ÿWPCe zT¾…˸¯Ðg —¼ª·(—¡.˜Á东ýùIþ;Û[ø±Æe†&¼å×£ð`KºµBo ¯BæVROéNîXºN)”ž]fûLñG\ɸòqwG°lF› îö:Í„õÝÌ«$Ø»ü„EúÎ4„ÄyÅ{² ˆ”¥tŒŒ—âÆèô¡1ú%A~A¡'àÍäç‹/l_EåÓ<çu°Þ Ó‚þëcH¬R¡Ø PmjĤ^2±„bÞËS%ļÐäÍä´â÷!§mkI‹Š‘$Buo—®K½Áõ>k¸ßk rD“J{c÷ĸ|ÆÞ³)ƒŠæ;2ð‹ú G$?ÃOj©óŽë,Äñ`£ÂzJí2¯Yªð.Ï­¥m$›ßêm¸o+áÒ—`#ë ¼ÂÔ®~Šç1éCGÎÓŠþâ‰\ÓC®RO3N"ÁNpäó‹[’M‹cª7¤é뤩5­´úôÉäãh4ó0ã¹ÌÑÓAP&“ºð@¢|:*¸0?Í2>-‰®?Ìð¸!ˆžÎ1׊qg­dÉ?Ôø-x˜P; ,{@ÿ(O‡sƒêE ¨ØôE^cÿæì|y5礦c¬M‚ØJùrULi̲íáb‹n\ëOò@W# ÂUNÍ % 04!bU 0¿]^  w@( 4h | ‹ m V¤ 0Dú Ü> UN h U:m§U:¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬ AQæÆ7 0Dý 0DA 0D…… D/ÉÉ Bø D3 BH˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ(æ() Z‹6Times New Roman Regular»( ¤U$¡¡Ó  Ó- ù-(o(2þï$¤¤Ý ƒ¤U!ÝÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒ„°ÒÔ€XäíX»»ÔÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóU™6%ä LMDNDOPDQRDSDTÓ€^Ö…#%3|x`ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ LÝ ƒþï$ÝÓ  ÓÒ°ÒÒ„°ÒÔ€XäíX»»ÔÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔIn€their€original€brief,€Ms.€Pippin€and€Mr.€Delaney€state:€ð ðThe€Defendants€do€not€believeÐ Ü Ðor€concede€that€the€Chancellor€was€correct€in€his€finding€that€the€new€road,€Friendly€Drive,€isÏwhere€the€old€Ô_ÔBomaÔ_Ô€Baxter€Road€used€to€be,€but€in€light€of€the€standards€of€appellate€reviewÏapplicable€here,€the€Defendant„Appellants€have€chosen€not€to€pursue€that€argument.ðð€€(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó  Bomad]ocumentsHerronsHerronSelmeksreargumentJaredEmerton t]he$mischaracterized'í€"  Z 6Times New Roman Regular ûÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€»õ »»»ÔÔ€iÆ »»õÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X<XiÆÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€24,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,@ÓÐAZ‹"Arial Regular ûÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€»õ »»»ÔÔ€iÆ »»õÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X<XiÆÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€23,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,@ÓÐAZ‹"Arial Regular!"#$&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdVVVV'ÿÿdxd dÝ ƒ¤U!ÝÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÒ°ÒÑܰÑÒX°ÒÔ€¼N´¼»»ÔÓ€ÓÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ7€η»»ddÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  Ñò òÔ‡¼4Ǽ¼¼N´ÔÔ‡„Oò„¼¼4ÇÔñ^ññTñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@E Ý` 8ttxPXÜð  rßñTññ^ññ^ññ^ñÌÓ€Óñ^ññ^ñà@¡ ¡ DàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌñ^ñßt€ )>.*jxèÿ` `€€@Ef ` 8ttxP@` ð  tßñ^ñà@ÜÜ)DàAT€NASHVILLEó óˆÐ ` „ ÐÔ#†¼4Ǽ„„Oòg#ÔÌÌÌMARY€F.€HALL€andà h àà À àà  à)Ð  . ÐDON€K.€HALL,à  àà h àà À àà  à)Ð  D  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àPlaintiffs/Appellees,à À àà  à)à p àPutnam€ChanceryÐ Lp  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àNo.€93„731Ð b†  ÐVS.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ð xœ  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àAppeal€No.Ð Ž²  ÐMARY€ROSE€PIPPIN€andà À àà  à)à p à01A01„9609„CH„00439Ð ¤È ÐDALE€DELANEY,à h àà À àà  à)Ð ºÞ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àDefendants/Appellants.à À àà  à)Ð æ  ÐÓ€ÓÌÔ#†¼N´¼¼¼4ÇH#ÔÌÌà@. . Dàòòò òÔ‡ fY ¼¼N´ÔORDER€GRANTING€PETITION€FOR€REHEARINGÔ#†¼N´¼  fYu#Ôóóó óˆÐ Íñ ÐÌà ` àMary€Rose€Pippin€and€Dale€Delaney€have€filed€a€petition€requesting€this€courtÏto€reconsider€its€August€19,€1998€opinion€in€light€of€seven€exhibits€that€were€notÏtransmitted€to€this€court€with€the€rest€of€the€record€on€appeal.€€At€our€request,€Mary€F.