ÿWPCÈ IFÜBg -±Mº'±Oºƒ›¨/³ÂƒêºóË’qµp×hî[ÇóBr 9xyºÖµîom.@TFNeˆ´G’w~#²¾oKØþæ=øù?ˆÈKh #¸Öéã°¬\_`á§÷÷§ß?²{¼ÒñsQA«o*Ü{‘LNíPö(l¡D ÝËLgêwM2©'7¤LøÐµ8°Z|w¶±Ôá—™}‰gj R‹V¨¾¨ÀO)Ö1åVÍýêD9<Ú%Ê‚ØL£Ã}“ºXÈŠË)uZW€ò?•ç,/ÿn%T&Þþ ñYn§” [ïícs$òV–¾óɶh&ˆ®Ý%Ÿ›­[žŽ‚…•€øƒ©k¨ú°Æ+ pœ¶ËéOrO‰9c¥èlèúùïL]ÑaXÁI¯áß¾k _dŒåëìÕ‚Æ!«ò)˜º„H©yìsò5)¦6àä¨l•Ä|ße°D/÷¢­¨:Çé°æ“·@l­”¡¤E| bjmÊF‡’ŸÓpl@ÙÎ/ò²ûÓÛýêvXÄ^÷,‰˜Lëõ®B0PÀ¯b‹A{¢Þÿ4õÆwΤÓwü®«iÎ¥+£ ¦íÙ¤·Š½GjÎa^ñ´â "õ`_ }ö@±CW@›¡‘b#É\ %% ^ + 0ˆ7 UN¿ w 4 z% ÒŸ q € m‚ ™ Æ¡ Æg Æ-ÆóóN¹¹¹E»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»b½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½½ 0ëÅÅÅÅ B°° 0¤Í D3q D-¤ 0KÑÑ ASÆo 0¤5 0DÙ A«˜\\IB01S01\CLERK1NASÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»v‹/Ï (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularqdj/B011C8 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2!$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@a»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôûIò»»Ô d(|3‰U$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@a»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3‰U$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@a»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@a»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼@a»»»ÔÑ8€¥XXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ü ü ìàÔ‡îG´î»¼@aÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼@a»îîG´ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€August€11,€2003Ð üL ÐÔ‡X¥X»¼@aÔÌò òÔ#†¼@a»XX¥ÿ#ÔÔ_ÔJ.L.Ô_Ô€Ô_ÔBEECHUMÔ_Ô,€JR.òòóó€v.€CHARLES€Ô_ÔTRAUGHBERÔ_ÔÔ‡X¥X»¼@aÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Chancery€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€01„1870„II€€€€€€Carol€L.€McCoy,€ChancellorÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2003„00150„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€December€15,€2003€Ð ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓPetitioner,€an€inmate€with€the€Department€of€Corrections,€sought€judicial€review€of€decisions€of€theÐ xÈ  ÐTennessee€Board€of€Probations€and€Parole€first€to€revoke€his€parole€and€then€to€decline€to€releaseÐ d´ Ðhim€on€parole.€€The€Chancery€Court€for€Davidson€County€denied€the€inmateððs€request€for€relief,€andÐ P  Ðthe€inmate€has€appealed.€€We€have€determined€that€the€inmateððs€challenge€to€the€revocation€of€hisÐ <Œ Ðparole€was€untimely€and€that€the€inmateððs€complaint€regarding€the€late€certification€of€the€recordsÐ (x Ðregarding€his€Georgia€conviction€is€without€merit.€€Accordingly,€we€affirm€the€dismissal€of€theÐ d Ðinmateððs€petition.Ð P ÐÓüÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right€;€Judgment€of€the€Chancery€CourtÐ Ø( ÐAffirmed€and€Remandedó óÐ Ä ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼@a»àX¥Ñ#ÔÔ‡X¥X.¼@aÔWilliam€B.€Cain,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòWilliam€C.€Koch,€Jr.óó€andÐ œì ÐòòPatricia€J.€Cottrellóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð ˆØ ÐÌÔ_ÔJ.L.Ô_Ô€Ô_ÔBeechumÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€Clifton,€Tennessee,€Pro€Se.Ð `° ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€E.€Moore,€Solicitor€General,€and€DawnÐ 8!ˆ  ÐJordan,€Assistant€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€Charles€Ô_ÔTraughberÔ_Ô.Ð $"t! ÐÓ¤ÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼@a»XX¥Ó#ÔÔ‡X¥X»¼@aÔÐ ü#L# ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼@a»XX¥\ #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X¥X»¼@aÔà  àOn€June€13,€2001,€Petitioner/Appellant,€Ô_ÔJ.L.Ô_Ô€Ô_ÔBeechumÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€filed€a€Petition€for€a€Writ€ofÐ Ô%$!% ÐCertiorari€in€the€Chancery€Court€of€Davidson€County€to€review€an€adverse€action€of€the€TennesseeÐ À&"& ÐBoard€of€Probation€and€Parole.Ð ¬'ü"' ÐÌà  àOn€June€7,€1983,€Appellant€was€convicted€of€second€degree€murder€and€armed€robbery,Ð „)Ô$) Ðreceiving€a€25€year€sentence.€€He€was€paroled€in€April€of€1993€and€allowed€to€remove€to€the€StateÐ p*À%* Ðof€Georgia,€where€his€family€resided.