WPC ,MCM]P["w5x"[(C-$V }0 2d$\S9 ׶-7a@ng X3iC*{|F^1|@rM^(U2BFfOfcJ͢ūXaH-{kE9.+jSSE_N3<!ENӋ SR9d W5D1 !xT}<D#zR4A< J6[&~myc39x+RL ,_SvEH),~Ó˛cx1=.L_AIcAEruShIrl~xtKz%+0"eR/g+g1ж;f?"떰}^.6%,JIhoB-/\N!EZS׷~Q0RT@Bm)# >UNI % 0(4A 0l1 0Dw@c A  f *, U:V*U: AQ BE 0Db 0D 0D D/.. B] D3zHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLl(9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($n~<$)i)3|x  7  $    1    Rule10(CourtofAppeals).MemorandumOpinion.(b) TheCourt,with  concurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.((3$ !      0  (#$  0   x  $    2    Thissectionofthecodeisastatuteoflimitations. DDH eӀ  7  $    1    Rule10(CourtofAppeals).MemorandumOpinion.(b) TheCourt,with  concurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase. x  $    2    Thissectionofthecodeisastatuteoflimitations.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  !"  XvXXXinXXv   Ad FILEDXvXin   September16,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr. XXvAppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular  !"  XvXXXinXXv   Ad FILEDXvXin   September15,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr. XXvAppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular!"#%C<< C d(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ''' dxdP Pd 'dxd !  TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T r(<,(j 8` `@E` ttx$ r r(<,(j 8` `@E` ttx$ r           @h h INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE,@kk%ATJACKSON   @:: _________________________________________________________________',XXX' CHARLESEDWARDHAYNES,   )  LauderdaleCountyCircuitCourtNo.5010 L    )  񀀀Plaintiff/Appellant.  )  App.No.02A019803CH00066 ( x   )VS.  )  Hon.JosephH.Walker,Judge  P    )  t(>.*jx` `@EW` ttx$ S tߛ ROBERTCONLEY,WARDENand   )   (  JIMBLANKENSHIP,HEALTH   )  AFFIRMED     ADMINISTRATOR ,  )       )   ЀDefendants/Appellees.  )     )  OPINIONFILED:   CharlesE.Haynes, ProSe X  JohnKnoxWalkup, AttorneyGeneral&Reporter  4 AbigailTurner ,AssistantAttorneyGeneral $t ForDefendants/Appellees.______________________________________________________________________________@! MEMORANDUMOPINION   #  1       ( ______________________________________________________________________________  0,X` X,XX0   `     h      p Farmer,J.    ` CharlesEdwardHaynessuedRobertConley,warden,andTimBlankenship,healthadministrator, pursuantto42U.S.C.1983andT.C.A.283104. 0  #  2      ׀Thetrialcourtgrantedthe %` # DefendantsmotiontodismissthecomplaintpursuanttoRules12.02(1)and(6)oftheTennesseeRulesofCivilProcedureforlackofjurisdictionandforfailuretostateaclaimuponwhichreliefcanbegranted.ThePlaintiffappealsfromthatorder. ` Althoughnotspecificallystatedinthecomplaint,itisapparentthatthePlaintiffisaninmateinthecustodyoftheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrectionsbyhisnumerousreferencestoprisonpersonnelandtheinformationcontainedinhisapplicationtoproceedwithoutpaymentof 1H-1 feesandaffidavitindicatingthatheisincarceratedattheWestTennesseeHighSecurityFacility(WTHSF). ` Thecomplaintallegesthatuponcomplainingofstomachpains,Plaintiffwasseenattheprisoninfirmarywherehewasscreenedbyanurseandreferredtoa P.A.,aMr.HarperwhomPlaintiffthoughtwasadoctor.Mr.HarperprovidedPlaintiffwithvariousmedicationsoveraperiodoftime.PlaintiffaversthathewasultimatelyseenbyaprisondoctorwhoprescribedZantacandanantibiotic.HewasinformedthatZantacisnotonalistofmedicationspaidforforprisonuseand,duetothecost,ithadtobeapprovedbyaboard.WhenPlaintiffcomplainedtoWardenConley,hewasadvisedthatthiswasthepolicyofthedepartmentandtherewasnothingthatWardenConleycoulddo.PlaintifffurtherallegesthatbothDefendantshaverefusedtoprovidehimwiththenamesoftheboardmembers.ThecomplaintseekscompensatoryandpunitivedamagesfromtheDdefendantsaswellasinjunctivereliefrequiringthemtoissuetohimthemedicationprescribedbytheprisondoctor. `  ` Amotiontodismissforfailuretostateaclaimuponwhichreliefcanbegrantedteststhesufficiencyofthecomplaint,andwearerequiredtotaketheallegationsofthecomplaintastrueandtoconstruetheallegationsliberallyinfavoroftheplaintiff. Pursellv.FirstAmericanNatl $X" Bank ,937S.W.2d838,840(Tenn.1996). %0!$  ` Neitherastatenoritsofficialssuedactingintheirofficialcapacityare personsunder1983. Willv.MichiganDeptofStatePolice ,491U.S.58,109S.Ct.2304,105L.Ed.2d45(1989). h+&*  SeealsoDeanv.Campbell ,No.02A019704CV00077,1997WL401960,(Tenn.App.July17, @-(, 1997).TheDefendantsinthepresentcasewereclearlysuedintheirofficialcapacities. Alsosee /h*. Haferv.Melo ,502U.S.21,112S.Ct.358,116L.Ed.2d301(1991). 0@,0  ` Furthermore,T.C.A.98307(h)providesthat [s]tateofficersandemployeesareabsolutelyimmunefromliabilityforactsoromissionswithinthescopeoftheofficersoremmployeeemployeesofficeoremployment,exceptforwillful,malicious,orcriminalactsorforactsoromissionsdoneforpersonalgain.Thecomplaintdoesnotallegethatthedefendantswereguiltyofwillful,maliciousorcriminalactsoromissionsorforactsoromissionsdoneforpersonalgain.