WPC? hl O\so,`je<ֿB)p"*獁Y./ad6 lPaA*B'2ͅ#2 0h{%W<Oz{{k l uanJdj3ka<G&my怔cƞf8\ LLV1ڽ֋)~'M`'x+CM{|: -ʌ Q O):ks?z헐vT7= =e0ISqg-PYpI' %.!e S BSP * '] M!HXZX0oWi]GU=֚n=E5RӄG# т!_R]|'yge\1\W=s0E@uo +ir-\zF q!CJr^ܻUÒ@›` 0~@ 0x 0k6 0k 0 0~ 0$ 0 0 0 0 v 0 01 0C 0V 0h 07 0 0 0B 0 0 0 05UB % 0z  0 1s 0x \ 0=m 0F 0P 1@ 0 0O#E]# 0}_# 0x# 0T$ 0j$ 0eK% 0W% 0W& 0^& 0j& 0L' 0( 0( 0a) 0B* 06+ 0=, 0-W- 0@. 0/ 00 0 1 01 0H2 02 03 0V4 04 1r5)6n96 046 B7477 0K7^7 0JF8@8#!9N:: m:UF ;R;UF; 0P,<w|<|<|<A< AQ=>^ > 0P> 0D4?U:x? D3?V& 8Document[8]Document Style0..8` ..` V8Document[4]Document Style.. . V 8Document[6]Document Style8..V 8Document[5]Document Style0..V/8Document[2]Document Style 2A.3  Ԁ   V& 8Document[7]Document Style0..0` ..` zU :Right Par[1]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..2I.3  Ԁ..0..zh :Right Par[2]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..2A.3  Ԁ..0` ..` V?8Document[3]Document Style.. 21.3  Ԁ   z{ :Right Par[3]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  ..P 21.3  Ԁ` ..` 0 .. z :Right Par[4]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. .. 2a.3  Ԁ .. 0..z :Right Par[5]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..2(1)3  Ԁ..0h..hz :Right Par[6]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h..2(a)3  Ԁh..h0..z :Right Par[7]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....2i)3  Ԁ..0..z :Right Par[8]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....p..2a)3  Ԁ..0p..pVX8Document[1]Document Style  @..8  2I.3  Ԁ     Ԉ l2:Technical[5]Technical Document Style.. 2(1)3  Ԁ. l2:Technical[6]Technical Document Style.. 2(a)3  Ԁ. l/%:Technical[2]Technical Document Style 2A.3  Ԁ   .. l,!:Technical[3]Technical Document Style 21.3  Ԁ   .. l(!:Technical[4]Technical Document Style 2a.3  Ԁ   .. l:0:Technical[1]Technical Document Style  2I.3  Ԁ     .. l1:Technical[7]Technical Document Style.. 2i)3  Ԁ. l1:Technical[8]Technical Document Style.. 2a)3  Ԁ. <6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXR& 8BibliogrphyBibliography0....jo4Tech InitInitialize Technical StyleS   1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 S CuyTechnicalTechnical Document Style11.11.1.11.1.1.11.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1fp2Doc InitInitialize Document StyleS #    I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)S !"($0 ($0 0 (($0 0 0   A_ekqwDocumentDocument StyleI.1.A.a.(1)(a)i)a)x?t2PleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading Paper % z &(  &XXXXX6G''*d66G''*d6HH1HH2HH3HH4HH5HH6HH7HH8HH910111213141516171819202122232425262728  .+('2$ FT!   p4Heading 2Underlined Heading Flush LeftV4Heading 1Centered Heading@..  b* 8Bullet ListIndented Bullet List0..0` ..` B& $1Document Style0..8` ..` B $2Document Style.. . B $3Document Style8..B $4Document Style0..B-$5Document Style 23  Ԁ   B& $6Document Style0..0` ..` dS $7Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..23  Ԁ..0..df $8Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..` 23  Ԁ..0` ..` B=$9Document Style.. 23  Ԁ   fy &10Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. 23  Ԁ` ..` 0 .. f &11Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..23  Ԁ .. 0..f &12Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h23  Ԁ..0h..hf &13Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h..23  Ԁh..h0..f &14Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....23  Ԁ..0..f &15Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....p..p23  Ԁ..0p..pDV!