ÿWPC ¼?ØÉZ8öõ°Ñ€Û0ß‹äM¡ôôPh+““h|÷û^#?Wï2Éô;um z6rEŸ"Hœ•0è–Ýl‰øIJÙXÏz)Â韽Éï6}º¼ B]yÄ0Å’Þ‘–¹=/:?3œú2$EòjËåbÄÚ9à0ˆ€º9»î7¯ÅêÄ{ŸÞ5ïDæ"'‡‹ŸCû>K ƒ±u9unlÃC&§Iô¨”E¡«­Šè“ ™%2›Ü‡ÐTŒ¬$Á`Ý‚á4vå§>ñå’FBΊhxgÃc½¹ðÿù Í’-Þ`<$‡Ÿ¸Î'÷Kœ"à×ÝÏËß/Ì£‡®Êo‡} ‡>…¶ÐmT™+èm G*sÑ£R¬VàžOx,ôlÍ;?…ò½¼ L _Øùc™†ÉÓG´›Ô…PW›·gi! =k3í·®aé—åªç»=D^ o"z2Þ ƒ°šYÆó¡zÇ÷JqNÄ󠢺OGÁCâÿ8!¥·µóÏŠ–¼ÉjpªK°e]}K «c ÈZ‹¸©?S'Š0M‚éØšzù䵬Y¹& »Ö\m܌Ո8ÏN@þ’ (!&xBððù‡EÎ:3ÝvÝI¢éhGÚa¸ãè¿b#Á\ % U @# 0ˆc U Në ^ 9 wE zI Òà 4• © ¸ mº ÆÑ Æ— Æ] Æ#éNñññEóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóbõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõ 0ëýýýý Bèè 0¤ D3© D-Ü 0K   ASTƧ 0¤m 0D A«U˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»(ÆúI Z‹(Times New Roman (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular3 …+s  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt8n_+GRA~1ü¿ 3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 - ù-(|G2…÷$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôòµò»»Ô d(|3G~$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3G~$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z=»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑÀ°ÑÑÀ°ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Z=»»»ÔÑ8€1XXdì»»d8ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Z=»»¼Z=Ôà@ü ü ìàÔ‡î€MZ=ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ À Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼Z=»îî€MG#ԈРæ& ÐÓ  ÓOctober€8,€2001€SessionÐ  L ÐÔ‡X1X»¼Z=ÔÌò òÔ#†¼Z=»XX1/#ÔÌMICHAEL€DANIEL€FRYòòóó€v.€Ô_ÔYURIKOÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔSHINODAÔ_Ô€FRYòòóóÔ‡X1X»¼Z=Ôó óÐ  ^ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ  ^ Ðà@@øøìàNo.€99D„1613€€€€€€Muriel€Robinson,€JudgeÐ  J ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Í` AßÐ Î  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2000„02969„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€December€5,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ É  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE< ` AßÐ ¡á  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓPursuant€to€the€wifeððs€motion€under€Rule€60,€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.,€the€trial€court€amended€the€divisionÐ œÜ Ðof€the€husbandððs€Navy€pension€contained€in€€an€agreed€order€of€divorce.€€We€reverse€the€trial€courtððsÐ ˆÈ Ðjudgment.Ð t´ ÐÓ,ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€CourtÐ LŒ ÐReversed€and€RemandedÐ 8x Ðó óÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼Z=»àX1ê#ÔÔ‡X1X.¼Z=ÔBen€H.€Cantrell,€P.J.,€M.S.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòWilliam€B.€Cain,€J.óó€andÐ P ÐòòJohn€A.€Ô_ÔTurnbullÔ_Ô,€Sp.€J.óó,€joined.Ð ü< ÐÌD.€Scott€Parsley,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Michael€Daniel€Fry.Ð Ô ÐÌÔ_ÔYurikoÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔShinodaÔ_Ô€Fry,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€Pro€Se.Ð ¬ì ÐÓïÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼Z=»XX1#ÔÔ‡X1X»¼Z=ÔÐ „Ä ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼Z=»XX1D #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X1X»¼Z=ÔÓÓà@¬¬)ìàò òI.ó óˆÐ \!œ! ÐÓÓà  àThe€parties€married€in€1989.€€The€husband,€pursuing€a€career€in€the€Navy,€filed€a€complaintÐ 4#t# Ðfor€divorce€in€May€of€1999.€€In€June€of€1999,€the€wife€filed€an€answer€and€counterclaim€and€theÐ  $` $ Ðhusband€filed€his€answer€to€the€counterclaim.€€By€the€time€the€case€was€ready€for€trial,€the€partiesÐ  %L!% Ðhad€agreed€on€all€issues€except€the€disposition€of€the€marital€residence€and€certain€items€of€personalÐ ø%8"& Ðproperty.