ÿWPC  ‹Æ›:L»@†Ü7‰@Uê ô’¾5ÒCÍŸPºLÉ«òºµÝì¼3óD ]އ» C¾*À€ÖUÕºçéFxOâε0iYº"‹†”S¬ÚCR˜›$.`ŠeØPóÖ•diÀ“ëAFœó XXXã[Ôà  àà ` àA€review€of€findings€of€fact€by€a€trial€court€is€òòde€novoóó€upon€the€record€of€the€trialÐ P( #& Ðcourt,€accompanied€by€a€presumption€of€correctness,€unless€the€preponderance€of€the€evidence€isÐ <)Œ$' Ðotherwise.€Tenn.€Rule€App.€P.€13(d);òò€Brooks€v.€Brooks,€óó992€S.W.2d€403,€404€(Tenn.€1999).€€ReviewÐ (*x%( Ðof€questions€of€law€is€òòde€novo,óó€without€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€òòSee€Nelson€v.€Wal„Mart€Stores,Ð +d&) ÐInc.,€óó8€S.W.3d€625,€628€(Tenn.€1999).Ô#†Xã[X X X>ó«\#ÔÐ ,P'* ЇÔ‡ X>ó XXXã[Ôà  àà ` àWe€first€address€the€issues€raised€by€Mother€regarding€the€Juvenile€CourtððsÐ ° Ðdetermination€that€there€was€clear€and€convincing€evidence€of€grounds€to€terminate€her€parentalÐ œì Ðrights.€€Ô#†Xã[X X X>ó%_#ÔIt€is€well€established€that€"parents€have€a€fundamental€right€to€the€care,€custody,€and€controlÐ ˆØ Ðof€their€children."€€òòIn€re€Drinnonóó,€776€S.W.2d€96,€97€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1988)€(citing€òòStanley€v.Ð ˆØ ÐIllinoisóó,€405€U.S.€645,€92€S.€Ct.€1208,€31€L.Ed.2d€551€(1972)).€€"However,€this€right€is€not€absoluteÐ xÈ Ðand€parental€rights€may€be€terminated€if€there€is€clear€and€convincing€evidence€justifying€suchÐ h ¸ Ðtermination€under€the€applicable€statute."€€òòId.óó€(citing€òòSantosky€v.€Krameróó,€455€U.S.€745,€102€S.€Ct.Ð X ¨ Ð1388,€71€L.Ed.2d€599€(1982)).€€Ð H ˜ ÐÌà  àà ` àTermination€of€parental€or€guardianship€rights€must€be€based€upon€a€finding€by€theÐ ( x  Ðcourt€that:€(1)€the€grounds€for€termination€of€parental€or€guardianship€rights€have€been€establishedÐ h  Ðby€clear€and€convincing€evidence;€and€(2)€termination€of€the€parentððs€or€guardianððs€rights€is€in€theÐ X  Ðbest€interests€of€the€child.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„1„113(c).€€Before€a€parentððs€rights€can€beÐ øH  Ðterminated,€it€must€be€shown€that€the€parent€is€unfit€or€substantial€harm€to€the€child€will€result€ifÐ è8  Ðparental€rights€are€not€terminated.€€òòIn€re€Swanson,€óó2€S.W.3d€180,€188€(Tenn.€1999);€òòIn€re€M.W.A.,Ð Ø(  ÐJr.,€óó980€S.W.2d€620,€622€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1998).€€Similarly,€before€the€court€may€inquire€as€toÐ È Ðwhether€termination€of€parental€rights€is€in€the€best€interests€of€the€child,€the€court€must€firstÐ ¸ Ðdetermine€that€the€grounds€for€termination€have€been€established€by€clear€and€convincing€evidence.€Ð ¨ø ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„1„113(c).€€This€Court€discussed€the€ð ðclear€and€convincing€evidenceðð€standardÐ ˜è Ðin€òòOððDaniel€v.€Messier,€óó905€S.W.2d€182€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1995),€as€follows:Ð ˆØ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€ð ðclear€and€convincing€evidenceðð€standard€defies€preciseÐ h¸ Ðdefinition.€€òòMajors€v.€Smith,óó€776€S.W.2d€538,€540€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.Ð X¨ Ð1989).€€While€it€is€more€exacting€than€the€preponderance€of€theÐ H˜ Ðevidence€standard,€òòSantosky€v.