ÿWPC  7kˆ'¡zPÅ|ÕCÅyÕÒ ¸Õ`I8hòˆ‡†Ĺw/,÷_‹ú»æÊçàƒÁmÔJvÚh(gQé+KíB°øû­v1ÁèÅÂi1ì7‚²~¾Ì#n§¨U
œéaÿ{%úJp!TjEç•TÇ\µûÍnòìfCfær¸›øMãÅN„J÷†R ýÒ¾l&Œí Ù3 ˆ †ôÖâËm¿ÊßÈ­­Ðïíà±G¬J~/@zV9üõ& Ê x"¨Ð»s`ðFŨè4ÑSå^“±â®zcƒVQ‡Î Ééý)׊㼪ܔaäm“?þ†ÒÑs [ìõº1UÑJeXŒ(ÜO&m>®ù<ßÿÏÒÎlô{ge¹ôxP[íܰh顕ܺÔTö3»kW'¿Z‡wšGgh3Åþ×½««:’C…?4‹J¨WâYA\ö/{uà¸ð˜dº‡ÇÚÌ©`¿ÜpJMÿŸ¡T­ñ5æR&fMC–c³0Êò¢L°y@t1ꚨÎî`Œò_É|8(U0¢s6‘ð*ÊÛìé¶,•xÌ5d¥‡´…NE¥*Cú14-²Pò¿ÚVñz>ØÄ uh©×Úèö;Í·HÖ©b#É\ %% ^ + 0ˆ7 UN¿ w 4 z% ÒŸ q € m‚ 0D™ ÆÝ Æ£ ÆiÆ/UNõNCïEW4E‹b““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““ 0ë›››› B†† 0¤£ D5G D-| 0K©© ASôÆG 0¤  0D± A«õ˜\\IB01S02\CLERKJACÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»Í…‚1Ï (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular6hö001s02 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular åÝ ƒR¢¶$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô´Lò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑÀÑRule€10€of€the€Rules€of€the€Court€of€Appeals€of€Tennessee€states:Ð ° ÐÌà8  àà ` àThis€Court,€with€the€concurrence€of€all€judges€participating€in€the€case,€may€affirm,€reverseÐ 2‚ Ðor€modify€the€actions€of€the€trial€court€by€memorandum€opinion€when€a€formal€opinion€would€haveÐ óC Ðno€precedential€value.€€When€a€case€is€decided€by€memorandum€opinion€it€shall€be€designatedÐ ´ Ðð ðMEMORANDUM€OPINIONðð,€shall€not€be€published,€and€shall€not€be€cited€or€relied€on€for€anyÐ uÅ Ðreason€in€any€unrelated€case. MÝ ƒR¢¶$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô´Lò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔPrior€to€the€trial,€each€party€prepared€a€proposed€list€of€assets,€dividing€the€personal€property.€€During€theÐ ° Ðcourse€of€the€trial,€Wife€introduced€her€proposed€list€as€Trial€Exhibit€6.€€ GLANZMAN COA P.J. W.S.HighersFredrickRossie JahnHuddlestonFlannaryKinardWattersBatson Dube- ù-(|G2¢¶$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ÿ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô´Lò»»Ô d(|3ÿ$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ÿ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿ$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ÿ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ÿ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼Ÿ»»»ÔÑ8€Ð'XXdé»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ò ò ìàÔ‡îoŸÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@òò%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼Ÿ»îîo #ԈРÓ# ÐÓ  ÓOctober€11,€2004€SessionÐ öF ÐÔ‡XÐ'X»¼ŸÔÌò òÔ#†¼Ÿ»XXÐ'ó#ÔCHARLES€FREDRICK€GLANZMANòòóó€v.€JOYCE€BRYANT€GLANZMANòòóóÔ‡XÐ'X»¼ŸÔó óÐ ï? ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Shelby€CountyÐ é 9 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€CT„004908„02€€€€€€George€H.€Brown,€JudgeÐ Ó # ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‘á  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2003„03067„COA„R3„CV€„€Filed€December€2,€2004Ð ŠÚ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<]` AßÐ ^®  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡X`rXXXÐ'ÔThis€is€a€divorce€case.€€The€husband€appeals€from€the€trial€courtððs€divorce€decree€distributing€theÐ V¦  Ðmarital€and€separate€property€and€awarding€the€wife€alimony€òòin€futuroóó.€€We€affirm.òòò òÐ ? Ðó óóóÔ#†XÐ'XXX`r#ÔÔ#†¼Ÿ»XXÐ'w#ÔÔ‡XÐ'X»¼ŸÔÌÓÓò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmed;€andÐ a ÐRemandedó óÐ ûK ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼Ÿ»àXÐ'æ#ÔÔ‡XÐ'X.