WPC &r!Y3zt ٦9I2ť& ,⺒Gguo3@RʘUyp _IM=rxhlr=[Qn{zS]PLLlKT}@煩C h-x&f-9CK/7?z'받G$\zVY>E>f!`<*H]$Gi ܀p#RG[ =/,{pRkUMxqE\gǢU\ݶ#|zd;DL:͗؋sI-Kq_5c2+1|dB0tS?t0u^}T߁Bdbk~jbhc :~#nQZK =}#_MH:38'Bxk̕ b.؆s}/ 4JNOC\s>Ş_q7;H PȖ6:b#\U@ %] 0c ^ w UN zI  4   m   ] #NEb 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K   AST 0m 0D AUHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6,,,,0(9 Z(Times New Roman (`$.8dd8    %-s ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt9,<3|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 - -(|G2&$ !.8}dd8         0  v d(|3W$ !.8}dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3W$ !.8}dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8}dd8     _  }8!XXdd8  @ Ȝ}INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#}Ȝ(#Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsFebruary22,2002 L X!X} #}XX!#THOMASDYERv.TENNESSEEDEPARTMENTOFCORRECTIONX!X}  J @@ AppealfromtheChanceryCourtforDavidsonCounty  J @@No.01885I  6 @@*AV) ` dE< ` A    @@TTNo.M200101446_COA_ԄR3CV_ԄFiledSeptember5,_2002__Ԁ   AV) ` dE<d` A e  Ѐ  t    #}XX!#X!X}X!XX!WilliamC.Koch,Jr.,concurring. `    IdonotdifferwiththecourtsdispositionofissuesraisedbyMr.Dyerinthiscase. 8 However,Ihavepreparedthisseparateopiniontoexplainwhywehavenotdecidedthiscasebased $ onproceduralgroundsinamannerconsistentwithHawkinsv.TennesseeDeptofCorr.,No.  M200100473COAR3CV,2002Tenn.App.LEXIS536(Tenn.Ct.App.July25,2002). x   Lessthanonemonthago,thiscourtupheldatrialcourtsdismissalofapetitionfor_common P lawwrit_Ԁofcertiorarifiledbyaprisonerbecauseitwasnotfiledinthecountyinwhichtheinstitution < housingtheprisonerislocated.WeconstruedTenn.CodeAnn.4121803(1997)torequirethat ( alawsuitforacauseofactionaccruingwhileaprisonerisincarceratedmustbebroughtinthecounty  wherethefacilityhousingtheprisonerislocated.Hawkinsv.TennesseeDeptofCorr.,2002Tenn.  App.LEXIS536,at*39. p   Thislawsuitwasnotfiledinthecountywheretheinstitutionhousingtheprisonerislocated. H Accordingly,itwasfiledinthewrongcourtbasedonourinterpretationofTenn.CodeAnn.4121 4 803.IfourdecisioninHawkins_v._ԀTennesseeDepartmentofCorrectionappliedhere,theproper   remedywouldbetovacatethejudgmentandremandthecasewithdirectionsthatitbetransferred    tothepropercourtfordispositioninaccordancewithTenn.CodeAnn.161116(Supp.2001).  t! However,asourdecisioninthiscaseshoulddemonstrate,wehavedeterminedthatHawkinsapplies !`" prospectivelytoallcasesfiledafterHawkinswasdecidedandtoallcasesfiledbeforeHawkinswas "L# decidedinwhichtheapplicationofTenn.CodeAnn.4121803hasbeenraised.Itdoesnotapply #8 $ tocasesfiledbeforeHawkinswasdecidedinwhichtheapplicationofTenn.CodeAnn.4121803 $$!% wasnotraised. %"&   ThiscasewasfiledbeforeourdecisioninHawkinswasfiled,andneitherpartyraisedthe l'#( applicationofTenn.CodeAnn.4121803eitherinthetrialcourtoronappeal.Accordingly,we X($) _need_Ԁnot,intheabsenceofprejudicetothejudicialprocess,grantrelieftopartieswhofailedtotake D)%* timely,reasonablyavailableactiontonullifyanyharmfuleffectcausedbyfailingtoheedTenn.Code 0*&+ Ann.4121803. +', #X!XXX!I##}XX!'#X!X}     `     h     ___________________________________ -\*/    `     h     WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE#}XX!n#