ÏHall€and€Don€K.€Hall€have€filed€a€response€to€the€petition€for€rehearing.€€The€clerk€andÏmaster€has€also€transmitted€a€supplemental€record€containing€the€seven€missingÏexhibits€and€an€affidavit€concerning€the€reasons€why€these€exhibits€were€not€includedÏwith€the€original€appellate€record.ÌÌà ` àBefore€turning€to€the€substance€of€the€petition€for€rehearing,€we€will€considerÏwhy€the€seven€missing€exhibits€were€not€transmitted€to€this€court€when€the€appellateÏrecord€was€originally€filed.€€The€clerk€and€master€states€that,€after€a€discussion€with€theÏclerk€of€the€appellate€courts,€she€elected€not€to€transmit€these€exhibits€because€theyÏwere€too€bulky.€€While€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€25(b)€states€that€ð ð[d]ocuments€of€unusual€bulkÏor€weight,€and€physical€exhibits,€other€than€documents,€shall€not€be€transmittedðð€withÏthe€appellate€record,€the€seven€exhibits€at€issue€in€this€case€were€not€bulky.€€WhenÏfolded,€they€can€easily€fit€into€several€manila€envelopes€which€could€have€beenÏincluded€with€the€original€appellate€record.€€Thus,€we€find€that€both€the€clerk€andÐ ¼;à5<Š Ðmaster€and€the€clerk€of€the€appellate€court€erred€when€they€determined€that€theseÏparticular€exhibits€were€too€bulky€to€be€transmitted€with€the€appellate€record.ÌÌà ` àNotwithstanding€this€error,€the€clerk€and€master€properly€notified€the€parties€thatÏshe€was€not€transmitting€these€seven€exhibits€with€the€original€appellate€record.€€SheÏpersonally€notified€the€lawyer€representing€Ms.€Pippin€and€Mr.€Delaney€that€she€wasÏholding€these€exhibits€in€her€office€and€that€he€would€be€responsible€for€deliveringÏthese€exhibits€to€the€appellate€court€on€the€day€of€argument.€€The€lawyer€did€notÏrequest€these€exhibits€until€ten€days€after€this€court€entered€its€August€19,€1998Ïopinion.€€Thus,€the€clerk€and€masterððs€error€was€compounded€by€the€lawyerÏrepresenting€Ms.€Pippin€and€Mr.€Delaney.€€Their€failure€to€cause€the€exhibits€to€beÏdelivered€to€this€court€or€to€rely€on€them€in€their€brief€and€argument€left€both€this€courtÏand€their€adversaries€with€the€understandable€impression€that€they€were€not€relying€onÏthese€exhibits€on€appeal.ÌÌà ` àUnder€these€facts,€we€are€reluctant€to€conclude€that€Ms.€Pippin€and€Mr.€DelaneyÏhave€waived€their€opportunity€to€rely€on€these€seven€exhibits€by€their€lawyerððs€failureÏto€take€the€steps€reasonably€necessary€to€make€sure€that€these€exhibits€were€before€theÏcourt€when€this€case€was€originally€submitted.€€Therefore,€we€direct€the€clerk€of€theÏappellate€court€to€file€the€supplemental€record€containing€the€seven€exhibits,€and€weÏwill€reconsider€our€August€18,€1998€opinion€in€light€of€these€exhibits.ÌÌà ` àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.€Delaney€assert€that€the€absence€of€the€seven€missing€exhibits€Ïcaused€the€court€to€make€thirteen€material€factual€errors€in€its€August€19,€1998€opinion.€ÏWe€take€up€each€of€these€asserted€errors.ÌÌÓ€Óà ` à1.à0 ¸ àò òThe€location€of€the€Boma„Baxter€Roadó ó.à  àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.€DelaneyÐ L/p)4 Ðassert€that€this€court€concurred€with€the€trial€courtððs€erroneous€findingÏconcerning€the€location€of€the€Boma„Baxter€Road€because€it€did€notÏconsider€the€seven€missing€exhibits.€€The€issue€of€the€location€of€theÏâ âBoma„Baxter€Road€is€not€before€the€court€because€Ms.€Pippin€and€Mr.Ð 3´-8 ÐDelaney€explicitly€abandoned€this€issue.׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Thus,€the€late„filed€exhibitsÐ Ü Ðhave€no€bearing€on€this€question.