¼ŸÔDavid€R.€Farmer,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòW.€Frank€Crawford,€P.J.,€W.S.,€óóÐ Î Ðand€òòAlan€E.€Highers,€J.óó,€joined.Ð · ÐÌCharles€Fredrick€Glanzman,€òòPro€seóó.Ð ‰Ù ÐÌJ.€Richard€Rossie€and€David€A.€Billions,€Memphis,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellee,€Joyce€BryantÐ [« ÐGlanzman.Ð D” ÐÓ¤Óò òÔ#†¼Ÿ»XXÐ'Ó#ÔÔ‡XÐ'X»¼ŸÔÓ  ÓÔ‡X`rXXXÐ'ÔòòÌóóÓ  ÓMEMORANDUM€OPINION׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð g ÐÌòòÓÓFacts€and€Procedural€BackgroundÐ ë ;  Ðóóó óÓ  ÓÓÓà  àPlaintiff/Appellant€Charles€Fredrick€Glanzman€(ð ðHusbandðð)€and€Defendant/Appellee€JoyceÐ »" " ÐBryant€Glanzman€(ð ðWifeðð)€were€married€on€December€27,€1980.€€At€the€time€they€were€married,Ð ¤#ô# ÐHusband€was€thirty„three€(33)€years€old€while€Wife€was€fifty€(50)€years€old.€€No€children€were€bornÐ $Ý$ Ðof€the€marriage.€€During€the€marriage,€Husband€was€employed€as€an€engineer€for€PrimeÐ v%Æ % ÐDevelopment€Group,€Inc.€and€also€worked€as€a€consulting€engineer.€€Early€in€the€marriage,€WifeÐ _&¯!&ý Ðoperated€a€private€learning€clinic,€but€she€worked€primarily€as€a€part„time€school€teacher€during€theÐ ° Ðlatter€stages€of€the€marriage.€€At€the€time€of€the€divorce,€Wife€was€seventy„three€(73)€years€old€andÐ ™é ÐHusband€was€fifty„six€(56)€years€old.€€Ð ‚Ò ÐÌà  àOn€November€17,€2003,€the€trial€court€entered€a€Final€Decree€of€Divorce,€awarding€a€divorceÐ T¤ Ðto€Wife€on€the€ground€of€inappropriate€marital€conduct.€€In€the€divorce€decree,€the€trial€courtÐ =  Ðordered,€in€pertinent€part,€as€follows:Ð & v ÐÌà8  àà ` à1.€€That€[Wife]€.€.€.€is€hereby€awarded€an€absolute€divorce€from€[Husband]Ð ø H Ðupon€the€ground€of€inappropriate€marital€conduct€.€.€.€.;Ðá 1 Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à.€.€.€.Ð ³  ÐÌà8  àà ` à3.€€That€[Wife]€shall€retain€as€her€sole€property€the€[marital€residence]€and/orÐ …Õ  Ðthe€proceeds€from€the€sale€of€the€home€.€.€.€.€€That€[Wife]€shall€be€responsible€for€theÐ n¾  Ð[first€and€second]€mortgage€payments€.€.€.€.€;ÐW§ Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à.€.€.€.Ð )y ÐÌà8  àà ` à5.€€That€[Husband]€shall€pay€[Wife]€permanent€alimony€òòin€futuroóó€in€theÐ ûK Ðamount€of€$1,500.00€per€month€.€.€.€.€;Ðä4Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à6.€€That€[Wife]€shall€be€awarded€as€her€sole€property€all€personal€propertyÐ ¶ Ðand€other€items€identified€in€Trial€Exhibit€6,€.€.€.€and€that€[Husband]€shall€be€awardedÐ Ÿï Ðall€other€personalty€or€items€of€the€marriage€which€are€not€identified€in€said€ExhibitÐ ˆØ Ð.€.€.€.€;ÐqÁÐ Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à.€.€.€.Ð C“ ÐÌà8  àà ` à8.€€That€[Husband]€shall€retain€as€his€sole€and€separate€property€his€IRA,Ð e Ð401k€and€other€retirement[]€accounts[.]ÐþNÐ Ð  ÐÌHusband€filed€an€appeal€to€this€Court€presenting,€as€we€perceive€them,€the€following€issues€for€ourÐ Ð!   Ðreview:Ð ¹" ! ÐÌà8  à(1)à0` Ð Ð àWhether€the€trial€court€erred€in€its€distribution€of€the€marital€and€separateÐ ‹$Û# Ðproperty,€and€Ðt%Ä $` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌà8  à(2)à0` Ð Ð àWhether€the€trial€court€erred€in€awarding€alimony€òòin€futuro€óóto€Wife.ÐF'–"&` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌÌÌÌÓ  Óò òòòStandard€of€ReviewÐ Ó+#'+ Їóóó óÓ  Óà  àIn€matters€heard€by€a€trial€judge€sitting€without€a€jury,€our€review€of€the€trial€courtððs€findingsÐ ° Ðof€fact€is€òòde€novoóó€upon€the€record,€accompanied€by€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.Ð ™é Ð13(d)€(2004).€€We€will€not€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€factual€findings€unless€the€evidence€in€the€recordÐ ‚Ò Ðpreponderates€against€those€findings.€€òòJahn€v.€Jahnóó,€932€S.W.2d€939,€941€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1996).€Ð k» ÐA€trial€courtððs€conclusions€on€questions€of€law€are€reviewed€òòde€novoóó,€but€without€any€presumptionÐ T¤ Ðof€correctness.€€òòIdóó.€(citing€òòUnion€Carbide€Corp.€v.€Huddlestonóó,€854€S.W.2d€87,€91€(Tenn.€1993)).Ð =  ÐÓ  ÓÌòòò òProperty€Divisionó óÐ  _ ÐóóÓ  ÓÌà  àUnder€section€36„4„121€of€the€Tennessee€Code,€the€court€may,€upon€request€of€either€partyÐ à 0  Ðin€a€divorce€action,€equitably€divide€or€distribute€the€marital€property.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„Ð É   Ð121(a)(1)€(2004).€€In€making€an€equitable€division,€the€trial€court€shall€consider€all€relevant€factors,Ð ²  Ðincluding€any€of€those€listed€in€section€36„4„121(c).òò€€Flannary€v.€Flannaryóó,€121€S.W.3d€647,€650ð!ð51Ð ›ë  Ð(Tenn.€2003).€€Section€36„4„121(c)€sets€forth€the€following€factors:Ð „Ô  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(1)€€The€duration€of€the€marriage;ÐV¦ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(2)€€The€age,€physical€and€mental€health,€vocational€skills,€employability,Ð ? Ðearning€capacity,€estate,€financial€liabilities€and€financial€needs€of€the€parties;Ð(xÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(3)€€The€tangible€or€intangible€contribution€by€one€(1)€party€to€the€education,Ð a Ðtraining€or€increased€earning€power€of€the€other€party;ÐúJÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(4)€€The€relative€ability€of€each€party€for€future€acquisitions€of€capital€assetsÐ ã3 Ðand€income;ÐÌÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(5)€The€contribution€of€each€party€to€the€acquisition,€preservation,Ð µ Ðappreciation,€depreciation€or€dissipation€of€the€marital€or€separate€property,€includingÐ žî Ðthe€contribution€of€a€party€to€the€marriage€as€homemaker,€wage€earner€or€parent,Ð ‡× Ðwith€the€contribution€of€a€party€as€homemaker€or€wage€earner€to€be€given€the€sameÐ pÀ Ðweight€if€each€party€has€fulfilled€its€role;ÐY©Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(6)€€The€value€of€the€separate€property€of€each€party;ÐB’Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(7)€€The€estate€of€each€party€at€the€time€of€the€marriage;Ð+{Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(8)€€The€economic€circumstances€of€each€party€at€the€time€the€division€ofÐ d Ðproperty€is€to€become€effective;ÐýMÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(9)€€The€tax€consequences€to€each€party,€costs€associated€with€the€reasonablyÐ æ 6 Ðforeseeable€sale€of€the€asset,€and€other€foreseeable€expenses€associated€with€theÐ Ï!  Ðasset;и"!Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(10)€€The€amount€of€social€security€benefits€available€to€each€spouse;€andС#ñ"Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(11)€€Such€other€factors€as€are€necessary€to€consider€the€equities€between€theÐ Š$Ú# Ðparties.