WPC v6TE pb363(vfdTQ{ ?۲¯go_eV<" '\ ە쑋`ڼ[r/O=,ԫ YI|^KNi#i.2"/{pz*&mZP"pԾ1~33w{i&:1k4lrpv?iPeH5ǓUr&.mv|.#inqOv/i"|Rla,k7p; {x72((wÁý%!j2As\hKi=:x-׹e@%R˖8B UqsfR~s?y4 ٔI濛l[[޿꧄@/xb#\ % UN# 0q UBN 1G UN z  h U @ 1u 0 c9b( 0DN 72^ ,E8 1:w4 mb 0    1 B{ 1 0 D3 D- 0K## ASn 0 0D+ AoHP LaserJet 4 Plus,,,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(ehCEKQW]cioAutoList4I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.(9 Z 6Times New Roman Regular C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt  R^$      1  $   _X+X $ԀThisamountincludes$54,000.00inmortgagesonthepropertyawardedtoHusband.#$ XX+~#(hH  Z(Times New Roman 3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0   i)-hP-s 0UfCEKQW]cioAutoList3I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.],¢k2X3|xU- -(|G2^$ !.8,dd8         0  D0uhCEKQW]cioAutoList5I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I. d(hCEKQW]cioAutoList6I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.(|3A$ !.8,dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3A$ !.8,dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _  8+XXdd8  @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON# #Ԉ ,   MAY23,2002Session X X+X #XX+#LEOCLIFFORDDAVIS,JR.v.ANGELADAVISX+X   ` @@ DirectAppealfromtheChanceryCourtforMadisonCounty  h @@No.56866;TheHonorableJoeC.Morris,Chancellor  X @@*AV) ` dE<` A (  @@TTNo.W200101748_COA_ԄR3CVFiledOctober16,2002 '  AV) ` dE<` A      XXXX+Thisappealarisesfromadivorceproceedinginitiatedbythehusband.Thetrialcourt,holdingthat  husbandhadengagedininappropriatemaritalconduct,grantedthedivorcetothewife.Thetrial  courtvaluedandclassifiedmuchofthepartiespropertywithlimitedproof.Thecourtfurther  awardedwifeattorneysfeesandcosts.Husbandnowraisesseveralissuesforourreview.Forthe z foregoingreasons,weaffirminpart,reverseinpart,andremandthiscaseforfurtherproceedings. f Ѐ#X+XXX##XX+h#X+X R  Tenn.R.App.P.3;AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtAffirmedinPart, .~ ReversedinPartandRemanded  n   #X+h#X+X.AlanE.Highers,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichW.FrankCrawford,P.J.,W.S., N andHollyKirbyLillard,J.,joined. > JamesF.Butler,J.Brandon_McWherter_,Jackson,TN,forAppellant  Linda_Sesson_ԀTaylor,JacksonTN,forAppellee   V OPINION #XX+#X+X "! #XX+| #X+X  XXXX+@FactsandProceduralHistory n$#   #X+XXX #XXXX+LeoCliffordDavis(Husband)andAngela_Laure_ԀDavis(Wife)weremarriedonJune10,1995 F&!% inMadisonCounty,Tennessee.OnDecember29,1999,#X+XXX #XXXX+Ԁafterapproximatelyfourandahalfyears 2'"& ofmarriageandthebirthofonechild,HusbandfiledfordivorcefromWife.Asgroundsforthe (n#' divorce,Husbandallegedthat#X+XXX #XXXX+ԀWifehadengagedininappropriatemaritalconductandthat  )Z$( irreconcilabledifferencesexistedbetweentheparties#X+XXX #XXXX+.#X+XXX}#XXXX+Wifesoonfiledanansweraswellasa )F%) countercomplaint,inwhichshedeniedHusbandsallegationsandallegedthatHusbandhadengaged *2&* ininappropriatemaritalconduct. +'+   , (,8   OnJanuary31,2000,thecourtenteredanorder_pendente_Ԁlite.Thisordergrantedtemporary   custodyofthepartiesminorchildtoWifeandorderedHusbandtopay$735.00permonthinchild  supportandalimony.