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% Ðâ âÌà ` à2.à0 ¸ àò òThe€Herronsðð€January€1973€Purchaseó ó.à  àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.Ð  6 ÐDelaney€take€issue€with€the€courtððs€statement€that€Floyd€and€BelleÏHerron€purchased€ð ðthe€3.48„acre€tractðð€in€January€1973.€€The€exhibitsÏoriginally€included€with€the€appellate€record€indicate€that€in€JanuaryÏ1973,€the€Herrons€purchased€a€12€to€15„acre€tract,€north€of€the€55„acreÏtract,€that€included€the€3.48„acre€tract€they€later€conveyed€to€the€SelmeksÏin€1979.€€The€size€of€the€tract€purchased€by€the€Herrons€in€January€1973Ïis€not€relevant€to€the€issues€presented€on€this€appeal.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌà ` à3.à0 ¸ àò òThe€Herronsðð€Intention€to€Build€Homesó ó.à  àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.Ð ºÞ  ÐDelaney€also€assert€that€this€court€was€incorrect€when€it€stated€that€Mr.ÏHerron€acquired€the€property€with€the€intention€to€build€homes.€€WhileÏthis€point€is€also€irrelevant€to€the€ultimate€issues€in€the€case,€Ms.€PippinÏand€Mr.€Delaney€refer€in€their€original€brief€to€the€portions€of€Mr.ÏHerronððs€testimony€in€which€he€stated€that€he€extended€Friendly€DriveÏð ðsouthward€through€his€property€in€order€to€build€new€houses€in€theÏðð70s.ðð€€Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌà ` à4.à0 ¸ àò òThe€Location€of€Carmel€Allisonððs€Houseó ó.à  àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.Ð b† ÐDelaney€take€issue€with€the€courtððs€statement€that€Carmel€AllisonððsÏhouse€was€on€the€3.48„acre€tract€acquired€by€the€Herrons€in€1973.€€Mr.ÏAllisonððs€house€was€on€the€12€to€15„acre€tract€acquired€by€the€HerronsÏin€1973€but€was€not€on€the€3.48„acre€tract€the€Herrons€later€conveyed€toÏthe€Selmeks.€€This€error€does€not€affect€the€outcome€of€this€appealÏbecause€the€significance€of€the€location€of€Mr.€Allisonððs€house€relatesÏto€his€construction€of€Friendly€Road€to€provide€him€access€to€Old€BaxterÏRoad€and€to€the€old€Boma„Baxter€Road.€€Exhibit€8€reinforces€thisÏcourtððs€original€conclusion€that€Friendly€Road€passed€by€Mr.€AllisonððsÏhouse€and€provided€access€to€Old€Baxter€Road€and€to€the€old€Boma„¼Baxter€Road.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌà ` à5.à0 ¸ àò òDead€end€of€Friendly€Roadó ó.à p àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.€Delaney€assert€thatÐ R*v$" ÐExhibit€10€demonstrates€that€this€court€was€incorrect€when€it€stated€thatÏFriendly€Road€intersected€with€the€old€Boma„Baxter€Road.€€Exhibit€10€Ïis€a€1942€survey€plat€that€must€have€been€prepared€before€Mr.€AllisonÏconstructed€Friendly€Road€to€gain€access€to€Old€Baxter€Road€and€to€theÏold€Boma„Baxter€Road.€€Exhibit€20€clearly€shows€that€Friendly€RoadÏintersects€with€both€the€Old€Baxter€Road€and€the€old€Boma„BaxterÏRoad.€€Thus,€the€late„filed€exhibits€have€no€bearing€on€this€matter.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% Ðâ âÐ è2 -* Ðà ` à6.à0 ¸ àò òUse€of€the€old€Boma„Baxter€Roadó ó.à È àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.€Delaney€takeÐ Ü Ðâ âissue€with€the€courtððs€finding€that€the€old€Boma„Baxter€Road€ð ðhad€beenÏlittle€used€over€the€preceding€decadesðð€and€assert€that€it€had€not€beenÏused€at€all€since€1949.€€This€is€simply€reargument€of€a€disputed€factÏissue.€€Olive€Jared,€Iva€Lowe,€Emil€Emerton,€and€James€StaffordÏtestified€about€the€use€of€the€old€Boma„Baxter€Road€since€1949.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌà ` à7.à0 ¸ àò òLocation€of€Friendly€Driveó ó.à p àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.