WPC$ # t U: % 0 w@ 4  0J% o 0Tu 0^ 0h' 0r 0| 0} 0 1u 0dU*lB)DCU> AM@ BQv~vR D3% 0@X AO  0D! D/! B " 0?=" 0D|$HP LaserJet 4 PlusHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLr,cAZ"Arial RegularX(~$  HTR[A' LegalLh (Avery 4167 Post CardA' Legalh (Avery 4167 Post CardTXmXXX73XXdXXd7 LUMUNDOYPYQRDSTUӀڃ"3|x`2 0Indent123  H2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Arial% Line 7 d 7Border 1dd<  9p`(&Times New Roman-!C << G d  !  #d#    H \RA'\#d#     YYY FILEDX October30,1997CecilCrowson,Jr.AppellateCourtClerk  y !#d#    H \RA'\#d#  $       10.AffirmanceWithoutOpinionMemorandumOpinion.  8  (b)MemorandumOpinion. TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.[AsamendedbyorderfiledApril22,1992.]PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'`Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   ion-F Geneva  ion-F Geneva $$$$'dxd("$    -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd((3#!$ ~!  HTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'TXXXX7XXdd7   `   0  (#$  0   ! .     H \RA'\#Xd##Xd#     ""R#%!A1-j|` . `@Rߛ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEEEASTERNSECTIONATKNOXVILLE   RONALDSTEPHENCOFER,  ) BRADLEYCIRCUIT      ) Plaintiff/Appellee   ) NO.03A019705CV00173      )v.      )      )LYNDASUSANDAVISCOFER, ) HON.STEPHENBEBB Defendant/Appellant  ) JUDGE      ) Defendant/Appellant  ) AFFIRMEDD.MitchellBryant,Cleveland,forAppellant.RonD.Powers,Chattanooga,forAppellee. " @ MEMORANDUMOPINION"̛̜        INMAN,SeniorJudge̛̜ Theappellantarguesthat(1)theCourterredinawardingbothpartiesadivorce,insistingthatsheshouldhavebeenawardedadivorce;(2)theCourtfailedtoawardhersufficientalimony;(3)theCourtshouldhaveawardedtheentireinterestinthemaritalresidencetoher,ratherthana50percentinterest;(4)theCourtfailedtoawardherareasonableattorneyfee. Therecordrevealsthatthemaritalestatewasequitablyandfairlydividedandthattheawardofalimonywaslikewiseequitableandinkeepingwiththecircumstancesoftheparties.Sincetheallowanceofattorneyfeesisordinarilyamatterofjudicialdiscretion,therecordrevealsnoabuseofthisjudicialprerogative.̜ ThiscaseispeculiarlyadaptivetotheapplicationofRule10,RulesoftheCourtofAppeals,X &   ""Ԁandthejudgmentisaccordinglyaffirmedatthecostsoftheappellant.      _________________________________      WilliamH.Inman,SeniorJudgeCONCUR:_______________________________HoustonM.Goddard,PresidingJudge_______________________________HerschelP.Franks,Judge%  ̜