ÿWPCE …# VUNa %¯ 0(µbÝw@å4% 9 H 0JP 0Tš 0^î 0hL 0r´ 0|& 0†¢ 0( 1u¸ 0d- U>‘ B)Ï DCø AM;U*ˆ ²v~¿ B=vÓZ D3- 0@` AO Æï 0Dµ D/ù B(˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡- ù- ³:´:Uµ:£¶:·:¸:D¹:Uº:U»:Ó€Å:U¥Hœ$3|xÅ:2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d7Border 1dd€- Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÔ€"ÔÔ€"ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€"XÔÌÌJuly€29,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó óPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'h dStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ћрÑÑ7€¦XXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  Ñœò òÙ€€ÙßR€!# A1-j|` ç `€€@ÿRßÞ ÞÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌYVETTE›€PATRICE€GARRETT,à àà à)à àSumner€JuvenileÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àNo.€€€48„99Ìà àPlaintiff/Appellant,à àà àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌJAMES€EDWARD€GRAY,€JR,à àà à)à àAppeal€No.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à01A01„9709„JV„00489Ìà àDefendant/Appellee.à àà àà à)ÌÌÌà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àAT€NASHVILLEÌÌà@ àAPPEAL€FROM€THE€JUVENILE€COURT€OF€SUMNER€COUNTYÌà@ àAT€GALLATIN,€TENNESSEEÌÌÓ  ÓHONORABLE€BARRY€BROWN,€JUDGEÌÓ  Óó óÌÌÌJames€W.€Price,€Jr.ÌSuite€1230ÌFirst€American€CenterÌNashville,€Tennessee€37238„1230ÌATTORNEY€FOR€PLAINTIFF/APPELLANTÌÌÌJames€E.€Gray,€Jr.Ì6393€Valley€Oak€DriveÌMemphis,€Tennessee€38141ÌPRO„SE€FOR€DEFENDANT/APPELLEEÌÌÌÓ  Óò òVACATED€AND€REMANDEDó óÌÓ  ÓÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àHENRY€F.€TODDÌà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGEÌWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌò òÌÌÌYVETTE€PATRICE€GARRETT,à àà à)à àSumner€JuvenileÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àNo.€€€48„99Ìà àPlaintiff/Appellant,à àà àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌJAMES€EDWARD€GRAY,€JR,à àà à)à àAppeal€No.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à01A01„9709„JV„00489Ìà àDefendant/Appellee.à àà àà à)Ìó óÌÌà@ àòòò òÔ€„ÔO€P€I€N€I€O€NÔ€XÔó óóóÌÓ  ÓÓÓÌà àThis€appeal€involves€the€enforcement€of€the€support€provisions€of€a€paternity€judgmentÏof€the€Juvenile€Court.ÌÌà àOn€May€19,€1994,€the€Juvenile€Court€entered€judgment€that€the€captioned€defendantÏwas€the€natural€father€of€Sheldon€Bernard€Garrett,€born€out€of€wedlock€on€August€18,€1979,Ïgranting€custody€to€the€plaintiff€mother€and€legitimating€the€child.€€The€expenses€of€birth€wereÏreserved€for€future€adjudication.€€The€father€was€ordered€to€provide€health€insurance€for€theÍchild€until€October€30,€1994,€and€to€pay€to€the€mother€$530.00€per€month€plus€clerks€fees€ofÏ$26.00€beginning€May€13,€1994.ÌÌà àOn€August€29,€1997,€the€mother€filed€a€ð ðPetition€for€Order€of€Arrearage€and€MedicalÏExpenses€and€to€Amend€Decree.ðð€€The€petition€alleged€that€the€father€had€concealed€a€part€ofÏhis€earnings€resulting€in€an€inadequate€award€of€monthly€support,€that€support€has€been€paidÏonly€since€June,€1994,€and€that€the€mother€was€required€to€pay€an€unstated€amount€of€birthÏexpenses.€€The€petition€prayed€as€follows:ÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` ÒÓÓà à1.à àThat€at€a€hearing€the€court€determine€theÏamount€of€reasonable€and€necessary€expenses€of€the€childÏfrom€its€birth€until€entry€of€the€order€of€legitimation€and€enterÏjudgment€accordingly.ÌÌà à2.à àThat€the€decree€heretofore€entered€by€(sic)Ïamended€and€an€order€of€child€support€in€accordance€withÏthe€guidelines€be€entered.ÌÌà à3.à àThat€petitioner€be€granted€her€reasonableÏattorneys„fees€and€costs.ÌÌà à4.à àFor€general€relief.ÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓÓÌà àOn€November€8,€1995,€the€father€filed€an€answer€and€counter€petition€admittingÏprevious€proceedings€and€denying€all€other€facts€alleged€in€the€petition.€€Affirmatively,€theÏanswer€alleged€that€the€child€ð ðmay€have€been€adopted€by€the€motherððs€husband,€that€the€claimÏfor€arrearage€and€medical€expenses€was€barred€by€laches,€and€that€the€mother€had€interferedÏwith€visitation€by€concealing€the€identity€of€the€child€and€parentage€of€its€father€until€May€12,Ï1994.ÌÌà àThe€counter€complaint€alleged€that€the€child€prefers€to€reside€with€his€father.€€TheÏcounter€complaint€prayed€for€custody€and€child€support.ÌÌà àOn€July€16,€1997,€the€father€filed€a€petition€to€terminate€child€support€because€the€childÏhad€graduated€from€high€school,€had€lived€with€his€father€since€July€1996,€and€his€name€hadÏbeen€changed€from€Garrett€to€Gray.ÌÌà àOn€August€29,€1997,€the€Juvenile€Judge€entered€an€order€reading€as€follows:ÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ « ÒÓÓà àThis€cause€came€on€to€be€heard€before€theÏHonorable€Barry€Brown,€Judge,€upon€the€Petition€ofÏYvette€Garrett€seeking€to€have€a€judgment€of€arrearage€inÏchild€support€adjudicated€€against€the€Respondent€JamesÏGray.€€The€Court€declined€to€conduct€an€evidentiary€hearingÏand€the€parties€stipulated€that€if€called€to€testify€the€partiesÏwould€have€testified€as€follows:ÌÌà àThat€the€Respondent€James€Gray€had€beenÏadjudicated€the€father€of€the€minor€child€Shelton€on€the€11thÏday€of€May,€1994€and€was€ordered€to€pay€the€sum€ofÏ$530.00€being€21%€of€his€net€salary€of€$3,466.00€perÏmonth€in€accordance€with€the€guidelines.€€The€Court€at€thatÏtime€reserved€the€issue€of€arrearage€in€child€support€to€aÏlater€hearing.ÌÌà àThat€prior€to€filing€the€original€Petition€in€this€caseÏthe€mother€had€filed€no€Petition€for€enforcement€of€childÏsupport.ÌÌà àThat€in€1979€the€Respondent€was€on€active€duty€asÏa€staff€sergeant€in€the€U.S.€Army.€€That€from€1980€to€1981Ïthe€Respondent€was€employed€full€time€with€the€MemphisÏPolice€Department,€and€from€1981€to€present€he€has€beenÏemployed€by€the€Shelby€County€Sheriffs€Department€whereÏhe€is€now€an€administrative€assistant€to€the€ProcessingÏCommissioner.ÌÌà àThat€in€1994€the€Respondentððs€monthly€income€wasÏ$3,466.00.€€In€1993€his€monthly€income€was€$3,303.42Ïand€in€1992€his€monthly€income€was€$2,845.00.€€TheÏRespondent€was€unable€to€provide€proof€of€income€otherÏthan€above€but€at€no€time€during€the€life€of€the€child€wasÏRespondent€not€fully€employed€at€a€salary€at€or€above€theÏminimum€wage€and€that€the€Respondent€had€at€all€timesÏmedical€insurance€available€for€the€child.ÌÌà àThat€the€mother€has€no€records€to€support€her€claimÏfor€necessities€for€the€child€but€would€have€testified€that€theÏcost€of€the€birth€of€the€child€was€$5,000.00€and€that€theÏcost€of€necessities€for€the€child€from€1979€to€1981€wasÏ$175.00€per€month,€1982€was€$310.00€per€month,€1983€toÏ1994€was€$330.00€per€month.