€€While€on€parole€in€Georgia,€in€April€of€2000,€AppellantÐ \+¬&+ Ðpleaded€guilty€to€the€felony€offense€of€violation€of€the€Georgia€Controlled€Substance€Act.€€BecauseÐ H,˜', Ðhe€was€on€parole€at€the€time€of€this€guilty€plea€in€Georgia,€he€was€returned€to€Tennessee€for€parole€Ð 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_Ôrevocation€proceedings.€€A€parole€revocation€hearing€was€held€on€June€1,€2000,€and€by€order€of€JuneÐ ° Ð7,€2000,€his€parole€was€revoked.€€A€parole€grant€hearing€was€held€on€December€6,€2000€and€by€orderÐ œì Ðof€December€17,€2000€parole€was€denied€and€the€board€issued€a€finding€that€his€allegations€ofÐ ˆØ Ðmisconduct€and€procedural€errors€by€the€hearingsðð€official€were€not€substantiated.Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àThis€disposition,€being€a€final€disposition,€Appellant€was€notified€by€letter€of€September€7,Ð L œ Ð2000,€that:€€ð ðThis€disposition€is€final€and€there€is€no€further€appeal€recourse€available€to€you€on€thisÐ 8 ˆ Ðmatter€through€the€Tennessee€Board€of€Probation€and€Parole.ðð€€No€application€for€certiorari€wasÐ $ t Ðtimely€filed€from€the€September€7,€2000€disposition,€and€the€next€proceeding€was€a€parole€hearingÐ  ` Ðheld€December€6,€2000.€€The€parole€board€voted€to€deny€parole,€and€Beechum€appealed€that€decisionÐ ü L  Ðpursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„28„105€and€the€Administrative€Rules€andÐ è 8  ÐRegulations€of€the€Tennessee€Board€of€Probation€and€Parole.€€This€appeal€was€denied€and€PetitionerÐ Ô$  Ðwas€notified€by€letter€of€May€17,€2001€that:€€Ð À  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àYour€request€for€an€appeal€is€denied.€€The€document(s)€provided€doÐ ˜è  Ðnot€support€your€claim€of€significant€new€information€or€evidenceÐ „Ô  Ðthat€was€not€available€at€the€time€of€your€hearing.ÐpÀ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àAlso,€upon€review€the€board€file€and€tape€recording€of€the€hearing,Ð H˜ Ðyour€allegation€of€significant€procedural€error(s)€by€the€HearingsÐ 4„ ÐOfficial(s)€was€not€substantiated.Ð p` x` x ÐÌà8  àThis€disposition€is€final€and€there€is€no€further€appeal€recourse€available€to€you€onÐ øH Ðthis€matter€through€the€Tennessee€Board€of€Probation€and€Parole.Ðä4Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àAppellantððs€issues€on€appeal€address€two€separate€proceedings.€€First,€is€his€parole€revocationÐ ¼  Ðproceeding€resulting€in€the€revocation€of€his€parole€which€became€administratively€final€onÐ ¨ø ÐSeptember€7,€2000.€€Secondly,€is€the€hearing€of€December€6,€2000,€declining€his€application€forÐ ”ä Ðparole€which€became€administratively€final€on€May€17,€2001.€Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àHis€application€for€a€writ€of€certiorari€relative€to€the€September€7,€2000€disposition€on€paroleÐ X ¨ Ðrevocation€is€untimely,€and€the€trial€court€properly€dismissed€it€for€lack€of€subject€matter€jurisdiction.€Ð D!” ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€27„9„102€(2000)€provides€in€relevant€part:Ð 0"€  ÐÌà8  àSuch€party€shall,€within€sixty€(60)€days€from€the€entry€of€the€order€or€judgment,€fileÐ $X" Ða€petition€of€certiorari€in€the€chancery€court€of€any€county€in€which€any€one€(1)€orÐ ô$D # Ðmore€of€the€petitioners,€or€any€one€(1)€or€more€of€the€material€defendants€reside,€orÐ à%0!$ Ðhave€their€principle€office,€stating€briefly€the€issues€involved€in€the€cause,€theÐ Ì&"% Ðsubstance€of€the€order€or€judgment€complained€of,€the€respects€in€which€theÐ ¸'#& Ðpetitioner€claims€the€order€or€judgment€is€erroneous,€and€praying€for€an€accordantÐ ¤(ô#' Ðreview.Ð)à$(Ð Ð  Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àFailure€to€file€the€application€for€a€writ€of€certiorari€within€sixty€days€after€September€7,€2000Ð ° Ðâ âdeprived€the€trial€court€of€subject€matter€jurisdiction,€and€the€chancellor€had€no€alternative€but€toÐ œì Ðdismiss.€€òòTurner€v.€Tennessee€Bd.€of€Parolesóó,€993€S.W.2d€78€(Tenn.Ct.App.1999);€òòThandiwe€v.Ð ˆØ ÐTraughberóó,€909€S.W.2d€802€(Tenn.Ct.App.1994).Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àThe€application€for€certiorari€is€timely€as€to€the€denial€of€parole,€which€becameÐ L œ Ðadministratively€final€on€May€17,€2001.€€In€this€administrative€proceeding,€the€scope€of€review€byÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€courts€is€very€limited.Ð $ t ÐÌà8  àà ` àThe€scope€of€review€under€the€common€law€writ,€however,€is€very€narrow.€Ð ü L  ÐIt€covers€only€an€inquiry€into€whether€the€Board€exceeded€its€jurisdiction€or€is€actingÐ è 8  Ðillegally,€fraudulently,€or€arbitrarily.€€Conclusory€terms€such€as€ð ðarbitrary€andÐ Ô$  Ðcapriciousðð€will€not€entitle€a€petitioner€to€the€writ.€€At€the€risk€of€oversimplification,Ð À  Ðone€may€say€it€is€not€the€correctness€of€the€decision€that€is€subject€to€judicial€review,Ð ¬ü  Ðbut€the€manner€in€which€the€decision€is€reached.€€If€the€agency€or€board€has€reachedÐ ˜è  Ðits€decision€in€a€constitutional€or€lawful€manner,€then€the€decision€would€not€beÐ „Ô  Ðsubject€to€judicial€review.ÐpÀÐ Ð  ÐÌòòPowell€v.€Parole€Eligibility€Review€Bd.óó,€879€S.W.2d€871,€873€(Tenn.App.1994)(citations€omitted).Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àThe€primary€complaint€asserted€on€appeal€is€the€alleged€consideration€by€the€parole€boardÐ  p Ðof€documents€from€the€State€of€Georgia€establishing€his€conviction€for€violation€of€the€GeorgiaÐ  \ ÐControlled€Substance€Act.€€When€Respondent€first€filed€its€Motion€for€Summary€Judgment€onÐ øH ÐAugust€31,€2001,€the€Felony€Accusation,€the€Superior€Court€of€Douglas€County€Final€Disposition,Ð ä4 Ðand€the€Notice€of€Board€Action€from€the€Georgia€Superior€Court€were€filed€by€Respondent€withoutÐ Ð  Ðproper€authentication€and€certification.€€This€deficiency€prompted€Petitioner€to€file€a€Motion€to€strikeÐ ¼  Ðthe€documents,€and€by€Order€of€June€18,€2002,€the€trial€court€sustained€the€Motion.€€Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àOn€July€15,€2002,€Respondents€filed€additional€copies€of€the€Georgia€documents,€this€timeÐ €Ð Ðproperly€authenticated€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence€902€and€1005.€€These€documents,Ð l¼ Ðcertified€by€Cindy€W.€Chaffin,€Clerk€of€the€Superior€Court€of€Douglas€County,€Georgia,€disclosedÐ X ¨ Ðthat€J.L.€Beechum,€Jr.€was€convicted€on€his€plea€of€guilty€of€April€27,€2000€of€violation€of€theÐ D!” ÐGeorgia€Controlled€Substances€Act,€a€felony,€and€sentenced€to€five€years€in€confinement€in€theÐ 0"€  ÐGeorgia€Department€of€Corrections.Ð #l! ÐÌà  àPetitioner€moved€to€strike€these€authenticated€documents€asserting€that€any€authenticationÐ ô$D # Ðof€the€documents€wherein€the€actual€authentication€by€the€clerk€is€dated€subsequent€to€the€filing€ofÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€Order€on€April€13,€1999,€would€be€fraudulent€and€illegal€under€state€and€federal€law.€€He€statesÐ Ì&"% Ðin€his€Motion,€ð ð[t]hat€the€only€certification€of€the€Public€Record€of€the€felony€accusation€that€wouldÐ ¸'#& Ðbe€admissible€under€the€Rule€of€the€court€would€have€been€Dated€April€13,€1999€when€it€was€FiledÐ ¤(ô#' Ðby€court€clerk;€not€June€21,€2002;€3€years,€2€months€and€8€days€later.ððÐ )à$( Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àNo€authority€is€cited€for€this€proposal€which,€taken€to€its€logical€conclusion,€would€nullifyÐ ° Ðâ âall€certifications€post„dating€the€original€entry€of€the€Order.€€The€documents€are€properly€certifiedÐ œì Ðpursuant€to€Tennessee€Rule€of€Evidence€902(3)€and€(4)€and€were€properly€considered€by€the€Board.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àIn€his€nineteen€page€Petition€for€a€Writ€of€Certiorari,€Petitioner€claimed€that€he€was€deprivedÐ `° Ðof€ð ðdelinquent€time€of€359€days€that€was€taking€(sic)€illegally.ðð€€No€where€in€the€Petition€doesÐ L œ ÐPetitioner€explain€any€basis€for€this€request€for€relief,€and€the€trial€court€properly€denied€it.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àThe€action€of€the€chancellor€is€in€all€respects€affirmed,€and€costs€of€the€appeal€are€assessedÐ  ` Ðto€Appellant.Ð ü L  ÐÌÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð „Ô  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGE