WPC )/B68 !GqAAo5דAP2r2hA!!r~ UTF0]bHW`r#oۦygڣK,{ҡM@xxVŶF~JZp}v]I$L[VY\[;6n`c%2 !h K$,6E1p#Yv3(k_]Bi%@Q߲G J|o)sqV=,CPU'3huIy#D>FzCw&n0Ci|9Qfy{k * Y#=p.uz}+kAK v[*mԫ-QuaMZdREW$")Z՜z2s2٭ycZrYJBQ"1.S| ơn?hb %\^ b 0nUNwD4H\ zk m #  W   NEb 0 B 0 D5a D- 0K ASa 0' 0D A7)-s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular|&-٥3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 40500Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(|G2$ !.8}dd8         0  E d(|3j$ !.8}dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3j$ !.8}dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8}dd8     _  }8HXXdd8  р@ }INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#}#Ԉ &   XHX} #}XXH#STATEOFTENNESSEE,etal.v.FLORENCEE._HARRELL_XHX}  8 @@ ChanceryCourtforUnionCounty  8 @@No.2836  $ FILEDSEPTEMBER9,_2002_   @@*AV) ` dE< ` A    @@TTNo.E200101710COAR3CV   AV) ` dE<j` A k     #}XXHh#XHX} @  OPINION #}XXHѠ#XHX}Ԁ ONPETITIONTOREHEAR  R  HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHerschelP.Franksand .~ D.MichaelSwiney,JJ.,joined.#}XXH#XHX} j   WearepresentedwiththepetitionoftheStateofTennesseeforarehearingofthiscase. B AlthoughweinvitedcounselforMs._Harrell_Ԁtorespondtothispetitionourinvitationwasdeclined. .   ItisassertedbytheStatethatourholdingiscontrarytothecaseof_Varney_Ԁv.Louise,an  unreportedopinionofthisCourtfiledinNashvilleonNovember21,2001.Thiscasewas  unavailablewhentheStatefileditsbriefandwas,therefore,notcitedtherein.    In_Varney_thefatherandmotherweredivorcedinAugustof1993andcustodyoftheir f childrenwasawardedtothemother.InAugustof1999thetrialcourtawardedsoletemporary R custodytothefather;however,themotherwasnotorderedtopayanychildsupport.InDecember > of1999thefatherfiledamotionforchildsupportfromthemother.InAugustof2000thetrialcourt * z orderedthatcustodyofthechildrenbereturnedtothemother;however,itdidnotaddressthefather's !f  motionforchildsupport.Thefatherappealedthetrialcourt'sfailuretoawardhimretroactivechild "R! supportforthetimehehadcustodyofthechildren. ">"   Addressingthefactthatthemotherwasneverorderedtopaychildsupportforthetimethe $ $ fatherhadcustodyofthechildren,theCourtin_Varney_Ԁnotedthateveryparentisobligatedtosupport %!% hisorherchildrenduringtheirminorityandthatthisobligationtoprovidesupportexistseven &!& withoutanorder.Accordingly,theCourtremandedthecasetothetrialcourtforadeterminationof '"' themother'sobligationtopaychildsupport.InsodoingtheCourtdidnotindicatethattheaward v(#( ofsupportshouldberetroactiveonlytothedateofthefather'smotionforsupport.Rather,the b)$) Court'srecognitionofeveryparent'sobligationtosupporthisorherchildfromminorityeven N*%* withoutacourtorderclearlyindicatestheproprietyofawardingsupportretroactivetothetimethe :+&+ fatherwasgrantedcustody. &,v',  -b(-   Fortheforegoingreasonsthepetitiontorehearisgrantedandourpreviousopinionis  vacated.TheorderoftheChanceryCourtislikewisevacatedandthecaseisremandedfor  calculationofchildsupportowedbyMs._Harrell_ԀretroactivetoDecember1,1995,thedateofthe  divorcedecreegrantingMr._Harrell_Ԁcustodyoftheparties'children,suchcalculationtobemadein t accordancewiththeTennesseeChildSupportGuidelines. `    `     h   _________________________________________  `    `     h   HOUSTONM.GODDARD,PRESIDINGJUDGE  L  #}XXH#XHX}#}XXH#XHX}Ԁ.󀀀   ̀ p       p #}XXH,#   `     h