WPC 1۲oj _&P@?Q H'&&ٗ 8ꜝ~4Ǟz2|%նR]F":PL ًv2#lPGۗeTxWAeh UݤPhJͣ^1W9;h6.c@ErFAAdLdf:YëTJ^{qJ-"rC+sdl#|Q k鏧 ʧR~pǕuS>bFԂY6 >!$-٫8O@묭2b[K#{l쎳ю:B8N 2">W?iΠ7e;6i g%ڃJ{3H"W7 ;CE X!A=L'^_x؃f5ƴ<ȑI d1\>6!79&Gyqee9"뿞v/Q[OWTn4 kb#\ % UN# 0q UN ^ G wS zW  4   m   k 1N 0DEb 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K ASH 0a 0D AIHP LaserJet 4 Plus,,,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularR|g-s  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt],:i+003|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  R $      1  ɴ  _Rule10(CourtofAppeals).MemorandumOpinion.ThisCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudges  participatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhena x formalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbe @ designated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasonin X anyunrelatedcase.(#$  0   - -(|G2 $ !.8dd8         0  ɴ d(|3&$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3&$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _  8XXdd8  @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON# #Ԉ ,   ASSIGNEDONBRIEFSMAY6,2002 X XX #XX#_ROWANA_ԀBOBOANDKEVINBOBOv._LEANTHER_ԀG._WILLETT_XX   ` @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforShelbyCounty  h @@No.300289T.D.;TheHonorableJohnR._McCarroll_,Jr.,Judge  X @@*AV) ` dE<` A (  @@TTNo.W200102552_COA_ԄR3CVFiledNovember7,_2002_ '  AV) ` dE<` A      X`XXXThiscaseinvolvesbodilyinjuriesarisingfromamotorvehicleaccidentthatoccurredonOctober  19,1998inMemphis,Tennessee.ThetrialcourtreturnedaverdictforthePlaintiffs.Plaintiffsthen  filedamotionfornewtrialoralternativelyforan_additur_.ThetrialcourtgrantedPlaintiffsmotion  fornewtrialandthisappealensued.#XXXX`b##XX#XX z V Tenn.R.App.P.3;AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtDismissed& V Remanded  F   #Xˀ#XX.AlanE._Highers_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidR.Farmer,J.,andHolly &v Kirby_Lillard_,J.,joined. f R._Layne_Ԁ_Holley_,Memphis,TN,forAppellant F DavidHill,_Corey_ԀLeathers,Memphis,TN,forAppellees & R #XXˁ#XX#XX˺ #XX  X`XXX@!MEMORANDUMOPINION  #  1      ׈ !        Thiscaseinvolvesbodilyinjuriesresultingfromamotorvehicleaccidentwhichoccurred ~#"  onOctober19,1998on_Raines_ԀRoadinMemphis,Tennessee.Appellees,_Rowana_ԀBobo( Mrs. V% $ _Bobo)andKevinBobo( Mr.Bobo),wererearendedbytheAppellant,LeantherWillett( Ms.  Willett).     Thecasebeganinthecircuitcourt,atwhichthejuryreturnedaverdictinfavorofMr.and 8  Mrs.Boboastoliabilityanddamages,awardingMr.Bobothesumof$75.00andMrs.Bobothe  ` sumof$150.00.Thereafter,Mr.andMrs.Bobofiledamotionfornewtrialoralternativelyforan  8  additur.ThetrialcourtgrantedMr.andMrs.Bobosmotionforanewtrialastoallissuespresented.   ЀThisappealensuedfromthetrialcourtsorderforanewtrial.Ms.Willettraisesmultipleissueson   appeal.Theseissues,however,willnotbeaddressedbythiscourtduetolackofsubjectmatter p jurisdiction. H    LawandAnalysis  H       TennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure3(a)providesinpertinentpart [i]ncivilactions  everyfinaljudgmententeredbyatrialcourtfromwhichanappealliestotheSupremeCourtor  CourtofAppealsisappealableasofright.Inthepresentcase,Appellantappealstherulingofthe X  trialcourtsgrantofanewtrial.However,Tennesseecaselawisclearthatanordergrantinganew 0"  trialisnotafinaljudgmentandthereforeisnotappealableasamatterofright.Davisv.Flynn,No. $X" E199900421COAR3CV,2000Tenn.App.LEXIS439,at*3(Tenn.Ct.App.June21,2000); %0!$ Evansv.Wilson,776S.W.2d939,941(Tenn.1989);Panzerv.King,743S.W.2d612,616(Tenn. '#& 1988). )$(  h+&*   Appellee,citingjudicialeconomy,asksthiscourttoaddresstheissuesraisedbyAppellant  eventhoughnotbroughtbeforethiscourtusingcorrectappellateprocedure.Thiscourtmustdecline  todoso.InaccordancewithTennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure3(a),wheretherehasbeenno ` finaljudgment,wearewithoutjurisdictiontoaddresstheissuesraisedonappeal.Davis,2000Tenn. 8  App.LEXIS439,at*3;Foxv.Wisdom,No.89184II,1990Tenn.App.LEXIS109,at*3(Tenn.  ` Ct.App.Feb.22,1990);Maberryv.Bean,No.87328II,1988Tenn.App.LEXIS279,at*4(Tenn.  8  Ct.App.May10,1988).     Conclusion  p       Accordingly,becausethiscourtlackssubjectmatterjurisdiction,wedismissthisappealand  p remandtothetrialcourtforfurtherproceedings.CostsonappealtaxedtotheAppellant,Leanther H Willett,andhissurety,forwhichexecutionmayissueifnecessary.      `     h      p ______________________________ %0!$    `     h      p ALANE.HIGHERS,JUDGE#XXXX`1 ##XX #XX