ÿWPCÄ ÍÀÒù ÝŽ)›ÖŽ2››èoèJ}LëÕRR—[ÀeÚÔá…nÃ>+¥†ýÅNÓÙ…íÅÜ«=¿V±-è~š©°-%zgSFðÑК…™ëÕŽ/ tmn›6'…j™MËGˆ8É´/ òÜ)#qõÒ´w}þ—š•sŒ8–\×Tüä@…ذMêzª%Þ{àCù?ãü(k€°Ê63/)”°hs†è[—Özñ—MOÞëxÖ?€œSJj¨¨?YëSàE*p7eý|ÐÑóý¦xéÄ±Ë Æä–ÐÁFi Y“žÃíSé›n">ûc\ò$ƒƒ sÝËÀL:¢Æ þ‰iÎ ˜¥䌕yCcù½[¿GIÄç1/¶Ô /±îFw•À>;ï‡ÒtÊH–ý¨*‘¶l¨’Âûà ^¡³ïð‹z†ôïçhaÏÝwò˜÷Y{‹z_ù7Ec·†‹/Ž ÔÿÿpŸzâÌ`PãÀEÈ•º'‰™ ¨ˆÁ¿™ËÍÄÛ~hniŠ~ȉNšƒéÛddÈõX’°ì ɤ@F¾‰d ¡ÀOÄoæ Øc• ì†é– Þ-Ahô1]‰2]Qð ÍäÞ-Ï}ñ†û6Ö›©o¿ìb#É\ %% UN+ 0ˆy UN 0cO j² zÒ–wh 1uß 72T 1‡†Æ ÆÓÆ™Æ_^ %N1w3 0D7E{4}‘  m¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢b¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹ 0ëÁÁÁÁ B¬¬ 0¤É D3m D-  0KÍÍ ASÆk 0¤1 0DÕ A«˜\\IB01S02\CLERKJACÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à `Ý ƒR^$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô³„ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ôà ` àThe€trial€court€awarded€the€following€marital€property€to€Wife:€marital€home€with€a€value€of€$325,000Ð ° Ðbut€equity€of€$67,428,€2001€van€with€a€value€of€$4,500,€Wifeððs€IRA€with€a€value€of€$3,268,€payment€of€$8,636€to€WifeÐ qÁ Ðfor€signing€joint€income€tax€returns,€and€a€payment€of€$183,692.50€from€Husband€to€Wife€to€equalize€marital€estateÐ 2‚ Ðdistribution.€€The€trial€court€awarded€the€following€marital€property€to€Husband:€VC€building€with€a€value€of€$575,000Ð óC Ðand€an€equity€of€$334,071,€Husbandððs€IRA€with€a€value€of€$14,246,€the€net€increase€in€value€of€$105,000€in€VC€and€VO,Ð ´ Ðand€an€additional€$20,000€from€a€loan.€€Husband€was€also€required€to€pay€$20,000€to€First€Citizens€National€Bank€fromÐ uÅ Ðthe€loan€he€took€to€pay€income€taxes,€another€joint€loan€of€$2,100,€and€a€payment€of€$183,692.50€to€Wife€to€equalizeÐ 6 † Ðthe€marital€property€division. ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt mÝ ƒR^$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô³„ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ôà ` àBecause€the€final€decree€of€divorce€and€the€divorce€proceedings€occurred€before€Acts€2003,€ch.€305,Ð ° Ððð€2€became€effective,€amending€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101,€the€prior€version€of€this€statute€applies.3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a) i)(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList1I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5œ–C1Ï (#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó6hö0ê:i¢×+003|x ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ- ù-(|G2^$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€‚q»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô³„ò»»Ô d(|3¿$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€‚q»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3¿$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€‚q»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€‚q»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼‚q»»»ÔÑ8€ÛŸXXdé»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ò ò ìàÔ‡îz.‚qÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@òò%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼‚q»îîz. #ԈРÓ# ÐÓ  ÓAPRIL€22,€2004€SessionÐ öF ÐÔ‡XÛŸX»¼‚qÔÌò òÔ#†¼‚q»XXÛŸñ#ÔWILLIAM€ANTHONY€BACIGALUPOòòóó€v.€MARY€DARLENE€RAINESÐ ï? ÐBLACKNALL€BACIGALUPOòòóóÔ‡XÛŸX»¼‚qÔó óÐ  P ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Dyer€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€00„101€€€€€€Lee€Moore,€JudgeÐ ä 4 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<¡` AßÐ ¢ò  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2003„01578„COA„R3„CV€„€Filed€October€4,€2004Ð ›ë  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<n` AßÐ o¿  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡X$XXXÛŸÔThis€case€arises€from€the€divorce€proceedings€of€Husband€and€Wife.€€Husband€filed€for€a€divorceÐ g· Ðfrom€Wife,€citing€inappropriate€marital€conduct€and€irreconcilable€differences€as€grounds€for€aÐ P  Ðdivorce.€€Wife€filed€her€answer€and€counterclaim,€stating€she€was€entitled€to€a€divorce€on€the€basisÐ 9‰ Ðof€inappropriate€marital€conduct€and€adultery.€€The€trial€court€granted€Wife€a€divorce,€establishedÐ "r ÐWife€as€the€primary€residential€parent€of€Child,€divided€the€partiesðð€marital€property,€set€alimonyÐ  [ Ðpayments€Husband€must€pay€to€Wife,€imposed€a€lien€on€Husbandððs€property€to€secure€the€propertyÐ ôD Ðdivision€and€support€payments,€and€awarded€Wife€a€portion€of€her€attorneyððs€fees€incurred€as€a€resultÐ Ý- Ðof€the€proceedings.€€For€the€following€reasons,€we€affirm€in€part,€reverse€in€part,€and€remand€forÐ Æ Ðfurther€proceedings€consistent€with€this€opinion.Ð ¯ÿ ÐÔ#†XÛŸXXX$¤#ÔÔ#†¼‚q»XXÛŸ#ÔÔ‡XÛŸX»¼‚qÔÌÓ˜ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmed€in€Part,Ð jº ÐReversed€in€Part€&€Remandedó óÐ T¤ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼‚q»àXÛŸ #ÔÔ‡XÛŸX.¼‚qÔAlan€E.€Highers,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòW.€Frank€Crawford,€P.J.,€W.S.,€óóÐ ' w Ðand€òòDavid€R.€Farmer,€J.óó,€joined.Ð !`  ÐÌJames€A.€Hamilton,€III,€Dyersburg,€TN,€for€AppellantÐ â"2" ÐÌThomas€H.€Strawn,€Dyersburg,€TN,€for€AppelleeÐ ´$ $ ÐÓä ÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼‚q»XXÛŸ #ÔÔ‡XÛŸX»¼‚qÔÐ †&Ö!& ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼‚q»XXÛŸº #ÔÔ‡XÛŸX»¼‚qÔÓ  Óò òÔ‡X$XXXÛŸÔà@ûûìàFacts€and€Procedural€Historyó óˆÐ Y(©#( ÐÌà  àWilliam€Anthony€Bacigalupo€(ð ðHusbandðð€or€ð ðAppellantðð)€and€Mary€Darlene€BacigalupoÐ ,*|%* Ð(ð ðWife,ðð€ð ðAppellee,ðð€or,€collectively€with€Husband,€ð ðthe€partiesðð)€were€married€on€October€22,Ð +e&+ Ð1994,€in€Dyer€County,€Tennessee.€€The€parties€had€one€child€of€the€marriage,€Amanda€JaneÐ þ+N', Ðâ âBacigalupo€(ð ðChildðð),€born€on€April€23,€1996.€€Both€parties€had€married€once€before,€but€neitherÐ ç,7(-ý ÐHusband€nor€Wife€had€children€from€their€respective€prior€marriages.€€Husband,€however,€had€twoÐ ° Ðstepchildren,€Elisha€and€Hunter€Evans,€from€his€prior€marriage€to€Tammy€Peel.€Ð ™é Ðâ âÌà  àHusband€obtained€his€undergraduate€degree€from€the€University€of€Tennessee€at€Martin,Ð k» Ðgraduated€from€the€Southern€College€of€Optometry,€and€is€an€optometrist,€having€his€practice€inÐ T¤ ÐDyersburg,€Tennessee.€€At€the€time€of€the€partiesðð€marriage€in€1994,€Husband€was€a€sole€practitionerÐ =  Ðof€Vision€Center€(ð ðVCðð),€which€later€became€an€S€corporation.€€However,€Wife€worked€to€pay€offÐ & v Ðapproximately€$88,000€on€the€second€mortgage€of€the€VC€building.€€In€April€1996,€Husband€mergedÐ  _ Ðhis€practice€with€that€of€another€optometrist,€Dr.€Brian€Robinson€(ð ðDr.€Robinsonðð),€establishing€aÐ ø H Ðpartnership€with€an€interest€division€of€51/49€percent€between€Husband€and€Dr.€Robinson,Ð á 1  Ðrespectively.€€Husband€personally€owns€the€real€property€for€VC,€while€VC€has€assets€of€equipment,Ð Ê   Ðreceivables,€records,€and€furniture.€€In€April€2000,€Dr.€Robinson€became€an€equal€partner€withÐ ³  ÐHusband,€each€owning€a€50%€interest€in€VC.€€During€the€marriage,€Husband€and€Dr.€RobinsonÐ œì  Ðconstructed€a€3,000€square„foot€addition€to€the€VC€building,€for€which€Wife€guaranteed€the€loan.€Ð …Õ  ÐAdditionally,€in€April€1997,€Husband€and€Dr.€Robinson€acquired€another€practice,€which€becameÐ n¾  Ða€limited€liability€company€named€Visual€Options€(ð ðVOðð)€and€was€originally€located€at€theÐ W§  ÐDyersburg€mall.€€After€the€5„year€lease€with€the€mall€expired€in€April€2002,€Husband€and€Dr.Ð @ ÐRobinson€took€out€a€loan€from€First€Citizens€National€Bank€and€relocated€VO€to€the€propertyÐ )y Ðadjacent€to€the€VC€property.€€The€trial€court€found€that€Husbandððs€earning€capacity,€based€onÐ b ÐHusbandððs€tax€returns€for€the€previous€years,€was€between€$225,000€and€$250,000€per€year.€Ð ûK ÐÌà  àWife€holds€an€undergraduate€degree€in€business€administration€with€a€major€in€accountingÐ Í Ðfrom€the€University€of€Tennessee€at€Martin.€€Additionally,€Wife€has€taken€some€courses€for€creditÐ ¶ Ðtowards€her€masterððs€degree.€€At€the€time€of€the€partiesðð€marriage,€Wife€was€employed€by€DyersburgÐ Ÿï ÐState€Community€College€(ð ðDSCCðð),€working€as€the€director€of€continuing€education€and€earningÐ ˆØ Ðbetween€$31,000€and€$32,000€per€year.€€Subsequently,€after€the€second€mortgage€on€the€VCÐ qÁ Ðproperty€was€paid€off,€Wife€resigned€from€her€position€at€DSCC€and€began€to€work€for€Husband€atÐ Zª ÐVC€and€VO.€€Wife€testified€that€she€worked€four€to€five€days€a€week€for€two€to€three€hours€per€dayÐ C“ Ðat€the€optometry€clinic.€€Although€the€trial€court€found€that€most€of€the€business€decisions€wereÐ ,| Ðmade€by€Dr.€Robinson€and€Husband,€it€found€that€Wife€prepared€payrolls,€conducted€interviews,€andÐ e Ðorganized€staff€meetings.€€Since€December€2000,€Wife€has€worked€for€the€University€of€TennesseeÐ þN Ðin€a€temporary€position€that€is€renewed€yearly,€earning€$28,700€per€year.€€The€trial€court€found€thatÐ ç 7 ÐWifeððs€earning€capacity€ranged€between€$25,000€and€$45,000€annually.€Ð Ð!   ЀÌà  àChild€suffers€from€a€hearing€impairment,€requiring€the€use€of€a€hearing€aid€to€improve€herÐ ¢#ò" Ðspeech€discrimination.€Despite€this€impairment,€Childððs€teacher€testified€that€Child€was€anÐ ‹$Û# Ðexceptional€student€and€always€well„prepared€for€school.€€Child€had€advanced€far€enough€in€schoolÐ t%Ä $ Ðsuch€that€she€would€receive€additional€reading€instruction€from€the€class€a€grade€above€her€own.€Ð ]&­!% ÐÌà  àAt€the€time€of€the€marriage,€both€Husband€and€Wife€owned€their€own€home€and€each€homeÐ /(#' Ðwas€subject€to€a€mortgage.€€The€parties€sold€their€homes€and€purchased€a€marital€home.€€Eventually,Ð )h$( Ðthat€home€was€sold,€and€the€parties€moved€into€the€current€marital€home,€which€was€subject€to€aÐ *Q%) Ðmortgage€in€the€amount€of€$257,572€at€the€time€of€divorce.€Ð ê*:&* ЀÐ Ó+#'+ Ðà  àIn€January€2000,€Husband€began€having€an€affair€with€one€of€his€employees,€Tracy€MillerÐ ° Ð(ð ðMillerðð).€€At€first,€upon€being€questioned€by€Wife,€Husband€denied€that€he€was€having€an€affair.€Ð ™é ÐWife€later€found€out€about€Husbandððs€affair€in€February€2000.€€Subsequently,€the€parties€soughtÐ ‚Ò Ðmarriage€counseling€from€their€minister,€Paul€Helton.€€Additionally,€Husband€sought€counselingÐ k» Ðfrom€Dr.€Carolyn€West„Willette,€a€licensed€psychologist,€and€Wife€sought€counseling€from€Dr.€JohnÐ T¤ ÐLeite,€also€a€licensed€psychologist.€€Further,€Wife€attended€the€Caron€Foundation€for€moreÐ =  Ðpsychotherapy€to€address€her€personal€issues€of€growing€up€with€a€father€who€was€an€alcoholic.€Ð & v ÐÌà  àOn€June€29,€2000,€Husband€filed€for€a€divorce€from€Wife,€citing€inappropriate€maritalÐ ø H Ðconduct€and€irreconcilable€differences€as€grounds€for€divorce.