WPCO DU: %nX 04p4n AQenXw@&fnnvn#  n     c k s { n 0 8 0D@ 0@ 0D D/ B7 BT D3q 0J 0T 0^B 0h 0r 0|z 0 0| 1u  0dU>B)#DCL AMU*v~v|<6X9`("Courier NewTTX3|x<6X9`("Courier NewTTXXx6X@DQX@<6X9`("Courier NewTT6X@DQ@( T$  _#$ `X4f PXP"#$&C<< C$ `X4f PXP&D`s New Roman RegularXXlD PG;XP eDDDIӀ$ `X4f PXP$ `X4f PXP$ `X4f PXPLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5$ `X4f PXP(3$ !  ("$    ($$   1  ((' dxd dP Pd'''''dxd2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23  ,-./0123 ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d====7Border 1dd#>C << G<  9p`(Arial !  ""  @@   YYY FILED@XJuly1,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerk  PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   ellan Geneva  ellan Geneva ! .        )` ` X2X)\RA'\<R?A>A1-j|`  `@Rߛ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEEATNASHVILLE   ` X$ X BENNIEDAYandKARENDAY, )      ) Petitioners/Appellants,  )      )#` XxX# AppealNo.&` X$2 X&v.  )  01A019708Ch00442  )CITYOFDECHERD,OTISB. )  FranklinChancerySMITH,JR.,MAYOR, )  No.14,381HANKWEDDINGTON,BILLVAN )HOOSIER,FRANKGREEN,and )DARYLDONEY,COMMISSIONERS )  )  Respondents/Appellees. )   <CONCURRINGOPINION  < Iconcurintheresultofthemajorityopinionbutwouldbasethatresultondifferentreasoning. In McCallenv.CityofMemphis ,786S.W.2d633(1990)theSupremeCourtabandonedthedifferentstandardsofreviewbetweencommonlawcertiorarianddeclaratoryjudgmentandheld:8 Whethertheactionbythelocalgovernmentalbodyislegislativeoradministrativeinnature,theCourtshouldrefrainfromsubstitutingitsjudgmentforthebroaddiscretionaryauthorityofthelocalgovernmentalbody.Aninvalidationoftheactionshouldtakeplaceonlywhenthedecisionisclearlyillegal,arbitrary,orcapricious.Ӝ Therefore,thisaction(inaction)bytheCityofDecherdCommissionersshouldbereviewedaccordingtothatstandard.Myreviewofthisrecorddoesnotleadtotheconclusionthatthedecisionis"clearlyillegal,arbitraryorcapricious."Therefore,theChanceryCourtdecreeshouldbeaffirmed. Further,Iammovedtocommentontheparagraphregardinglegislators.Manyforcesaffectthelegislativeprocessatanylevel;somegood,somenot.Thejudiciaryshouldneverbeusurplegislativefunction;butweshouldbeavailableasacheckonlegislativeactionswhichareunconstitutionaloroutsidelegislativeprovince.  _________________________________  WALTERW.BUSSART,  SPECIALJUDGE