WPC, hF/K ?:k 7iܡv@*|+rOԑ  ߏDИDsc`!|!-ꄪGͤ8C3wJMB6S:-ك8Q [0 cZg^ 1b֭2 oA!qR5¡l(UGuL@;}   c) 1uNd 72f7E 0 D 0c( 0! 0 0y 0J 0 0 0Q 0 0"rUNP Y !""##b$%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 0Y&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 1e"' 0N''' 0 '''' B(( 0( D5) D-) 0K)) AS.** 0G+ 0D+ A/,_/ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regularp)/b014c23|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptU\\IB01S08T\knoxclerk4,,,,0\  `&Times New RomanLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 53#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i) - Rz$      6    _ThereissomedisputeastowhethertheExecutorreadthewilland/orhandedoutcopiesofthewillatthe  meeting.TheExecutortestifiedthathedidboth.RuthCradicinitiallytestifiedthattheExecutoronlyhandedoutcopies; t however,insubsequenttestimony,sheclaimedthathedidnotreadthewillandtestifiedthathe mighthavehadacopy 8 withhim.(#$  0    Rz$      8    _Tenofthechildrensignedtheagreementattheendofthemeeting.CarlHeltonsignedthedocumentthe  followingday.(;3$2#  0  .3  0    Rz$      7    _TherecordshowsthatRoyHeltoninitiallyofferedtopay$1,000toeachofhissiblingsor$11,000total;  however,thewritingsignedbythe11childrenreflectsthatheagreedtopay$12,000orapproximately$1,090.90per t child.(|3?$ !.8^dd8      Rz$      10    _Thesourceofthisinformationwasthepropertytaxcardmaintainedintheofficeofthetaxassessor.*AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x     Rz$      2    _Therecordcontainsconflictingallegations/testimonyregardingthedateofMrs._Helton_sdeath.Thedates  ofFebruary5,2002,andFebruary6,2002,arebothmentioned.Thisconflictisnotmaterialtotheresolutionofthis t case. HELTONCradic&unconscionabilityimpression[sResha GRW HousMcGaughGalbreathShuptrineGuiliano CleoMcKay N.R. S.W.VoightTrigg i]nBrowder(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular O Rz$      9    _TherecordsuggeststhatthechildrenrecognizedRoy_Helton_scontributionsovertheyearsinassistingthe  deceasedwiththemaintenanceoftheproperty. Rz$      4    _Therecordshowsthatthechildrenwereraisedontheproperty.    Rz$      5    _Oneofthechildren!CarlHelton!failedtoattendthefamilymeeting,mistakenlyhavinggonetothewrong  location.  Rz$      3    _Thepropertyconsistsofasmall,rundownhouse,locatedon10acres.X)XԀ#XX)#- -  Rz$      1    _Roy_Helton_swifeisalsoaplaintiffinthiscase.SheissuingbecauseRoyHeltonapparentlyintendsthatthe  propertywillbedeededtohimandhiswifejointly.Foreaseofreference,wewillrefertoRoyHeltonasthesole t plaintiff.64Hyperlink     !"#$ 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(O$(|G2z$ !.8^dd8         0   d(|3?$ !.8^dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?