#X+XXX#XXXX+Followingtheentryofthisorderaswellasreciprocaltemporaryrestraining  orders,thecourtissuedagarnishmentonHusbandswagesduetohisfailuretopaythetemporary t supportordered. ` #X+XXXO#XXXX+  OnNovember7,2000,bothHusbandandWifemadefilingswiththecourt.Husbandfiled 8  a StipulationandStatementanda FinancialStatement.Thesetwofilingslistedalloftheparties $ t personalandmaritalassetsalongwithcorrespondingvaluesanddisclosedHusbandsallegedincome  ` andexpenses#X+XXX#XXXX+.#X+XXX^#XXXX+Similarly,Wifefileda SettlementProposalthatalsodisclosedthepartiesassets  L  andtheirrespectivevalues.#X+XXX#XXXX+  8    Onthesameday,thecourtheardargumentsconcerningHusbandsvisitationrights.The   disputestemmedfromchargesbroughtagainstHusbandfortheaggravatedsexualbatteryofthe   partiesminorchild.Asaresultoftheseproceedings,Husbandsvisitationrightsweretemporarily   terminateduntilthechargeswereresolved.Atsuchtime,Husbandcouldpetitionthecourtfor   reinstatementofhisvisitationprivileges. p #X+XXXu#XXXX+Ԁ \   AtrialwasheldonMarch5,2001atwhichevidencewasofferedastothepartiesrelative H fault,thevalueofmaritalpropertyanddebts,andthepartiesincome.Asaresultofthetrial,the 4 courtwasabletoissueitsfindingsonMay9,2000.#X+XXX#XXXX+Relevanttothiscase,thecourtfoundthatWife  p wasentitledtothedivorceonthegroundsofHusbandsinappropriatemaritalconduct.Further,the  \ courtfoundthatHusbandsandWifesincomesin1999were$30,488.16and$6,325.00 H respectively.Fortheyear2000,thecourtfoundthatHusbandsandWifesincomeswouldbe 4 $33,000.00and$17,000respectively.   #X+XXX}#XXXX+  Withregardtothepartiesrealproperty,thecourtfoundtwotractsoflandandatrailer  locatedonthelargerofthetractstobemaritalproperty.Thecourtvaluedthepropertyat$72,000.00  andconcludedthat$19,500.00ofequityexistedinthepropertydueto$54,000.00ofoutstanding  mortgages.ThecourtdeterminedthatthepropertyshouldbeawardedtoHusbandalongwiththe l mortgageobligations,butthatHusbandshouldpay$9,750.00,halfoftheequity,toWife. X    Withregardtopersonalty,thecourtfoundthatHusbandshouldbegranted$40,800.00of 0"  separateproperty.Wifewasgrantedanautomobilethathadnoequityduetoanoutstandingloan. #l! Withregardtothedivisionofmaritalpropertyotherthantherealty,thecourtfoundthatWifeshould $X" beawardedpropertyvaluedat$1375.00plusvariousfurnitureaswellasonehalfofhusbands $D # 401(k)andpensionplansandonehalfofaCDheldbyHusband.Intotal,byourcalculations,the %0!$ courtconcludedthatWifewasentitledtoapproximately$16,165.00ofmaritalproperty.Husband, &"% again,byourcalculations,wasgrantedapproximately$18,490.00inmaritalproperty.Withregard '#& tomaritaldebt,thecourtfoundthatHusbandandWifeshouldpay$58,995.00  #  1      ׀and#X+XXX#XXXX+$16,250.00 (#' respectively. )$( Ї  OnJune16,afinaldecreeofdivorcewasenteredinaccordancewiththecourtsfindings.  ThedecreegrantedWifethedivorcebasedonHusbandsinappropriateconduct#X+XXX"#XXXX+,dividedtheproperty  anddebtsasshownabove,andorderedHusbandtopay$105.00perweektoWifeforchildsupport.  