ÌÌà àThe€Court€finds:ÌÌà àThat€due€to€the€motherððs€failure€to€seek€childÏsupport€prior€to€1994€the€Court€should€mitigate€theÏarrearage€and€that€the€father€should€pay€to€the€mother€theÏtotal€sum€of€$850.00€as€child€support€arrearage.€€The€CourtÏfurther€finds:ÌÌà àThat€the€child€will€become€18€on€the€18th€day€ofÏAugust,€1997€and€has€graduated€from€high€school€andÏtherefore€the€fatherððs€obligation€for€payment€of€childÏsupport€should€terminate.ÌÌà àIt€is€thereby€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€ANDÏDECREED€that€Petitioner,€Yvette€Garrett,€is€awardedÏ$850.00€for€child€support€arrearage.ÌÌà àIt€is€further€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€ANDÏDECREED€that€support€payments€shall€terminate€as€ofÏAugust€1,€1997.ÌÌà àIt€is€further€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€ANDÏDECREED€that€the€Respondent€is€not€entitled€to€any€offsetsÏor€credits€for€said€arrearage.ÌÌà àIt€is€further€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€ANDÏDECREED€that€the€cost€of€this€cause€is€taxed€to€theÏRespondent€for€which€execution€may€issue.ÌÓ  ÓÌÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓÓà àThe€mother€appealed€and€presented€the€following€issues:ò òÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` ÒÓ  ÓÓÓà àó ó1.à àWhether€the€Trial€Court€erred€in€not€grantingÏan€an€evidentiary€hearing€on€the€issue€of€arrearage€in€childÏsupport.ÌÓ  ÓÌÓ  Óà à2.à àWhether€the€court€should€have€awarded€theÏchild€support€arrearage€based€upon€the€needs€of€the€child€andÏthe€guildlines.ÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓÓà àÌà àThe€motherððs€brief€concludes€that€this€Court€should€increase€the€judgment€for€arrearsÏsupport€to€$50,272.00.Ìò òÌó óà àThe€record€received€by€this€Court€contains€no€transcript€or€statement€of€the€evidence.€ÏHowever,€the€judgment€of€the€Juvenile€Court,€quoted€above,€does€contain€some€findings€ofÏfacts.ÌÌà àThe€appellee€father€has€filed€no€brief€in€this€Court,€and€the€appeal€has€been€taken€underÏconsideration€upon€the€meager€record€and€the€brief€of€the€appellant€mother.ÌÓ  ÓÌÓ  Óòòà àò òóóFIRST€ISSUE:€òòó óÌFailure€to€grant€an€Evidentiary€HearingóóÌÌÓ  Óà àIn€response€to€an€order€of€this€Court,€the€Juvenile€Judge€has€filed€the€followingÏstatement:ÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` ÒÓ  ÓÓÓà àOn€this€the€25th€day€of€June,€1998,€the€Court€makesÏthis€statement€in€this€matter€as€follows:ÌÌà àFor€the€purpose€of€this€hearing€the€Court,€to€the€bestÏof€its€recollection,€met€with€the€partiesðð€attorneys€during€theÏdocket.€€The€docket€was€extremely€heavy€and€the€likelihoodÏof€having€the€time€to€try€this€case€on€was€very€small.ÌÌÓ  Óà àThe€attorneys€asked€the€Court€how€it€usually€rules€inÏthese€type€of€cases.€€The€Court€explained€to€the€attorneysÏwhat€the€Court€customarily€follows€but€because€each€case€isÏindividual€the€ruling€can€vary€but€to€the€Courtððs€exactÏdecision€it€would€be€impossible€to€say€without€hearingÏtestimony.ÌÌà àThe€attorneys€agreed€to€put€on€proof€of€what€theirÏclients€would€have€stated€to€the€Court.€€Based€on€theirÏevidence€presented,€the€Court€made€its€decision.ÌÌà àAt€no€time€did€this€Court€deny€the€parties€the€right€toÏa€full€hearing€in€this€case.ÌÓ  Óà àÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓÓò òà àÌÌÓ  Óó óà àThe€foregoing€statement€is€treated€by€this€Court€as€a€statement€of€oral€proceedingsÏleading€to€the€judgment€under€review.