€Kramer,€óó455€U.S.€at€766,€102€S.€Ct.Ð 8ˆ Ðat€1401;€òòRentenbach€Engððg€Co.€v.€General€Realty€Ltd.,€óó707€S.W.2dÐ (x Ð524,€527€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1985),€it€does€not€require€such€certainty€asÐ h Ðthe€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€standard.€€òòBrandon€v.€Wright,€óó838Ð X ÐS.W.2d€532,€536€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1992);€òòState€v.€Groves,€óó735€S.W.2dÐ øH Ð843,€846€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).Ðè8` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àClear€and€convincing€evidence€eliminates€any€serious€orÐ È! Ðsubstantial€doubt€concerning€the€correctness€of€the€conclusions€to€beÐ ¸"  Ðdrawn€from€the€evidence.€€òòSee€Hodges€v.€S.€C.€Toof€&€Co.,€óó833Ð ¨#ø! ÐS.W.2d€896,€901€n.€3€(Tenn.€1992).€€It€should€produce€in€the€fact„Ð ˜$è" Ðfinderððs€mind€a€firm€belief€or€conviction€with€regard€to€the€truth€ofÐ ˆ%Ø # Ðthe€allegations€sought€to€be€established.òò€€In€re€Estate€of€Armstrongóó,Ð x&È!$ Ð859€S.W.2d€323,€328€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1993);€òòBrandon€v.€Wright,€óó838Ð h'¸"% ÐS.W.2d€at€536;€òòWiltcher€v.€Bradley,€óó708€S.W.2d€407,€411€(Tenn.€Ct.Ð X(¨#& ÐApp.€1985).ÐH)˜$'` x` x ÐÌòòOððDaniel€v.€Messier,€óó905€S.W.2d€at€188.Ð (+x&) ÐÐ ,h'* Ðà  àà ` àInitiation€of€termination€of€parental€or€guardianship€rights€may€be€based€upon€aÐ ° Ðnumber€of€statutory€grounds.€€The€three€grounds€pertinent€to€this€appeal€are:Ð  ð ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(1)à0¸ ` x` xàAbandonment€by€the€parent€or€guardian,€as€defined€in€[priorÐ €Ð Ðlaw],€has€occurred;׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×ÐpÀ¸ x¸ x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(2)à0¸ ` x` xàThere€has€been€substantial€noncompliance€by€the€parent€orÐ P   Ðguardian€with€the€statement€of€responsibilities€in€aÐ @  Ðpermanency€plan€or€a€plan€of€care€pursuant€to€the€provisionsÐ 0 € Ðof€title€37,€chapter€2,€part€4;Ð p ¸ x¸ x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(3)(A)à0¸ ` x` xàThe€child€has€been€removed€from€the€home€of€the€parent€orÐ P  Ðguardian€by€order€of€a€court€for€a€period€of€six€(6)€monthsÐ ð@  Ðand:Ðà0 ¸ x¸ x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(i)à0¸ x¸ xàThe€conditions€which€led€to€the€childððs€removal€orÐ À Ðother€conditions€which€in€all€reasonable€probabilityÐ ° Ðwould€cause€the€child€to€be€subjected€to€further€abuseÐ  ð Ðor€neglect€and€which,€therefore,€prevent€the€childððsÐ à Ðsafe€return€to€the€care€of€the€parent(s)€or€guardian(s),Ð €Ð Ðstill€persist;ÐpÀxx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(ii)à0¸ x¸ xàThere€is€little€likelihood€that€these€conditions€will€beÐ P  Ðremedied€at€an€early€date€so€that€the€child€can€beÐ @ Ðsafely€returned€to€the€parent(s)€or€guardian(s)€in€theÐ 0€ Ðnear€future;€andÐ pxx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(iii)à0¸ x¸ xàThe€continuation€of€the€parent€or€guardian€and€childÐ P Ðrelationship€greatly€diminishes€the€childððs€chances€ofÐ ð@ Ðearly€integration€into€a€safe,€stable€and€permanentÐ à0 Ðhome.