Ðs%à $Ð Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(c)€(2004)òòóó.€€ð ðA€division€is€not€rendered€inequitable€simply€because€itÐ E'•"& Ðis€not€precisely€equal,€or€because€each€party€did€not€receive€a€share€of€every€piece€of€maritalÐ .(~#' Ðproperty.ðð€€òòManis€v.€Manisóó,€49€S.W.3d€295,€306€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€2001)€(citing€òòKinard€v.€Kinardóó,€986Ð )g$( ÐS.W.2d€220,€230€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1998)).€€Trial€courts€are€granted€broad€discretion€when€dividingÐ *P%) Ðthe€marital€estate,€and€such€decisions€are€ð ðentitled€to€great€weight€on€appeal.ðð€€òòWatters€v.€Wattersóó,Ð é*9&* Ð959€S.W.2d€585,€590€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1997)€(citing€òòBatson€v.€Batsonóó,€769€S.W.2d€849,€859€(TennÐ Ò+"'+ ÐCt.€App.€1988)).€€Appellate€courts€will€generally€defer€to€a€trial€courtððs€division€of€property€unlessÐ ° Ðit€is€inconsistent€with€the€factors€enumerated€in€section€36„4„121(c)€or€is€against€the€weight€of€theÐ ™é Ðevidence.€€òòIdóó.Ð ‚Ò ÐÌà  àIn€the€case€at€bar,€the€parties€stipulated€prior€to€the€divorce€hearing€that€Wife€would€beÐ T¤ Ðawarded€the€net€proceeds€from€the€sale€of€the€marital€residence€as€her€sole€separate€property.€€TheÐ =  Ðorder€awarding€Wife€the€marital€residence€also€provided€that€the€court€shall€consider€HusbandððsÐ & v Ðrelinquished€interest€in€those€proceeds€when€deciding€the€remaining€disputed€issues,€includingÐ  _ Ðproperty€division€and€alimony.€€In€the€divorce€decree,€Wife€received€the€marital€home,€but€she€alsoÐ ø H Ðassumed€both€mortgages.€€The€record€reflects€that,€depending€on€the€amount€for€which€the€martialÐ á 1  Ðhome€sold,€Wife€would€receive€between€$166,000€and€$240,000€in€sale€proceeds.€€Ð Ê   ÐÌà  àWith€regard€to€the€personal€property,€the€parties€were€unable€to€agree€to€a€division€of€theÐ œì  Ðpersonal€property.€€The€trial€court€awarded€Wife€items€of€personal€property€listed€in€Trial€ExhibitÐ …Õ  Ð6.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Although€Husband€presented€evidence,€through€cross€„examination€of€Wife,€of€the€value€of€threeÐ n¾  Ðseparate€rings€and€a€fur€coat,€there€is€no€evidence€in€the€record€as€to€the€value€of€the€other€itemsÐ W§  Ðlisted€in€Trial€Exhibit€6.€€Husband€received€all€other€items€of€personal€property€not€listed€in€TrialÐ @ ÐExhibit€6,€as€well€as€all€funds€held€in€his€IRA,€401k€and€other€retirement€accounts.€€Ð )y ÐÌà  àIn€òòDube€v.€Dubeóó,€104€S.W.3d€863€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€2002),€this€Court€affirmed€a€trial€courtððsÐ ûK Ðdivision€of€marital€property€that€resulted€in€one€spouse€receiving€a€significantly€greater€proportionÐ ä4 Ðof€the€marital€assets.€€òòId.óó€at€868.€€In€òòDubeòòóóóó,€the€husband€had€greater€earning€potential€than€the€wife;Ð Í Ðgreater€ability€to€acquire€assets;€significant€educational€background;€and€was€significantly€youngerÐ ¶ Ðthan€the€wife.€€òòIdóó.€€The€òòDubeóó€court€reasoned€that,€while€the€division€of€assets€was€certainly€not€equal,Ð Ÿï Ðthe€division€was€equitable€in€light€of€the€factors€enumerated€in€section€36„4„121(c).€€òòIdóó.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àHere,€Wife€was€seventy„three€years€old€at€the€time€of€the€divorce.€€The€record€shows€that,Ð Zª Ðduring€the€marriage,€she€contributed€significantly€as€a€wage€earner,€while€working€full„time.