€€On€July€19,€2000,€Wife€filed€herÐ á 1  Ðanswer€and€counter„complaint€for€divorce,€alleging€inappropriate€marital€conduct€and€adultery.€Ð Ê   ÐAfter€a€hearing€on€January€6€and€9,€2003,€the€trial€court€issued€a€memorandum€opinion,€twoÐ ³  Ðamendments€to€such€opinion,€and€a€final€decree€of€divorce.€€The€trial€court€awarded€Wife€a€divorceÐ œì  Ðon€the€basis€of€inappropriate€marital€conduct€and€adultery,€established€that€Wife€would€be€theÐ …Õ  Ðprimary€residential€parent€for€Child,€set€Husbandððs€child€support€payments€to€Wife€at€$2,108€perÐ n¾  Ðmonth€with€an€additional€$300€per€month€to€be€placed€in€an€education€account€for€Child,€dividedÐ W§  Ðthe€marital€property,€set€Husbandððs€alimony€payments€to€Wife€at€$1,000€per€month€for€a€period€ofÐ @ Ðfive€years,€and€ordered€Husband€to€pay€$10,000€of€Wifeððs€attorneyððs€fees,€leaving€the€balance€to€beÐ )y Ðpaid€by€Wife.€€Husband€filed€his€notice€of€appeal€to€this€Court€and€presents€the€following€issues,€asÐ b Ðwe€perceive€them,€for€our€review:Ð ûK ÐÌÓ€ (5h83 ÓÝ"‚3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚3£`)ÝÔ25hÔÚ  ÚIÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝWhether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€refused€to€appoint€a€guardian€ad€litem€for€ChildÐ Í Ðand/or€to€subject€the€parties€to€a€psychological€evaluation;݃3£`)™)݌ж` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚3£Ü*ÝÔ25hÔÚ  ÚIIÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝWhether€the€trial€court€erred€in€its€division€of€marital€assets;݃3£Ü*+݌Пï` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚3£ò+ÝÔ25hÔÚ  ÚIIIÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝWhether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€imposed€a€lien€on€Husbandððs€assets€to€secureÐ ˆØ Ðthe€payment€of€the€property€settlement,€child€support,€and€alimony;݃3£ò++,ÝŒÐqÁ` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚3£v-ÝÔ25hÔÚ  ÚIVÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝWhether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€refused€to€hear€testimony€regarding€the€natureÐ Zª Ðand€value€of€the€marital€personal€property;݃3£v-¯-ÝŒÐC“` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚3£à.ÝÔ25hÔÚ  ÚVÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝWhether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€awarded€Wife€alimony€for€a€period€of€fiveÐ ,| Ðyears,€given€the€short€duration€of€the€marriage;€and݃3£à./ÝŒÐe` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚3£M0ÝÔ25hÔÚ  ÚVIÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝWhether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€awarded€Wife€$10,000€for€her€attorneyððs€fees.݃3£M0†0ÝŒÐþN` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÌFor€the€following€reasons,€we€affirm€in€part,€reverse€in€part,€and€remand€for€further€proceedingsÐ Ð!   Ðconsistent€with€this€opinion.Ð ¹" ! ÐÌÓ  Óò òStandard€of€Reviewó óÐ ‹$Û# ÐÌÓ  Óà  àWe€review€a€trial€courtððs€division€of€marital€property€òòde€novoóó€upon€the€record,€affording€aÐ ^&®!% Ðpresumption€of€correctness€to€the€trial€courtððs€findings€of€fact.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(d);€òòDellingerÐ G'—"& Ðv.€Dellingeróó,€958€S.W.2d€778,€780€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1997)€(citing€òòHass€v.€Knightonóó,€676€S.W.2d€554,Ð 0(€#' Ð555€(Tenn.€1984);€òòDalton€v.€Daltonóó,€858€S.W.2d€324,€327€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1993)).€€This€Court€isÐ )i$( Ðmindful€that€trial€courts€are€given€wide€discretion€by€appellate€courts€with€respect€to€the€manner€inÐ *R%) Ðwhich€they€divide€marital€assets,€and,€therefore,€marital€property€divisions€are€given€great€weightÐ ë*;&* Ðby€this€Court€on€appeal.€€òòDellingeróó,€958€S.W.2d€at€780€(citing€òòWade€v.€Wadeóó,€897€S.W.2d€702,€715Ð Ô+$'+ Ð(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1994);€òòWallace€v.€Wallaceóó,€733€S.W.2d€102,€106€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1987)).€€WithÐ ° Ðregard€to€an€award€of€alimony,€trial€courts€are€given€wide€discretion€because€the€amount€andÐ ™é Ðduration€of€such€alimony€awards€are€affected€by€the€courtððs€findings€of€fact€in€consideration€of€theÐ ‚Ò Ðfactors€contained€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101(d)(1).€€òòVaughn€v.€Vaughnóó,€No.€E2000„02281„Ð k» ÐCOA„R3„CV,€2001€Tenn.€App.€LEXIS€572,€at€*4€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Aug.€7,€2001)€(citing€òòSiegel€v.Ð T¤ ÐSiegelóó,€No.€02A01„9708„CH„00198,€1999€Tenn.€App.€LEXIS€139€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Mar.€5,€1999)).€Ð =  ÐAs€such,€this€Court€must€uphold€an€alimony€award€unless€the€trial€court€has€abused€its€discretion.€Ð & v ÐòòIdóó.€(citing€òòSiegelóó,€1999€Tenn.€App.€LEXIS€139€(citing€òòHanover€v.€Hanoveróó,€775€S.W.2d€612€(Tenn.Ð  _ ÐCt.€App.€1989))).€€Additionally,€an€award€of€attorneyððs€fees€is€likewise€within€the€discretion€of€theÐ ø H Ðtrial€court,€and€we€will€not€interfere€with€such€an€award€absent€a€clear€showing€of€an€abuse€ofÐ á 1  Ðdiscretion.€€òòAaron€v.€Aaronóó,€909€S.W.2d€408,€411€(Tenn.€1995)€(citing€òòStorey€v.€Storeyóó,€835€S.W.2dÐ Ê   Ð593,€597€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1992);€òòCrouch€v.