ÐÐ xx ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„1„113(g).€€Ð °"  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€Juvenile€Court€found€there€was€clear€and€convincing€evidence€that€Mother€hadÐ $à" Ðmet€all€three€of€these€statutory€grounds€for€termination€of€her€parental€rights.€€In€making€thisÐ €%Ð # Ðdetermination,€the€Juvenile€Court€had€access€to€reports€from€the€DCS€representative€and€the€reportsÐ p&À!$ Ðof€the€Guardian€ad€litem.€€The€Juvenile€Court€heard€the€testimony€of€the€DCS€representative€andÐ `'°"% ÐMother.€€ð ðUnlike€this€Court,€the€[Juvenile€Court]€observed€the€manner€and€demeanor€of€theÐ P( #& Ðwitnesses€and€was€in€the€best€position€to€evaluate€their€credibility.ðð€€òòUnion€Planters€Natððl€Bank€v.Ð ° ÐIsland€Mgmt.€Auth.,€Inc.óó,€43€S.W.3d€498,€502€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€2000).€€The€trial€courtððsÐ  ð Ðdeterminations€regarding€credibility€are€accorded€considerable€deference€by€this€Court.€€òòId.óó;òò€DavisÐ à Ðv.€Liberty€Mutual€Ins.€Co.óó,€38€S.W.3d€560,€563€(Tenn.€2001).€€ð ððð[A]ppellate€courts€will€not€re„Ð €Ð Ðevaluate€a€trial€judgeððs€assessment€of€witness€credibility€absent€clear€and€convincing€evidence€to€theÐ pÀ Ðcontrary.ðððð€òòWells€v.€Tennessee€Bd.€of€Regentsóó,€9€S.W.3d€779,€783€(Tenn.€1999).€€Ô‡ X>ó XXXã[ÔÐ ` ° ÐÌà  àà ` àBased€on€our€review€of€the€record,€including€the€facts€detailed€above,€we€do€notÐ < Œ Ðbelieve€the€Juvenile€Court€committed€any€reversible€error€in€its€conclusion€that€clear€and€convincingÐ ( x Ðevidence€existed€to€terminate€Motherððs€parental€rights€pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€36„1„Ð  d  Ð113(g)(2)€and€(g)(3)(A)(i)€through€(iii)Ô#†Xã[X X X>ó}#ÔÔ‡ X>ó XXXã[Ô.€€Motherððs€last€minute€efforts€to€attempt€to€comply€with€theÐ P  Ðrequirement€of€the€Plan€and€remain€drug€free€simply€cannot€form€the€basis€for€a€conclusion€that€theseÐ ì<  Ðstatutory€requirement€have€not€been€met.€€This€is€especially€true€since€Mother€admittedly€still€is€notÐ Ø(  Ðable€to€properly€care€for€her€children€or€provide€them€a€suitable€place€to€live.€€Because€we€affirm€theÐ Ä  Ðtermination€of€Motherððs€parental€rights€pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€36„1„113(g)(2)€andÐ °  Ð(g)(3)(A)(i)€through€(iii)Ô#†Xã[X X X>ó#ÔÔ‡ X>ó XXXã[Ô,€we€pretermit€Motherððs€argument€that€she€had€not€abandoned€the€childrenÐ œì  Ðor€willfully€failed€to€support€them€due€to€her€incarceration.Ð ˆØ ÐÔ#†Xã[X X X>ó¨#ÔÌÔ‡ X>ó XXXã[Ôà  àà ` àHaving€affirmed€that€two€of€the€three€statutory€grounds€for€termination€were€provenÐ d´ Ðby€clear€and€convincing€evidence,€we€next€address€Motherððs€claim€that€it€was€not€proven€by€clearÐ P  Ðand€convincing€evidence€that€the€termination€of€Motherððs€parental€rights€was€in€the€best€interests€ofÐ <Œ Ðthe€children.