€Delaney€differ€withÐ ` „ Ðthe€courtððs€conclusion€that€ð ð[t]he€improved€portion€of€the€old€Boma„¼Baxter€Road€came€to€be€known€as€Friendly€Drive.ðð€€This€argumentÏrelates€to€the€issue€concerning€whether€Friendly€Drive€runs€where€theÏold€Boma„Baxter€Road€used€to€run.€€Ms.€Pippin€and€Mr.€DelaneyÏspecifically€waived€this€issue€in€their€original€brief.€€The€late„filedÏexhibits€shed€no€new€light€on€this€question,€and€the€courtððs€conclusionÏabout€the€location€of€Friendly€Drive€is€amply€supported€by€the€record.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌà ` à8.à0 ¸ àò òThe€Development€of€the€Bean€propertyó ó.à  àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.Ð , ÐDelaney€assert€that€the€court€mischaracterized€the€Bean€property€asÏð ðundeveloped€farm€propertyðð€in€light€of€the€evidence€of€the€existence€ofÏa€barn€on€the€northern€portion€of€the€property.€€The€state€of€theÏpropertyððs€ð ðdevelopmentðð€in€1980€is€only€marginally€relevant€to€theÏissues€in€this€case,€and€the€late„filed€exhibits€shed€no€new€light€on€thisÏquestion.€€This€court€pointed€out€the€existence€of€the€barn€in€its€AugustÏ19,€1998€opinion€€and€now€concludes€that€a€55„acre€tract€of€farmÏproperty€is€not€ð ðdevelopedðð€simply€because€of€the€erection€of€a€barn.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌà ` à9.à0 ¸ àò òAccess€to€the€barnó ó.à  àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.€Delaney€insist€that€theÐ Â!æ Ðrecord€does€not€support€this€courtððs€conclusion€that€Mr.€Bean€used€ð ðaÏrelatively€short€dirt€roadway€extending€south€from€the€end€of€theÏimproved€portion€of€Friendly€Drive€to€drive€his€tractor€to€.€.€.€[the]€barn.ðð€ÏThe€late„filed€exhibits€shed€no€new€light€on€this€matter.€€This€was€aÏcontested€issue€at€trial,€and€Ms.€Pippinððs€and€Mr.€Delaneyððs€originalÏbrief€cites€to€the€portion€of€the€evidence€establishing€that€the€barn€ð ðwasÏaccessible€from€a€dirt€road,€about€one€hundred€feet€in€length,€which€hadÏbeen€used€by€Mr.€Bean€to€get€his€tractor€to€the€barn.ðð€€Ms.€Pippin€andÏMr.€Delaney€cannot€take€a€position€in€their€petition€for€rehearing€thatÏdiffers€from€the€position€they€took€in€their€original€brief.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌà ` à10.à0 ¸ àò òAccess€to€the€property€from€Friendly€Driveó ó.à x àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.Ð  .Ä(& ÐDelaney€insist€that€the€court€erred€by€concluding€that€there€were€twoÏaccesses€to€the€55„acre€tract€in€1985.€€They€insist€that€there€is€noÏevidence€of€an€access€to€the€property€from€Friendly€Drive.€€The€late„¼filed€exhibits€shed€little€new€light€on€this€disputed€fact€question.€€JohnÏBond€(Bohn)€testified€on€cross„examination€during€the€January€10,€1994Ïhearing€that€the€roadway€from€Friendly€Drive€was€ð ðgraveled€downðð€andÏthat€the€Halls€used€the€roadway€to€get€to€their€barn.€€Thus,€the€evidenceÏdoes€not€preponderate€against€this€courtððs€finding€concerning€access€toÏthe€55„acre€tract€from€Friendly€DñJñdñJñrive.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÐ Z9~30 Ðà ` à11.à0 ¸ àò òAbandonment€of€the€old€Boma„Baxter€Roadó ó.à x àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.Ð Ü ÐDelaney€assert€that€this€courtððs€conclusion€that€the€old€Boma„BaxterÏRoad€ð ðhad€not€been€abandoned€even€though€it€had€fallen€into€desuetudeÏas€a€public€roadðð€conflicts€with€the€trial€courtððs€conclusion€that€the€roadÏhad€been€abandoned.€€The€late„filed€exhibits€are€of€little€help€on€thisÏissue.€€Ms.€Pippinððs€and€Mr.€Delaneyððs€assertion€misapprehends€the€trialÏcourtððs€conclusion.