Husbandwasalsoorderedtopay$7,573.00toWifeinattorneysfeesandotherrelatedcosts.A t portionofthefees,totaling$3,848.00,wasspecificallyfortheattorneysfeesandcostsWife ` incurredforoverturningatemporaryorderofcustodysoughtbyHusband,securingthesupport L  Husbandrefusedtopay,terminatingHusbandsvisitation,andanorderofprotectionandpetition 8  forcontemptfiledbyWife.Husbandfiledatimelynoticeofappealandnowraisesseveralissues $ t forourreview.#X+XXXq##XXXX+Ԁ#X+XXX&#XXXX+Ԁ#X+XXX&#XXXX+Ԁ#X+XXX='#XXXX+  #X+XXX'#XXXX+  `    @  @`  @ Issues   L   (   I.0 ` Whetherthetrialcourtactedcontrarytothepreponderanceoftheevidencein  8  determiningthevalueofvariouspropertyownedbytheparties,thelevelofthe $  partiesindebtedness,andthepartiesincomes#X+XXX'#XXXX+; ` (#` (#  (Uf83 ! ! 0  II.0` (#(#Whetherthetrialcourterredbyconsideringevidencenotintroducedattrial; ` (#` (#  (eh88! !" 3"     3+2eh  III  .3  0 `   WhetherthetrialcourterredinorderingHusbandtopay$54,000forthepartiestwo p mortgages; 3+,݌\` (#` (# Ќ   U(uh88! !" 3"  0   3-2uh  IV  .3  0` (#(#  WhetherthetrialcourterredbyawardingWifeaportionofHusbandscertificates 4 ofdeposit;and 3--݌ p` (#` (# Ќ   W(h88U! !" 3"     3/2h  V  .3  0 `   WhetherthetrialcourterredbyawardingWifeattorneysfeesandcosts.  @  @  @ #X+XXX)# X+XXX+  3//݌H` (#` (# Ќ    #X+XX X+0# X+XXX+Ԁ `     h      p    4 #X+XX X+|1# X+XXX+   LawandAnalysis  $ X2#X+XX X+62#XXXX+  Husbandsfirstfourissuesconcernthecourtsclassification,valuation,anddivisionof  propertybetweentheparties.Whenfacedwiththeobligationtodividetheassetsofdivorcing  parties,courtsmustfirstclassifyeachassetaseithermaritalorseparateproperty._Dunlap_Ԁv._Dunlap_,  996S.W.2d803,814815(Tenn.Ct.App.1998)Ӏ(citing_Cutsinger_Ԁv._Cutsinger_,917S.W.2d238,  241(Tenn.Ct.App.1995)).Whenclassifyingtheproperty,courtsmustlooktosection364121(b) P oftheTennesseeCode.Section364121(b)providesinpertinentpart:  h 8  (1)(A) Maritalpropertymeansanyrealandpersonalproperty,bothtangibleand !  intangible,acquiredbyeitherorbothspousesduringthecourseofthemarriage... p"! .8#"   8  (B) Maritalpropertyincludesincomefrom,andanyincreaseinvalueduring $ $ themarriageof,propertydeterminedtobeseparatepropertyinaccordancewith % % subdivision(b)(2)ifeachpartysubstantiallycontributedtoitspreservationand X&!& appreciation,andthevalueofvestedand_unvested_Ԁpension,vestedand_unvested_  'p"' stockoptionrights,retirementorotherfringebenefitrightsrelatingtoemployment '8#( thataccruedduringtheperiodofthemarriage.($)   8  ....@*%+     +X&, 8  (D)Asusedinthissubsection, substantialcontributionmayinclude,butnot   belimitedto,thedirectorindirectcontributionofaspouseasahomemaker;wage x earner;parentorfamilyfinancialmanager,togetherwithsuchotherfactorsasthe @ courthavingjurisdictionthereofmaydetermine....X   8  ....   8  (2) Separatepropertymeans:( x   8  (A)Allrealandpersonalpropertyownedbyaspousebeforemarriage;     0    Ѐ(B)Propertyacquiredinexchangeforpropertyacquiredbeforethemarriage;H  (#(# 0    (#(# 0  (C)Incomefromandappreciationofpropertyownedbyaspousebeforemarriageexcept (  Ѐwhencharacterizedasmaritalpropertyundersubdivision(b)(1); (#(#   (D)Propertyacquiredbyaspouseatanytimebygift,bequest,deviseordescent.... 0  Tenn.CodeAnn.364121(b)(2001).    