WPCe -# U: % 0(w@49M\ 0Jd 0T 0^ 0h` 0r 0|: 0 0< 1u 0dAU*B)DC AQ;  0DR 0@ 0D AM D/g B B D3  v~ vHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh,  AZ"Arial RegularX($ FDGHIDJKDLDMNӀX_#3|x_2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23    ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Arial% Line 7 d7Border 1dd!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  ("$    ($$   1  !#C << G((' dxd dP Pd'''''dxd  !  #d#  ""     YYY FILEDXJuly1,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerk  PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   ellan Geneva  ellan Geneva ! .       \RA'\7ϯXXdd7    ћ @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE!ٜR%*A1-j|:`  `@Rߛ@ ATNASHVILLE X̛̜W.HUDSONCONNERY,JR.,ETAL., )      ) Plaintiffs/Appellants,  ) AppealNo.      ) 01A019709CH00529      )̜VS.      ) DavidsonChancery      ) No.953865I         )COLUMBIA/HCAHEALTHCARE  )CORPORATION,ETAL.,   )      ) Defendants/Appellees.  )@   CONCURRINGOPINION X  IconcurinJudgeToddsopinionaffirmingthegrantofsummaryjudgmenttothedefendants.Iwriteseparatelysimplytoemphasizethefollowingpoints:  First,thebonusplanallowedtheplaintiffstopurchasesharesofthecompanyatapricebelowthemarketprice.Whentheplaintiffsleftthecompanybeforethesharesfullyvested,theydidnotforfeittheirinvestment;theysimplylostthedifferencebetweenwhattheyhadinvestedandthemarketvalueoftheshares.Thedifferenceinthepurchasepriceandthemarketvalueiswhatthiscontroversyisabout.  Second,theplangavethecompensationcommitteethepowerto waiveanyconditionsforthelapseorterminationofrestrictionswithrespecttoalloranyportionoftheRestrictedStockorRestrictedUnits.Sec.8(b)ofthe1990Plan.WhenthecommitteeissuedtherestrictedstockinOctoberof1994withthemergerofthecompanywithColumbiaHCACorporationpendingitspecificallypointedoutthatvestingwouldnotaccelerateintheeventofa changeincontrol,aconditionthatwouldhaveresultedinvestingunderSec.18(h)oftheplan.Therefore,therestrictedstockdidnotvestwhenthetwocompaniesmerged.  Finally,Ithinktheundisputedfactsshowthattheplaintiffsvoluntarilyleftthecompany.Therefore,theycouldnottakeadvantageoftheprovisionthattherestrictedstockwouldfullyvestuponterminationwithoutcause.̛̜      _________________________________      BENH.CANTRELL,JUDGE