WPC ?*^!c?2 ڂflI$!N[pf`Kg!xS#ZL#}n+ϡ[I2ήfſI=1fMһSmqU4ןBG~~v Z + z0X[J]{OU{ѭb?Iߩl‰!lTOd0yZJ5kT#'ÆdWBsǰ*lrp@k& f 7=Bvv<ՌÅUEck7)N@kmg/̢,; r&\|t sx.cU\ 9iMCnS<1/n6Кpv[l#[$ٱ tYNR+DAtV}H:<ǺU]CMfd>M\Bs[:Z*.h?uLCm&eb#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz U@   ] # 0DN-UF/SuEb 0 B 0 D3~ D- 0K AS)| 0B 0D A*HP LaserJet 40500+ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularyG* C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU(9 Z(Times New Roman Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0  <09Z .Courier New Regular I R4$      1    _ Rule10oftheRulesoftheCourtofAppealsprovidesasfollows:    8 ` ThisCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm, 8 reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhena L formalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedby  memorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shall  notbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninanyunrelated H  case.# ~#|5 - -(|G24$ !.8@]dd8         0   d(|3{$ !.8@]dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3{$ !.8@]dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8@]dd8     _  @]81XXdd8  @ M@]INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#@]M #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsNovember16,2001 L X1X@] #@]XX1#E.ALFRED_BIBBINS_,a/k/aEDOWENSv._T.R._ԀGUNN,d/b/a_T.R._ԀGUNN J COMPANYX1X@]   ^ @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforHamiltonCounty  ^ @@No.99C1615SamuelH.Payne,Judge  J FILEDDECEMBER13,_2001_ "  @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200101070_COA_ԄR3CV   AV) ` dE<` A      Theplaintifffiledacomplaintseekingmoneydamagesandotherreliefagainstthedefendant.The  complaintallegesthattheplaintiffisentitledtotherequestedreliefbasedonpastdefamatory x statementsandanticipated libelousandslanderousstatementsthatdamageplaintiffsreputation. d Thetrialcourtdismissedthecomplaint forlackofproof.Weaffirm. P b Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourt (x Affirmed;CaseRemanded  d   #@]X1#X1X.@]CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHoustonM._Goddard_, < _P.J._,andD.Michael_Swiney_,J.,joined. ( E.Alfred_Bibbins_,Chattanooga,Tennessee,ProSe.  Nobrieffiledonbehalfofappellee,_T.R._ԀGunnd/b/a_T.R.Gunn_ԀCompany.  #@]XX1#X1X@] MEMORANDUMOPINION X1XXX1 # @]X X1 # X1X @] #  1      # @]X X1 # X1X @]#X1XX X1 # L"! #@]XX1 #X1X@]    Thetrialcourtsorderofdismissalrecitesthatthismatterwas heardonOctober20,2000. $$t# Theorderfurtherrecitesthatbothpartiesappearedatthehearing.Wedonothaveatranscriptor %` $ statementoftheevidencememorializingwhattookplaceatthehearingonOctober20,2000. This %L!% courtcannotreviewthefactsdenovowithoutanappellaterecordcontainingthefacts,andtherefore,  wemustassumethattherecord,haditbeenpreserved,wouldhavecontainedsufficientevidenceto  supportthetrialcourtsfactualfindings. _Sherrod_Ԁv._Wix_ ,849S.W.2d780,783(Tenn.Ct.App.  1992).Accordingly,wedonothaveafactualbasisuponwhichwecan_say_Ԁthatthetrialcourterred t whenitdeterminedthattherewasa lackofprooftosupporttheplaintiffsclaim. `   Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.Costsonappealaretaxedtotheappellant.This 8  caseisremandedforcollectionofcostsassessedbelow,pursuanttoapplicablelaw. $ t    `     h     _______________________________ $     `     h     CHARLESD.SUSANO,JR.,JUDGE