€Crouchóó,€385€S.W.2d€288,€293€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1964)).€Ð ³  ÐÌÌÓ  Óò òGuardian€Ad€Litem€and€Psychological€Examinationó óÐ n¾  ÐÌÓ  Óà  àFirst,€Husband€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€refused€to€appoint€a€guardian€ad€litemÐ A‘ Ðor€order€a€psychological€examination€of€the€parties€to€determine€what€custody€arrangement€wouldÐ *z Ðbe€in€Childððs€best€interest.€€We€begin€by€noting€that,€in€general,€the€appointment€of€a€guardian€adÐ c Ðlitem€for€a€child€is€a€decision€within€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€17.03;€òòseeÐ üL Ðalsoóó€24A€Am.€Jur.€2d€òòDivorce€and€Separationóó€ðð€966€(1998).€€Additionally,€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€35.01Ð å5 Ðstates€what€is€required€by€a€moving€party€to€establish€the€necessity€of€ordering€a€physical€or€mentalÐ Î Ðexamination€of€a€party€to€a€civil€suit:Ð · ÐÌÓ XÓà0  àà ` àWhen€the€mental€or€physical€condition€(including€the€blood€group)€of€a€party,Ð ‰Ù Ðor€of€a€person€in€the€custody€under€the€legal€control€of€a€party,€is€in€controversy,€theÐ r Ðcourt€in€which€the€action€is€pending€may€order€the€party€to€submit€to€a€physical€orÐ [« Ðmental€examination€by€a€suitably€licensed€or€certified€examiner€or€to€produce€forÐ D” Ðexamination€the€person€in€his€or€her€custody€or€legal€control.€€The€order€may€beÐ -} Ðmade€only€on€motion€for€good€cause€shown€and€upon€notice€to€the€person€to€beÐ f Ðexamined€and€to€all€parties€and€shall€specify€the€time,€place,€manner,€conditions,€andÐ ÿO Ðscope€of€the€examination€and€the€person€or€persons€by€whom€it€is€to€be€made.Ðè 8Ð Ð  ÐÌÌÓ X?ÓTenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€35.01.€€ð ðIf€formal€or€informal€discovery€leads€to€the€production€of€existingÐ £#ó" Ðexamination€records,€the€moving€party€will€not€be€entitled€to€insist€on€further€examinations€unlessÐ Œ$Ü# Ðit€can€demonstrate€that€the€prior€examinations€are€insufficient€for€its€purposes.ðð€€òòOdom€v.€Odomóó,€No.Ð u%Å $ ÐM1999„02811„COA„R3„CV,€2001€Tenn.€App.€LEXIS€881,€at€*20€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Dec.€5,€2001).€Ð ^&®!% ÐÌà  àIn€this€case,€we€cannot€say€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€denied€Husbandððs€motion€for€theÐ 0(€#' Ðparties€to€submit€themselves€to€psychological€examinations.€€At€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€had€theÐ )i$( Ðbenefit€of€Wifeððs€psychologist,€Dr.€John€Leite,€on€this€witness€stand,€who€had€been€treating€WifeÐ *R%) Ðsince€August€2000.€€Husband€was€provided€the€opportunity€to€cross„examine€Dr.€Leite.€Ð ë*;&* ÐAdditionally,€the€trial€court€was€provided€the€deposition€of€Husbandððs€psychologist,€Dr.€CarolynÐ Ô+$'+ ÐWest„Willette,€who€had€been€treating€Husband€since€January€2000.€€Therefore,€in€this€case,€becauseÐ ° ÐHusband€fails€to€argue€that€such€evidence€is€insufficient,€we€cannot€say€that€the€trial€court€erredÐ ™é Ðwhen€it€denied€Husbandððs€motion€to€subject€the€parties€to€a€psychological€examination.€€Similarly,Ð ‚Ò Ðwe€cannot€say€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€when€it€denied€Husbandððs€motion€to€appoint€aÐ k» Ðguardian€ad€litem€for€child.€€Husband€states€that€a€guardian€ad€litem€should€have€been€appointed€toÐ T¤ Ðinvestigate€Wifeððs€alleged€propensity€to€exhibit€rage€and€anger.€€Husband€argues€that€such€behaviorÐ =  Ðrequires€the€appointment€of€a€guardian€ad€litem€to€investigate€and€determine€the€status€of€WifeððsÐ & v Ðmental€health.€€However,€as€noted€above,€the€trial€court€had€sufficient€evidence€before€it€in€the€formÐ  _ Ðof€Dr.€John€Leiteððs€testimony,€and€Husband€had€an€opportunity€to€cross„examine€Dr.€Leite€and€askÐ ø H Ðhim€questions€concerning€Wifeððs€alleged€bouts€of€rage.€€Therefore,€we€cannot€say€that€the€trial€courtÐ á 1  Ðerred€when€it€refused€Husbandððs€motion€to€appoint€a€guardian€ad€litem€or€to€subject€the€parties€toÐ Ê   Ða€psychological€examination.Ð ³  ÐÌÓ  Óò òMarital€Property€Divisionó óÐ …Õ  ÐÌÓ  Óà  àHusband€argues€that€the€trial€court€incorrectly€classified€the€increase€in€value€of€VO€and€VCÐ X¨  Ðas€marital€property€because€such€increase€in€value€occurred€following€Husbandððs€filing€of€a€divorceÐ A‘ Ðcomplaint.€€Additionally,€Husband€argues€that€Wife€did€not€substantially€contribute€to€the€increaseÐ *z Ðin€value€of€VO€and€VC,€and,€therefore,€she€should€not€be€entitled€to€the€increase€in€value€of€thoseÐ c Ðbusinesses.€€Finally,€Husband€argues€that,€because€the€marriage€was€short€in€duration,€the€trial€courtÐ üL Ðerred€when€it€divided€the€marital€assets€equally.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð å5 ЀÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€36„4„121€defines€what€constitutes€marital€property€and€separateÐ · Ðproperty€for€purposes€of€divorce.€€Specifically,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(b)(1)(A)€(2003)Ð  ð Ðprovides:Ð ‰Ù ÐÌÓ XÓà0  àà ` àð ðMarital€propertyðð€means€all€real€and€personal€property,€both€tangible€andÐ [« Ðintangible,€acquired€by€either€or€both€spouses€during€the€course€of€the€marriage€upÐ D” Ðto€the€date€of€the€final€divorce€hearing€and€owned€by€either€or€both€spouses€as€of€theÐ -} Ðdate€of€filing€of€a€complaint€for€divorce€.€.€.€.