€Ð C“ ÐHowever,€due€to€poor€physical€health,€she€had€been€unemployed€since€at€least€the€year€2000.€€SheÐ ,| Ðdid€not€own€any€investments€or€retirement€accounts.€€She€received€approximately€$600€per€monthÐ e Ðin€social€security.€€Husband,€however,€was€fifty„six€years€old€at€the€time€of€trial,€in€relatively€goodÐ þN Ðhealth,€and€€maintained€full„time€employment€as€an€engineer,€earning€income€from€PrimeÐ ç 7 ÐDevelopment€Group,€Inc.€in€the€amount€of€$73,150.50€as€reflected€by€his€2002€W„2.€€In€addition,Ð Ð!   ÐHusband€owned€retirement€accounts€worth€approximately€$40,000.€€Ð ¹" ! ÐÌà  àAlthough€Wife€received€the€marital€residence€and€many€items€of€personal€property,€weÐ ‹$Û# Ðcannot€conclude€that€the€trial€courtððs€division€of€property€was€inequitable€without€evidence€of€theÐ t%Ä $ Ðvalue€of€the€personal€property.€€Therefore,€after€reviewing€the€record€and€in€light€of€the€factorsÐ ]&­!% Ðenumerated€in€Section€36„4„121(c),€we€conclude€that€the€evidence€does€not€preponderate€against€theÐ F'–"& Ðtrial€courtððs€division€of€property.Ð /(#' ÐÐ )h$( ÐÓ  Óòòò òAlimonyó óóóÐ ° ÐÓ  ÓÌà  àThe€trial€court€awarded€Wife€$1,500€per€month€in€alimony€òòin€futuroóó.€€Husband€asserts€thatÐ Ñ Ðthe€alimony€payment€is€beyond€his€ability€to€pay.€€Husband€further€contends€that,€because€WifeÐ jº Ðreceived€such€a€large€share€of€the€property€division,€she€does€not€require€spousal€support.€Ð S£ ÐÌà  àSimilar€to€the€division€of€marital€property,€the€trial€courtððs€determination€of€whether€to€awardÐ % u Ðalimony€is€guided€by€statutory€factors€found€in€section€36„5„101(E)€of€the€Tennessee€Code.€€Tenn.Ð  ^ ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101(E)€(2004).€€Section€36„5„101(E)€provides€that,€in€determining€the€nature,Ð ÷ G Ðamount,€length€of€term,€and€manner€of€alimony€payment,€the€trial€court€shall€consider€all€relevantÐ à 0  Ðfactors,€including:Ð É   ÐÌà8  àà ` à(I)€The€relative€earning€capacity,€obligations,€needs,€and€financial€resourcesÐ ›ë  Ðof€each€party,€including€income€from€pension,€profit€sharing€or€retirement€plans€andÐ „Ô  Ðall€other€sources;Ðm½ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(ii)€The€relative€education€and€training€of€each€party,€the€ability€andÐ V¦  Ðopportunity€of€each€party€to€secure€education€and€training,€and€the€necessity€of€aÐ ? Ðparty€to€secure€further€education€and€training€to€improve€such€partyððs€earningÐ (x Ðcapacity€to€a€reasonable€level;ÐaÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(iii)€The€duration€of€the€marriage;ÐúJÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(iv)€The€age€and€mental€condition€of€each€party;Ðã3Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(v)€The€physical€condition€of€each€party,€including,€but€not€limited€to,Ð Ì Ðphysical€disability€or€incapacity€due€to€a€chronic€debilitating€disease;еРР Ðà8  àà ` à(vi)€The€extent€to€which€it€would€be€undesirable€for€a€party€to€seekÐ žî Ðemployment€outside€the€home€because€such€party€will€be€the€custodian€of€a€minorÐ ‡× Ðchild€of€the€marriage;ÐpÀÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(vii)€The€separate€assets€of€each€party,€both€real€and€personal,€tangible€andÐ Y© Ðintangible;ÐB’Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(viii)€The€provisions€made€with€regard€to€the€marital€property€as€defined€inÐ +{ Ððð€36„4„121;ÐdÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(ix)€The€standard€of€living€of€the€parties€established€during€the€marriage;ÐýMÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(x)€The€extent€to€which€each€party€has€made€such€tangible€and€intangibleÐ æ 6 Ðcontributions€to€the€marriage€as€monetary€and€homemaker€contributions,€andÐ Ï!  