&16Document Style  @..  23  Ԁ     Ԉ X/&17Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ. X/&18Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ. X-(&19Technical Document Style 23  Ԁ   .. X*$&20Technical Document Style 23  Ԁ   .. X)$&21Technical Document Style 23  Ԁ   .. X83&22Technical Document Style  23  Ԁ     .. X/&23Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ. X/&24Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ.   CRight ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersI.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)3|x<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXx6X@JQX@( T$   dtpO'$(G.2$ FT!   IXX     0  MARVINBERKELESLIEMcWILLIAMS($   0   VANNLASLEYPINCHAKMcDONALDLUFKINFRIERSONShelbyvilleGlenna KiddHawthornes S.W.ClarksvilleNETHERTONBraswellCarothersHP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0U<4 9Z .Courier New Regular GLENNA KIDDShelbyvilleMcMURRAYGlenna KiddHawthornes<4 9Z .Courier New Regular((3$ FT!    7 T"   _^XTXXX^AX^XT   Ad FILED^^A  October15,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdA ZT\]_C<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5QxS'L ((3$ FT!   ($$   1  ,cAZ"Arial RegularGGGG'dxd FT!   _QXRXXXSXRXXQXR`   8yXXdd8TR[A'Legal3'A' Legal3'T  X@LLINTHECOURTOFAPPEALS `    _xYX_B2.jzh `@Ep tt6 x_ATKNOXVILLÈ @  @  @ v@*@@*)0  KNOXCOUNTY(#(# JAMESR.BALDWIN,@*)  03A019903CH00110   @*)   \    PlaintiffAppellant,  )   p  2  @*)   h    v.@*)  @* >  @*)  HON.SHARONBELL   THEKNOXCOUNTYBOARD0 h 0h(#h(#)0(#(##QXRXXSXRV#SXRXXQXRJUDGE (#(# OFEDUCATION,@*)   `  Ѐ  @*)   6   DefendantAppellee.@*)   l  @*)  AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED B @*)@*  THOMASR.HENLEYofLUFKIN,HENLEY&CONNER,Knoxville,forAppellantRICHARDT._BEELER_,KnoxCountyLawDirector,andMARYANN_STACKHOUSE_,DeputyLawDirector,forAppellee@$OPINION x'$    @  @`  @  @  ) ' _Goddard_,_P.J._     `    ` Thisappeal#QXRXXSXR#involvesanactionforbackwagesbyJames @/%- R.Baldwin,thePlaintiff/AppellantandaformeremployeeoftheKnoxCountySchoolBoard,theDefendant/Appellee.Mr.Baldwinarguesthatheisowedapproximately$32,187inwages.Uponthefilingofhiscomplaint,Mr.Baldwinmovedforsummaryjudgment, andtheBoardlikewisemovedforsummaryjudgmentontheground 8@/7 _ofresjudicatawhenitfileditsanswertoMr.Baldwinscomplaint.   SXd,XXQXd,   ` AfterhearingthepartiesargumentsonJanuary25,  1999,theTrialCourtgrantedtheBoardsmotionforsummary  judgmentonthegroundofresjudicataonFebruary26,1999.Mr. `  BaldwinappealsthejudgmentoftheTrialCourt. @     `     h        ` Mr.Baldwinssoleissueonappeal,whichwerestate, @ iswhethertheTrialCourt#QXd,XXSXd, #SXd,XXQXd,Ԁerredbyapplyingthedoctrineofres   judicatabecausetheissuespresentedinthecasesubjudiceare  notthesameasinaprevioussuitagainsttheBoard.     `     h    ` Mr.BaldwinhadbeenateacherwiththeKnoxvilleCity %  SchoolSystem.WhentheKnoxvilleCitySchoolSystemmergedwith `'  theKnoxCountySchoolSystem,Mr.Baldwinappliedforthe @)" positionof_workerscompensation_Ԁadministratorandreceivedthat  +!$ positionbeginningwiththe198990schoolyear.Heretiredfrom -#& thatpositionin1993. .%(    `     ` Mr.BaldwinfiledhisfirstlawsuitagainsttheBoard 4 +. in1994andallegedthattheBoardhadpaidhimlessthanhe `6-0 shouldhavereceivedduringtheyears1988to1993.Amonghis @8.2 allegationswerethattheBoardowedhim$32,187inwages.The  :04 _TrialCourtdismissedallofMr.Baldwinsclaimsanddenied `  reliefexceptfor$179,whichtheBoardacknowledgedthatitowed @  Mr.Baldwinforwagesduringthe199293schoolyear.      `       ` Mr.BaldwinappealedtothisCourt,whichaffirmedthe `  judgmentoftheTrialCourt.SeeBaldwinv.KnoxCountyBoardof @  Education,anunreportedopinionofthisCourt,filedin   KnoxvilleonNovember30,1995. `    `     ` ApproximatelyeighteenmonthslateronFebruary3,  1997,Mr.Baldwinfiledhissecondlawsuitconcerningwages.In  hissecondcomplaint,Mr.BaldwinarguedthattheBoardowedhim !` $32,187inwages,butinthiscomplaint,heallegedthatthe #@ reductioninpaywasaviolationofTennesseeCodeAnnotated %  495203,whichprovidesforateachersrightsinaschool `'  system.Asalreadynoted,Mr.Baldwinmovedforsummary @)" judgment,asdidtheBoard,whichassertedtheaffirmative  +!$ defenseofresjudicata. -#&    `     h      ` Afterargumentsbybothsides,theTrialCourtheld 2@), thatresjudicatabarredMr.Baldwinssecondlawsuit. 4 +. @* _ @8.2    ` Mr.BaldwinarguesthattheTrialCourterredin `   applyingthedoctrineofresjudicatainthecasesubjudice.He @  contendsthatissuesinthepresentcasewerenotthesameas   thoseinthefirstlawsuit.Hemaintainsthattheissueinthe  firstlawsuitwasbreachofanimpliedcontractandthatthe  issueinthesecondlawsuitwasviolationoftheteachertenure `  statute.Withrespecttothepartiesineachsuit,Mr.Baldwin @  assertsthat thefirstlawsuitinvolvedchargingspecific   administrativeofficials,Plaintiffssupervisors,withmaking ` promisesandnotkeepingthem.Thesecondlawsuitinvolves @ chargingtheschoolboardasabroadgovernmentadministrative   agencywithviolatingtherightsandprivilegesofan  employee....Hearguesthatthetwocausesofactioncouldnot  havebeenbroughtinthesamelawsuitbecausethe issueswere !` contradictoryImpliedcontractv.tenurerights,andtheproof #@ wouldhavebeendifferentforeach.Therefore,thedoctrineof %  resjudicataisnotapplicable. `'     `     h    ` TheBoardarguesthatresjudicataisapplicabletothe -#& casesubjudice.Citingnumerouscasesinsupportofits .%( argument,theBoardassertsthat thedoctrineofresjudicata 0`'* barsthissecondlawsuitsinceitisbetweenthesamepartiesand 2@), isbasedonthesameclaimastoallissueswhichwereorcould 4 +. havebeenlitigatedintheformersuit. `6-0    `    :04    ` AstheBoardnotes,thedoctrineofresjudicatabarsa `  secondsuitbetweenthesamepartiesonthesamecauseofaction @  astoallissueswhichwereorcouldhavebeenlitigatedinthe   formersuit.PennAmericaInsuranceCompanyv._Crittenden_,984  S.W.2d231(Tenn.Ct.App.1998);Collinsv.GreeneCountyBank,  916S.W.2d941,945(Tenn.Ct.App.1995)(emphasisadded). `     `     ` Wefindthatthiscasepresentsuswithaclassic ` exampleofresjudicata.#QXd,XXSXd,x#Thekeytoananalysisunderres @ judicataiswhethertheissuecouldhavebeenlitigatedinthe   formerlawsuit.SXd,XXQXd,ԀInhisfirstlawsuit,Mr.BaldwinsuedtheKnox  CountyBoardofEducation,thesamepartyinthesecondsuit.  Theissueinhisfirstlawsuitwas$32,187inwagesthatwere !` owedhimbytheBoard,andinthissecondsuit,theissueis #@ $32,187inbackwages.However,inhissecondsuit,Mr.Baldwin %  assertshisclaimforwagespursuanttotheteachertenure `'  statute,aclaimhecertainlycouldhaveraisedinhisfirst @)" lawsuit. `     h     +!$    `       ` Fortheforegoingreasons,thejudgmentoftheTrial 0`'* Courtisaffirmed,andthecauseremandedforcollectionofthe 2@), judgmentandcostsbelow.Costsofappealareadjudgedagainst 4 +. Mr.Baldwinandhissurety. `6-0     :04    `       `     h     ___________________________      `     h     HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.  CONCUR:  __________________________ P  HerschelP.Franks,J. @  __________________________ ` D.MichaelSwiney,J. P   ,#QXd,XXSXd,y&#