ÐfÐ Ð  ÐÌÓ XÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(b)(1)(A)€(2003).€€Further,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(b)(1)(B)€statesÐ è 8 Ðð ðmarital€propertyðð€includes€ð ðincome€from,€and€any€increase€in€value€during€the€marriage€of,Ð Ñ!!  Ðproperty€determined€to€be€separate€property€in€accordance€with€subdivision€(b)(2)€if€each€partyÐ º" ! Ðsubstantially€contributed€to€its€preservation€and€appreciation€.€.€.€.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„Ð £#ó" Ð121(b)(1)(B)€(2003).€€ð ðOnce€it€has€been€determined€that€a€spouse€has€made€a€substantial€contributionÐ Œ$Ü# Ðto€the€preservation€and€appreciation€of€the€other€spouseððs€separate€property,€òòallóó€of€the€increase€inÐ ° Ðvalue€during€the€marriage€is€considered€marital€property,€even€though€other€factors€may€haveÐ ™é Ðcontributed€to€the€increase.ðð€€òòHumphries€v.€Humphriesóó,€No.€E2000„02912„COA„R3„CV,€2001€Tenn.Ð ‚Ò ÐApp.€LEXIS€512,€at€*14€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€July€23,€2001)€(citing€òòEllis€v.€Ellisóó,€748€S.W.2d€424,€426Ð k» Ð(Tenn.€1988);€òòDenton€v.€Dentonóó,€33€S.W.3d€229,€237€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€2000)).€€Finally,€we€note€thatÐ T¤ ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(b)(1)(D)€defines€ð ðsubstantial€contributionðð€to€ð ðinclude,€but€not€beÐ =  Ðlimited€to,€the€direct€or€indirect€contribution€of€a€spouse€as€homemaker,€wage€earner,€parent€orÐ & v Ðfamily€financial€manager,€together€with€such€other€factors€as€the€court€having€jurisdiction€thereofÐ  _ Ðmay€determine.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(b)(1)(D)€(2003).€€Ð ø H ÐÌà  àUnder€the€circumstances€of€this€case,€Husbandððs€argument,€that€the€trial€court€incorrectlyÐ Ê   Ðclassified€the€increase€in€value€of€VC€and€VO,€fails.€€We€begin€by€noting€that€VO€was€a€practice€thatÐ ³  Ðbegan€in€April€1997€during€the€partiesðð€marriage.€€Therefore,€given€there€is€no€evidence€that€suchÐ œì  Ðinterest€was€acquired€by€any€means€outlined€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(b)(2)€defining€separateÐ …Õ  Ðproperty,€any€interest€Husband€owned€in€VO€necessarily€falls€under€the€definition€of€maritalÐ n¾  Ðproperty€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(b)(1)(A).€€For€this€reason,€any€interest€or€increase€in€valueÐ W§  Ðof€Husbandððs€interest€in€VO€must€be€marital€property.€€Ð @ ÐÌà  àNext,€concerning€the€increase€in€value€of€VC,€it€is€true€that€Husband€owned€VC€before€theÐ b Ðpartiesðð€married,€which€means€that€such€interest€is€separate€property€as€defined€by€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð ûK Ððð€36„4„121(b)(2)(A).€€However,€as€we€noted€above,€once€a€trial€court€determines€that€a€non„owningÐ ä4 Ðspouse€has€made€a€substantial€contribution€to€the€preservation€and€appreciation€of€an€owningÐ Í Ðspouseððs€separate€asset,€the€entire€increase€in€value€during€the€marriage€must€be€considered€maritalÐ ¶ Ðproperty.€€òòHumphriesóó,€2001€Tenn.€App.€LEXIS€512,€at€*14.€€In€this€case,€there€was€ample€evidenceÐ Ÿï Ðthat€Wife€substantially€contributed€to€the€preservation€and€appreciation€of€VC.€€The€testimony€atÐ ˆØ Ðtrial€was€undisputed€that€Wife€contributed€approximately€$88,000€of€her€wages€toward€the€paymentÐ qÁ Ðof€the€second€mortgage€on€the€VC€property.€€Additionally,€Wife€contributed€indirectly€by€acting€asÐ Zª Ða€homemaker,€wage€earner,€parent,€and€family€financial€manager€for€the€marriage,€all€of€which€fallÐ C“ Ðunder€the€examples€of€what€ð ðsubstantial€contributionðð€includes€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„Ð ,| Ð121(b)(1)(D).€€Further,€Wife€was€an€employee€at€VC€and€VO,€and€she€worked€for€over€a€year,Ð e Ðorganizing€staff€meetings€and€preparing€the€businessðð€payroll.€€Therefore,€the€trial€court€did€not€errÐ þN Ðwhen€it€classified€the€increase€in€the€value€of€VC€and€VO€as€marital€property.Ð ç 7 ÐÌà  àFinally,€Husband€argues€that,€because€the€marriage€was€of€such€short€duration,€the€divisionÐ ¹" ! Ðof€assets€should€not€have€been€equal,€and€Husband€should€have€received€a€larger€portion€of€the€Ð ¢#ò" ÐÌÌÌÌÌmarital€estate.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€36„4„121(c)€(2003)€enumerates€what€a€trial€court€mustÐ )h$( Ðconsider€when€equitably€dividing€marital€property:Ð *Q%) ÐÌÓ XÓà  à(1)€The€duration€of€the€marriage;Ð Ó+#'+ Ðà0  à(2)€The€age,€physical€and€mental€health,€vocational€skills,€employability,€earningÐ ° Ðcapacity,€estate,€financial€liabilities€and€financial€needs€of€each€of€the€parties;ЙéÐ Ð  Ðà0  à(3)€The€tangible€or€intangible€contribution€by€one€(1)€party€to€the€education,€trainingÐ ‚Ò Ðor€increased€earning€power€of€the€other€party;Ðk»Ð Ð  Ðà0  à(4)€The€relative€ability€of€each€party€for€future€acquisitions€of€capital€assets€andÐ T¤ Ðincome;Ð= Ð Ð  Ðà0  à(5)€The€contribution€of€each€party€to€the€acquisition,€preservation,€appreciation,Ð & v Ðdepreciation€or€dissipation€of€the€marital€or€separate€property,€including€theÐ  _ Ðcontribution€of€a€party€to€the€marriage€as€homemaker,€wage€earner€or€parent,€withÐ ø H Ðthe€contribution€of€a€party€as€homemaker€or€wage€earner€to€be€given€the€same€weightÐ á 1  Ðif€each€party€has€fulfilled€its€role;ÐÊ  Ð Ð  Ðà  à(6)€The€value€of€the€separate€property€of€each€party;Ð ³  Ðà  à(7)€The€estate€of€each€party€at€the€time€of€the€marriage;Ð œì  Ðà0  à(8)€The€economic€circumstances€of€each€party€at€the€time€the€division€of€property€isÐ …Õ  Ðto€become€effective;Ðn¾ Ð Ð  Ðà0  à(9)€The€tax€consequences€to€each€party,€costs€associated€with€the€reasonablyÐ W§  Ðforeseeable€sale€of€the€asset,€and€other€reasonably€foreseeable€expenses€associatedÐ @ Ðwith€the€asset;Ð)yÐ Ð  Ðà  à(10)€The€amount€of€social€security€benefits€available€to€each€spouse;€andÐ b Ðà0  à(11)€Such€other€factors€as€are€necessary€to€consider€the€equities€between€the€parties.