$ !.8^dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8^dd8     _  ^8)XXdd8  *OY0  @ (#(#M^INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  0  @WW$(#(#ATKNOXVILLE#^M1#Ԉ &   0 @ August18,2003Session L 0 @ X)X^0 @ #^XX)A#ROYHELTON,etal.v.JANICEFAYE_VIERS_,etal.X)X^  J 0 @ 0 @ @@ AppealfromtheChanceryCourtforHawkinsCounty  J 0 @ @@No.14961ThomasR._Frierson_ԀII,Chancellor  6 0 @ FiledOctober30,_2003_0 @     0 @ @@*AV) ` dE<` A   0 @ 0 @ @@TTNo.E200300132_COA_ԄR3CV   0 @ 0 @ AV) ` dE<|` A }  0 @   'X9XXX)FollowingthedeathofMattieP.Helton( thedeceased),11ofher12survivingchildrensigneda x  writingagreeingtosellthedeceasedsrealpropertytothetwelfthchild,theirbrother,RoyHelton, d for$12,000.Soonthereafter,twoofthechildren,JaniceFaye_Viers_ԀandNadineCradic,refusedto P beboundbytheagreement.RoyHelton_/ #  1      _Ԁthensuedhistwosistersforspecificperformance.The < sistersfiledacounterclaimforrescissionandotherrelief.Anothersister,RuthCradic,subsequently (x filedaninterveningpetitionforrescissionandotherrelief.Attheconclusionofabenchtrial,the d courtallowedRuth_Cradic_spetitiontointervene;grantedRoy_Helton_scomplaintforspecific P performanceoftheagreement;anddeniedthethreesistersrequestforrescission.Weaffirm.#X)XX'X9##^XX)#X)X^ < #^XX) #X)X^0 @ Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourt  0 @ Affirmed;CaseRemanded   0 @   #^X)- #X)X.^CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichD.Michael_Swiney_,J.,  andWilliamH._Inman_,Sr.J.,joined. t 0   (#(# DouglasT.Jenkins,Rogersville,Tennessee,fortheappellants,JaniceFaye_Viers_,NadineCradic, L  andRuthCradic.#^XX)9 #X)X^ 8!  0   (#(# PhillipL.Boyd,Rogersville,Tennessee,fortheappellees,#^XX)A#X)X^ԀRoyHeltonandJudyHelton. #`"  0 @ 0 @ OPINION #^XX)#X)X^ %$!% #^XX)#X)X^    &"&  _  I.   P#^XX)#X)X^  #^XX)#X)X^ThedeceaseddiedtestateinFebruary,2002.% #  2      ׀Shewassurvivedby12ofher15children#^XX)#X)X^.  Sheappointedherson,BillyR.Helton( theExecutor),toserveasexecutorofher#^XX)#X)X^lastwilland t testament.Herwill#^XX)#X)X^containsfiveprovisions,onlythesecondandthirdofwhicharematerialtothis ` case.T#^XX)#X)X^hesecondprovisiondirectstheExecutortosellthedeceasedsrealproperty, #  3      ׀bywayofa L  publicorprivatesale.#^XX)#X)X^Afterpaying alldebtsandexpenses,theExecutoristodividetheproceeds 8  equallyamongthedeceasedschildren.Thethirdprovisionofthewillgivesthechildrenarightof $ t firstrefusaltopurchasethesubjectproperty.) #  4      #^XX)#X)X^ԀThewillprovidesthatthe reasonablepurchaseprice  ` oftheproperty shallbedeterminedbyacquiringthree(3)appraisalsfromlocalrealtorsand  L  averagingsaidappraisals.Theaverageoftheappraisalswouldbethepurchasepricethechild(ren)  8  wouldpayifanydecidedtopurchasetheproperty.Further,theaverageoftheappraisalswasto $  serveasthebasepriceforthepropertyiftheExecutordecidedtosellthePropertyataprivatesale.   #^XX)#X)X^#^XX)#X)X^  #^XX)R#X)X^InMarch,2002,aboutamonthafterthedeceasedsdeath,thechildrenhadameetingto   discusswhethertoallowtheirbrother,RoyHelton,topurchasetheproperty.+ #  5      ׀TheExecutortook   theleadatthemeeting.l  #  6      ׀Thethreesisterswhonowattempttorescindtheagreementclaimthatthe p ExecutorencouragedthechildrentoallowRoyHeltontopurchasethepropertyandthathegavethe \ followingreasonsfordoingso:(1)sellingwithoutobtainingthreeappraisalswouldsavemoney;(2) H thechildrenwouldhavetopayinheritancetaxesiftheycouldnotagreeamongthemselvestosell 4 theproperty;and(3)thechildrenmightnotgetasmuchmoneyforthepropertyifacourtgot  p involved.TheExecutordeniesmakingthefirstofthesethreestatements.  \   #^XX)#X)X^Afteratleastanhourofdiscussion,thechildrenunanimouslyagreedtosellthepropertyto 4  RoyHeltonfor$12,000.D  #  7      #^XX)*#X)X^ԀOneofthechildrenpreparedaninformal,handwrittenagreementto   memorializetheirunderstanding.Allofthe11childrensignedtheagreement. #  8      #^XX)R#ԀX)X^Inadditionto   signatures,theagreement#^XX) #X)X^Ԁcontainsthefollowing: WethechildrenofMattieP.Heltonagreetolet  Roybuytheproperty.Price$12,000.00.( #  9      #^XX)!#X)X^Ԁ#^XX)<"#X)X^Noappraisalswereacquiredbeforethepurchaseprice  wassetat$12,000.#^XX)"#X)X^Aftersigningtheagreement,thechildrenorallyagreedthatRoyHeltonwould  payanyremainingcoststoprobatethewill,includingattorneysfees;however,thechildrenagreed  todeduct$60.00fromtheirshareofthepurchasepricetorepaytheremainderofthedeceaseds r  funeralexpenses.#^XX)!##X)X^ԀRoyHeltonsattorneysubsequentlypreparedawarrantydeed.Allofthechildren ^  exceptJaniceFayeViersandNadineCradicsignedthedeed.#^XX)$#X)X^ J    Therecordreflects#^XX)%#X)X^thatJaniceFayeViersandNadineCradicdecidednottosignthewarranty " r  deed#^XX),&#X)X^afterconsultinganattorneyanddiscovering(1)thattheirmothersestatewouldnotowe ^  inheritancetaxes,and(2)thatthepropertyhadbeenappraisedatapproximately$34,000.h #  10      ׀#^XX)&#X)X^Itis J  undisputedthatthethreeobjectingsisterswanttheirbrothertohavetheproperty;theysimplywant 6  moremoneyfortheirinterests.#^XX)3(#X)X^ "    #^XX)()#X)X^RoyHelton#^XX))#X)X^broughtthisactionbasedupontheagreement.Heseekstheequitableremedy   ofspecificperformance.Inturn,JaniceFayeViersandNadineCradiccounterclaimfortheequitable  remedyofrescission.Theyalsoaskedthetrialcourttoenforcethedirectionscontainedinthe  deceasedswill#^XX))#X)X^Ԁregardingappraisalsor,inthealternative,toappointtheClerk&Mastertosellthe n landviapublicauction.Thethirdsisterjoinedintheirrequestbywayofherinterveningpetition.#^XX)~+#X)X^ Z #^XX),#X)X^  ThetrialcourtgrantedRoyHeltonsrequestforspecificperformance,holdingthatthe 2 agreementwasenforceable.ThetrialcourtalsograntedRuthCradicspetitiontointervene.The n trialcourtrefusedtograntthethreesistersrequestforrescission,findingthat theevidence  Z preponderatesinfavoroffindingthatnomutualmistakeexisted;thatthethreesisters fail[ed]to F establishthattheExecutor renderedfalsestatementsofexistingfact;andthattheobjectingsisters 2  enteredintoandexecutedtheagreement voluntarilyandwithoutundueinfluence.Fromthis  judgment,thethreesistersappeal.      II.  ?0   Inthisnonjurycase,ourreviewisdenovoupontherecordoftheproceedingsbelow.Tenn. j!  X9XXX)R.App.P.13(d)#X)XX X91# X9XXX)# ^sX X9,# X9X ^s.#X)XX X9S1##^XX)1#X)X^W X9XXX)emusthonorthepresumptionthatthetrialcourtsfindingsoffactarecorrect V"  unlesstheevidencepreponderatesotherwise.#X)XX X92##^XX)1#X)X^ Id .#^XX)3#X)X^;seealso TheBank/FirstCitizensBankv.Citizens B#! andAssoc. ,82S.W.3d259,262(Tenn.2002)(citing Boganv.Bogan ,60S.W.3d721,727(Tenn. .$~" 2001)); UnionCarbideCorp.v.Huddleston ,854S.W.2d87,91(Tenn.1993).#^XX)i3#X)X^ԀHowever,thereis %j # nopresumptionofcorrectnessastothetrialcourtsconclusionsoflaw. TheBank/FirstCitizens  Bank ,82S.W.3dat262(citing SouthernConstructors,Inc.v.LoudonCountyBd.ofEduc. ,58  S.W.3d706,710(Tenn.2001));#^XX)4#X)X^ Campbellv.FloridaSteelCorp. ,919S.W.2d26,35(Tenn.1996).  Further,thetrialcourt,havingseenandheardthewitnessestestify,isinthebestpositionto t determinethewitnessescredibility. Bowmanv.Bowman ,836S.W.2d563,567(Tenn.Ct.App. ` 1991). X9XXX)Therefore,thetrialcourtsdeterminationsregardingwitnesscredibilityareentitledtogreat L  weightonappeal#X)XX X97##^XX)e6#X)X^. Massengalev.Massengale ,915S.W.2d818,819(Tenn.Ct.App.1995). 8     `  N !"#$(03#^XX)8#X)X^?  ?  ?  ?     III.  ` A.   8   g;  Onappeal,thethreeobjectingsisterspresenttwoissuesforreview:(1)whetherthetrialcourt   erredinorderingspecificperformanceand(2)whetherthetrialcourterredinrefusingtoorder   rescission.Wewilladdresstheseissuesintheorderstated.#^XX):#X)X^     B. p Q=  #^XX)=#X)X^Theprinciplesofequitygoverntherighttospecificperformance. Millerv.Resha ,820 H S.W.2d357,360(Tenn.1991);seealso GRWEnter.,Inc.v.Davis ,797S.W.2d606,614(Tenn. 4 Ct.App.1990); Owensv.Church ,675S.W.2d178,185(Tenn.Ct.App.1984).Grantingthe  p equitableremedyofspecificperformance restswithinthesounddiscretionofthetrialcourtand  \ upontheparticularfactsofeachcase. McGaughv.Galbreath ,996S.W.2d186,191(Tenn.Ct. H App.1998)(citing Shuptrinev.Quinn ,597S.W.2d728,730(Tenn.1979));seealso GRWEnter. , 4 797S.W.2dat614.Itiswellsettledthatcourtsshouldnotinterferewiththerightofpartiesto   contract. Guilianov.Cleo,Inc. ,995S.W.2d88,100(Tenn.1999)(citing McKayv.Louisville&   N.R.Co. ,133Tenn.590,59596,182S.W.874,875(1916)(citing Baltimore&OhioS.W.Ry.Co.  v.Voight ,176U.S.498,505,20S.Ct.385,387,44L.Ed.560(1900))).Instead,courtsshould   carryouttheintentionsofthepartiesandthetermsbargainedforinthecontract,unlessthoseterms  violatepublicpolicy. Id. Forexample,partiesmayagreeto termsthatmaynotseemdesirableor l pleasanttooutsideobservers. Id. (citationsomitted);seealso Brooksv.NetworksofChattanooga, X  Inc. ,946S.W.2d321,324(Tenn.Ct.App.1996)(citationomitted).#^XX)=#X)X^ D!   Agreementsenteredintoamongfamilymembersareviewedinaspeciallight.#^XX)D#X)X^TheSupreme #l! Courtin Triggv.Read, 24Tenn.(5Hum.)529(1845),explainedthat $X" 8  8`   [i]nthecasesoffamilycompromises,allthatneedbesaidhereisthat %0!$ agreementsaffectingthemareupheldwithastronghand,andan &"% equityhasbeenadministeredinregardtothem,whichhasnotbeen '#& appliedtoagreementsgenerallyuponthegroundthatthehonorand (#' peaceoffamiliesmakeitjustandpropersotodo.)$(` x` x   |*%)  Id .at545.Nonetheless,wherespecificperformanceissoughttoenforceacontractforthesaleof   land,the contractmustbeclear,definite,completeandfreefromanysuspicionoffraudor  unfairness. Shuptrine ,597S.W.2dat730(quoting Johnsonv.Browder ,185Tenn.601,#^XX)E#X)X^207  S.W.2d1,3(1947));seealso GRWEnter. ,797S.W.2dat614#^XX)I#X)X^.