ÌÌà àWhere€evidence€is€excluded€by€a€trial€court,€it€is€permissible€for€counsel€to€state€for€theÏrecord€the€substance€of€the€excluded€evidence€or€include€the€excluded€evidence€in€the€record€onÏappeal.òò€€Farmers„Peoples€Bank€v.€Clemmeróó,€Tenn.€1975,€519€S.W.2d€801,€548€S.W.2d€661;ÏòòMcLean€v.€Memphis€Union€Station€Coóó.,€1€Tenn.€Civ.€App.€(1€Higgins)€457.ÌÌà àWithout€a€transcript€or€statement€of€the€proceedings,€the€certificate€of€the€JuvenileÏJudge€that€he€did€not€refuse€to€hear€any€evidence€disposes€of€appellants€first€issue.ÌÓ  ÓÌÓ  Óà àò òSECOND€ISSUEó ó:ÌòòChild€Support€ArrearagesÌóóÌÓ  Óà àAppellant€argues€that€she€is€entitled€to€$50,272.00€arrears€child€support€from€the€birthÏof€the€child€to€the€date€of€the€order€of€patenrity€and€beginning€of€support€payments.€€TheÏincome€of€the€father€during€this€period€was€stipulated€and€counsel€stated€to€the€Court€that€theÏmother€would€testify€that€the€cost€of€birth€was€$5,000.00€and€that€the€cost€of€necessities€for€theÏœchild›€was€from€$175€to€$330€per€month€during€this€period.ÌÌà àThe€order€of€the€Trial€Court€stated€that€the€award€to€the€mother€should€be€mitigated€toÏ$850.00.ÌÌà àIn€òòState€ex€rel.€Coleman€v.€Clayóó,€Tenn.€1991,€805€S.W.2d€752,€the€parties€hadÏintimate€relations€for€two€years.€€When€informed€of€the€pregnancy€he€first€deniedÏresponsibility,€but€later€contributed€some€support€in€kind€and€promised€regular€support€but€didÏnot€perform.€€The€paternity€suit€was€filed€when€the€child€was€14€years€old.€€The€father€evadedÏprocess€for€2€years,€and€judgment€was€not€rendered€until€the€child€was€16.€€The€SupremeÏCourt€remanded€to€the€Juvenile€Court€for€revision€and€said:ÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` ÒÓÓà àThe€Court€of€Appeals,€relying€upon€emphasizedÏlanguage€in€ðð€36„2„108,€held€correctly€that€the€fatherððsÏresponsibility€for€support€of€a€child€of€his€born€out€ofÏwedlock€arises€at€the€date€of€the€childððs€birth.€€Because€theÏstatute€also€permits€the€juvenile€court€to€make€a€retroactiveÏaward€for€expenses€incurred€in€the€support€of€the€child€priorÏto€the€entry€of€the€paternity€decree,€such€an€award€can€beÏmade€back€to€the€date€of€the€childððs€birth,€under€appropriateÏcircumstances.€€Obviously,€the€juvenile€judge€has€broadÏdiscretion€to€determine€the€amount€of€such€a€retroactiveÏaward,€as€well€as€the€manner€in€which€it€is€to€be€paid.ÌÓ  Ó„€„€„€„ÌÓ  Óà àWhat€the€juvenile€judge€lacks€is€discretion€to€limit€theÏfatherððs€liability€for€child€support€in€an€arbitrary€fashion€thatÏis€not€consistent€with€the€provisions€in€T.C.A.€ðð€36„2„102Ïand€Ì€ðð€36„2„108.ÌÓ  Ó„€„€„€„ÌÓ  Óà àWe€further€agree€that€the€statute€gives€the€juvenileÏcourt€the€discretion€to€order€a€retroactive€support€award€backÏto€that€date,€the€amount€and€method€of€payment€to€beÏdetermined€by€juvenile€judge€in€light€of€the€circumstances€ofÏthe€case€and€consistent€with€the€standards€which€normallyÏgovern€the€issuance€of€child€support€orders.ÌÓ  Ó„€„€„€„ÌÓ  Óà àAs€did€the€Court€of€Appeals,€we€also€reject€theÏdefendantððs€argument€that€Mary€Coleman€should€be€deniedÏrecovery€because€she€is€guilty€of€laches.€€In€order€toÏestablish€such€a€bar,€more€than€mere€delay€must€be€shown.€ÏòòMurphy€v.€Emeryóó,€629€S.W.2d€895,€897„98€(Tenn.€1982).