ÐûKÐ Ð  ÐÌÓ XdÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(c)€(2003).€€As€the€statute€suggests,€and€Husbandððs€argument€fails€toÐ Í Ðrecognize,€there€are€numerous€factors€a€trial€court€must€consider€when€dividing€a€marital€estate.€Ð ¶ ÐThough€it€is€true€that€the€marriage€was€short€in€duration,€other€factors€favor€the€trial€courtððs€divisionÐ Ÿï Ðof€the€marital€property.€€As€noted€above,€Wife€substantially€contributed€to€the€preservation€andÐ ˆØ Ðappreciation€of€Husbandððs€interest€in€VC.€€She€directly€contributed€by€paying€part€of€the€secondÐ qÁ Ðmortgage€off€with€her€wages€and€working€at€VC€and€VO,€and€she€indirectly€contributed€by€fulfillingÐ Zª Ðher€role€as€a€wage€earner,€homemaker,€and€parent.€€Wifeððs€ability€for€future€acquisitions€of€capitalÐ C“ Ðassets€and€income€is€less€certain€than€Husbandððs€ability.€€Wifeððs€position€at€the€University€ofÐ ,| ÐTennessee€is€an€occupation€renewed€on€a€yearly€basis,€while€Husband€holds€steady€employment€atÐ e Ðhis€optometry€clinic.€€Finally,€Husbandððs€earning€capacity€far€exceeds€Wifeððs€earning€capacity.€Ð þN ÐTherefore,€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€division€of€marital€property.Ð ç 7 ÐÌà  àBecause€Husbandððs€argument€over€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€its€division€of€personalÐ ¹" ! Ðproperty€involves€the€marital€property€division,€we€address€that€issue€here.€€In€this€case,€the€partiesÐ ¢#ò" Ðattempted€to€present€evidence€of€the€value€of€the€partiesðð€household€goods.€€The€trial€court€refusedÐ ‹$Û# Ðto€take€evidence€on€those€items€and€stated€that€the€parties€should€either€agree€on€a€division€or€theÐ t%Ä $ Ðcourt€would€order€a€sale€of€such€items€and€divide€the€proceeds.€€The€parties€were€unable€to€reachÐ ]&­!% Ðan€agreement€for€division€of€the€household€items,€and,€subsequently,€the€court€awarded€Wife€allÐ F'–"& Ðhousehold€goods,€furniture,€and€appliances€in€her€possession€except€for€Husbandððs€items€of€separateÐ /(#' Ðproperty,€without€taking€any€evidence€of€the€values€of€such€household€items.€€As€a€result,€this€CourtÐ )h$( Ðcannot€determine€whether€such€division€of€the€household€items€was€equitable€in€accordance€withÐ *Q%) Ðthe€division€of€the€remainder€of€the€marital€estate.€€Therefore,€in€the€interest€of€judicial€economy,Ð ê*:&* Ðwe€remand€this€case€to€the€trial€court€for€a€determination€of€the€values€of€the€partiesðð€householdÐ Ó+#'+ Ðpersonal€property€alone,€consideration€of€the€factors€enumerated€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(c)Ð ° Ðfor€a€division€of€such€marital€household€items€only,€and€an€equitable€division€of€the€maritalÐ ™é Ðhousehold€items€in€accordance€with€the€division€of€the€remainder€of€the€partiesðð€marital€estate.Ð ‚Ò ÐÌÓ  Óò òImposition€of€the€Lienó óÐ T¤ ÐÌÓ  Óà  àNext,€Husband€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€imposed€a€lien€on€the€VC€propertyÐ ' w Ðin€order€to€secure€Husbandððs€property€settlement€obligation€of€$183,692.50,€as€well€as€his€paymentsÐ  ` Ðof€child€support€and€alimony.€€In€its€final€decree€of€divorce,€the€trial€court,€when€discussing€theÐ ù I Ðproperty€settlement€payment€of€$183,692.50€from€Husband€to€Wife,€stated€that€ð ð[a]€lien€on€theÐ â 2  ÐVision€Center,€P.C.€property€is€imposed€to€secure€the€payment€of€[Wifeððs]€share€of€marital€propertyÐ Ë   Ðalong€with€the€payments€of€any€child€support€and€alimony.ðð€€We€note€that€ð ð[t]he€imposition€of€a€lienÐ ´  Ðon€property€is€an€extraordinary€and€harsh€remedy€that€must€be€exercised€with€caution€lest€injury€beÐ í  Ðdone€to€the€obligor€spouse€and€his€or€her€property,€and€should€not€be€resorted€to€where€less€onerousÐ †Ö  Ðremedies€are€available.ðð€€24A€Am.€Jur.€2d€òòDivorce€and€Separationóó€ðð€885€(1998).€€This€Court€hasÐ o¿  Ðpreviously€upheld€the€imposition€of€a€lien€on€a€partyððs€property€where€there€was€evidence€that€theÐ X¨  Ðobligor€spouse€had€committed€fraud€against€the€obligee€spouse.€€òòNorman€v.€Normanóó,€No.€03A01„Ð A‘ Ð9702„CV„00047,€1998€Tenn.€App.€LEXIS€204,€at€*6„8€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Mar.€25,€1998).€€However,Ð *z Ðthis€Court€has€also€upheld€a€trial€courtððs€denial€of€imposing€a€lien€on€an€obligor€spouseððs€propertyÐ c Ðwhere€such€a€lien€would€hamper€the€business€operations€of€the€obligor€spouse€and€place€theÐ üL Ðobligorððs€source€of€income€in€jeopardy.€€òòManis€v.€Manisóó,€49€S.W.3d€295,€306€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€2001)Ð å5 Ð(upholding€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€wifeððs€request€for€a€lien€on€dividends€distributed€fromÐ Î Ðhusbandððs€corporations€or€to€require€husband€to€obtain€court€approval€before€consenting€to€sales€ofÐ · Ðcorporate€property€until€husband€paid€wife€her€interest€in€the€marital€estate).