ÿWPCi 2# ÌUN× %% 0(+w@S4“§ 0l¶ 0D"f 0Jn 0T¸ 0^  0hj 0rÒ 0|D 0†À 0F 1uÖ 0dK 0@¯ D3ï B" U>? B)} DC¦ AMé U*6 5` AQ• Ææ 0D¬ 0Dð D/4 Bc˜€v~vÓ–˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLHÎ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ õöD÷DøDùDúûEüÓ€ B\J#°(# 3|x ((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò""""'ÿÿdxd d< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d$$$$7Border 1dd* %Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial +Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€#ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ+"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€'ÔÔ€'ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€'XÔÌÌò òNovember€14,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€'ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó*+ ,-Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó..'÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd ŽÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€#ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝRule€10€(Rules€of€the€Court€of€Appeals€of€Tennessee).€Ì(a)€ò òAffirmance€Without€Opinion.ó ó€€€The€Court,€with€the€concurrence€of€all€judges€participatingÏin€the€case,€may€affirm€the€action€of€the€trial€court€by€order€without€rendering€a€formal€opinionÏwhen€an€opinion€would€have€no€precedential€value€and€one€or€more€of€the€following€circumstancesÏexist€and€are€dispositive€of€the€appeal:Ìà à(1)€the€Court€concurs€in€the€facts€as€found€or€as€found€by€necessary€implication€by€the€trialÏcourt.à àÌà à(2)€there€is€material€evidence€to€support€the€verdict€of€the€jury.Ìà à(3)€no€reversible€error€of€law€appears.€Ìà àSuch€cases€may€be€affirmed€as€follows:€ð ðAffirmed€in€accordance€with€Court€of€Appeals€ÌRule€10(a).ððÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  ion-F Geneva ÒÒ  ion-F Geneva ÒÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€#ÔÝ  ÝÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€LžXXdðdÈ7ÑÑ  Ñ›Þ ÞÌà@ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àWESTERN€SECTION€AT€JACKSONÌÌLARRY€CORDER,€€€€€€à à€à àà à)à àó óFrom€the€Circuit€Courtò òÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à àà à€à àà à)à àó ófor€Shelby€County,€Tennesseeò òÌà àPlaintiff/Appellant,à àà àà à)à àó óThe€Honorable€Janice€M.€Holder,ÏJudge€€€€€ò òÌvs.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó óShelby€County€Circuit€No.€74955ò òÌAUTRY€GATEWOOD,€€€€€€€€€€€à àà à)à àó óAppeal€No.€02A01„9609„CV„00229ò ò€€€ÌœÙ€*ÙßR€&(%A1-j|3?` Å `€€@ÿRß›à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€Defendant/Appellee.€€€€€€€€€€€€à àà à)à àAFFIRMEDÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à àà àà àà à)à àó óLarry€Corder€€€€€€€€ò òÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó óMemphis,€Tennesseeò òÌà àà àà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à àà à)à àó óPro€Se€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó óTarik€B.€Sugarmon€ò ò€ó ó€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)à àó óMemphis,€Tennessee€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)à àó óAttorney€for€Defendant/Appellee€ò òÌòòÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌÌà@ àóóRULE€10€œORDER›Ìòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌÓÓóóó óÌà àThis€matter€appears€appropriate€for€consideration€pursuant€to€Rule€10(a)€of€the€Rules€of€theÏCourt€of€Appeals€of€Tennessee.× ƒ/ ××  ×Ìà àIn€this€case,€œPlaintiff/Appellant,›€Larry€Corder,€has€appealed€from€the€judgment€of€the€TrialÏCourt€dismissing€his€suit€against€the€defendant,€Autry€Gatewood.€€In€its€order€of€September€16,Ï1996,€the€trial€court€entered€judgment€in€favor€of€the€Defendant/Counter„Plaintiff€in€the€amount€ofÏœ$762.25›€in€actual€damages€and€œ$3,500.00›€in€punitive€damages.€Ìà àThis€case€arises€out€of€an€ongoing€feud€between€Larry€Corder€and€Autry€GatewoodÍinvolving€mutual€claims€of€harassment,€stalking,€and€vandalism.€€In€his€òòpro€seóó€General€SessionsÏwarrant,€Mr.€Corder€sought€damages€against€Ms.€Gatewood€for€harassment,€filing€a€false€policeÏreport,€and€malicious€prosecution.€€Gatewood€counter„claimed,€seeking€redress€against€Corder€forÏharassment,€vandalism,€and€criminal€trespass.€€The€General€Sessions€Court€ruled€against€CorderÏon€his€cause€and€held€for€Gatewood€on€hers,€awarding€œ$500.00›€in€compensatory€damages€andÏœ$11,500.00›€in€punitive€damages.€Ìà àOn€de€novo€appeal€to€Circuit€Court,€the€trial€court€held€a€bench€trial€and€then€grantedÏGatewoodððs€motion€for€judgment€at€the€conclusion€of€the€plaintiffððs€proof.€€Corder€appeals€thisÏruling€by€raising€numerous€issues,€most€of€which€relate€to€evidentiary€matters€and€allegations€ofÏimpropriety€of€the€trial€court€and€defense€counsel.€€Most€notably,€Corder€asserts€error€by€the€trialÏcourt€in€limiting€the€number€of€witnesses€he€could€call€at€trial.€€In€her€Order€on€Judgment,€the€trialÏcourt€stated€that€the€attorney€for€the€defendant€had€informed€her€that€numerous€witnesses€hadÏcontacted€him,€complaining€that€they€had€no€information€or€evidence€germane€to€the€action.€€As€aÏresult,€the€trial€court€asked€Corder€to€call€only€the€witnesses€he€felt€were€most€important€to€his€caseÏto€testify.€€Even€after€Corder€reduced€the€number€of€witnesses€he€would€call€from€his€original€50Ïsubpoenaed€witnesses,€much€of€the€testimony€he€elicited€involved€the€actions€of€a€third€person€notÏa€party€to€this€lawsuit.€€€Ìà àAlthough€Corder€presents€numerous€evidentiary€issues€on€appeal,€he€provides€no€statementÏof€the€evidence,€no€transcript€of€the€proceedings€and€no€record€of€what€the€trial€court€considered€inÏruling€on€the€merits€of€this€case.€€Accordingly,€we€have€nothing€to€review€other€than€the€technicalÏrecord€of€pleadings.€€ð ðWhere€evidence€was€heard€by€the€Trial€Court€but€œnot›€preserved€on€appeal,€itÏmust€be€presumed€that€the€judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€is€supported€by€sufficient€evidence.ðð€Ïò òòòDaniel€v.€Metropolitan€Govððt€of€Nashvilleóóó ó,€696€S.W.2d€8,€10„11€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1985);Ïò òòòsee€alsoó óóó€òòò òIrvin€v.€City€of€Clarksvilleóóó ó,€767€S.W.2d€649,€653€(Tenn.€App.€1988).Ìà àThe€trial€courtððs€grant€of€judgment€in€favor€of€Autry€Gatewood€is€affirmed.€€Costs€areÏtaxed€to€the€Appellant,€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.€€ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àò òóóHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€J.ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌòòÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌóóW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,€P.J.,€W.S.ÌÌòòÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌALAN€E.€HIGHERS,€œJ.ó ó›