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„1„113(i)€describes€the€standard€for€determining€whetherÐ (x Ðtermination€is€in€the€best€interests€of€the€child€in€such€cases:Ð d ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(i)à0¸ ` x` xàIn€determining€whether€termination€of€parental€orÐ ì< Ðguardianship€rights€is€in€the€best€interest€of€the€child€pursuantÐ Ø( Ðto€this€part,€the€court€shall€consider,€but€is€not€limited€to,€theÐ Ä Ðfollowing:а¸ x¸ x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(1)à0¸ x¸ xàWhether€the€parent€or€guardian€has€made€such€anÐ ˆØ Ðadjustment€of€circumstance,€conduct,€or€conditions€asÐ t Ä Ðto€make€it€safe€and€in€the€childððs€best€interest€to€be€inÐ `!° Ðthe€home€of€the€parent€or€guardian;ÐL"œ xx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(2)à0¸ x¸ xàWhether€the€parent€or€guardian€has€failed€to€effect€aÐ $$t" Ðlasting€adjustment€after€reasonable€efforts€by€availableÐ %` # Ðsocial€services€agencies€for€such€duration€of€time€thatÐ ü%L!$ Ðlasting€adjustment€does€not€reasonably€appearÐ è&8"% Ðpossible;ÐÔ'$#&xx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(3)à0¸ x¸ xàWhether€the€parent€or€guardian€has€maintained€regularÐ ¬)ü$( Ðvisitation€or€other€contact€with€the€child;И*è%)xx ÐÐ „+Ô&* Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(4)à0¸ x¸ xàWhether€a€meaningful€relationship€has€otherwise€beenÐ ° Ðestablished€between€the€parent€or€guardian€and€theÐ œì Ðchild;ЈØxx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(5)à0¸ x¸ xàThe€effect€a€change€of€caretakers€and€physicalÐ `° Ðenvironment€is€likely€to€have€on€the€childððs€emotional,Ð L œ Ðpsychological€and€medical€condition;Ð8 ˆxx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(6)à0¸ x¸ xàWhether€the€parent€or€guardian,€or€other€personÐ  ` Ðresiding€with€the€parent€or€guardian,€has€shownÐ ü L  Ðbrutality,€physical,€sexual,€emotional€or€psychologicalÐ è 8  Ðabuse,€or€neglect€toward€the€child,€or€another€child€orÐ Ô$  Ðadult€in€the€family€or€household;ÐÀ xx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(7)à0¸ x¸ xàWhether€the€physical€environment€of€the€parentððs€orÐ ˜è  Ðguardianððs€home€is€healthy€and€safe,€whether€there€isÐ „Ô  Ðcriminal€activity€in€the€home,€or€whether€there€is€suchÐ pÀ Ðuse€of€alcohol€or€controlled€substances€as€may€renderÐ \¬ Ðthe€parent€or€guardian€consistently€unable€to€care€forÐ H˜ Ðthe€child€in€a€safe€and€stable€manner;Ð4„xx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(8)à0¸ x¸ xàWhether€the€parentððs€or€guardianððs€mental€and/orÐ  \ Ðemotional€status€would€be€detrimental€to€the€child€orÐ øH Ðprevent€the€parent€or€guardian€from€effectivelyÐ ä4 Ðproviding€safe€and€stable€care€and€supervision€for€theÐ Ð  Ðchild;€orм xx ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà0¸ ` x` xà(9)à0¸ x¸ xàWhether€the€parent€or€guardian€has€paid€child€supportÐ ”ä Ðconsistent€with€the€child€support€guidelinesÐ €Ð Ðpromulgated€by€the€department€pursuant€to€ðð€36„5„Ð l¼ Ð101.ÐX ¨xx ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„1„113(i).