Ð ä&$#' ÐÌà  àOne€of€the€agreed€paragraphs€incorporated€in€the€final€decree€pertained€to€the€division€of€theÐ ¼(ü$) Ðhusbandððs€Navy€pension.€€Paragraph€9€of€the€decree€provided:Ð ¨)è%* ÐÌà8  àà ` à9.€€It€is€further€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€AND€DECREED€that€Wife€isÐ €+À', Ðawarded€one„half€(ðð)€of€Mr.€Fryððs€pension€through€the€U.S.€Navy€that€has€vestedÐ l,¬(- Ðâ âduring€the€term€of€the€marriage.€€The€parties€will€cooperate€in€the€preparation€of€aÐ X-˜).ý ÐQualified€Domestic€Relations€Order.€€Counsel€for€Mother€shall€prepare€the€QualifiedÐ À ÐDomestic€Relations€Order.ЬìÐ Ð  Ðâ âÌà  àThe€Defense€Finance€and€Accounting€Service€rebuffed€their€first€effort€to€establish€the€wifeððsÐ „Ä Ðright€to€a€portion€of€the€Navy€pension.€€Because€the€government€requires€a€provision€in€the€decreeÐ p° Ðthat€sets€a€specific€amount€or€provides€a€formula€by€which€a€specific€amount€can€be€calculated,€itÐ \œ Ðbecame€necessary€to€amend€the€final€divorce€decree.€€Accordingly,€the€wife€filed€a€motion€pursuantÐ H ˆ Ðto€Rule€60.02(5),€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.,€ð ðto€allow€a€new€order€to€be€entered€to€carry€out€the€intent€of€theÐ 4 t Ðprevious€order€of€the€Court€and€to€be€in€compliance€with€the€Department€of€Defense.ððÐ  ` ÐÌà  àThe€parties€could€not€agree€on€the€language€to€be€included€in€the€amended€decree,€so€the€trialÐ ø 8  Ðjudge€finally€signed€the€order€submitted€by€the€wifeððs€counsel.€€The€operative€paragraphs€of€theÐ ä $  Ðamended€decree€provide:Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àThe€Court€finds€that€the€parties€were€married€on€April€11,€1989,€in€Guam,€aÐ ¨è  Ðterritory€of€the€United€States€of€America.€€The€Court€further€finds€that€as€ofÐ ”Ô  ÐNovember€9,€1999,€Michael€Daniel€Fry€had€been€in€the€United€States€Navy€for€14Ð €À Ðyears€and€achieved€the€pay€grade€of€E7.€€The€Court€further€finds€that€the€parties€haveÐ l¬ Ðbeen€married€at€least€10€years€of€the€14€years€that€Husband€has€been€in€the€Navy€andÐ X˜ Ðtherefore€Wife€is€entitled€to€a€minimum€of€fifty„percent€(50%)€of€his€NavyÐ D„ Ðretirement.Ð0pÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àThe€Court€further€finds€that€if€Husband€completes€a€20€year€tour€of€duty€andÐ H Ðqualifies€for€retirement€then€the€numerator€of€the€fraction€described€in€the€UniformÐ ô4 ÐServices€Former€Spouse€Protection€Act€will€be€10€years€married€and€if€he€completesÐ à  Ðhis€tour€of€duty€and€qualifies€for€retirement€the€denominator€of€that€fraction€will€beÐ Ì  Ð20€year€for€the€number€of€years€of€credible€service.€€According€to€the€1999€RetiredÐ ¸ø ÐMilitary€Almanac€at€page€28,€an€E7€with€over€19€years€of€service€will€receive€aÐ ¤ä Ðmonthly€amount€of€military€nondisability€retirement€pay€of€$1,106.€€If€Husband€isÐ Ð Ðpromoted€between€the€date€of€this€order€and€the€completion€of€20€years€of€duty€thenÐ |¼ Ðthis€number€will€have€to€be€adjusted€to€account€for€his€promotion.Ðh¨Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àThis€appeal€followed.à0  àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àà0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àÐ@!€ È(#È(# ÐÌÓÓà@……)ìàò òII.ó óˆÐ #X" ÐÓÓà  àThe€amended€order€awards€the€wife€one„half€of€the€husbandððs€retirement€on€the€assumptionÐ ð$0!$ Ðthat€he€will€retire€at€twenty€years€of€service.€€We€think€that€is€a€significant€alteration€of€the€agreedÐ Ü%"% Ðorder€in€the€final€decree.€€As€we€interpret€the€original€order,€it€awarded€the€wife€one„half€of€theÐ È&#& Ðpension€ð!ð€but€only€of€that€portion€that€accrued€during€the€marriage.