#^XX)`J#X)X^ t 'X9XXX)  Theequitableremedyofrescissionis availableonlyunderthemostdemanding L  circumstances. Robinsonv.Brooks ,577S.W.2d207,208(Tenn.Ct.App.1978).Assuch, 8   [r]escissionisaremedywhichshouldbeexercisedsparinglyandonlywhenthesituationdemands $ t such. Richardsv.Taylor ,926S.W.2d569,571(Tenn.Ct.App.1996)(quoting JamesCable  ` Partnersv.Jamestown ,818S.W.2d338,343(Tenn.Ct.App.1991)).Ultimately,thedecisionto  L  grantrescissionisamatterrestinginthesounddiscretionofthetrialcourt,andwewillnotdisturb  8  acourtsdecisionabsentanabuseofthatdiscretion. Vakilv.Idnani ,748S.W.2d196,199200 $  (Tenn.Ct.App.1987).Undertheabuseofdiscretionstandard, [a]nappellatecourtshouldnot   reverse...adiscretionaryjudgmentofatrialcourtunlessitaffirmativelyappearsthatthetrial   courtsdecisionwasagainstlogicorreasoning,andcausedaninjusticeorinjurytotheparty   complaining. Marcusv.Marcus ,993S.W.2d596,601(Tenn.1999)(quoting Ballardv.Herzke ,   924S.W.2d652,661(Tenn.1996))(citationsomitted).#X)XX'X9J##^XX)J#X)X^ p @)C. H   Thethreeobjectingsisters#^XX)P#X)X^Ԁarguethatthegrantofspecificperformancewasinerrorbecause  p theagreementwas renderedunenforceablebymisrepresentation,mistake,andunconscionability.  \ First,indiscussingthesubissuesofmisrepresentationandmistake,theyarguethattheExecutor H  intentionally,negligently,ormistakenlymisrepresentedthefollowingthreefactsatthefamily 4 meeting:(1)thatthechildrenwouldpayestatetaxesofatleast45percentiftheydidnotsellthe   propertytotheirbrother;(2)that thestatewouldstepinandsellthe[p]ropertyifthechildrendid   notselltotheirbrother#^XX)Q#X)X^;and(3)thatthechildrenwouldreceivemoremoneyiftheysoldtotheir  brotherRoy.#^XX)T#X)X^    Initsmemorandumopinion,thetrialcourtheldthattheinheritancetaxrepresentationwas l alegalrepresentation,notarepresentationoffact,andthattheothertwo#^XX)cU#X)X^representationswerebased X  upon merespeculationandprojectionandnotbasedonexistingfact.Ultimately,thetrialcourt D! foundthatthe evidencedoesnotsupportafindingthatanyfraudwascommitted.#^XX)V#X)X^Weholdthat 0"  thetrialcourtwascorrectinitsdeterminationthattheinheritancetaxrepresentationisalegal,not #l! afactual,assertion.Itiswellsettledthatamistakeoflawisnotsufficienttowarrantrescission. $X"  Trigg, #^XX)W#X)X^24Tenn.(5Hum.)at532.#^XX)>Y#X)X^Asaresult,weholdthatthetrialcourtwascorrectingranting $D # specificperformanceeventhoughtheExecutorslegalassertionswereincorrect.Further,wefind %0!$ thatthetrialcourtwasrightinholdingthattheothertworepresentationsweremerely speculation &"% andprojection,notrepresentationsoffact.TheExecutorwassimplypredictingthatthestatewould '#&  stepinandthatthechildrenwouldgetmoremoneyiftheysoldtotheirbrother.Therefore,the (#' trialcourtproperlygrantedspecificperformancedespitetheExecutorsspeculationsastowhat )$( wouldoccuriftheyfailedtoreachanagreement. |*%)  h+&* *OY * *    Indiscussingthesubissueofunconscionability,theappellantsarguethattheagreementwas  unconscionablebecausethepropertywasappraisedbythecountyatnearlythreetimestheagreed  purchasepriceof$12,000.