€€The€trial€court€found€only€that€the€old€Boma„BaxterÏRoad€has€been€abandoned€ð ðas€a€public€road,ðð€not€that€it€had€beenÏabandoned€by€area€landowners.€€This€ñKñis€ñKñprecisely€our€conclusion.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌà ` à12.à0 ¸ àò òAccess€of€the€Jared€Propertyó ó.à p àà È àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.€DelaneyÐ –º  Ðassert€that€late„filed€Exhibit€26€shows€that€Friendly€Drive€and€the€oldÏBoma„Baxter€Road€is€not€Ms.€Jaredððs€only€means€of€access€to€herÏproperty.€€While€Exhibit€26€shows€that€Ms.€Jared€has€other€access€to€herÏproperty€south€of€the€interstate€right„of„way,€it€does€not€indicate€anyÏother€access€to€her€property€north€of€the€interstate€right„of„way.€€TheÏrelevant€issue€in€this€case€is€the€access€to€Ms.€Jaredððs€property€north€ofÏthe€interstate€right„of„way;€therefore,€Exhibit€26€is€of€little€value€on€thisÏquestion.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌà ` à13.à0 ¸ àò òThe€Use€of€the€old€Boma„Baxter€Roadó ó.à  àThis€final€factual€argumentÐ Pt Ðis€basically€a€renewal€of€Ms.€Pippinððs€and€Mr.€Delaneyððs€sixth€argumentÏregarding€the€use€of€the€old€Boma„Baxter€Road€since€1949.€€The€late„¼filed€exhibits€shed€little€additional€light€on€this€disputed€factual€issue.€ÏWe€have€already€pointed€to€three€witnesses€other€than€Mr.€Emerton€whoÏtestified€that€persons€other€than€Mr.€Herron€used€the€old€Boma„BaxterÏRoad€after€1949.€€The€purpose€of€petitions€for€rehearing€is€not€to€reargueÏdisputed€factual€issues.Ð ¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌÌÓ€Óà ` àMs.€Pippin€and€Mr.€Delaney€cannot€at€this€late€stage€depart€from€the€statementsÏand€concessions€contained€in€their€original€brief.€€We€have€carefully€examined€theÏseven€late„filed€exhibits€and€have€determined€that€they€do€not€require€an€outcomeÏdifferent€from€the€outcome€of€our€August€19,€19ñLñ9ñLññMñ8ñMñ8€opinion.€€The€factual€issues€Ms.ÏPippin€and€Mr.€Delaney€seek€to€raise€at€this€time€are€either€not€relevant€or€notÏmaterial€to€the€issues€presented€on€this€appeal.€€Thus,€we€again€affirm€the€decision€ofÏthe€trial€court€that€the€abutting€landowners€had€not€abandoned€their€use€of€the€oldÏBoma„Baxter€Road€even€thoughñNñtñNñ€it€had€ñOñceased€to€be€a€publicly€maintained€roadñOññPñfallen€intoÏdisrepairñPñ.ÌÌà ` àIt€is,€therefore,€ordered€that€our€August€1ñQñ9ñQññRñ8ñRñ,€1998€opinion€be€withdrawn€and€thatÏthe€revised€opinion€ñSñclarifying€several€factual€matters€ñSñissued€contemporaneously€with€this€order€be€filed€in€its€place.Ìâ âÐ ³7×14 Ðà ` àIt€is€further€ordered€that€the€clerk€and€master€not€forfeit€her€costs€forÏâ âtransmitting€the€appellate€record€in€light€of€the€erroneous€advice€received€from€theÏclerk€of€the€appellate€courts€and€the€oversight€of€Ms.€Pippinððs€and€Mr.€DelaneyððsÏcounsel.ÌÌà ` àIt€is€further€ordered€that€the€costs€associated€with€the€filing€and€disposition€ofÏthe€petition€for€rehearing€be€and€are€hereby€taxed,€jointly€and€severally,€to€Mary€RoseÏPippin€and€Dale€Delaney€and€their€surety€for€which€execution,€if€necessary,€mayÏissue.ÌÓ€ÓÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à______________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àHENRY€F.€TODD,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àMIDDLE€SECTION€ÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à______________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGE€ÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à______________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGE€