ÿWPC” &bóêì;å¸`¥¸L²“ˆ\*Í(ŽÒÐQè^=läèà°µ‰r,Ÿ'` Å·ðUçíñÄ[ÑœƒÜï@sA¡› ÂÙCàÛ–Þºgîd„TãÿÄ6 5Y?eÎ {†Z^½ ˆþðÜ—ö—Á£z&Þðþ:‹¶à¶áÕq¯ýŠ‹°óbƒÀ;8¥¿{ú+þ‘ñÝÙµ5?ÛS#ð/Eð‹‹ÏX=nÚ&01o@¨Æ›$¦L¸PÅ*] K—·ý©˜@ê·sëYÉiIˆ¤ï¨+Œ¼Ù|CWb]¨Ç_Óåâ°Jû‚ŒW±À..KÑÆÈ²‹.´_X[XÃ} ZKÑRá&Xéݲ¯ÚlP8õÂÖÝ·!©GV6t¥P¤´¿Yr¬Õ¸^Ïý†AÌ<ÊÁën‹ Åã¹½±dÊ—P…du  B…×)2‡ž&®e7¬OA´b[üÑý¢``,ÿW¯lA¿`Š—#ß Wú8[4äWCc6u€tÆ1Ô÷¦œŽ!”™½¢_¬yФd§™ÿãN²“Jæ*ã•HŒ…+ÂbåkPk4¹,Þ<Œeóx£I¡rú ¶“=…¤j-dN/º*Å%L4ñLnI-ĸ²SßH†%ÉÆ#· ÷)ÐJ½b %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ NÐ 0DÒ Æ ÆÜ Æ¢ Æh ‡. Nµ·ÌEà#Áâââr£££rb‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ 0ë Bzz 0¤— D5; D-p 0K ASèÆ; 0¤ 0D¥ A«é»ÏŠ‹-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularš‚,-xê:i¢×+003|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 }Ý ƒRšÇ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô«Ýò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€Since€it€was€stipulated€that€the€right„of„way€for€Watt€Nolan€Road€is€fifty€(50)€feet,€the€margins€of€the€roadÐ ° Ðwould€be€defined€and€located€as€parallel€lines€lying€twenty„five€(25)€feet€on€each€side€of€and€parallel€to€the€center€line. Ý ƒRšÇ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô«Ýò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€To€the€extent€there€may€be€a€portion€of€the€right„of„way€which€must€be€traversed€in€order€to€connect€theÐ ° Ðdescribed€driveway€to€the€paved€surface€of€Watt€Nolan€Road,€Plaintiffs€would€be€Ô_ÔestoppedÔ_Ô€to€deny€access€since€to€doÐ tÄ Ðso€would€violate€the€clear€intent€of€the€parties€to€grant€ingress€and€egress€rights€to€the€Defendants. Ý ƒRšÇ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô«Ýò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€€€We€note€that€our€decision€here€is€in€accord€with€the€case€of€€ò òMaxwell€v.€Laxó ó,€òòóó€292€S.W.2d€223€(Ct.€App.Ð ° Ð1954)€wherein€the€Western€Section€of€this€Court€affirmed€the€action€of€the€Chancery€Court€of€Henry€County€whichÐ vÆ Ðgranted€an€abutting€landownerððs€request€for€an€injunction€ordering€removal€of€a€sign€located€on€a€dedicated€right„of„way.˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0 hÑ H ÑÑ\R3Ø'Avery 8160 Ink Jet Addres\Ñ hÑ ° ÑÑ\R3Ø'Avery 8160 Ink Jet Addres\Ñ- ù-(|G2šÇ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€…»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô«Ýò»»Ô d(|3AH$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€…»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3AH$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€…»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€…»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼…»»»ÔÑ8€U¹XXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ü ü ìàÔ‡îô…ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼…»îîô #ԈРÖ& Ðà@õõìàSeptember€6,€2002€SessionˆÐ üL ÐÔ‡XU¹X»¼…ÔÌò òÔ#†¼…»XXU¹ý#Ôà@È È ìàÔ_ÔF.T.Ô_Ô€GREER€,€òòet€al.óó€v.€JOSEPH€C.€Ô_ÔMACRIÔ_Ô,€òòet€alóó.Ô‡XU¹X»¼…Ôó óˆÐ úJ ÐÌà@í í ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Chancery€Court€for€Sumner€CountyˆÐ ú J Ðà@!ìàNo.€€€€€€€2000C„89ˆÐ æ 6 Ðà@°°ìàTom€E.€Gray,€ChancellorˆÐ Ò " ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<•` A߈Ð –æ  ÐÌà@K K ìàNo.€M2001„02536„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€December€11,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ԈР‘á  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<h` AßÐ i¹  Ðó óÌÌà  àThis€appeal€arises€from€the€denial€of€the€Chancery€Court€of€Sumner€County€of€PlaintiffsððÐ P  Ðrequest€for€an€injunction.€€The€dispute€involves€the€construction€of€a€brick€entranceway€whichÐ <Œ Ðconnects€a€county€road€to€Defendantsðð€driveway€easement€over€the€Plaintiffsðð€property.€€TheÐ (x Ðentranceway€lies€within€the€ð ðmetes€and€boundsðð€of€a€county€road.€€The€Chancellor€refused€to€grantÐ d Ðan€injunction€ordering€removal€of€the€entranceway€holding€that€the€county€was€the€only€party€withÐ P Ðstanding€to€seek€removal€of€obstructions€within€the€right„of„way€of€a€county€road.€€We€disagree€withÐ ì< Ðthe€Chancellor€and€find€that€the€Plaintiffs€own€fee€simple€title€to€the€pertinent€portion€of€the€right„of„Ð Ø( Ðway€and€therefore€have€standing€to€assert€their€ownership€rights€independent€of€the€county.€€WeÐ Ä Ðtherefore€reverse€the€finding€of€the€Chancellor€and€remand€the€case€for€further€proceedings.€€Ð ° ÐÌò òÌà@ääìàTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Chancery€CourtˆÐ tÄ Ðà@Ãà ìàReversed€and€RemandedˆÐ `° ÐÌó óòòÌÔ#†¼…»àXU¹Ï#ÔÔ‡XU¹X.¼…ÔThomas€W.€Graham,óó€SP.€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòBen€H.€Ô_ÔCantrellÔ_Ô€óóandÐ $"t! ÐòòPatricia€J.€Cottrellóó,€joined.Ð #`" ÐÌHomer€R.€Ô_ÔAyersÔ_Ô,€Ô_ÔGoodlettsvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellants,€F.€T.€Greer€and€wife,€Sally€RobbÐ è$8 $ ÐGreer,€and€Sue€R.€Hancock.Ð Ô%$!% ÐÌCurtis€M.€Lincoln,€Ô_ÔHendersonvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellees,€Joseph€C.€Ô_ÔMacriÔ_Ô€and€wife,€LauraÐ ¬'ü"' ÐL.€Ô_ÔMacriÔ_Ô.Ð ˜(è#( ÐÌò òÌÐ  \+¬&+ý ÐÔ_ÔÑ€-iÑÑ€þiÑà@66'ìàOPINIONó óˆÐ ° ÐÌà@%ìàòòBackgroundóóˆÐ ˆØ ÐÌà  àThis€case€began€when€F.€T.€Greer€and€wife,€Sally€Rob€Greer,€and€Sue€R.€Hancock€broughtÐ `° Ðsuit€in€the€Chancery€Court€of€Sumner€County€seeking€injunctive€relief€against€the€Defendants,Ð L œ ÐJoseph€C.€Marci€and€wife,€Laura€L.€Marci.€€Plaintiffs€sought€injunctions€requiring€the€DefendantsÐ 8 ˆ Ðto€remove€from€Plaintiffsðð€properties€certain€obstructions€and€materials€related€to€the€DefendantsððÐ $ t Ðdriveway€to€and€from€the€county€road€known€as€Watt€Nolan€Road.€€The€genesis€of€the€disputeÐ  ` Ðcenters€around€a€May€29,€1998,€agreement€styled€Ingress,€Egress€Driveway€and€Utility€Easement€andÐ ü L  ÐAgreement€between€Plaintiffs,€F.€T.€Greer€and€wife,€and€the€Defendants€which€provided€for€anÐ è 8  Ðeasement€of€ingress€and€egress€primarily€for€the€benefit€of€the€Defendants€but€also€with€certain€rightsÐ Ô$  Ðbeing€granted€to€the€Plaintiffs.€€As€a€consequence€of€this€agreement,€the€Defendants€constructed€aÐ À  Ðdriveway€from€Watt€Nolan€Road€along€the€boundary€line€between€Plaintiffs,€F.€T.€Greer€and€wife,Ð ¬ü  Ðand€Plaintiff,€Sue€R.€Hancock,€which€extended€to€the€southerly€line€of€the€Defendants.€€In€general,Ð ˜è  Ðthe€lawsuit€claimed€numerous€transgressions€across€the€twelve€(12)€foot€easement€onto€the€PlaintiffsððÐ „Ô  Ðrespective€properties€including€an€objection€to€a€substantial€brick€entrance€gateway€which€is€theÐ pÀ Ðsubject€of€this€appeal.€€After€a€full€evidentiary€hearing,€the€Chancellor€ruled€on€all€those€issues€ofÐ \¬ Ðthe€complaint€except€matters€dealing€with€that€portion€of€the€Defendantsðð€driveway€and€entrance€gateÐ H˜ Ðwhich€lay€within€the€metes€and€bounds€of€the€fifty€(50)€foot€right„of„way€of€the€Watt€Nolan€Road.€Ð 4„ ÐThe€Chancellor,€noting€Sumner€County€was€not€a€party€to€this€action,€refused€to€grant€relief€as€toÐ  p Ðobstructions€lying€within€the€county€road€right„of„way.€€From€this€ruling€and€the€Trial€CourtððsÐ  \ Ðsubsequent€October€12,€2001,€order€denying€Plaintiffsðð€motion€to€modify€as€to€this€issue,€theÐ øH ÐPlaintiffs€have€filed€this€appeal€asking€the€Court€to€rule€on€the€following€issues:Ð ä4 ÐÌà8  à1)à0` Ð Ð àWhether€or€not€the€limitations€set€forth€in€the€Ingress,€Egress€Driveway€andÐ ¼  ÐUtility€Easement€and€Agreement€filed€as€Exhibit€No.€1,€apply€to€that€portionÐ ¨ø Ðof€the€driveway€constructed€by€the€appellees€which€is€within€the€metes€andÐ ”ä Ðbounds€of€the€road€right„of„way€granted€to€Sumner€County,€Tennessee,€forÐ €Ð ÐWatt€Nolan€Road.Ðl¼` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8  à2)à0` Ð Ð àWhether€or€not€a€property€owner€has€control€of€that€portion€of€his€propertyÐ X ¨ Ðdedicated€as€a€road€right„of„way€to€a€county€government€to€the€exclusion€ofÐ D!” Ða€holder€of€an€easement€which€was€granted€to€the€beginning€of€a€county€roadÐ 0"€  Ðright„of„way.Ð#l!` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌòòóóÓÓà@H H ìàòòEffect€of€Ingress,€Egress€Driveway€and€Utility€Easement€AgreementóóˆÐ ô$D # ÐÓÓà  àThe€first€issue,€the€effect€of€the€May€29,€1998,€Ingress,€Egress€Driveway€and€UtilityÐ Ì&"% ÐEasement€Agreement€within€the€metes€and€bounds€of€the€right„of„way€of€Watt€Nolan€Road,€may€beÐ ¸'#& Ðaddressed€with€dispatch.€€A€review€of€both€the€easement€description€contained€in€the€Agreement€andÐ ¤(ô#' Ðâ âthe€March€21,€1999,€survey€of€George€C.€Gregory€which€was€introduced€at€trial€make€it€clear€theÐ )à$( ÐAgreement€encompasses€only€property€which€lies€outside€the€margins€of€the€Watt€Nolan€Road.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀Р° Ðâ âWhen€an€easement€is€created€by€a€grant,€it€must€be€strictly€construed€and€when€its€terms€are€specific,Ð œì Ðthey€are€decisive€of€the€limits€of€the€easement.€€ò òFoshee€v.€Brigmanó ó,€129€S.W.2d€207€at€208€(Tenn.Ð ˆØ Ð1939)€See€also€ò òHenry€v.€Tenn.€Electric€Power€Companyó ó,€5€Tenn.€App.€205€(1927).€€A€principleÐ xÈ Ðwhich€underlies€the€use€of€all€easements€is€that€the€owner€of€an€easement€cannot€materially€increaseÐ h¸ Ðthe€burden€of€it€upon€the€serviant€estate€or€impose€thereon€a€new€and€additional€burden,€absent€a€newÐ T ¤ Ðor€amended€agreement.€€ò òLittle€v.€Paduchó ó,€912€S.W.2d€170€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1995)€We€find€theÐ @  Ðdescription€of€the€subject€easement€begins€at€the€margin€and€does€not€extend€into€the€metes€andÐ 0 € Ðbounds€of€the€Watt€Nolan€Road€and€therefore,€the€terms€of€the€Easement€Agreement€may€not€beÐ  l Ðdirectly€applied€to€any€portion€of€the€public€road€right„of„way€known€as€the€Watt€Nolan€Road.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð  X  ÐÌà@½ ½ ìàòòRights€of€Landowners€After€DedicationˆÐ à0  ÐóóÌà  àWe€now€turn€to€the€remaining€issue€which€we€believe€might€better€be€phrased,€ð ðWhat€rights,Ð ¸  Ðif€any,€do€the€Plaintiffs€retain€within€the€right„of„way€of€the€Watt€Nolan€Road€independent€ofÐ ¤ô  ÐSumner€County?ðð€€Because€the€record€is€silent€on€the€exact€method€by€which€Sumner€CountyÐ à  Ðacquired€its€right„of„way€for€Watt€Nolan€Road,€we€assume€same€was€acquired€by€implied€dedicationÐ |Ì Ðas€is€the€case€for€a€substantial€portion€of€the€county€roads€in€this€State.€€Since€it€has€been€stipulatedÐ h¸ Ðby€the€parties€that€the€Plaintiffs€ð ðown€abutting€properties€and€each€of€said€properties€extend€to€theÐ T¤ Ðcenter€line€of€Watt€Nolan€Road,€Sumner€County,€Tennesseeðð,€it€becomes€our€task€to€determine€theÐ @ Ðextent€of€any€retained€rights€the€Plaintiffs€have€in€that€portion€of€their€properties€lying€within€theÐ ,| Ðpreviously€dedicated€public€road€right„of„way.€€Ð h Ðà  àOur€Supreme€Court€has€addressed€this€issue€most€recently€in€the€case€of€ò òState,€ex€rel,€KesselÐ T Ðv.€Ashó ó,€888€S.W.2d€430€(Tenn.€1994)€wherein€it€held:Ð ôD ÐÌà8  à€...€longstanding€law€provides€that€when€property€is€dedicated€to€a€governing€body€forÐ Ð  Ðpublic€use,€the€governing€body€acquires€only€an€easement€in€the€property,€and€the€feeÐ ¼  Ðremains€in€the€dedicator,€or€in€the€abutting€landowners€where€property€conveyed€isÐ ¨ø Ðfor€a€street€or€highway.€...€the€county€does€not€own€the€fee€title€to€the€roadways,€butÐ ”ä Ðhas€at€most€only€an€easement€of€right„of„way.€€Ð€ÐÐ Ð  Ðà€VV'(#àò òState,€ex€rel,€Kesseló ó,€supra,€at€431ˆÐ l ¼ ÐÌThis€principle€was€announced€even€as€early€as€1854€by€our€Supreme€Court€when€it€opined€theÐ H"˜  Ðfollowing,€to„wit:Ð 4#„! ÐÌà8  à€...€If€a€man€lay€out€a€street€or€public€way€over€his€land,€for€the€general€public,€and€itÐ  %\ # Ðbe€accepted€and€used€by€the€public€in€the€manner€intended,€that€is€a€valid€dedicationÐ ø%H!$ ÐÑ-iÑâ âÑH°ÑÑTRY,3Ø'Avery 8160 Ink Jet AddresXà3Ø' Letter 3Ø' Letterÿ3Ø'TÑâ âÑ  Ñof€the€easement.€€It€consists€in€the€right„of„way€over€the€land€of€another€and€not€ofÐ ° Ðan€interest€in€the€land€itself,€that€remains€in€the€owner€of€the€fee€unaffected€by€theÐ œì Ðdedication€...ЈØÐ Ð  Ðà€ââ (#àò òMontilian€Scott€v.€The€Stateó ó,€33€Tenn.€629€at€632€(Tenn.€1854)ˆÐ tÄ ÐÌFinally,€òòTennessee€Jurisprudenceóó€summarizes€the€law€as€follows:Ð P   ÐÌà8  àUnder€a€common€law€dedication,€the€public€does€not€acquire€a€fee€in€the€land,€butÐ ( x Ðsimply€the€right€to€use€it€for€the€purposes€for€which€it€was€dedicated.€€The€feeÐ  d Ðremains€in€the€owner,€and€he€holds€it€subject€to€the€easement€vested€in€the€public.€Ð  P  ÐThe€public€acquires€only€an€easement€in€the€property€dedicated.€...Ðì < Ð Ð  Ðà€ÄÄ&(#à9€Tenn.€Juris.,€Dedication,€Section€8ˆÐ Ø(  ÐÌSince€easements,€as€previously€stated€herein,€are€to€be€strictly€construed€and€may€not€be€materiallyÐ °  Ðincreased€to€the€detriment€of€the€serviant€estate,€we€find€the€Plaintiffs€retain€within€the€dedicatedÐ œì  Ðright„of„way€all€those€rights€attendant€to€fee€simple€ownership€which€are€not€inconsistent€with€theÐ ˆØ  Ðpublic€road€easement.€€See€ò òEast€Tennessee,€V.€&€G.€Ry.€Co.€V.€Telford€Executorsó ó,€14€S.W.€776Ð tÄ Ðat€777€(Tenn.€1890).€€In€the€case€at€hand,€the€Plaintiffs€are€the€fee€simple€owners€of€the€land€onÐ d´ Ðwhich€the€Defendants€have€constructed€a€brick€entranceway.€€Under€the€law€of€this€State,€fee€simpleÐ P  Ðowners€have€absolute€possessory€right€to€use€the€property€described€in€their€deeds€as€they€see€fitÐ <Œ Ðsubject€only€to€such€contracts,€conveyances,€statutes,€or€common€law€that€may€otherwise€apply.€€InÐ (x Ðthis€case€the€only€relevant€limitation€on€the€Plaintiffsðð€right€to€possess€is€the€public€road€easement.€Ð d ÐNo€right€of€possession€exists€in€the€Defendants€which€would€authorize€the€construction€andÐ P Ðmaintenance€on€the€Plaintiffsðð€land€of€the€subject€brick€structure.€€This€being€the€state€of€the€law,€theÐ ì< Ðonly€remaining€question€is€whether€or€not€the€Plaintiffs€have€standing€to€bring€this€suit.€€Ð Ø( ÐÌà@‰‰&ìàòòStandingóóˆÐ ° ÐÌà  àAfter€granting€relief€relative€to€that€portion€of€Plaintiffsðð€property€not€lying€within€the€countyÐ ˆØ Ðroad€right„of„way,€the€Trial€Court€below€determined€that€it€should€take€no€action€relative€toÐ tÄ Ðconstruction€within€the€county€road€right„of„way€holding€that€only€the€county€had€standing€to€object:Ð ` ° ÐÌà8  à€...€€I€am€of€the€opinion€the€county€is€the€one€that€can€object€to€whatððs€on€the€right„of„Ð 8"ˆ  Ðway€...€€So€they€donððt€have€to€remove€it€if€itððs€on€the€right„of„way€...Ð$#t!