#^XX)Y#X)X^ԀInthiscase,thechildrenheldameetingtodeterminewhethertosellthe  propertytotheirbrother.Attheconclusionofthemeetingandfollowingatleastanhourof t discussionregardingtheiroptions,thechildrenunanimouslyagreedtosellthepropertytoRoy ` Helton.TheappellantsadmitthattheywantRoyHeltontohavetheproperty.However,after L  discoveringthattheymightbeentitledtomoremoney,theappellantsrefusedtocompletethesale. 8    Wehaveemphasizedbeforethat anindividualisfreetobindhimself[orherself]bya  ` contractwherethe termsmaynotseemreasonableordecenttoanoutsideobserver. Brooks ,946  L  S.W.2dat324(citationomitted  ).#^XX)K^#X)X^Thisisespeciallytrueinthecaseoffamilyagreements,whichare  8   favoredinthelaw. Masonv.Pearson ,668S.W.2d656,662(Tenn.Ct.App.1983)(quoting $   Williamsv.Jones ,54Tenn.App.189,203,388S.W.2d665,672(1963)).Familyagreementsmay    restongrounds[that]wouldnothavebeensatisfactoryifthetransactionhadoccurredbetween   merestrangers. Id. Inthiscase,althoughstrangersmayfindthepurchasepriceundesirable, mere   strangersdidnotenterintothisagreement.Thechildrenheldafamilymeetingtodecidewhatto   dowiththehomeinwhichtheywereraised.#^XX)a#X)X^Thechildrencontractedtoreceiveexactlywhatthey p bargainedfor!$12,000andthepeaceofmindthattheirbrotherwouldreceivethepropertyandthat \ itwouldremainintheirfamily. H   Intheend,thetrialcourtcorrectlyconcludedthat themereinadequacyofconsideration  p wasnotanadequatebasis torenderthe[agreement]unenforceable.#^XX)=e#X)X^ԀBecausetheevidencedoesnot  \ preponderateagainsttheunderlyingfactualpredicate,wemusthonorthetrialcourtsdetermination H thattheagreementwasenforceableandthatRoyHeltonwasandisentitledtospecificperformance.#^XX)Hg#X)X^ 4   D.   h  Theappellantssecondargumentisthatthetrialcourterredinfailingtograntrescission.  #^XX)h#X)X^Afterreadingthetrialcourtsmemorandumopinion,itisourunderstandingthat theappellants  arguedthat#^XX)i#X)X^rescissionshouldbegrantedbecausetheagreementwasunenforceableduetofraud l and/ormisrepresentation,mutualmistake,andduress,theverysameargumentsmadeinconnection X  withtheissueofspecificperformance.Thefactofthematteristhatt#^XX)vj#X)X^heargumentintheappellants D! briefisnotclearastothebasisoftheirrescissioncontention.Theyfailedtocitetotherecord#^XX)k#X)X^Ԁand 0"  #^XX)l#X)X^simplystatedthatrescissionwasproper [f]orthereasonsstatedabove.Becausewefindthatthe #l! appellantsfailedtocomplywithRule27(a)(7)oftheTennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure,we $X" willnotfurtheraddresstheissueofrescissioninthisopinion.Sufficeittosaythatwefindnoabuse $D # ofdiscretioninthetrialcourtsdecisiondenyingrescission. %0!$ #^XX)m#   ?  ?  ?  ?  ?  ?  ?  ?  ?  X)X^ IV. '#&     Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.Thiscaseisremandedtothetrialcourtfor )$(  enforcementofthetrialcourtsjudgmentandforcollectionofcostsassessedbelow,allpursuantto |*%) applicablelaw.Costsonappealaretaxedtotheappellants,JaniceFayeViers,NadineCradic,and  RuthCradic.   q/d/#^XX)q#X)X^Ԁ#^XX)s#X)X^     (#(#(#(# (#(#(#(#  Ӏ @  @`  @  @  @h  @  @ _______________________________ 8   @  @`  @  @  @h  @  @ CHARLESD.SUSANO,JR.,JUDGE $ t