WPC &\؅őY}.:!0Ʌ#U~»?wY8AS ӇGj/`W"'?6AU"Js|𚑉vqؓxI3ZlfM# w+YPIlHRo MI=D|p[8O"G523Ô.iF9q%Y08"t 4n5W'D? `]_lcڶs92k7l}3·a< 1tqIEG}p?5'7+u{#x*qE5 !>l{IdS^A{D9yЂO`ƇɂM?SBE\X 5ݥ>95q~ &n 0K%$ _mlǻϬOI{'ο,2eBb#\ %% ^ + 07 UN w 4 z+  w  m UN   y??NEb                                     0 B 0 D5 D- 0K ASj 0 0D' Ak\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK4,,,,0R}z/ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular=.:i+00 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(|G2$ !.8 dd8         0   d(|3w$ !.8 dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3w$ !.8 dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8 dd8     _   8MXXdd8  @  0 INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#  0 #Ԉ &   October15,2003Session L XMX  # XXM#COMBUSTIONFEDERALCREDITUNIONv.JOHNH.FARMERXMX   J @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforHamiltonCounty  J @@No.92CV1143W.NeilThomasIII,Judge  6 FILEDNOVEMBER26,_2003_    @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200300107_COA_ԄR3CV   AV) ` dE<|` A }     AjudgmentwasrenderedagainstMr.Farmerin1992.Itremainedunpaid,andthejudgment x  creditorspetitionforrevivalwasgranted.Mr.Farmerappeals,claimingthatheneversignedthe d notewhichformedthebasisofthe1992action.Weaffirm. P  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtisAffirmed  (x   # XMx#XMX. WilliamH._Inman_,Sr.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHerschelP.Franksand P D.Michael_Swiney_,JJ.,joined. < JohnH.Farmer,ProSe.  Allison_Ulin_ԀLynch,Chattanooga,Tennessee,attorneyforappellee,CombustionFederalCredit  Union.   OPINION # XXM#XMX  ` # XXM#XMX     OnSeptember28,1992,intheHamiltonCountyCircuitCourt,ajudgmentwasrenderedin 8!  favoroftheCombustionFederalCreditUnionagainstMr.Farmerwhichwasunpaidandunassigned. $"t! Withinthetimeallowed,thejudgmentcreditorpetitionedtheCircuitCourttorevivethejudgment, #`" andpropernoticewasservedonMr.Farmer.Heappearedincourtandundertooktodenythathe #L# executedthepromissorynotewhichwasthebasisofthe1992judgment.TheCircuitCourtruled $8 $ thatthejudgmentwasresjudicataandsustainedthepetitiontorevive. %$!%   Mr.Farmerappearsprose.HisappealdoesnotcomplywiththeRulesofAppellate '"' Procedureandhedoesnotspecifyanyissuesforourconsideration.Wecannotreviewfactswedo (#( notknowwhatthefactsarewithoutanappellaterecord,andbylawweareconsequentlyrequired )$) toassumethattherecord,haditpreservedtheevidence,wouldhavecontainedsufficientevidence p*%* tosupporttheactionofthetrialcourt.See _Sherrod_Ԁv._Wix_ ,849S.W.2d780(Tenn.App.Ct.1992). \+&+   H,',  _  Judgmentisaffirmed.Costsareassessedtotheappellant,JohnH.Farmer, X4 XXXMԀforwhich   executionmayissueifnecessary.  #X XX X ##VXX  #X XVԀ#VXX #X XV     `     h     ___________________________________ L     `     h     WILLIAMH.INMAN,SENIORJUDGE