELL,€JUDGEÌ