Ð Ð  Ðà€<<1(#àMinute€Book€211,€page€425,ˆÐ $`" Ðà€FF,(#àChancery€Court€of€Sumner€CountyˆÐ ü$L # ÐÌPlaintiffs€in€their€brief€cite€the€case€of€ò òKnierim€v.€Leatherwoodó ó,€542€S.W.2d€806€(Tenn.€1976)Ð Ô&$"% Ðwhich€states€as€follows:Ð Ä'#& ÐÌà8  àWe€think€it€both€reasonable€and€clear€that€a€private€citizen€may€sue€to€enjoin€theÐ œ)ì$( Ðmaintenance€of€an€obstruction€on€a€public€highway€where€he€has€sustained€specialÐ ˆ*Ø%) Ðinjury€or€damage.Ðt+Ä&*Ð Ð  Ðà€&&6(#àò òKnierimó ó,€supra€at€810ˆÐ `,°'+ ÐÐ P- (, ÐÑþiÑâ âѰHÑÑTRY,3Ø'Avery 8160 Ink Jet AddresY,3Ø'Avery 8160 Ink Jet Addres 3Ø' Letter 3Ø' LetterTÑâ âÑ  ÑThe€Defendants€in€their€brief€respond€that€the€Plaintiffs€have€failed€to€ð ð€...€allege€in€their€complaintÐ ° Ðany€damage€caused€by€the€erection€of€any€portion€of€the€driveway€or€concrete€thereof€located€onÐ œì Ðcounty€property€nor€is€there€any€proof€in€the€record€to€that€effect€...ðð€€We€do€not€agree€withÐ ˆØ ÐDefendantsðð€position€as€stated.€€We€note€that€the€Complaint€at€prayer€3€asks€the€Court€to€require€theÐ tÄ ÐDefendants€ð ðto€remove€all€concrete€at€the€entrance€to€their€easement€adjacent€to€Watt€Nolan€RoadÐ `° Ð...€in€excess€of€a€strip€of€concrete€ten€(10)€feet€in€width€...ðð€and€at€prayer€11€ð ðThat€the€Defendants€beÐ L œ Ðpermanently€restrained€and€enjoined€from€trespassing€upon€the€lands€of€the€Plaintiffs,€or€either€orÐ 8 ˆ Ðthem,€for€any€reason.ðð€€We€further€note€that€the€first€stipulation€of€the€parties€was€that€the€PlaintiffsÐ $ t Ðowned€ð ðto€the€center€line€of€Watt€Nolan€Road,€Sumner€County,€Tennessee.ðð€€Finally,€we€note€thatÐ  ` Ðseveral€pictures€filed€as€exhibits€clearly€show€the€brick€entrance€being€connected€to€the€pavementÐ ü L  Ðof€Watt€Nolan€Road€on€one€end€and€to€the€gravel€drive€on€the€other€end.€€Under€the€allegations€andÐ è 8  Ðthe€proof€in€this€record,€it€is€abundantly€clear€that€the€Defendantsðð€entranceway€is€located€onÐ Ô$  ÐPlaintiffsðð€property.€€We€hold€that€the€Plaintiff€has€stated€a€case€of€trespass€and€special€injury€andÐ À  Ðtherefore,€has€standing€as€a€private€citizen€under€ò òKnierimó ó€to€seek€the€relief€requested€regardless€ofÐ ¬ü  Ðwhether€Sumner€County€is€a€party.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð œì  Ðà  àFor€the€reasons€stated€herein,€the€Order€of€the€Chancery€Court€of€Sumner€County€is€reversed,Ð ˆØ  Ðand€this€matter€is€remanded€to€said€Court€for€entry€of€such€further€injunctive€relief€as€the€PlaintiffsÐ tÄ Ðmay€be€entitled€to€receive€not€inconsistent€with€the€decision€rendered€herein.€€The€costs€of€this€causeÐ `° Ðare€assessed€to€the€Defendants.Ô#†¼…»XXU¹P #ÔÔ‡XU¹X»¼…ÔÐ Lœ ÐÌÔ#†¼…»XXU¹¸E#ÔÔ‡XU¹X»¼…ÔÌòòóóÔ#†¼…»XXU¹F#ÔÔ€XU¹X»¼…ÔÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à____________________________________€Ð À Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€W.€GRAHAM,€SPECIAL€JUDGEÐ ¬ü Ð