€€The€original€order€was€inÐ ´'ô#' Ðaccordance€with€the€general€rule€announced€by€the€courts€of€this€state€that€only€the€portion€ofÐ  (à$( Ðretirement€benefits€that€accrue€during€the€marriage€are€marital€property€subject€to€division.€€òòSeeÐ Œ)Ì%) ÐCohen€v.€Cohenóó,€937€S.W.2d€823€(Tenn.€1996).€€Therefore,€the€change€was€substantive€and€not€justÐ x*¸&* Ðclerical.Ð d+¤'+ ÐÐ P,(, Ðà  àRule€60,€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.,€allows€courts€to€correct€final€judgments€for€clerical€mistakesÐ À Ð(60.01)€or€for€a€host€of€reasons€appearing€in€60.02:Ð ¬ì ÐÌà8  àà ` àOn€motion€and€upon€such€terms€as€are€just,€the€court€may€relieve€a€party€orÐ „Ä Ðthe€partyððs€legal€representative€from€a€final€judgment,€order€or€proceeding€for€theÐ p° Ðfollowing€reasons:€(1)€mistake,€inadvertence,€surprise€or€excusable€neglect;€(2)€fraudÐ \œ Ð(whether€heretofore€denominated€intrinsic€or€extrinsic),€misrepresentation,€or€otherÐ H ˆ Ðmisconduct€of€an€adverse€party;€(3)€the€judgment€is€void;€(4)€the€judgment€has€beenÐ 4 t Ðsatisfied,€released€or€discharged,€or€a€prior€judgment€upon€which€it€is€based€has€beenÐ  ` Ðreversed€or€otherwise€vacated,€or€it€is€no€longer€equitable€that€a€judgment€shouldÐ  L  Ðhave€prospective€application;€or€(5)€any€other€reason€justifying€relief€from€theÐ ø 8  Ðoperation€of€the€judgment.€Ðä $ Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àIn€her€Rule€60€motion,€the€wife€did€not€allege€any€of€the€specific€grounds€listed€in€the€rule.€Ð ¼ü  ÐIn€fact,€the€motion€did€not€seek€a€substantive€change€in€the€final€decree€at€all.€€The€only€object€of€theÐ ¨è  Ðmotion€was€a€change€that€would€satisfy€the€government€regulations€pertaining€to€payment€of€benefitsÐ ”Ô  Ðto€a€former€spouse.Ð €À ÐÌà  àThe€last€part€of€Rule€60.02(4),€and€Rule€60.02(5),€contain€non„specific€reasons€for€grantingÐ X˜ Ðrelief€from€a€final€judgment.€€But€the€wife€did€not€allege€any€equity€that€would€justify€modifying€theÐ D„ Ðfinal€decree,€and€our€courts€have€consistently€said€that€Rule€60.05(5)€does€not€allow€a€court€to€relieveÐ 0p Ða€party€from€a€free,€calculated,€and€deliberate€choice.€€òòSee€Federated€Insurance€Co.€V.€Ô_ÔLethcoeÔ_Ôóó,€18Ð \ ÐS.W.3d€621€(Tenn.€2000);€òòTyler€v.€Tyleróó,€671€S.W.2d€492€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1984);€and€òòMagnavox€v.Ð H ÐBoles€&€Ô_ÔHiteÔ_Ô€Construction€Co.óó,€583€S.W.2d€611€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1979).€€Since€the€husband€and€wifeÐ ô4 Ðagreed€on€the€language€in€the€final€decree€when€both€were€represented€by€counsel€and€there€is€noÐ à  Ðindication€that€it€was€anything€but€an€arms„length€transaction,€Rule€60.02(5)€does€not€give€her€anÐ Ì  Ðavenue€for€relief.Ð ¸ø ÐÌà  àWe€reverse€the€judgment€below€and€modify€the€trial€courtððs€order€to€provide€that€the€wife€Ð Ð Ðwill€be€entitled€to€a€part€of€the€husbandððs€Navy€pension€according€to€the€following€formula:€€Ð |¼ Ѐ̀€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€òò1óó€€€€€€€X€€€€€€€€€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€10€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óó€€€€€€€€€X€€€€€€€(retirement€pay)Ð T ” Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€2€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€(Number€of€years€in€the€Navy€at€retirement)Ð @!€  ÐÌThe€cause€is€remanded€to€the€Circuit€Court€of€Davidson€County€for€the€entry€of€an€order€inÐ #X" Ðaccordance€with€this€opinion.€€Tax€the€costs€on€appeal€to€the€wife.Ð $D # ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à_________________________________________€Ð ´'ô#' Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€PRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.Ð  (à$( ÐÌ