WPC0 .|QcP ˉb-ydg6Cyj̪WjHI)OʇWPi^, Y$L.BIVO]!Vh9}2l_:b*ĞD3J?`}𸵷u,;qyGeҾ% H Ad'Rv[q]y&LpkQCĚئ)kP_M9,c_rH<ө4|gJ`6\BJ(J$t=dx\>4UuP1)x#=G݅zU@HW dC*D2放E 9>V䏂..kQ[-#B`a]g\D)&Ug`^`8p@IHyU\v$P|ovNԉbZ.ǾaknX GBN:tȦgL']uhW6SO^/bUN\ % 0^ 8wD4H\ zk m #   _ %  U NN"E########################b%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 0---- B 05 D3 D-  0K99 AS 0 0DA A(hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    E8+ K+t)tWpdocs3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 8000 Series PS0 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(I Z6Times New Roman Regular    - -(|G2$ !.86]d d 8         0  E d(|3 $ !.86]d d 8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3 $ !.86]d d 8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8"d d8     _  x8DXXdd 8  sQ@ 9xINTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#x9#Ԉ &   ӀAssignedonBriefAugust2,2001 L XtXx #xXXt#DAWNA.DUGANv.ELLIOTTR.MYERS(DECEASED),etal.XtXx  J @@ AppealfromtheJuvenileCourtforWashingtonCounty  J @@No.JUV275JohnL.Kiener,Judge  6 FILEDSEPTEMBER24,2001    @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200100281COAR3JV   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Inthispaternitycaseanunwedmotherofaminorchildappealsajudgmentgrantingvisitation x  privilegestotheparentsofthefather,whoisdeceased.Wevacatethejudgmentandremandfora d determinationofwhetherfailingtograntvisitationwouldresultin harmtothechild,as P contemplatedbyT.C.A.366306(b). <  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheJuvenileCourtVacated; d CauseRemanded  P   #xXt#XtX.xHoustonM.Goddard,P.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHerschelP.Franksand ( CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,joined.  JohnS.Taylor,JohnsonCity,Tennessee,fortheAppellant,DawnA.Dugan  NoBriefwasfiledfortheAppellees,ElliottR.Myers(deceased)andGeorgeandSandraMyers t  OPINION #xXXt#XtXx L  #xXXt #  XtXx  ThisappealconcernsacontroversyancillarytoapaternitysuitbyDawnA.Duganagainst $"t! ElliottR.Myers,whowasdeterminedtobethefatherofElliottR.Dugan,d.o.b.2/11/2000.Mr. #`" Myersisnowdeceased.Hisparents,thegrandparentsofthechild,soughtandweregranted #L# visitationwiththechildbytheJuvenileCourtofWashingtonCountypursuanttoT.C.A.366306. $8 $   Ms.DuganappealscontendingthattheJuvenileCourtdidnotmakeafindingoffactrelative &"& toharmtothechild,whichisnecessarytoauthorizevisitation. '"'   Therecordinthiscaseissparse.Theonlypertinentmattercontainedthereinisanorderof )$) theTrialCourtenteredonSeptember26,2000,grantingvisitation. p*%*   \+&+ sQ      Thisorderexplicitlyfindsthatitisinthebestinterestofthechildthatvisitationbeaccorded  tothegrandparents.Itis,however,silentastoanotherrequirementundertheStatuterelativetoharm  tothechildifvisitationisnotgranted.     InthisregardtheCodeSectionabovereferencedprovidesunderSubsection(b),the p following: \  (b)(1)Inconsideringapetitionforgrandparentvisitation,thecourtshall 4 t firstdeterminethepresenceofadangerofsubstantialharmtothechild.Such  ` findingofsubstantialharmmaybebaseduponcessationoftherelationship  L  betweenanunmarriedminorchildandthechildsgrandparentifthecourt  8  determines,uponproperproof,that:  $   (A)Thechildhadsuchasignificantexistingrelationshipwiththe   grandparentthatlossoftherelationshipislikelytooccasionsevereemotional   harmtothechild;    (B)Thegrandparentfunctionedasaprimarycaregiversuchthatcessation  oftherelationshipcouldinterruptprovisionofthedailyneedsofthechildand l thusoccasionphysicaloremotionalharm;or X  (C)Thechildhadasignificantexistingrelationshipwiththegrandparent D andlossoftherelationshippresentsthedangerofotherdirectandsubstantial 0p harmtothechild. \  (2)Forpurposesofthissection,agrandparentshallbedeemedtohavea 4 significantexistingrelationshipwithagrandchildif:    (A)Thechildresidedwiththegrandparentforatleastsix(6)consecutive  months;   (B)Thegrandparentwasafulltimecaretakerofthechildforaperiodof  notlessthansix(6)consecutivemonths;or |  (C)Thegrandparenthadfrequentvisitationwiththechildwhoisthe h subjectofthesuitforaperiodofnotlessthanone(1)year. T    @!    BecausetheTrialJudgedidnotmakeafindingoffactunderSubsection(b)asrequiredby ,"l! theStatute,wedeemitappropriatetoremandforhimafterhearingadditionalproof,ifhedeems #X" itnecessarytomakeadeterminationregarding harmtothechild. $D #   FortheforegoingreasonthejudgmentoftheTrialCourtisvacatedandthecauseremanded %"% forfurtherproceedingsnotinconsistentwiththisopinion.Costsofappealareadjudgedagainst &#& GeorgeandSandraMyers. '#'    `     h   _________________________________________ d+'+    `     h   HOUSTONM.GODDARD,PRESIDINGJUDGE