€€Ð  ð ÐÌà  àUnder€the€circumstances€of€this€case,€we€do€not€think€the€imposition€of€a€lien€on€the€VCÐ r Ðproperty€is€appropriate€to€secure€the€property€settlement€and€support€obligations.€€In€a€temporaryÐ [« Ðorder€for€support,€Husband€was€ordered€to€pay€all€the€bills€associated€with€the€marital€home,Ð D” Ðincluding€the€payments€on€the€loan€secured€by€the€marital€home.€€Additionally,€Husband€wasÐ -} Ðordered€to€pay€$1,000€per€month€to€Wife€as€child€support.€€Finally,€Husband€was€ordered€to€payÐ f ÐWife€alimony€in€the€amount€of€$500€per€month.€€Such€order€was€filed€in€August€2000,€and€there€isÐ ÿO Ðno€evidence€that€Husband€failed€to€make€one€payment€pursuant€to€this€order.€€After€our€review€ofÐ è 8 Ðthe€record,€we€cannot€say€that€an€imposition€of€a€lien€on€the€VC€property€was€justified.€€Therefore,Ð Ñ!!  Ðwe€remand€this€case€to€the€trial€court€to€revisit€this€issue€and€to€impose€a€less€onerous€method€ofÐ º" ! Ðsecuring€the€property€settlement€and€support€obligations.Ð £#ó" ÐÌÌÌÓ  Óò òAlimonyó óÐ G'—"& ÐÓ  Óà  àNext,€Husband€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€awarded€Wife€alimony,€or,€in€theÐ 1(#' Ðâ âalternative,€erred€when€it€awarded€Wife€alimony€for€a€period€of€five€years.€€Tennessee€courts€areÐ )j$( Ðguided€by€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101(d)(1)€(2001)׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€for€determining€the€amount€and€duration€ofÐ ° Ðâ âalimony€payments€one€spouse€must€pay€to€another:Ð ™é ÐÌÓ XÓà0  à(d)(1)€It€is€the€intent€of€the€general€assembly€that€a€spouse€who€is€economicallyÐ k» Ðdisadvantaged,€relative€to€the€other€spouse,€be€rehabilitated€whenever€possible€by€theÐ T¤ Ðgranting€of€an€order€for€payment€of€rehabilitative,€temporary€support€andÐ =  Ðmaintenance.€€Where€there€is€such€relative€economic€disadvantage€and€rehabilitationÐ & v Ðis€not€feasible€in€consideration€of€all€relevant€factors,€including€those€set€out€in€thisÐ  _ Ðsubsection,€then€the€court€may€grant€an€order€for€payment€of€support€andÐ ø H Ðmaintenance€on€a€long„term€basis€or€until€the€death€or€remarriage€of€the€recipientÐ á 1  Ðexcept€as€otherwise€provided€in€subdivision€(a)(3).€€Rehabilitative€support€andÐ Ê   Ðmaintenance€is€a€separate€class€of€spousal€support€as€distinguished€from€alimony€inÐ ³  Ðsolido€and€periodic€alimony.€€In€determining€whether€the€granting€of€an€order€forÐ œì  Ðpayment€of€support€and€maintenance€to€a€party€is€appropriate,€and€in€determining€theÐ …Õ  Ðnature,€amount,€length€of€term,€and€manner€of€payment,€the€court€shall€consider€allÐ n¾  Ðrelevant€factors,€including:ÐW§ Ð Ð  ÐÓ X‡ÓÓ °Óà0  àà0` xxàÐ ` x` x Ðà0  àà0` xxà(A)€The€relative€earning€capacity,€obligations,€needs,€and€financialÐ )y Ðresources€of€each€party,€including€income€from€pension,€profitÐ b Ðsharing€or€retirement€plans€and€all€other€sources;ÐûK` x` x Ðà0  àà0` xxà(B)€The€relative€education€and€training€of€each€party,€the€ability€andÐ ä4 Ðopportunity€of€each€party€to€secure€such€education€and€training,€andÐ Í Ðthe€necessity€of€a€party€to€secure€further€education€and€training€toÐ ¶ Ðimprove€such€partyððs€earning€capacity€to€a€reasonable€level;Пï` x` x Ðà  àà ` à(C)€The€duration€of€the€marriage;Ð ˆØ Ðà  àà ` à(D)€The€age€and€mental€condition€of€each€party;Ð qÁ Ðà0  àà0` xxà(E)€The€physical€condition€of€each€party,€including,€but€not€limitedÐ Zª Ðto,€physical€disability€or€incapacity€due€to€a€chronic€debilitatingÐ C“ Ðdisease;Ð,|` x` x Ðà0  àà0` xxà(F)€The€extent€to€which€it€would€be€undesirable€for€a€party€to€seekÐ e Ðemployment€outside€the€home€because€such€party€will€be€custodianÐ þN Ðof€a€minor€child€of€the€marriage;Ðç 7` x` x Ðà0  àà0` xxà(G)€The€separate€assets€of€each€party,€both€real€and€personal,€tangibleÐ Ð!   Ðand€intangible;й" !` x` x Ðà0  àà0` xxà(H)€The€provisions€made€with€regard€to€the€marital€property€asÐ ¢#ò" Ðdefined€in€ðð€36„4„121;Ћ$Û#` x` x Ðà0  àà0` xxà(I)€The€standard€of€living€of€the€parties€established€during€theÐ t%Ä $ Ðmarriage;Ð]&­!%` x` x Ðà0  àà0` xxà(J)€The€extent€to€which€each€party€has€made€such€tangible€andÐ F'–"& Ðâ âintangible€contributions€to€the€marriage€as€monetary€and€homemakerÐ /(#' Ðcontributions,€and€tangible€and€intangible€contributions€by€a€party€toÐ ° Ðthe€education,€training€or€increased€earning€power€of€the€other€party;Йé` x` x Ðâ âà0  àà0` xxà(K)€The€relative€fault€of€the€parties€in€cases€where€the€court,€in€itsÐ ‚Ò Ðdiscretion,€deems€it€appropriate€to€do€so;€andÐk»` x` x Ðà0  àà0` xxà(L)€Such€other€factors,€including€the€tax€consequences€to€each€party,Ð T¤ Ðas€are€necessary€to€consider€the€equities€between€the€parties.Ð= ` x` x ÐÌÓ °LŒÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101(d)(1)€(2001).€€The€most€important€factors€are€the€obligeeððs€need€andÐ  _ Ðthe€obligorððs€ability€to€pay.€€òòLancaster€v.€Lancasteróó,€671€S.W.2d€501,€503€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1984)Ð ø H Ð(citing€òòAleshire€v.€Aleshireóó,€642€S.W.2d€729,€733€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1981)).€€Ð á 1  ÐÌà  àHusband€relies€on€the€fact€that€the€marriage€was€very€short€in€duration,€and,€therefore,€WifeÐ ³  Ðwas€entitled€to€alimony€for€a€shorter€period,€if€any€at€all.