Ðtangible€and€intangible€contributions€by€a€party€to€the€education,€training€orÐ ¸"! Ðincreased€earning€power€of€the€other€party;С#ñ"Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(xi)€The€relative€fault€of€the€parties€in€cases€where€the€court,€in€its€discretion,Ð Š$Ú# Ðdeems€it€appropriate€to€do€so;€andÐs%à $Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(xii)€Such€other€factors,€including€the€tax€consequences€to€each€party,€as€areÐ \&¬!% Ðnecessary€to€consider€the€equities€between€the€parties.ÐE'•"&Ð Ð  ÐÌÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101(E)(i)ð!ð(xii)€(2004).€€While€the€statute€sets€forth€many€factors,€the€twoÐ *P%) Ðmost€important€factors€are€(1)€the€need€of€the€recipient€spouse€and€(2)€the€obligor€spouseððs€abilityÐ é*9&* Ðto€pay,€with€the€single€most€important€factor€being€the€recipient€spouseððs€need€for€support.€€òòPerryÐ Ò+"'+ Ðv.€Perryóó,€114€S.W.3d€465,€467€(Tenn.€2003);€òòScarbrough€v.€Scarbroughóó,€No.€W2000ð!ð01807„COA„Ð ° ÐR3„CV,€2001€WL€640368,€at€*€2,€4€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€June€8,€2001)€(òòno€perm.€app.€filedóó).€€The€trialÐ ™é Ðcourts€have€broad€discretion€in€applying€the€factors€set€forth€in€section€36„5„101(E).€€òòAnderton€v.Ð ‚Ò ÐAndertonóó,€988€S.W.2d€675,€682€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1998).€€ð ðAppellate€courts€are€generally€disinclinedÐ k» Ðto€second„guess€a€trial€courtððs€spousal€support€decision€unless€it€is€not€supported€by€the€evidenceÐ T¤ Ðor€is€contrary€to€the€public€policies€reflected€in€the€applicable€statutes.ðð€€òòIdóó.Ð =  ÐÌà  àIn€issuing€its€ruling€in€this€case,€the€trial€court€stated€its€opinion€that€ð ðthis€is€a€case€that€criesÐ  _ Ðout€for€alimony.ðð€€The€record€likewise€supports€the€fact€that€Wife€was€in€need€of€spousal€support.€Ð ø H ÐAs€stated€previously,€she€was€seventy„three€years€old;€in€poor€physical€health;€with€no€retirementÐ á 1  Ðsavings€besides€social€security€benefits€of€$600€per€month;€and€she€had€monthly€expenses€ofÐ Ê   Ðapproximately€$3,500.€€Other€factors€supporting€the€award€of€alimony€include€the€duration€of€theÐ ³  Ðmarriage,€which€lasted€twenty„two€years.€€There€is€also€evidence€in€the€record€to€supportÐ œì  Ðconsideration€of€€the€relative€fault€of€Husband.€€In€light€of€the€foregoing€and€in€view€of€the€fact€thatÐ …Õ  Ðthe€record€reflects€that€Husband€is€capable€of€€paying€the€alimony€award,€we€conclude€that€the€trialÐ n¾  Ðcourtððs€award€of€alimonyòò€in€futuroóó€was€not€an€abuse€of€discretion.Ð W§  ÐÌÓ  Óò òòòConclusionÐ )y Ðóóó óÓ  ÓÌà  àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€we€affirm€the€trial€court€in€all€respects.€€Costs€of€this€appeal€areÐ úJ Ðassessed€to€the€Appellant,€Charles€Fredrick€Glanzman,€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.Ô#†XÐ'XXX`rÚ#ÔÔ#†¼Ÿ»XXÐ'¯#ÔÔ‡XÐ'X»¼ŸÔÐ ã3 ÐÔ#†¼Ÿ»XXÐ''O#ÔÔ€XÐ'X»¼ŸÔÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ‡× Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€R.€FARMER,€JUDGE