WPC U:V %nX 0442 F nXN   w@   n n ` nh   % - 5 0J= 0T 0^ 0h9 0r B 0|0 0 02 1u D37 0dj 0@U>B)LDCu AMU*/v~v AO_ 0Dt D/ B<6X9`("Courier NewTTX3|x<6X9`("Courier NewTTXXx6X@DQX@<6X9`("Courier NewTT6X@DQ@( T$  ӥH$Q $ `X4f PXP&D`s New Roman RegularXXlD PG;XP DӀ$ `X4f PXP$ `X4f PXP$ `X4f PXP2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23   d2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   !"#$&'( ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)%%%%'dxdP 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X("$    <  9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d44447Border 1dd-5C << G<  9p`(Arial !  77   YYY FILED7XJuly29,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerk  PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! .     X   )` ` X2X)\RA'\3R685A1-j|`  `@Rߛ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEEATNASHVILLE  ` XX3X33ROBERTLEEANDERSON,  )      )#` XxX# Plaintiff/Appellee, ) AppealNo.  ) 01A019802CH00082v.  )  ) MontgomeryChanceryREBECCAANNANDERSON, ) No.9271196  ) Defendant/Appellant. )  3ORDEROFREMAND    &` ` xX& 33ItappearsinthiscasethatahearingwasheldbeforethetrialcourtonNovember24,1997concerningapetitionforchangeofcustodyoftheminorchild,RobertLeeAnderson,Jr.Judgmentwasenteredonthatdate,andonthefollowingday,November25,1997,amotiontosetasidedefaultjudgmentwasfiledbytheappellantinthiscase,RebeccaAnnAnderson,asserting,amongotherthings,thatshehadnonoticeofthehearing.ThismotionwasheardonDecember16,1997andonJanuary5,1998anorderwasenteredbythetrialcourtdenyingthemotiontosetasidetheNovember24,1997order.̛ NoticeofappealwasfiledonbehalfofRebeccaAnnAndersononJanuary9,1998.̛ OnJanuary13,1998,counselfortheappelleefiledobjectionstotheallegedindigencystatusofRebeccaAnnAnderson.OnJanuary20,1998,counselforRebeccaAnnAndersonfiledamotiontostrikethepetitioner'soppositiontoindigencystatus.ThismotionwasheardonJanuary30,1998andonFebruary27,1998thetrialjudgeenteredanorderfindingtheappellantindigentandallowingtheappealtocontinueonpauper'soath.OnMarch12,1998,RebeccaAnnAndersonfiledwhatpurportstobeastatementoftheevidencepursuanttoRule24(c)oftheRulesofAppellateProcedure.̛ OnMarch13,1998,counselforRobertLeeAndersonfiledwhatpurportstobeacounterstatementoftheevidenceunderRule24(c)togetherwithamotionforthecourttoadopthisT.R.A.P.24cstatementandrejecttheT.R.A.P.24cstatementoftheappellant.OnthatsameMarch13,1998,theattorneyforRobertLeeAnderson,towit,GregoryD.Smith,filedamotiontowithdrawonthebasisthattheappelleedoesnotintendtoretainhimforthepurposesofappeal.OnMarch16,1998,thetrialjudgeenteredanorderallowingGregoryD.SmithtowithdrawandrelievinghimascounselofrecordforRobertLeeAnderson.̛ NeitherofthepurportedRule24(c)statementshasbeenapprovedbythetrialjudgealthoughcertainevidentiarydepositions,apparentlypresentedattheNovember24,1997hearings,havebeenauthenticated.̛ SincethereareconflictingRule24(c)statementsfiled,neitherofwhichhasbeenapprovedbythetrialcourt,thiscourtcannotapplytheautomaticapprovalprovisionsofRule24(f).ThiscaseisthereforeremandedtothetrialcourtforcompliancewithRule24(c)and(f)oftheRulesofAppellateProcedure. ̛̜  ___________________________________    3XHENRYF.TODD,PRESIDINGJUDGE   _____________________________________  BENH.CANTRELL,JUDGE̛̜  _____________________________________  WILLIAMB.CAIN,JUDGE