Aftercharacterizingtheparties'assetsaseithermaritalorseparateproperty,thetrialcourt P mustgivepartiestheirseparatepropertyandmakeanequitabledivisionofmaritalassets.See < _Batson_Ԁv._Batson_,769S.W.2d849,856(Tenn.Ct.App.1988).Anequitabledivisionofproperty (x doesnotnecessarilymeananequaldivision.See_Bookout_Ԁv._Bookout_,954S.W.2d730,732(Tenn. d Ct.App.1997);_Batson_,769S.W.2dat859."Thedivisionoftheestateisnotrenderedinequitable P simplybecauseitisnotmathematicallyequal,orbecauseeachpartydidnotreceiveashareofevery < itemofmaritalproperty."Kingv.King,986S.W.2d216,219(Tenn.Ct.App.1998)(citingCohen ( v.Cohen,937S.W.2d823,832(Tenn.1996);Ellisv.Ellis,748S.W.2d424,427(Tenn.1988);  Brownv.Brown,913S.W.2d163,168(Tenn.Ct.App.1994)).    Thetrialcourt'sclassification,valuation,anddivisionofmaritalpropertyenjoysa  presumptionofcorrectnessonappealandwillbereversedormodifiedonlyiftheevidence t preponderatesagainstthetrialcourt'sdecision.SeeLancasterv.Lancaster,671S.W.2d501,502 `  (Tenn.Ct.App.1984);_Hardin_Ԁv._Hardin_,689S.W.2d152,154(Tenn.Ct.App.1983)."Thetrial L ! courtisgrantedbroaddiscretioninadjustingandadjudicatingtheparties'interestinalljointlyowned 8!" property.Itsdecisionregardingdivisionofthemaritalpropertyisentitledtogreatweighton $"t# appeal."_Watters_Ԁv._Watters_,959S.W.2d585,590(Tenn.Ct.App.1997)(citing_Batson_,769S.W.2d #`$ at859).Thefairnessofthepropertydivisionisjudgeduponitsfinalresults.SeeWadev.Wade, #L% 897S.W.2d702,717(Tenn.Ct.App.1994)(citingThompsonv.Thompson,797S.W.2d599,604 $8 & (Tenn.Ct.App.1990)).   %$!'    ` #X+XXX2# X+XXX+   #X+XX X+I#XXXX+Inthecasesubjudice,Husbandfirstcontendsthatthetrialcourterredinassigningvalues '#) tovariousassetsoftheparties.Husbandsupportsthisassertionbyarguingthattheevidencefails (#* tosupportsuchfindings.TheitemsofpersonaltywhichHusbandallegeswereimproperlyvalued )$+ includethefollowing:firearms,alawnmower,twotrucks,twofourwheelers,twoboats,sevendeer t*%, heads,andHusbands401(k)andpensionplan.WeagreewithHusband.Fromourreviewofthe `+&- record,withregardtotheseitems,thecourteitherassignedvalueswithoutsufficientevidenceor  assignedvaluesoutsideoftherangeoftheactualevidenceoffered.    Husbandfurtherassertsthatthecourtimproperlyvaluedtheequityinthepartiesreal t property.Specifically,Husbandarguesthatthecourterredinvaluingthemortgagesontheproperty ` at$54,000.00.Weagree.Attrial,Husbandtestifiedthatthetotalindebtednessonthepropertywas L  $62,000.00.Inresponse,Wifetestifiedthatthecombinedindebtednesswasapproximately 8  $56,000.00.Accordingly,thevalueassignedbythetrialcourtisoutsidetheappropriaterangeand, $ t thus,isnotsupportedbyapreponderanceoftheevidence.#X+XXXI#XXXX+  `   Finally,Husbandmaintainsthatthetrialcourterredindeterminingtherelativeearningsof  8  thepartiesfortheyears1999and2000.WeagreewithHusbandwithrespecttotheparties1999 $  earnings.TheW2sofWifeadmittedintoevidenceplainlyshowthatsheearnedmorethanthecourt   foundandthatthecourtsfindingwascontrarytothepreponderanceoftheevidence.     