€ÍIndeed,€the€touchstone€of€laches€is€prejudice€to€the€otherÏparty,€and€here,€no€actual€prejudice€of€the€kind€contemplatedÏby€law€has€been€demonstrated€by€the€defendant.€€We€doÏfind,€however,€that€the€mother€has€waived€recovery€forÏexpensese€incurred€in€connection€with€her€pregnancy€andÏKristiððs€birth,€since€no€request€for€such€reimbursement€wasÏmade,€and€there€is€no€proof€in€the€record€to€support€such€anÏaward.ÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓ  ÓÓÓÌÓ  Óà àThe€foregoing€is€controlling€upon€the€facts€stated€therein.€€However,€in€the€presentÏappeal,€the€record€contains€no€transcript€or€statement€of€the€evidence€from€which€this€CourtÏcould€find€facts€comparable€to€those€recited€in€the€cited€opinion.€€This€Court€is€therefore€not€inÏposition€to€revise€or€reverse€the€discretion€of€the€Juvenile€Judge€which€was€repeatedlyÏrecognized€in€the€quoted€opinion€of€the€Supreme€Court.ÌÓ  ÓÌÓ  Óà àOrdinarily,€the€failure€to€provide€a€transcript€or€statement€of€the€evidence€is€conclusiveÏupon€appeal€requiring€a€determination€of€facts.€€However,€T.C.A.€ðð€27„3„128€œprovides›€forÏremand€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings€where€justice€of€the€case€requires.€€ThisÏappears€to€be€a€suitable€case€for€such€a€remand.ÌÓ  ÓÌÓ  Óà àTenn.€Code€Ann.€ððò ò€ó ó36„2„108(b)€requires€that€paternity€orders€provide€for€ð ðthe€supportÏof€the€child€prior€to€the€making€of€the€order€of€paternity€and€support,ðð€and€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€œÌðð›€36„2„108(d)€requires€that€these€decisions€must€be€made€in€accordance€with€the€child€supportÏguidelines.€€While€decisions€concerning€child€support€between€the€time€of€birth€and€the€time€ofÏfiling€the€paternity€petition€are€discretionary,€see€òòState€ex€rel.€Coleman€v.€Clayóó,€805€S.W.2dÏ752,€755€(Tenn.€1991);€òòBarabas€v.€Rogersóó,€868€S.W.2d€283,€288€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1993),Ïthese€decisions€cannot€limit€the€parentððs€liability€for€child€support€in€an€arbitrary€fashion.€€SeeÏòòState€ex€rel.€Coleman€v.€Clayóó,€805€S.W.2d€at€755.ÌÓ  Óà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ ` ÒÓ  ÓÓÓà àThe€parent€who€provides€support€has€the€right€toÏrecover€from€the€non„supporting€parent€just€reimbursementÏfor€the€amount€of€support€supplied€in€excess€of€theÏapportioned€share€of€the€supporting€parent.€[citationsÏomitted]€the€right€of€the€supporting€parent€to€reimbursementÏbegins€at€the€birth€of€the€child€and€does€not€appear€to€beÏsubject€to€any€statute€of€limitation.ÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓ  ÓÓÓÌòòState€ex€rel.€Grant€v.€Prograisóó,€1997€WL€536946,€at€*6.ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌà àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€Juvenile€Court€is€vacated€and€the€cause€is€remandedÏto€the€Juvenile€Court€for€further€hearing€and€consideration€of€the€just€amount€of€recovery€dueÏthe€appellant.€€Costs€of€appeal€are€taxed€against€the€appellee.Ìò òÌÓ  ÓVACATED€AND€œREMANDED.ó ó›ÌÓ  ÓÓÓÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à_________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àHENRY€F.€TODDà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLEÏSECTIONÌÓ  ÓÌÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGEÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