WPCC 7mGpBd1&ڡ %>~11fG_R4lVLuX=ʜAG/4jh r_ يhᶦMw5kJHQG(g65>(ˁ7=8Ȭ HK3%kax iNN]b .dR0=!QLEt9i^xlI5xpa>`DR8hJm0)xzb`@~7nnh 鯻*r"ŭOy#"gU,S;}NlߢV%M<"Zkb Ϥ,b(a:=%  &͏ڈAH6]pX1¢\XҤYNz. BMnyA;c_VhXIoR@1'jrB˩GϥEOcdb#\ %% + 0 UNI 0D ^ z aw347KZ\" mtNUNEb888888888888888888888888888888888888 0@@@@ B++ 0H D3 D- 0KLL AS 0 0DT A\\IB01S02\CLERKJAC,,,,0  Rs$      1  t  _ Rule10.MEMORANDUMOPINION [.]ThisCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatingin  thecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinion u wouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated 6  MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninanyunrelated G case.(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(#$  0  z/  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptlk.01s023|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5U(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular Rs$      2  t  _ThismotionwasthesubjectofMr.CoopersappealwhichwasdismissedbythisCourtaspremature. Rs$      3  t  _ThepetitionscontainedinthisrecordwerefiledMay26,1998,April12,1999andJune1,1999. WeakleyMaloan COA P.J. W.S.BradberryOwenberry- -(|G2s$ !.8dd8         0  t d(|3$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _  8XXdd8  @ nvINTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#nv #Ԉ #   AssignedOnBriefNovember21,2003 F XX #XX#CYNTHIAANNCOOPERv.JAMESRONNIECOOPERXX  ? @@ DirectAppealfromtheChanceryCourtforWeakleyCounty  9 @@No.14518W.MichaelMaloan,Chancellor  # @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200200595_COA_ԄR3CVFiledDecember16,_2003_   AV) ` dE<]` A ^     X#XXXPetitionersoughtanorderfromthetrialcourttorequirehisformerwifetoturnovertohimproperty V  awardedinthedivorceaction.Followingahearing,thetrialcourtruledthatthePetitionerhadnot ? sustainedhisburdenofproofandthatPetitionersformerwifedidnothaveinherpossessionany (x personalpropertygrantedtoPetitionerinthedivorcedecree.TherecordisbeforethisCourton a Petitionersappealandabsentatranscriptorstatementoftheevidence.Weaffirm. J #XXXX###XXt#XX Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtAffirmedand  Remanded     #X#XX.DavidR.Farmer,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichW.FrankCrawford,P.J.,W.S., r andHollyM.Kirby,J.,joined. [ JamesRonnieCooper,ProSe. -} E MEMORANDUMOPINION #XXt#XX #  1       O #XX #  XXX#XXX  CynthiaAnnCooperandJamesRonnieCooperweregrantedanabsolutedivorcepursuant !"! tosection364129(b)oftheTennesseeCodeAnnotatedbydecreeenteredJuly28,1997.The " " decreeprovidedfordistributionofmaritalpropertywithMr.Coopertoreceivetheitemsofpersonal ## propertyspecifiedinthedecree.OnApril12,1999,Mr.Coopercausedtobefiledinthetrialcourt $$ adocumententitled MotionForOrderOfEnforcementOfDivorceDecree.Themotionrecites v% % thatMr.Cooper,beinginthecustodyoftheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection,haddesignated _&!&  hisstepfather,Mr.DonOwenberry,ashisdesignatedreceivertoobtainpossessionofthepersonal H'"' propertyawardedhim.ThemotionfurtherrecitedthatMs.Cooperfailedtocomplywiththecourts  orderandaskedthecourttoenforceitsorder.     Mr.CooperbroughtanappealtothisCourtcomplainingthatthetrialcourthadfailedtoact k onhismotion.ByorderofJune8,2001,thisCourtenteredanorderdismissingthatappealsince, T insofarastherecordbeforeusdisclosed,thetrialcourthadnotruledonMr.Coopersmotion,the =  matterwasstillpendingbeforethetrialcourtandtheappealwaspremature. & v   OnMay26,1998,Mr.Cooperfileda MotionToRecoverPersonalPropertywhereinhe  H assertedthathehadnotreceivedcertainitemsofpersonalpropertywhichhadbeenawardedhim  1  inthedivorcedecree.OnApril12,1999,Mr.Cooperfileda MotionforOrderofEnforcementof    DivorceDecree,andsoughtanorderfromthetrialcourttocompelMs.Coopertoturnovertohim   theitemsofpersonalpropertywhichheallegedhehadnotreceived. #  2      ׀OnJune1,1999,Mr.Cooper   filedanothermotionfororderofenforcementofdivorcedecreeseekinganordertocompelMs.   CoopertoturnovertohimtheitemsawardedtohiminthedivorcedecreeandseekingtofindMs. n  Cooperincontempt. W    ThismatterwasheardbythetrialcourtonJanuary28,2002, uponthepetitionsfiledbythe )y Defendant(Mr.Cooper)onJune8,1998Q #  3      ׀andallrelatedpetitions,answerthereto,testimonyof b witnesses,andinfacttheentirerecordinthematter.Thecourtfoundthatthepetitionwasnot K sustainedbytheproofandthatthePlaintiff(Ms.Cooper)didnothaveinherpossessionany 4 personalpropertygrantedtoMr.Cooperbytheoriginaldecree.Thepetitionwasdismissed.Itis  fromthisorderthatMr.Cooperappeals.    ThisCourtsstandardofreviewoffindingsoffactbythetrialcourtisdenovouponthe  recordofthetrialcourt,accompaniedbyapresumptionofcorrectnessofthefinding,unlessthe q preponderanceoftheevidenceisotherwise.Itisourdutytoreviewthetrialcourtrecordinanon Z jurymattertodeterminewherethepreponderanceoftheevidencelies.Thatpresentsaproblemin C theinstantcasebecausetherecordbeforeuscontainsneitheratranscriptnorastatementofthe ,| evidence.Intheabsenceofatranscriptorstatementoftheevidence,thisCourtpresumesthat e sufficientevidenceexistedtosupportthetrialcourtsdecision.SeeLeekv.Powell,884S.W.2d118, N 121(Tenn.Ct.App.1994);Irvinv.CityofClarksville,767S.W.2d649,653(Tenn.Ct.App.1988).  7 Therefore,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedandthecaseisremandedtothetrialcourtfor !   suchfurtherproceedingsthatmaybenecessary.Costsoftheappealareassessedagainstthe " ! appellant,JamesRonnieCooper,forwhichexecutionmayissueifnecessary.#XXXX# # #"    `     h     ___________________________________ ]&!%    `     h     DAVIDR.FARMER,JUDGE