Withregardtotheclassificationofthepartiesproperty,Husbandassertsthatthetrialcourt   erroneouslyclassifiedtwoitems.First,Husbandarguesthatatruck,whichthecourtfoundtobehis p separateproperty,washisfathers.Husbandpointstohistestimonyattrialinwhichheindicated \ thatthetruckwasownedbyhisfatherandthathemerelydroveitsometimes.Fromourreviewof H therecord,noevidencewasofferedbyWifeinoppositiontothistestimony.AlthoughWifeasserted 4 thatHusbandstestimonywasnotentirelyreliable,therewasnoadditionalproofbeforethecourt  p uponwhichtoact.Thus,weholdthatthecourtsfindingwascontrarytothepreponderanceofthe  \ evidenceindeterminingthatthetruckwasHusbandsseparateproperty. H   Second,Husbandassertsthatthecourtimproperlyclassifiedacertificateofdepositallegedly   giventohimbyhisgrandmotherasmaritalproperty.Again,noevidencewasofferedtorefute   HusbandsclaimthattheCDwasagift.HadanyevidencebeenprovidedbyWifetothecontrary,  theresultmightbedifferent.However,withHusbandstestimonybeingtheonlyevidenceoffered,  weholdthattheevidencepreponderatedagainstthefindingthattheCDwasmaritalproperty.#X+XXXO# X+XXX+ We  takenoteofthefactthatHusbandsmaritalfaultcannotbetakenintoaccountinclassifyingand  dividingthepartiesproperty.See#X+X X+6X#XXX+Tenn.CodeAnn.364121(a)(1)(2001).#X+XXX@Y# X+XXX+ p    Finally,Husbandslastargumentwithrespecttotheclassificationanddivisionoftheassets `"  andliabilitiesconcernstheallocationoftwodebtstoHusband.First,Husbandarguesthatthecourt P#! hadnoevidenceuponwhichtosupporttherequirementthathepay$1,000.00toJacksonMadison @$" GeneralHospital.Fromourreviewoftherecord,weagreewithHusbandthatnoevidencewas 0% # offeredwithrespecttothisdebt.  &p!$   Next,Husbandarguesthatthecourterredinorderinghimtopay$733.00ofdebtowedto (P#& theWomensClinic.Wedisagreewithhusbandsassertionastothisdebt.AlthoughHusband (@$' testifiedthatWifeaccruedthisdebtpriortothemarriage,Wifetestifiedtothecontraryandoffered )0%( furtherproofintheformofanexhibit.Accordingly,weholdthatthisportionoftherulingwasnot * &) contrarytothepreponderanceoftheevidence. +'* Ї  Insum,becausethisCourthasreversedseveralfindingsmadebythetrialcourtwithrespect  tothepropertyvaluationsandclassifications,weremandthiscasetothetrialcourtsothatfurther  proofcanbeofferedandaredeterminationcanbemade.  #X+XX X+Y#XXXX+  Inhisfifthissue,Husbandassertsthatthetrialcourterredinawardingcostsandattorneys p feestoWife.TennesseeRuleofCivilProcedure54.04authorizestrialcourtstoawardcertain \  discretionarycostsincurredinaproceedingtotheprevailingparty.Tenn.R.Civ.P.54.04.When H  awardingdiscretionarycosts,asthenamedenotes,judgesaregivenbroaddiscretionandtheir 4  decisionswillnotbeoverturnedonappealunlessthechallengingpartycanclearlydemonstratean  p abuseofdiscretion.See_Placencia_Ԁv._Placencia_,3S.W.3d497,503(Tenn.Ct.App.1999)(citing  \  Perduev.GreenBranchMiningCo.,837S.W.2d56,60(Tenn.1992)).Werecentlystatedin  H  _Milliken_Ԁv._Crye_Ԅ_Leike_ԀRealtors,No.M199900071COAR3CV,2001Tenn.App.LEXIS472 4  (Tenn.Ct.App.July5,2001)thefollowingwithregardtodiscretionarycosts:   8   ` Generally,trialcourtsawardsuch[discretionary]coststowhicheverparty <  ultimatelyprevailsinthelawsuit,providedtheprevailingpartyhasfiledatimely, T  