€€When€taking€into€account€these€relevant€considerations,€as€well€asÐ 0"€  ÐMotherððs€testimony€and€admissions€coupled€with€the€testimony€of€Reed,€we€do€not€believe€theÐ #l! ÐJuvenile€Court€committed€reversible€error€when€it€concluded€that€clear€and€convincing€evidenceÐ $X" Ðexisted€that€it€was€in€the€best€interest€of€the€children€to€terminate€Motherððs€parental€rights.Ð ô$D # ÐÔ#†Xã[X X X>ó‚#ÔÌà  àà ` àNext,€we€consider€Motherððs€argument€that€she€was€not€made€aware€of€the€initialÐ Ð& "% Ðhearings€where€the€children€were€found€to€be€dependent€and€neglected€and€was€otherwise€notÐ À'#& Ðafforded€her€due€process€rights€since€she€was€in€jail€and€no€one€made€sure€she€was€present€orÐ °($' Ðrepresented€at€these€initial€hearings.€€Ô‡ X>ó XXXã[ÔTenn.€R.€Sup.€Ct.€Rule€13€ðð€1(d)(7)€states€that€parents€have€aÐ  )ð$( Ðright€to€counsel€at€all€stages€of€proceedings€involving€dependency€and€neglect€issues€or€terminationÐ  *ð%) Ðof€parental€rights.€€There€is€nothing€in€the€record€to€indicate€that€Mother€raised€this€issue€at€the€trialÐ Œ+Ü&* Ðcourt€level€after€an€attorney€was€appointed€to€represent€her.€€Issues€not€raised€at€trial€may€not€beÐ ° Ðraised€for€the€first€time€on€appeal.€€òòSimpson€v.€Frontier€Community€Credit€Unionóó,€810€S.W.2d€147,Ð œì Ð153€(Tenn.€1991);€òòDepððt€Human€Serv.óó€òòv.€DeFrieceóó,€937€S.W.2d€954,€960€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1996).€Ð ˆØ ÐIn€addition,€upon€consideration€of€the€record€as€a€whole,€and€since€Mother€was€present€andÐ tÄ Ðrepresented€by€counsel€at€the€termination€hearing,€we€hold€that€if€this€constituted€error,€it€did€notÐ `° Ðmore€probably€than€not€affect€the€judgment,€nor€did€it€result€in€prejudice€to€the€judicial€process.€Ð L œ ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€36€(b);€òòsee€also€Depððt€Childrenððs€Serv.óó€òòv.€Wilkersonóó,€No.€03A01„9810„JV„00341,Ð 8 ˆ Ð1999€WL€775759,€at€*€2€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Sept.€15,€1999)€(citations€omitted)€(holding€that€no€dueÐ $ t Ðprocess€violation€occurs€where€the€appellant€parent€participates€in€the€termination€hearing€and€thereÐ  ` Ðasserted€his€or€her€plenary€rights;€any€lack€of€due€process€initially€was€thereafter€fully€supplied).€€IfÐ ü L  Ðwe€were€to€accept€Motherððs€position€on€this€issue,€it€would€lead€to€the€outlandish€conclusion€thatÐ è 8  Ðonce€a€hearing€was€held€without€Motherððs€or€her€attorneyððs€attendance,€for€whatever€reason,€theÐ Ô$  ÐJuvenile€Court€would€be€powerless€later€to€hold€any€hearing€terminating€Motherððs€parental€rights.€Ð À  ÐSuch€is€not€the€law.€€Accordingly,€due€to€the€facts€and€circumstances€presented€by€the€record€onÐ ¬ü  Ðappeal,€we€find€no€merit€in€Motherððs€position€on€this€issue.Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àà ` àMotherððs€next€argument€challenges€the€effectiveness€of€DCS€in€providing€MotherÐ pÀ Ðreferrals€so€that€she€could€comply€with€the€terms€of€the€Plan.€€At€trial,€the€DCS€representative,€Ô#†Xã[X X X>ó}–#ÔReed,Ð \¬ Ðtestified€that€when€she€would€try€to€help€Mother€comply€with€the€Plan,€Mother€would€becomeÐ \¬ Ðdefensive€and€tell€Reed€it€was€none€of€her€business€to€make€referrals.€€Mother€even€would€hang€upÐ Lœ Ðthe€telephone€on€Reed.