€€Again,€Husband€ignores€the€other€factorsÐ œì  Ðwhich€favor€the€amount€and€duration€of€alimony€payments€awarded€to€Wife.€€In€this€case,€as€notedÐ …Õ  Ðabove,€Husbandððs€earning€capacity€far€exceeds€Wifeððs€earning€capacity.€€The€trial€court€found€thatÐ n¾  ÐHusband€has€the€ability€to€earn€between€$225,000€and€$250,000€per€year.€€On€the€other€hand,€theÐ W§  Ðtrial€court€found€that€Wife€has€the€ability€to€earn€between€$25,000€and€$45,000€annually.€€WhileÐ @ ÐWife€holds€an€undergraduate€degree€in€business€administration€with€a€major€in€accounting,€HusbandÐ )y Ðgraduated€from€the€Southern€College€of€Optometry€and€currently€practices€as€an€optometrist.€€Also,Ð b Ðas€noted€above,€while€Husband€has€contributed€to€the€marriage€as€the€primary€wage€earner,€WifeÐ ûK Ðhas€also€been€a€wage€earner€during€the€marriage.€€The€evidence€also€supports€the€fact€that€Wife€hasÐ ä4 Ðcontributed€as€a€homemaker€for€the€marriage.€€We€also€note€that€Wife,€though€awarded€the€maritalÐ Í Ðhome,€is€now€responsible€for€the€mortgage€payments€on€that€home€in€addition€to€her€other€monthlyÐ ¶ Ðexpenses,€increasing€her€need€for€alimony.€€Finally,€Husband€was€at€fault€for€the€divorce€becauseÐ Ÿï Ðof€his€adultery.€€Under€these€circumstances,€we€cannot€say€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€awardedÐ ˆØ ÐWife€alimony€of€$1,000€per€month€for€a€period€of€five€years.Ð qÁ ÐÌÓ  Óò òAttorneyððs€Feesó óÐ C“ ÐÌÓ  Óà  àFinally,€Husband€argues€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€when€it€awarded€WifeÐ f Ð$10,000€for€her€attorneyððs€fees.€€Specifically,€in€this€case,€the€trial€court€found€that,€if€Husband€paidÐ ÿO ÐWife€the€property€settlement€payment€of€$183,692.50€in€a€lump€sum,€Wife€would€have€sufficientÐ è 8 Ðfunds€to€pay€her€attorneyððs€fees.€€However,€because€the€trial€court€imposed€a€lien€on€HusbandððsÐ Ñ!!  Ðclinic€building,€Husband€argues€that€the€trial€court€precluded€Husbandððs€ability€to€pay€the€propertyÐ º" ! Ðsettlement€payment€in€a€lump€sum,€and,€therefore,€Husband€necessarily€would€have€to€pay€$10,000Ð £#ó" Ðfor€Wifeððs€attorneyððs€fees.€€Ð Œ$Ü# ÐÌà  àAn€award€of€attorneyððs€fees€is€treated€like€an€award€of€alimony.€€òòKoja€v.€Kojaóó,€42€S.W.3dÐ ^&®!% Ð94,€98€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€2000)€(citing€òòHerrera€v.€Herreraóó,€944€S.W.2d€379,€390€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.Ð G'—"& Ð1996);€òòCranford€v.€Cranfordóó,€772€S.W.2d€48,€52€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1989)).€€Therefore,€the€trial€courtÐ 0(€#' Ðshould€consider€the€factors€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101(d)€to€determine€whether€an€award€ofÐ )i$( Ðattorneyððs€fees€is€appropriate.€€òòIdóó.€€ð ðA€spouse€with€adequate€property€and€income€is€not€entitled€toÐ *R%) Ðan€award€of€alimony€to€pay€attorneys€fees€and€expenses.ðð€€òòIdóó.€(citing€òòUmstot€v.€Umstotóó,€968€S.W.2dÐ ë*;&* Ð819,€824€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1997);€òòDuncan€v.€Duncanóó,€686€S.W.2d€568,€573€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1984)).€Ð Ô+$'+ ÐAn€award€for€attorneyððs€fees€is€appropriate€when€the€requesting€spouse€does€not€have€sufficientÐ ° Ðfunds€to€pay€his€or€her€own€legal€fees€or€would€be€required€to€deplete€his€or€her€assets€to€pay€suchÐ ™é Ðfees.€€òòIdóó.€(quoting€òòBrown€v.€Brownóó,€913€S.W.2d€163,€170€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1994)).€€In€this€case,Ð ‚Ò ÐHusband€argues€that€he€could€pay€Wife€$183,692.50€in€a€lump€sum€if€no€lien€were€imposed€on€hisÐ k» Ðclinic€building.€€Additionally,€the€trial€court€found€that,€if€Husband€paid€such€property€settlementÐ T¤ Ðpayment€in€a€lump€sum,€Wife€could€afford€to€pay€her€own€attorneyððs€fees.€€Given€our€dispositionÐ =  Ðof€the€issue€concerning€the€lien€on€Husbandððs€clinic€building,€we€vacate€the€award€to€Wife€forÐ & v Ðattorneyððs€fees€and€remand€this€issue€to€the€trial€court€to€revisit€the€question€of€whether€an€awardÐ  _ Ðof€attorneyððs€fees€is€appropriate.Ð ø H ÐÌÓ  Óò òConclusionó óÐ Ê   ÐÌÓ  Óà  àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€Husbandððs€motion€to€appointÐ í  Ða€guardian€ad€litem€or€subject€the€parties€to€a€psychological€examination.€€We€affirm€the€propertyÐ †Ö  Ðdivision€but€remand€for€a€determination€of€the€value€of€the€household€personalty€and€a€division€inÐ o¿  Ðaccordance€with€the€division€of€the€remainder€of€the€marital€estate.€€We€reverse€the€trial€courtððsÐ X¨  Ðimposition€of€a€lien€on€Husbandððs€business€and€remand€for€the€imposition€of€a€less€onerous€meansÐ A‘ Ðof€securing€Husbandððs€obligations.€€We€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€award€of€alimony€to€Wife.€€We€vacateÐ *z Ðthe€award€of€attorneyððs€fees€and€remand€for€a€determination€of€whether€such€an€award€is€appropriateÐ c Ðin€light€of€our€reversal€of€the€lien€on€Husbandððs€business.€€Costs€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€equally€toÐ üL ÐAppellee,€Mary€D.€Bacigalupo,€and€Appellant,€William€A.€Bacigalupo,€and€his€surety€for€whichÐ å5 Ðexecution€may€issue€if€necessary.Ô#†XÛŸXXX$F #ÔÔ#†¼‚q»XXÛŸ #ÔÔ€XÛŸX»¼‚qÔÐ Î ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð r Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€HIGHERS,€JUDGE