properlysupportedmotion.Thesuccessfulpartyisnot,however,automatically  entitledtoanawardofcosts.Instead,trialcourtsarefreetoapportioncostsbetween  thelitigantsastheequitiesofeachcasedemand.Accordingly,ifanyequitablebasis \ appearsintherecordwhichwillsupportthetrialcourt'sapportionmentofcosts,this $t courtmustaffirm.Moreover,onappeal,theappellantbearstheburdenofshowing < thatthetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretioninitsassessmentofcosts.Sandersv.Gray,  989S.W.2dat345(citationsomitted)._Milliken_,2001Tenn.App.LEXIS472,at*35. | #X+XXX_# X+XXX+ԀD     Turningtothecasesubjudice,Husbandhasfailedtoshowthatthetrialcourtabusedits  \ discretioninanywaybyawardingcertaincoststoWife.Accordingly,weaffirmthetrialcourts $ decisioninthisrespect.    #X+XX X+h#XXXX+Withregardtotheattorneysfees,thiscourthasrepeatedlyheldthatanawardforattorneys ,| feesinadivorcecaseistreatedas_spousal_Ԁsupportandshouldbecharacterizedasalimonyin_solido_. D Wildv.Wild,66S.W.2d892,894(Tenn.Ct.App.2001)(citing_Sannella_Ԁv._Sannella_,993S.W.2d   73,76(Tenn.Ct.App.1999);Smithv.Smith,984S.W.2d606(Tenn.Ct.App.1997);_Anderton_  v._Anderton_,988S.W.2d675,682(Tenn.Ct.App.1988);_Gilliam_Ԁv._Gilliam_,776S.W.2d81(Tenn. L  Ct.App.1988)).Withattorneysfeesbeingaformofalimony,courtsmustbalancethefactorsgiven  d! insection365101(d)(1)oftheTennesseeCodeindeterminingaproperaward.BecausethisCourt  ," hasreversedaportionofthelowercourtsruling,weareunableproperlytoanalyzethisissue.Upon !# remand,thelowercourtshouldweighagainthefactorsgivenbystatuteinaccordancewithitsnew l"$ findings. 4#%   Asafinalmatter,HusbandhasrequestedthatthisCourtorderWifetopayhisattorneysfees $ ' incurredforthisappeal.Oursupremecourthasdefinedthefactorsthatshouldbeappliedwhen % ( consideringarequestforattorneysfeesincurredonappeal.Thesefactorsincludetheabilityofthe T&!) requestingpartytopaytheaccruedfees,therequestingpartyssuccessintheappeal,whetherthe 'l"* requestingpartysoughttheappealingoodfaith,andanyotherequitablefactorsthatneedbe '4#+ considered.Folkv.Folk,357S.W.2d828,829(Tenn.1962).ThisCourthasalsoheld,however, (#, that wherebothpartiesarepartiallysuccessfulonappeal,attorneysfeesassociatedwiththat t)$- appealshouldnotbegranted._Baggett_Ԁv._Baggett_,512S.W.2d292,294(Tenn.Ct.App.1973) <*%. (citing27B_C.J.S._ԀDivorce203,p.882,n.71.10);seealsoHuntv.Hunt,No. +T&/ M1997-00221-COA-R3-CV,2000Tenn.App.LEXIS488,at*1516(Tenn.Ct.App.July27, +'0 2000);Youngv.Young,971S.W.2d386,393(Tenn.Ct.App.1997).Accordingly,becauseboth  partieshavebeenpartiallysuccessfulandbecauseoftheequitablecircumstancesofthiscase,we x declinetoawardHusbandtheattorneysfeesincurredforthisappeal. @ #X+XXXGj# X+XXX+   Conclusion    v  Basedontheforegoingconclusions,weherebyaffirminpartandreverseinpartthedecision `  ofthetrialcourt.Inaddition,weremandthiscaseforfurtherproceedingsconsistentwiththis ( x opinion.Costsonappealareassessedagainsttheappellant,#X+XX X+sv#XXXX+LeoCliffordDavis,alongwithhis  @ surety#X+XXX0x# X+XXX+forwhichexecutionmayissueifnecessary.#X+XX X+x##XX+ #X+X       `     h     ___________________________________ (     `     h     ALANE.HIGHERS,JUDGE