€€Reed€further€stated€that€Mother€was€given€every€necessary€referral€in€orderÐ <Œ Ðto€complete€the€terms€of€the€Plan.Ô‡ X>ó XXXã[Ô€€Mother€denied€receiving€these€necessary€referrals.€€This€involvesÐ ,| Ða€fact€question,€which€the€Juvenile€Court€obviously€resolved€in€favor€of€DCS€when€it€found€thatÐ ,| ÐÔ#†Xã[X X X>ó‡¡#ÔDCS€had€made€reasonable€efforts€to€prevent€removal€of€the€children€or€the€situation€preventedÐ h Ðreasonable€efforts€from€being€made,€and€that€DCS€had€made€reasonable€efforts€to€assist€Mother€inÐ X Ðestablishing€a€suitable€home€for€a€period€of€four€months€following€removal€of€the€children.€€AsÐ øH Ðstated€previously,€ð ð[A]ppellate€courts€will€not€re„evaluate€a€trial€judgeððs€assessment€of€witnessÐ è8 Ðcredibility€absent€clear€and€convincing€evidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€òòWells€v.€Tennessee€Bd.€of€Regentsóó,Ð Ø( Ð9€S.W.3d€779,€783€(Tenn.€1999).€€Mother€presented€no€such€evidence.€Ð È ЀÌà  àà ` àFinally,€Mother€argues€that€because€the€Plan€was€not€made€a€part€of€the€technicalÐ ¨ ø Ðrecord€on€appeal,€(1)€it€cannot€be€established€that€DCS€fully€explained€its€obligations€to€Mother;€orÐ ˜!è Ð(2)€that€the€consequences€of€not€complying€with€the€Plan€were€properly€explained€to€Mother.€€TheÐ ˆ"Ø  Ðappellant€has€the€duty€"to€prepare€a€record€which€conveys€a€fair,€accurate€and€complete€account€ofÐ x#È! Ðwhat€transpired€in€the€trial€court€with€respect€to€the€issues€which€form€the€basis€of€the€appeal."€Ð h$¸" ÐòòNickas€v.€Capadalisóó,€954€S.W.2d€735,€742€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1997).€€In€the€absence€of€an€adequateÐ X%¨ # Ðrecord€on€appeal,€this€Court€will€presume€that€the€trial€courtððs€rulings€were€supported€by€sufficientÐ H&˜!$ Ðevidence.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Oodyóó,€823€S.W.2d€554,€559€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Since€Mother€failedÐ 8'ˆ"% Ðin€her€duty€to€make€the€Plan€part€of€the€record,€we€presume€that€DCS€met€its€obligations€and€MotherÐ ((x#& Ðwas€aware€of€the€consequences€of€not€complying€with€same.€€Mother€cannot€provide€an€incompleteÐ )h$' Ðrecord€on€appeal€and€then€challenge€the€termination€of€her€parental€rights€because€the€record€isÐ *X%( Ðâ âincomplete.€€We€note,€however,€that€in€any€event,€there€is€clear€and€convincing€evidence€in€theÐ ø*H&) Ðrecord€that€DCS€did€fully€explain€the€Planððs€obligations€to€Mother€and€the€consequences€of€notÐ ° Ðcomplying€with€the€Plan.€€Ð  ð Ðâ âÌò òòòà@  %ìàConclusionóóó óˆÐ €Ð ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€judgment€of€the€Juvenile€Court€is€affirmed,€and€this€cause€is€remanded€to€theÐ ` ° ÐJuvenile€Court€for€such€further€proceedings€as€may€be€required,€if€any,€consistent€with€this€Opinion,Ð P   Ðand€for€collection€of€the€costs€below.€€The€costs€on€appeal€are€assessed€against€the€Appellant,Ð @  ÐD.G.S.L.€and€her€surety.€€Ð 0 € ÐÌÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð Ð  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àD.€MICHAEL€SWINEY,€JUDGE