WPCR 55RA.m*yld}! `jmqU]EnZPނ?kVBDNޗ8wiQȃ]MN=O q9)=yo(_Lj#9A֣ωEkmSt^oi^:ސW6,Lc nQ'c@0Cȩl4U iʜ=@CwOz$ĹɣnЁ{F5r+u@f^o82RF3lm>ޯ[ߣ8_v?W@. +7jUv/ h(&%Q qc `NqW06-RMR\P:HA;r>Ө{҇(\U$ mWSy}ĕDf_!z4MSHmRWn4ӕhcVʲls(i- ̼(gS6Fĩٍo] j lhBl2b#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz UN   k 1 0DN;==EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEbGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG 0OOOO B:: 0W D3 D-. 0K[[ AS 0 0Dc AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5e,,,,0|o) (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular-vn):i+00 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0   - -(|G2$ !.8^ dd8         0  XX d(|3Gy$ !.8^ dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Gy$ !.8^ dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8^ dd8     _^ 8XXdd8@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @$ATNASHVILLE  @44October12,2000Session $ XX^  #^ XX#  CYNTHIAJUNEBURGESS,et_vir_.,_RICKY_ԀALBERTBURGESS,v.TIE " CO.1,LLC.XX^    6 @  DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforCoffeeCounty  6 @J J No.28,893Hon.L.CraigJohnson,CircuitJudge  " @*AV) ` dE<` A߈   @? ? No.M199902232_COA_ԄR3CVFiledNovember15,_2000_Ԉ   AV) ` dE<h` A i   InthisslipandfallactiontheTrialCourtgranteddefendantsummaryjudgment.Wevacateand P remand. < #^ XX#XX^  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtVacated.  P HerschelPickensFranks#^ X#XX.^ ,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhich#^ Xv#XX.^ Ԁ XXX# ^  X# XX. ^ CharlesD.Susano, ( Jr.#XX X##^ XR#XX.^ .J.,and XXX# ^  X# XX. ^ D.Michael_Swiney_,J.,joined.#XXX X##^ XXQ#XX^   #^ X#XX.^ MarkA.Williams,Manchester,Tennessee,forPlaintiffsAppellants,CynthiaJuneBurgessand  _Ricky_ԀAlbertBurgess.  GeraldL.Ewell,_Tullahoma_,Tennessee,forDefendantAppellee,TieCo.1,LLC. ` @66' OPINION #^ XXQ #XX^ Ԉ #`" #^ XX #XX^ 0  0` (#(# ` (#` (#    ` Thisactionresultedfromaslipandfalloniceatacarwashownedbydefendant.The %$!% TrialJudgegranteddefendantsummaryjudgment,andplaintiffshaveappealed. &"&    ` TherecordestablishesthatonJanuary29,1997,atapproximately10:30a.m.,plaintiff (#( slippedandfelloniceondefendantspremiseswhileutilizingtheserviceofitsselfservicecarwash. )$) Oneoftheplaintiffstestifieditwasprettywarmthatmorning,andtheothertestifiedshedidnt p*%*  thinkitwasfreezingthatmorning.Defendantsaffidavitsestablishedtheyhadnoactual \+&+ knowledgeofanyicycondition,andthattheyinspectedthepremiseseveryday,sevendaysaweek. H,', Anemployeeofthedefendanttestifiedthatheinspectedthepremisesat5:00p.m.onJanuary28, 4-(- _andagainat5:00p.m.onJanuary29,andobservednoicyconditions,norhadanyonecomplained  aboutanicycondition.     ` Apartyseekingsummaryjudgmentmustestablishthereisnogenuineissueof t materialfact,andthatitisentitledtoajudgmentasamatteroflaw.Byrdv.Hall,847S.W.2d208 ` (Tenn.1993).Nopresumptionofcorrectnessattachestodecisionsgrantingsummaryjudgments, L  becausetheyinvolvequestionsoflaw.Hembreev.State,925S.W.2d513(Tenn.1996). 8     ` Asageneralrule,negligencecasesarenotamenabletodispositiononsummary  ` judgmentunlessfromallthefactstakentogetherandwithalltheinferencestobedrawnandfacts  L  andinferencesaresocertainanduncontravertedthatreasonablemindswouldagree.SeeKeenev.  8  CrackerBarrelOldCountryStore,835S.W.2d501(Tenn.Ct.App.1992). $     ` Indecidingamotionforsummaryjudgment,thecourtmustviewthepleadingsand   evidencebeforeitinthelightmostfavorabletotheopponentofthemotiononanissuebyissue   basis.Wyattv.WinnebagoIndustries,Inc.,566S.W.2d276(Tenn.Ct.App.1977).      ` WesaidinMartinv.WashmasterAutoCenter,U.S.A.,946S.W.2d314(Tenn.Ct. \ App.1996): H 0  0` (#(#Inorderforanowneroroperatorofpremisestobeheldliablefornegligencein  p allowingadangerousordefectiveconditiontoexistonitspremises,itmustbeshown  \ thatthecondition(1)wascausedorcreatedbytheowner,operator,orhisagent,or H (2)iftheconditionwascreatedbysomeoneotherthantheowner,operator,orhis 4 agent,theremustbeactualorconstructivenoticeonthepartoftheowneroroperator   thattheconditionexistedpriortotheaccident....Constructiveknowledgecanbe   shownbyprovingthedangerousordefectiveconditionexistedforsuchalengthof  timethatthedefendant,intheexerciseofreasonablecare,shouldhavebecomeaware  ofsuchcondition....` (#` (# P.318(internalcitationsomitted). X     ` Consideringtheevidenceinthelightoftheabovestandard,atrieroffactcould 0"  reasonablyinferthattheicyconditionswerecreatedduringthenightofJanuary28,1997,orearlier. #l! Thetrieroffactcouldfurtherreasonablyinferthattheicyconditionswerenotcreatedonthe $X" morningoftheaccident,becausetakingthestrongestlegitimateviewofplaintiffstestimony,itwas $D # notfreezingweatherthatmorning. %0!$    ` Theevidenceestablishedthatthedefendantonlyinspectedthepremisesat5:00p.m. '#& eachday.Theissuethusbecomeswhetherinmidwinterdefendanthadadutytoinspectthe (#' premisesearlyinthemorningforicyconditions,asithadadutytomaintainitspremisesina )$( reasonablysafeconditionforitsinvitees. |*%)  h+&*    ` Whetheranownerhasexercisedtherequireddegreeofcaretoitsinviteesisa  questionoffactforthejury.KendallOilCo.v.Payne,293S.W.2d40(Tenn.Ct.App.1955).  Takingthestrongestlegitimateviewoftheevidenceinfavoroftheplaintiffs,andaccordingall  reasonableinferencesintheirfavor,weconcludethatsummaryjudgmentwasinappropriateinthis t case,andwevacatetheTrialCourtsjudgmentandremandforfurtherproceedingsconsistentwith ` thisOpinion.ThecostoftheappealistaxedtoTieCo.1,LLC. L       `     h     _________________________ $     `     h     HerschelPickensFranks,J.